The extent of the Biden-led crimes in seizing Ukraine's government in 2014, causing the West to become a security threat to Russia. And the Biden Regime’s ongoing onslaught serving the globalist agenda to bleed out and destroy the worlds's two leading superpowers

This is a 100% self-verifiable story proving the reality of the West's insidious aggression that has provoked Russia into invading Ukraine, which is part of its core security zone. Proving the extent of the West's offensive dismantles the false narrative that Putin aims to re-create the Soviet Empire, demonstrating the unnecessity of Biden's sanctimonious "rescue mission" to save the world from "Madman Putin" at the cost of bankrupting America and risking a nuclear WWIII. The article delves into the extent of the cover-up then-vice-president Biden had to do back in 2014 after his administration insidiously seized control of Ukraine's government after a false flag operation. The NATO-controlled puppet regime installed on the borders of Russia has left Putin almost no choice but to start taking over Ukrainian territories. The West was able to assume the "moral high ground" with the help of its propaganda outlets masquerading as the independent mainstream media, despite its egregious crimes anyone can instantly verify with the help of this article.

The story of Ukraine's West-coordinated regime change also demonstrates the Biden administration's intention of doing the same in Russia in aiding and abetting the globalist agenda to establish a totalitarian one-world government (if you still believe this is a "crazy" conspiracy theory, please first read this).

In describing the West's devious onslaught marketed as a "humanitarian" mission carried out of a "moral" obligation to Ukrainians, below are the recent developments, followed by how it all started in 2014.


The way Russia is being cornered into risking a nuclear World War III: current events

The Biden administration’s most recent request for $37.7 billion more to spend on Ukraine, in addition to the $66 billion taxpayer dollars already sent, "comes to a whopping $103.6 billion in spending with no audit" as of November 19, 2022, points out the Independent Sentinel. This more than a hundred billion so-called "humanitarian" aid has been sent abroad despite skyrocketing inflation and impending economic recession in the U.S., demonstrating the fact that the current administration does not work for its own citizens.

The more than a hundred billion taxpayer dollars sent to Ukraine "doesn’t include all the weapons we’ve sent, an effort that is depleting our military supplies," adds the Independent Sentinel. The U.S. had started its spending spree on Ukraine way back in 2013 when America had sent its first $5 billion right before Ukraine's regime change "succeeded" to get rid of the country's last Russia friendly president. What could America's $5 billion "aid" have served to accomplish then, and what does its current $103 billion "aid" trying to accomplish?

"What is America’s strategy in Ukraine? What is our goal?," questions a Fox News commentator, pointing out, "Congress can’t keep funding Ukraine forever without Biden telling us his strategy to end the war." This author adds, "Our commander in chief has yet to answer any of these questions. I believe it’s irresponsible to spend $12 billion – and a cumulative total of at least $54 billion [as of October 6, 2022] – to fund an effort that has no defined end."

Biden did admit on the final day of the NATO summit in Madrid that his administration's spending spree truly has no definite end. Biden announced that day the U.S. will continue to print money and funnel to Ukraine for “as long as it takes.” Biden added during this speech, “I don’t know how it’s going to end but it will not end with a Russian defeat of Ukraine in Ukraine.” The phrase "as long as it takes" is a canned response not only Biden but all of the compromised Deep State mouthpieces in the U.S. government have been instructed to give — please see the end of this video to hear numerous politicians parrot the same phrase "as long as it takes" in reply to questions on how long the U.S. will keep supporting Ukraine's war.

This US and NATO backed war may thus continue for decades into the indefinite future as the world's two superpowers keep fighting tooth and nail until one of them is defeated — down to every American's last dollar and down to the last Ukrainian and Russian — if the tensions don't escalate into a nuclear war that may bring the world to an end.

It's all well worth it, the mindless deep state mouthpieces have shilled, claiming America must keep supporting Ukraine to "defend democracy." These shills conveniently omit letting the public know that Ukraine has a West installed puppet regime instead of a democracy, as this article demonstrates beyond the shadow of a doubt.

"72% of Americans support continued military assistance to Ukraine," gaslight the war mongering beneficiaries of the military industrial complex. They claim their "data" shows that "everybody" is rooting for printing and sending endless American dollars to Ukraine. If you disagree with what "everybody" is supposedly cheering for, then what's wrong with you?

On March 26, 2022, senile Joe Biden blurted out during a speech that Vladimir Putin "cannot remain in power." In the child-like manner of a dementia patient, Biden admitted his administration's goal of toppling a sitting president just like his former administration did in Ukraine in 2014 when he was Vice President, as the upcoming sections demonstrate.

On April 9, 2022, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson made an unannounced visit to Kiev, exerting pressure on Zelensky to stop the peace talks between Ukraine and Russia that had been going on in Turkey, states a report in the Ukrainian news outlet Ukrayinska Pravda. Zelensky did end the peace talks, making a 180 degree turn from his opinion he'd expressed only 3 days ago when he'd said: "ending the talks now would prevent both countries from finding a solution to the present conflict and further prolong it." People's Dispatch reports that during the prior peace talks, all Russia had wanted was for Ukraine to remain neutral. Their article states:

During the last physical round of talks between both the countries in Istanbul in late March, Russia had claimed that Ukraine was ready to consider its demand of Ukrainian neutrality. The Russians had also said there were talks of a possible meeting between Zelensky and Russian president Vladimir Putin.

But the peace talks needed to end, Johnson had told Zelensky, because Putin needed to be defeated. NATO needed to remain in complete control of Ukraine.

In trying to escalate the tensions, in July 28, 2022, Senators Lindsay Graham and Richard Blumenthal submitted to the US Senate a bill to declare Russia a state sponsor of terrorism. "What do we do with terrorist states? We topple their governments!" notes Tucker Carlson. The New Voice of Ukraine states, "Moscow has told the United States that if Washington designates Russia a sponsor of terrorism, the Kremlin will recognize such a step as a "point of no return" in U.S.-Russian relations." Infowars explains that "the Kremlin has warned such a measure would destroy all ties and communications. It would make negotiated settlement in Ukraine almost an impossibility." Despite Kremlin's warning, "The European Parliament has prepared a resolution recognizing Russia as a “terrorist state” – to be subject of a vote held during a session in Strasbourg next week," reports ZeroHedge in their article dated November 19, 2022. "So far, the Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have been the first to legally recognize Russia  as a terrorist state," adds the ZeroHedge article.

Will the West's aggression cease in time to prevent Putin from using nuclear missiles as a last resort? Or will the insane masterminds of globalism never give up on trying to add Russia too to their empire, dragging the once-free world they've seized into annihilation?

After Ukraine was made to reject Russia's offer to remain neutral, and with the ongoing attempts to declare Russia a sponsor of terrorism to "justify" a regime change, Putin responded by announcing on September 30, 2022 Moscow’s annexation of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine which constitute about 15 percent of Ukraine's territory. The same day, Zelensky reacted by pouring gasoline on the fire, applying for expedited NATO membership. Again the same day,

Again on September 30, 2022, the same day Russia annexed 15 percent of Ukraine's territory and puppet president Zelensky applied for expedited NATO membership, U.S.'s puppet president Biden declared that "America's fully prepared with our NATO allies to defend every single inch of NATO territory — every single inch — so Mr. Putin, don't misunderstand what I'm saying. Every inch." In response to Biden, the deputy secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation stated that Ukraine's accession to NATO "would mean a guaranteed escalation to a World War Three."

Instead of stepping back and letting Ukraine's puppet regime resume the peace negotiations, US bought $290 million worth of anti-radiation drugs, states the October 4, 2022 announcement on the website of the U.S. Department of Human Resources (HHS). This purchase is part of “ongoing efforts to be better prepared to save lives following radiological and nuclear emergencies,” states the HHS's website.

On October 7, 2022, even Biden himself may have been so horrified about the deliberate escalation of the tensions and where his handlers have been making him lead the world, he again blurted out the full truth in his senility. Biden thought out loud at a Democratic fundraiser in New York, saying that “First time since the Cuban missile crisis, we have a direct threat of the use (of a) nuclear weapon if in fact things continue down the path they are going.” Biden added: “I don’t think there’s any such thing as the ability to easily (use) a tactical nuclear weapon and not end up with Armageddon.”

Regarding Biden's comments, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo stated:

“When you hear a president talking about Armageddon as a random thought just musing at a fundraiser, that is a terrible risk to the American people. If he truly believes that, he ought to be talking to us in a serious way. More importantly, he should be doing all the things that are necessary to deter Vladimir Putin.”

But the deeply compromised Biden administration has done nothing to de-escalate the tensions, letting NATO start its Steadfast Noon nuclear drills on October 17. Not only this, but on October 23, 2022, Biden sent 4,700 U.S. troops near Ukraine's Romanian border, having them practice ground and air assaults in preparation for invading Ukraine and fighting Russian forces. On October 26, Russia reacted by starting its own nuclear drills simulating a ‘massive nuclear strike,’ reports the New York Post, adding that "the exercise intended to simulate Russia’s response to a nuclear attack on the country."  These were just annual "routine drills," claimed the Associated Press in trying to downplay the extent of the escalation. But then a conflicting, disturbing interview was shared on Twitter between Russian military expert Igor Korotchenko and Russian television presenter Olga Skabeyeva. During this interview, when Skabeyeva asked Korotchenko “Today, we practiced destroying the USA and formerly great Britain, correct?" Korotchenko told "Absolutely correct."

After Biden's declaration of America's readiness to "defend every single inch of NATO territory," on November 15, 2022, mainstream media announced that NATO-ally Poland had been attached by a supposedly "Russian-made" missile, requiring Biden to make good on his word and start WWIII with Russia. But the missile had in fact been fired by Ukraine instead of Russia, Polish investigators determined, with which the Pentagon had to agree. But despite the way Poland, NATO, UK and U.S. all agreed that the missile hitting Poland "likely came from Ukrainian air defenses," Zelensky continued to insist Russia had fired the missile.

On November 17, 2022, "Nuclear strike preparedness drills were held in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine, in order to prepare military personnel for the possibility of Russia deploying a nuclear weapon," reports Ukrainska Pravda. On November 18, Russia fired a mock nuclear warhead at Ukraine.

With the extent of the escalation of the nuclear war threat downplayed by the mainstream media, Americans are sleepwalking into a nuclear WW3, says Dr. Francis Boyle, human rights lawyer and professor of international law who's drafted the United States Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. In an interview, Dr. Boyle succinctly explains why America is currently de facto in war with Russia, explaining why starting a war without the express authorization of congress is impeachable. Thankfully, Infowars reports that "A bill to impeach Joe Biden over his handling of Ukraine – and the very real threat of a nuclear war with Russia – is now circulating around Capitol Hill as several lawmakers realize that the US is sleepwalking into another world war." This Infowars article includes the impeachment bill.

America's deeply compromised senile puppet president must be stopped before he destroys the entire world to satisfy his puppeteers' insane lust for world domination. Please don't postpone taking action to ensure Biden is held accountable for dragging the world to the brink of Armageddon as he's admitted he's done.


How it all began: The America-coordinated toppling of Ukraine's last real president

The Maidan Revolution caused Ukraine's democratically-elected Russia-friendly president Viktor Yanukovych to get replaced with West-friendly Petro Poroshenko. This was accomplished with the help of key Obama Administration officials and Vice President Biden who kept pouring gasoline on the fire, siding with protestors to cause tensions to escalate. This provoked a huge uprising that reached its tipping point after a false flag operation. Biden then put the cherry on the cake by intimidating president Yanukovych into abandoning his post, scaring him into running in fear of his life. Biden and his allies didn't only topple Ukraine's duly-elected president as such, but they also hand-picked Ukraine's prime minister. The Obama Administration then prevented its crimes from getting exposed by making the new puppet president Poroshenko fire Ukraine's General Prosecutor and re-structure the General Prosecutor's office.

Regarding the events outlined, Salon summarizes how they all had cornered Russia:

The U.S. and NATO's interest in Ukraine is not really about resolving its regional differences, but about something else altogether. The U.S. coup was calculated to put Russia in an impossible position. If Russia did nothing, post-coup Ukraine would sooner or later join NATO, as NATO members had already agreed in principle in 2008. NATO forces would advance right up to Russia's border and Russia's important naval base at Sevastopol in the Crimea would fall under NATO control.

If Russia had responded to the coup by invading Ukraine, on the other hand, there would have been no turning back from a disastrous new Cold War with the West. To Washington's frustration, Russia found a middle path out of this dilemma, by accepting the result of Crimea's referendum to rejoin Russia, and only giving covert support to the separatists in the East [Donbas region].

In a June 2014 article, Counterpunch further summarizes where Ukraine's sly takeover left Putin:

A trap was thereby set for Putin. He was damned if he did, and damned if he didn’t. He could underreact, and betray Russia’s basic national interests, allowing NATO to advance its hostile forces to an ideal attack position.

Or he could overreact, by sending Russian forces to invade Ukraine. The West was ready for this, prepared to scream that Putin was “the new Hitler,” poised to overrun poor, helpless Europe, which could only be saved (again) by the generous Americans.

It's amazing how accurately this 2014 article's author could foresee the future, predicting way back in 2014 exactly how Western media would vilify Putin when he finally did invade Ukraine after 8 years, which was immediately followed by the "generous" Americans rushing to save Eastern Europe from their new Hitler exactly as predicted back in 2014.

Another 2014 article written right after the West-coordinated toppling of Ukraine's president succinctly describes America's pattern:

There has been, of course, a long and inglorious history of the U.S. government supporting the overthrow of elected governments: Mossadegh in Iran in 1953, Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954, Allende in Chile in 1973, Aristide in Haiti twice, Chavez in Venezuela briefly in 2002, Zelaya in Honduras in 2009, Morsi in Egypt in 2013, and others. After Yanukovych, the next target of these U.S.-embraced “democratic” coups looks to be Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela.

In these cases, it is typical for the mainstream U.S. news media to obsess over perceived flaws in the ousted leaders. The idea seems to be to cement in the minds of impressionable Americans that it is okay for the U.S. government to support the overthrow of democratically elected presidents if they have flaws.

The outcomes for the people of these countries that are “saved” from their imperfect leaders, however, often tend to be quite ugly. Usually, they experience long periods of brutal repression at the hands of dictators, but that typically happens outside the frame of the U.S. news media’s focus or interest. Those unhappy countries fade from view almost as quickly as they were thrust to center stage, next to the demonization of their elected leaders.

But before America and its NATO allies began their latest "high-minded" mission to "save" Ukraine's pretend-democracy, Biden had had to do quite a bit of covering up. He'd had to ensure his administration's crimes could not be dug up.


CAUGHT ON AUDIO: Biden orders his new puppet president to fire Ukraine's General Prosecutor and orders the re-structuring of Ukraine's General Prosecutor's office

After Ukraine's 2014 "revolution," the Obama Administration and VP Biden did not only make their new puppet president Petro Poroshenko fire Ukraine's General Prosecutor, but they made Poroshenko re-structure the entire prosecutor's office, also getting in their "person of trust within new prosecution system," in Poroshenko's words.

For the backdrop, those unfamiliar with the Biden family's influence peddling operation in Ukraine can find a clear exposition here. But to cover up his own dirt was only part of why Joe Biden got Ukraine's General Prosecutor Viktor Shokin fired on April 2016. Shokin seems to have been pursuing something even bigger than Hunter's pimping of his dad to foreign adversaries. Whatever it was that Shokin had been going after, it had caused not only Joe but the entire Obama administration to want to get rid of him since 2013. This has been revealed by a confession from John Kerry, the U.S. Secretary of State at that time. Kerry's words captured on video state:

“As a Secretary of State, I was deeply involved in this.

All of us, in the Obama Administration, were trying to get rid of that Prosecutor [Viktor Shokin]: from Obama, to the Secretary of State [John Kerry], to the Vice President [Joe Biden], all of us were working on that, and the Ambassador [to Ukraine].

And, we knew that, if Ukraine was going to survive, and win the revolution in the end, the Maidan, they had to get rid of that Prosecutor. And they did.”

Why had the members of the Obama Administration been so eager to want Ukraine's Maidan Revolution to succeed, and in fulfilling their wish, what could Biden and his allies have done to cause them to dread Ukraine's General Prosecutor?

After puppet president Poroshenko did fire Prosecutor Shokin upon having been ordered to do so by Biden, Shokin was defamed, accused of corruption, and accused of "blocking major cases against allies and influential figures and stymying moves to root out graft." But all of these allegations were fake, as has been revealed by leaked phone calls between Joe Biden and Poroshenko made public by Ukrainian lawmaker Andriy Derkach. During a conversation captured on video on February 18, 2016, Western stooge Poroshenko tells Biden he'd asked Shokin to resign despite the lack of any corruption charges against him. Poroshenko tells Joe during this leaked conversation:

"Joe, I have a second positive news for you. Yesterday I met with General Prosecutor Shokin. And despite of the fact that we didn’t have any corruption charges, we don’t have any information about him doing something wrong, I specially asked him — no, it was day before yesterday — I specially asked him to resign. [...] And as a finish of my meeting with him, he promised to give me the statement on resignation."

3 minutes 15 seconds into the same video, another incriminating phone conversation dated May 13, 2016 starts between Biden and Poroshenko, demonstrating the way the Obama Administration has bribed its way out of ending up prosecuted. This conversation starts with Biden saying "How are you?," to which Poroshenko replies sucking up like a lapdog, saying "Very well indeed, as usual when I hear your voice." Biden then tells Poroshenko, “And now that the new Prosecutor General is in place, we’re ready to move forward to signing that one billion dollar loan guarantee.” Poroshenko thanks Biden for the money.

The same video recording contains another segment revealing that Biden had not only gotten Ukraine's General Prosecutor fired, but had also ordered the re-structuring of the General Prosecutor's office to ensure Ukrainian prosecutors never stepped out of line again. This is admitted by Poroshenko 5 minutes 15 seconds into the video when Poroshenko tells Biden that they've set "the new structure of the general prosecutor's office, including the General Inspection, as we agreed with you." Accomplishing all this had been a “very tough challenge and a very difficult job,” Poroshenko also says. To ensure that no one in the restructured prosecutor's office would start looking in the wrong places, the puppet regime had appointed an "Ukrainian origin American prosecutor" as an "assistant and adviser" with "very good experience in the American System." Poroshenko tells Biden in the same video segment. This new adviser would "be the person of trust within new prosecution system," Poroshenko adds.

These recording segments featuring Biden's own voice leave no doubt about the way Ukraine had "legally" been turned into America's playground after Poroshenko's installation.


America hand-picks Ukraine's prime minister too

Yet another leaked recording helps in understanding how the Obama Administration has led Ukraine headlong into invasion by Russia. This audiotape features 2 high level Obama officials handpicking Ukraine's new prime minister, deciding to bring in West-friendly opposition leader Arseniy Yatsenyuk. Regarding the authenticity of this audiotape, BBC diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus states, "the US has not denied its veracity and has been quick to point a finger at the Russian authorities for being behind its interception and leak." Former State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki criticized the Russian officials’ publicizing of the tape as “a new low in Russian tradecraft.” Psaki did not dispute the recording's authenticity either, saying “I did not say it was not authentic” at a news briefing.

The leaked audiotape features a conversation between Geoffrey Pyatt who was US Ambassador in Ukraine, and Victoria Nuland who was then working as the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs. Nuland and Pyatt decided during their phone conversation to choose Arseniy Yatsenyuk as Ukraine's new prime minister instead of the other opposition leaders Vitali Klitschko and Oleh Tyahnybok. They told:

Nuland: [Breaks in] I think Yats [Arseniy Yatsenyuk] is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's the... what he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok [the other 2 opposition leaders] on the outside. [...]

Pyatt: [...] I think we've got to do something to make it stick together [...] But anyway we could land jelly side up on this one if we move fast. [...] We want to try to get somebody with an international personality to come out here and help to midwife this thing.

Nuland: [...] [Biden's national security adviser] Sullivan's come back to me, VFR, saying you need Biden, and I said probably tomorrow for an atta-boy and to get the deets [details] to stick. So Biden's willing.

Pyatt: OK. Great. Thanks.

The "deets" did stick after Biden's "atta-boy" and president Yanukovych was ousted and "Yats" did become Ukraine's new prime minister exactly as Nuland and Pyatt had agreed he should.

What had the Obama Administration done to "make it stick together" so it could "land jelly side up" by moving fast during the Maidan protests? Why had Biden's "atta boy" required the total restructuring of Ukraine's General Prosecutor's office after the firing of the country's General Prosecutor?

For the answers, let's go back further in time to 2013, to the start of the Maidan protests.


Destabilizing Ukraine with protests against police brutality and causing the protests to climax using a false flag operation

Although Poroshenko's predecessor Viktor Yanukovych was far from being a perfect leader, he had fairly defeated his arch-rival Yulia Tymoshenkothe in 2010 during the Ukrainian presidential election. Yanukovych "won cleanly - according to international observers," reports BBC News. "Yanukovych's closest ties and support base have always been with mainly-Russian speaking eastern and southern Ukraine," states the same BBC News article, adding that Yanukovych later "tried hard to shed the image of being 'Moscow's man'." In November 2013 while he was Ukraine's president, pressure from Russia caused Yanukovych to have a sudden and unexpected change of mind about signing an agreement to strengthen economic ties with the European Union. This caused protests to break out throughout the country. TRTworld explains that West-friendly protesters had been yearning to gravitate toward “European values,” quoting a former protestor state her understanding of these values as “dignity, the rule of law, a market economy, respect of human rights, zero tolerance for corruption.”

During the uprising, Independence Square (Maidan) in Kyiv became a huge protest camp. Diplomatic Courier reports that "Instead of the usual rallies in the thousands, which the government expected, the protests against his [Yanukovych's] decision grew to hundreds of thousands of people—in some cases, over a million people attended." Over 12% of Ukraine's population participated in 3 months of protests and clashes, states Geopolitical Monitor.

What had caused the protests to escalate as such, causing them to gain tremendous momentum?

The reason for the escalation of the unrest wasn't really the public's anger against President Yanukovych, but the anger against the brutality of the attempts to suppress the originally peaceful protests. International Business Times reports:

"The origins of EuroMaidan began as a much smaller protest that had sprouted in Independence Square in the center of Kiev on Nov. 21, the day Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych had, at the last minute, changed his mind on an Association Agreement with the European Union, deciding to strengthen economic ties with Russia instead. But it wasn’t until Nov. 30, when a group of student protesters were attacked by police leading to several injuries and hospitalizations, that the protest became a national movement. Masses swarmed to join in Independence Square, swelling up to nearly 1 million on Dec. 8."

The same International Business Times article mentions a poll that determined 70% of the people had flocked to Maidan (Independence Square) not to protest Yanukovych's change of mind, but "to support the rights of Ukrainians to protest peacefully without threats of police brutality." A 2013 article (web archive loads slowly) covering the same poll affirms that "The main reason Ukrainians massed in Kyiv’s Independence Square, was the violent police dispersal of a peaceful pro-EU demo and brutal beatings handed out on November 30."

The same tactic of stirring up nationwide protests against police brutality failed to gain as much momentum in America years later when a cop killed a felon called George Floyd on May 2020. The corrupt mainstream media colluded to portray the police as a brutal, racist establishment needing to be demolished, in their efforts to destabilize the U.S. Black citizens fortunately didn't buy into this "cause" and the protests failed to escalate. But the political climate was very different in Ukraine years ago. People had been way more oppressed, were way angrier and easier to manipulate.

"Maidan leaders and several hundred trained provocations hid behind the backs of people and aimed to seize power," told Ukraine's ex-General Prosecutor Viktor Shokin during an interview years later. Shokin added that after the uprising succeeded, Ukraine had an external administration and was ruled by a group led by Biden and Soros. Shokin, explained:

The leaders of Maidan had trained provocateurs, and also trained propagandists and speakers who were sent on the stage of Maidan. People were simply used as shields and for various bloody provocations. Unfortunately, at that time no one knew that on the stage of Maidan there were enemies who hid under embroidery and people’s anger.”

"If People Find Out the Truth About Maidan, Many Will Have a Heart Attack," told Ukraine's former General Prosecutor, who's unfortunately never revealed additional details.

On December 9, 2013, the day following Dec. 8 when nearly 1 million Ukrainians had taken to the streets, Biden kept working on what he'd told Victoria Nuland he was "willing" to do. He called president Yanukovych and "reaffirmed the strong support of the United States for Ukraine's European aspirations." Biden had pressured Yanukovych not just once but 9 times during the 3 months the protests had lasted. Associated Press calls this "an unusual level of contact that underscored the heightened U.S. concern about stability in Ukraine, a strategically located nation that shares a border with Russia."

On the morning of December 11, 2013, the protestors and opposition leaders emerged victorious from an overnight confrontation with the riot police in the Maidan that had lasted for nine hours. The crowds had cheered that morning as police forces had driven away from both the Maidan and Kiev City Hall building which had also been occupied by protesters for weeks. This was again perfect timing for the West to put pressure on Yanukovych. Nuland and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton showed up at the Maidan "where several thousand of protesters were calling for the resignation of President Viktor Yanukovich," CBS News reports. Nuland and Ashton talked to the protestors showing their support, handing out food items to them. They also requested to talk to the government and opposition leaders to work out a "solution."

Nuland's visit to the square came the day after the protestors' anger had been further fed by a strong statement released against the Ukrainian police by Secretary of State John Kerry. Kerry's statement expressed the U.S.'s "disgust with the decision of Ukrainian authorities to meet the peaceful protest [...] with riot police, bulldozers, and batons, rather than with respect for democratic rights and human dignity." CBS News adds that Yanukovych had finally agreed to meet with Nuland and Ashton, stating," The U.S. Embassy in Kiev told CBS News that Nuland met Wednesday morning with Yanukovych."

How Nuland had put pressure on Yanukovych during their meeting was revealed in a December 2013 speech Nuland gave at the U.S.-Ukraine Foundation Conference. In this speech, Nuland admitted having made 3 trips in five weeks to Ukraine during the protests, the first one being on December 5th. Nuland told during her speech:

"I spent more than two hours with President Yanukovych. It was a tough conversation, but also a realistic one. I made absolutely clear to him on behalf of the United States that what happened December 10th and more generally what’s been happening in security terms is absolutely impermissible in a European state, in a democratic state.

But I also made clear that the United States believes there is a way out for Ukraine, that it is still possible to save Ukraine’s European future, and that that is where we wanted to see the president lead his country."

After the protesters' December 11 victory over the riot police, the next day’s rally "in support of regime change and the European Association reached over a million people" yet again, reports Diplomatic Courier. The crowds showed no signs of abating. This caused panicked President Yanukovych to make a huge tactical mistake, playing right into the hands of Biden and the hawkish Nuland. On January 16, 2014, Yanukovych passed a bill enacting a set of draconian anti-protest laws that limited Ukraine's freedom of speech, freedom of press and the right to assemble by criminalizing most protests. With such a move, Yanukovych handed his opposition, the U.S. and E.U. ample ammunition to further vilify him and stir up more public anger. His opposition "accused the ruling party of a coup," yet again calling for a big gathering in Kiew, states BBC News. Opposition leader Oleg Tyagnibok told during a news conference that Yanukovych's goal was to "copy the Russian and North Korean methods," adding, "Yanukovych has started learning, little by little, to be a dictator.” The new restrictions became collectively known as the "dictatorship law." The U.S. and EU kept fanning the flames by continuing to express their "deep contempt."

On January 25, 2014, Yanukovych did agree to offer the post of prime minister to opposition leader "Yats" (Arseniy Yatsenyuk) as Nuland had wanted him to do, hoping to appease the revolutionaries provoked by America and EU. He also agreed to amending the anti-protest laws and proposed changing the constitution to decrease his own power and give more power to the parliament. But his opposition rejected all of these attempts to de-escalate the tensions, saying "We are prepared to take over the government, with the purpose of leading the country into the European Union."


The staging of a false flag operation, after which Biden "persuades" Yanukovych to flee for his life

On February 18th, "villain" president Yanukovych apparently unleashed the brutal riot police yet again onto Independence Square (Maidan). People appearing to be "cops" began to violently attack the protestors yet again. Two days later on February 20, violence in Kyiv climaxed, causing many Maidan protesters to be killed. BBC News reports that "it was the deaths of at least 88 people, many of them protesters shot dead by uniformed snipers in 48 hours of bloodshed" that finally brought Yanukovych down.

According to NBC News's description of the February 20 massacre, "At least 50 anti-government protesters were killed [...] including many who were shot by snipers. It was the bloodiest day in months of demonstrations." This article adds that "The dozens of people who lost their lives during the Maidan Revolution became known as the 'Heavenly Hundred.' A stretch of the street where many of them were killed now bears that name."

The very next day on February 21 following the killing of the 'Heavenly Hundred' shot by the uniformed snipers in the crowds, Biden and Nuland's efforts almost culminated. Yanukovych agreed to sign a European Union-mediated peace pact with the 3 opposition leaders Klitschko, Tyahnibok and Nuland's "Yats." By signing this resolution, Yanukovych agreed to initiating early presidential elections and forming an interim unity government made up of himself and the 3 opposition leaders. This agreement also restored the 2004 constitution that limits presidential powers.

But the raging crowds were not appeased with the peace pact and agreement for democratic transfer of power after all the killings that had taken place the day before on the 20th, thanks to the U.S. and E.U.'s further condemnation of the massacre and the "police brutality." Kyivpost reports that "International outrage against Yanukovych quickly mounted after the deaths, prompting the European Union and United States to apply financial and visa sanctions against top Ukrainian officials." The same Kyivpost article states that Yanukovych was also losing support with the defections of lawmakers from his own party as well as police officers. Protesters kept calling for Yanukovych's immediate resignation, or else threatening violance. On February 22, 2014, Yanukovych got cold feet, such that abandoned his post as president and and fled Kyiv.

What had caused Yanukovych to disgracefully flee despite his agreement with his opposition that guaranteed a peaceful transition of power through early elections? The answer is found in on page 98 of Joe Biden's memoir "Promise Me, Dad" (Flatiron Books, Kindle Edition). In this memoir, Biden brags about how he persuaded Yanukovych to "walk away:"

"I made the last of many urgent calls to Yanukovych in late February of 2014, when his snipers were assassinating Ukrainian citizens by the dozens and we had credible reports that he was contemplating an even more vicious crackdown. I had been warning him for months to exercise restraint in dealing with his citizens, but on this night, three months into the demonstrations, I was telling him it was over; time for him to call off his gunmen and walk away. His only real supporters were his political patrons and his operators in the Kremlin, I reminded him, and he shouldn’t expect his Russian friends to rescue him from this disaster. Yanukovych had lost the confidence of the Ukrainian people, I said, and he was going to be judged harshly by history if he kept killing them. The disgraced president fled Ukraine the next day."

Was the above really all that Biden had told Yanukovych to persuade a sitting president to dishonorably desert his post and run?

Biden's capable of using much stronger "persuasive" language than the above, such as threatening to get a Ukrainian president assassinated, reveals another leaked audio recording (loads slowly) of a phone conversation between Biden and his puppet Poroshenko who replaced Yanukovych. This conversation took place just 2 weeks after Donald Trump got elected president in 2016. During the conversation, Biden began telling Poroshenko that he didn't want Ukraine to start getting indebted to Trump by accepting monetary aid from the Trump Administration, ordering Poroshenko to try to find the funds his country needs through International Monetary Fund loans — or else Poroshenko's "economic as well as physical security" would be in jeopardy, Biden said. Biden told Poroshenko these exact words captured on video:

“This is getting very, very close to what I don’t want to have happen. I don’t want Trump to get in a position where he thinks he’s about to buy onto a policy where the financial system [of Ukraine] is going to collapse and he’s going to be looked to pour more money into Ukraine.

That’s how he’ll think about it before he gets sophisticated enough to know the detail.

So, anything you can do to push the PrivatBank to closure so that the IMF loans comes forward [for the funds Ukraine needs], I would respectfully suggest is critically important to your economic as well as physical security.”

What could Biden have meant by the "detail" Trump may come to "know" when he got "sophisticated enough," if Poroshenko were to let himself get indebted to him? Whatever this "detail" may be, it was important enough to endanger the puppet president's "economic as well as physical security.”

Plenty of convincing "detail" is revealed in a September 2015 paper in Oriental Review by Dr. Ivan Katchanovski from the University of Ottawa, which lays out conclusive evidence of the way the the bloody February 20, 2014 massacre that killed the "Heavenly Hundred" in Maidan was a false flag operation.

After Yanukovych was "persuaded" by Biden to flee for his life in ignominy, the Ukrainian parliament impeached and removed him from office hours after he'd abandoned his Kiev office to protesters. The interim government that formed did install Nuland's "Yats" as prime minister to lead the country until the early presidential elections scheduled for May 2014. Yats did sign the the trade pact with the European Union that Yanukovych had refused to sign way back at the beginning of the protests. This caused Russia to finalize the annexation of Crimea it had started. Ukraine's early May presidential election did bring NATO-friendly Poroshenko into power. Everything ended exactly the way the Obama Administration had planned — except — Ukraine's General Prosecutor had been snooping around. But Biden succeeded at taking care of it, followed by ordering a restructuring of the entire General Prosecutor's office "including the General Inspection," as has been described.

The Deep State and its corrupt operatives had indeed landed "jelly side up on this one."


The cover-up of the false flag operation

It's unclear how much of the "detail" Trump may have found out after Poroshenko had been threatened with assassination if he started getting indebted to Trump. Then president Trump halted military aid to Ukraine on July 18, 2019, after which he told Ukraine's current puppet president Zelensky on July 26, 2019, during a phone conversation, to investigate Biden and his son Hunter. But a "whistleblower" from the corrupt CIA who had tracked Trump's conversation released a complaint alleging that Trump used "the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country" in the 2020 presidential election. This helps then House speaker Nancy Pelosi start Trump's impeachment. On December 10, 2018, the House voted in favor of impeaching the president.

Trump was at least not assassinated for his crime of trying to dig up the Biden corruption.

Going back to the Maidan massacre of February 20, 2014, General Prosecutor Shokin had had a very hard time determining who had ordered the snipers to fire at the civilian crowds before Yanukovych had fled. Shokin has stated that law enforcement officers had blocked the investigation into the Maidan crimes, saying that he also "found evidence of the investigation being blocked by officials of the Prosecutor General’s Office, the Ministry of Interior, and the Security Service of Ukraine." Reuters explains:

The probes into the killings have been hindered by missing evidence. Many guns allegedly used to shoot protesters have vanished; many of the bullets fired were taken home as souvenirs. Barricades, bullet-pierced trees and other items of forensic evidence were removed, lawyers say.

Someone had done an extremely good clean-up job. Atlantic Counsel describes:

Imagine a European capital city where dozens of unarmed protesters are shot down in broad daylight. Now imagine that six years later, those responsible for the slaughter have still not been brought to justice. Inconceivable? Incredibly, this is precisely the situation in today’s Ukraine, where scores of protesters participating in the country’s Revolution of Dignity were killed in the vicinity of Kyiv’s Independence Square (Maidan) in late February 2014.

Zelenskyy acknowledged last week that the killings on Maidan remain “the most complicated case in our country.” He told the media that evidence and documents have been lost, while the scene of the crime has been tampered with and “cleaned up.” He could not say when those who gave the orders would be found, but gave assurances that the matter is being “dealt with faster than several years ago.” It is receiving proper attention, he stressed, “and we are doing everything possible.”

But while puppet Zelensky's re-structured General Prosecutor's office has been faffing about, an Italian journalist had been working hard...

Journalist Gian Micalessin is the military correspondent of the newspaper Il Giornale which is one of Italy's best selling newspapers. After a 2 year investigation, Micalessin located and interviewed 3 men whom he believes were among the snipers at Maidan Square in Kiev in February 2014. Here is Micalessin's story in Italian on Il Giornale, which also aired on TV as a documentary on Italy’s most watched Canale 5. Here is that documentary in 2 parts with English subtitles, featuring the alleged snipers confessing to operating under the command of an American military operative called Brian Christopher Boyenger.

Anyone surprised?


The disastrous consequences of Ukraine's West-organized regime change

The events described serve to reveal exactly why America can't let Putin take over Ukraine and expose the crimes of the Deep State and its compromised American stooges.

Thus the corrupt Biden Administration will keep fighting for "as long as it takes" until Putin's defeated, even if it may bring on a nuclear World War III.

As America's hell bent on toppling Russia's president just like it toppled Ukraine's, the more than $100 billion sent to Ukraine may just have been for starters.

A well-written Common Dreams article quotes a Washington Post editorial predict that after the ousting of Yanukovych, Ukraine was likely to "split along geographic lines as Russian speakers in the east of the country, perhaps supported by Moscow, reject the new political order.” The split had began on February 24, 2014 just 2 days after Yanukovych had fled, starting the Russo-Ukrainian War. This war has killed about 13,000 people as of July 2021 in just the the Donbas region alone, before Russia's invasion that killed tens of thousands of more Ukrainians. Comparing this huge death toll with the about 100 people who died in the Maidan massacre may demonstrate what Yanukovych had been trying to avoid, regardless or how corrupt or good a president he may have been. The West has caused Ukraine incomparably more harm than if it had let Yanukovych do what was best for his country.

Counterpunch summarizes succinctly:

"In short, while planning to incorporate Ukraine into the Western sphere, Western leaders were perfectly aware that this move would entail serious problems with Russian-speaking Ukrainians, and with Russia itself. Rather than seeking to work out a compromise, Western leaders decided to forge ahead and to blame Russia for whatever would go wrong."

What could happen if the West were to succeed in bleeding out Russia and defeating Putin, in the extremely unlikely scenario that Putin never used his nukes and let himself be deposed after Ukraine joined NATO? If Putin were to let this happen, all the West would have to do would be to sit back and watch Russia spiral into pure chaos in the vacuum created by Putin's ousting. Biden and Nuland could then "midwife this thing" and "get the deets to stick" yet again, adding Russia too to the UN-controlled conquests of the globalist cabal.

Perhaps many new countries would form with many new puppet regimes just like Ukraine's — in the extremely unlikely event Putin lets himself get toppled and killed, letting his country dissolve. But because Putin won't let this happen, the war will keep escalating and a nuclear World War III is in order unless Biden's impeached and stopped.

Please don't postpone taking action to push your representatives and senators to to impeach Biden, asking them to support the impeachment bill. Please help raise public awareness of the efforts of the lunatic masterminds of globalism who are trying to take over the world at the cost of first destroying it.



“Never underestimate the power of a small group of committed people to change the world. In fact, it is the only thing that ever has.” ~ Margaret Mead

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *