AN UNPRESCEDENTED EXPOSÉ SHOWCASING THE STRONGEST DAMNING EVIDENCE ON THE CREATION OF BIOWEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN COMMUNIST CHINA
A hard-hitting story including the exhaustive list of the laws and policies Fauci and Collins have violated in creating the deadliest viruses
By piecing together previously scattered facts like a jigsaw puzzle, this article reveals the complete picture of perhaps history's biggest atrocity. It proves, beyond reasonable doubt, the heinous attempt to ease in a global totalitarian regime by releasing a bioweapon and a huge psyop strategy. If you're not yet sure if the Great Reset is happening, please first self-verify its reality.
Due to extensive censorship efforts, few people are aware of the way the U.S. had still not stopped funding the genetic enhancement of coronaviruses in the Wuhan Lab until August 19, 2022, when the NIH finally announced cutting off its subaward to China. But despite cutting off the subaward, the NIH's Deputy Director Michael Lauer had told the Washington Examiner that his agency may continue to fund EcoHealth Alliance for the same grant R01AI110964 without the involvement of Wuhan Institute of Virology. The NIH did exactly this on September 21, 2022, resuming EcoHealth Alliance's funding to "collect samples of viruses from wildlife and then “rapidly supply viral sequences and isolates for use in vaccine and therapeutic development,” states the Intercept. Their article adds that this may mean "the researchers could ship live viruses around the world."
The most egregious part of all this is the way the terminated and re-instated grant to EcoHealth Alliance is the same one that created the pandemic, according to the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, Andrew Huff. Huff has hired an attorney and come forward admitting that their group did create Sars-CoV-2 with the same R01AI110964 grant for the project "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" whose subaward was terminated on August 19, 2022 and re-instated on September 21, 2022 without involving the Wuhan Lab.
We're living in a world so corrupt that the very same research that created the pandemic is being allowed to continue, with nobody daring to do anything to stop it!
Incredible? It's all absolutely real, as will be elaborated in the upcoming sections revealing the horrifying details hidden from the media by CCP-style censorship efforts.
It gets even worse.
EcoHealth Alliance is just 1 of the 11 similar institutions studying the spillover potential of viruses in the global network of hundreds of biolabs funded by the U.S., as this article will also elaborate. The above grant is only one of God knows how many other deadly grants making animal viruses transmissible among human populations.
If the crazy billionaires and compromised officials funding this heinous operation are not stopped, they will continue to enrich themselves immeasurably as they'll keep enforcing on the world the vaccines reverse engineered from the new viruses, further weakening world economies through "healthcare" tyranny before establishing their totalitarian one world government hellscape.
Researchers at Boston University have already succeeded at creating a much deadlier variant of SARS-CoV-2 which has an 80% kill rate. Congratulations!
On July 5, 2022, Forbes published an article, titled "The US Is Funding a Massive Virus Hunt That Might Cause Another Pandemic. Great Idea!"
But the situation is not hopeless. Really. We can stop these evil lunatics if only each of us does his/her part.
After self-verifying the whole truth with the help of the numerous credible links below, it's imperative for everyone to not postpone taking action to help criminalize all gain of function research and block the Great Reset agenda of the collaboration of communist China, a cabal of insane billionaires and the compromised government officials and politicians they've brought into power.
Watch out for this insidious psyop technique
Who could be naive enough to believe that the CCP would let the U.S. engineer potential bioweapons in its own country — without having complete control of the process?
And who in their right minds could believe humankind could "benefit" from the genetic enhancement of animal viruses to cause them to rapidly infect human populations?
But remember... It’s you who’s "crazy" — we were all deemed crazy little conspiracy theorists daring to doubt the superior wisdom of top scientists with PhD degrees when the pandemic began, when "authoritative sources" had deemed Fauci the “hero of the pandemic” instead of the villain. Mainstream channels and social platforms were colluding to give the impression that no legitimate authority agreed with us, maintaining a façade of unanimity while censoring or deriding the truth and promoting false narratives to deceive and sidetrack the masses. We were kept in isolation as this occurred and not allowed to congregate with others who could affirm our thoughts and feelings about the shutting down of our businesses. While you might have stayed glued to your TV in terror and kept watching the "reality" they'd turned inside out, did you ever wonder if something was wrong with you?
For those unfamiliar with this psyop strategy, it’s commonly referred to as “gaslighting,” defined by Britannica as ”an elaborate and insidious technique of deception and psychological manipulation” serving to “gradually undermine the victim’s confidence in his own ability to distinguish truth from falsehood, right from wrong, or reality from appearance, thereby rendering him pathologically dependent on the gaslighter in his thinking or feelings.”
How many Americans could have lost confidence in their own ability to "distinguish truth from falsehood, right from wrong, or reality from appearance" after the pandemic began, having become "pathologically dependent" on their gaslighters in their thinking or feelings? Plenty of Americans, apparently, as too few people opposed the insanity of keeping the economy shut down even after it became clear hospitals were never going to exceed their treatment capacities.
The Britannica article on gaslighting goes on to describe that the basic elements of the technique may include:
- "Isolating the victim from independent sources of information and validation, including other people."
- "Attempting to convince the victim of the truth of something intuitively bizarre or outrageous by forcefully insisting on it or by marshaling superficial evidence;"
- "Dismissing the victim’s contrary perceptions or feelings as invalid or pathological; questioning the knowledge and impugning the motives of persons who contradict the viewpoint of the gaslighter;"
Below is everything we the crazy conspiracy theorists were never meant to find out as we were "supposed to" continue to let Cable TV and fake news sources shape our "reality."
Definition of Fauci and Collins' crimes
As of October 2022, International law professor Dr. Francis Boyle, who has drafted the United States Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 (BWATA), is still trying to find a courageous Attorney General willing to indict Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Dr. Francis Collins, the former director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) which oversees Fauci's NIAID, as well as indicting everyone else who has aided and abetted Fauci and Collins. Boyle is accusing Fauci and Collins of having violated his Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, making them guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The details are found in Boyle's great interview.
This article hopes to help Boyle and others succeed in getting the creators of the pandemic indicted with criminally negligent homicide and treason.
According to US Legal, criminal negligence is defined as:
"Conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences"
Which "ordinary prudent or careful person" can be expected support and fund the genetic enhancement of bat viruses to make them capable of rapidly infecting human populations? This and nothing else has been done by Doctors Fauci and Collins, as will be laid out in detail.
To convict someone of criminal negligence, US Legal states that the courts must be able to prove his criminal mental state, explaining:
"Proof of that mental state requires that the failure to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk that a result will occur must be a gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person."
Representing an incredibly "gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person," Fauci and Collins have failed to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in funding the creation of bioweapons of mass destruction in a CCP-affiliated laboratory in communist China. This represents the simple truth obfuscated by treasonous top scientists and mainstream media colluding with the CCP.
In the 2016 paper titled "Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis," the world was warned that "advances in biotechnology may enable development and use of a new generation of biological weapons of mass destruction." This paper defined gain of function research (GOFR) as follows:
"Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens."
This 2016 paper details the risks and biosafety concerns of artificially enhancing "the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens," explicitly stating that "a devastating pandemic could potentially result from a laboratory accident involving an especially dangerous pathogen created via GOFR [gain of function research]." The same 1916 paper explains the purported benefits of GOFR such as attempts to develop vaccines and medical countermeasures, adding:
"Critics questioned the validity of claims about such benefits and argued that the studies might facilitate creation of biological weapons agents that could kill millions, or possibly even billions, of people."
This is just one of the countless warnings Collins' NIH and Fauci's NIAID had been given. NIH/NIAID nevertheless kept facilitating the "creation of biological weapons agents that could kill millions, or possibly even billions," in a PLA-affiliated lab in communist China through numerous unethical ploys and policy violations the upcoming sections spell out in full detail.
In late 2019 when the pandemic began, with the mainstream media eerily avoiding mentioning the possibility of a lab accident or bioweapon release, Fauci was allowed to assume the role of an unelected autocrat shaping almost all aspects of U.S. policy. The way Fauci's role overrode even the president's has been blurted out by Joe Biden in a December 2, 2021 speech whose video is available. In this speech, Biden irritably utters "I've seen more of Dr. Fauci than I have my wife... Look, who's president? Fauci!"
They say one hears the truth from children, but it's taken a demented old man to voice the extent to which America has been insidiously occupied from within by a CCP-compromised official.
On August 22, 2022, Fauci announced he'll be "stepping down from the positions of Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Chief of the NIAID Laboratory of Immunoregulation, as well as the position of Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden." His retirement pension "will amount to over $400,000 and top the annual salary that the President of the United States brings in," reports Fox News. Instead of spending his retirement in the lap of luxury after having caused more than 6 million people to die as of September 2022, this monster should spend his retirement in prison as this article will hopefully help bring on.
The U.S.'s collaboration with the CCP to obfuscate the pandemic's origins
A video is available of a 2017 interview where Fauci's mind plays a trick on him, and causing him to lose his guard and blurt out a weird "joke." In this interview, Fauci first mentions a visit he's had from the CCP's top science officials, followed by mentioning China's unusually large budget increase for bioresearch for that year. Fauci adds, "the Chinese are increasing their investment in biomedical research by something like 26% this year [...] they're investing very very heavily in biomedical research." The interviewer interrupts Fauci, joking "They're thinking of hiring you?" Fauci replies "I'm trying to hire them!" The audience laughs at this, not knowing how true it is. Fauci was indeed bought out to fund Chinese virologists with U.S. dollars to develop the CCP's bioweapons for them.
Here is another explosive interview in which International law professor Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 signed into law by George H. W. Bush, gives a detailed statement explaining that the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive biological warfare weapon. But cancel culture continues to obliterate such genuinely authoritative sources.
Sars-Cov-2 did get created in the Wuhan Institute of Virology
In August 2021, the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff announced that the pandemic came from the Wuhan lab in their August 2021 addendum to their report titled "The Origins of Covid-19, an Investigation of the Wuhan Institute of Virology." This report states:
"It is the opinion of Committee Minority Staff, based on the preponderance of available information; the documented efforts to obfuscate, hide, and destroy evidence; and the lack of physical evidence to the contrary; that SARS-CoV-2 was accidentally released from a Wuhan Institute of Virology laboratory sometime prior to September 12, 2019."
In an August 2, 2021 op-ed, Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe announced the way he's “had access to all of the U.S. government’s most sensitive intelligence related to the pandemic," which caused him to conclude:
"although the CCP has gone to great lengths to ensure there is no "smoking gun," every piece of evidence I have seen points to the pandemic’s origin being a leak out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."
On August 8, 2022. Professor Jeffrey Sachs, the head of the COVID-19 commission of the world's most influential top medical journal the Lancet, stated that after 2 years of intensive investigation, he's "pretty convinced" SARS-CoV-2 was engineered in a lab. Sachs declared (scroll for video):
"I chaired the commission for the Lancet for 2 years on Covid. I'm pretty convinced it came out of US lab biotechnology, not out of nature, just to mention, after 2 years of intensive work on this. So it's a blunder, in my view, of biotech [...] it's not being investigated, not in the United States, not anywhere, and I think for real reasons, that they don't want to look underneath the rug."
Dr. Robert Redfield, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, also announced that he believed a lab leak is the most likely explanation for the COVID-19 pandemic. Redfield explained:
"I'm just giving my best opinion as a virologist, and I don't think it's plausible that this virus went from a bat to an animal – we still don't know that animal – and then went into humans and immediately learned how to be human-to-human transmissible to the point of now causing one of the greatest pandemics we've had in the history of the world."
"That's not consistent with how other coronaviruses have come into the human species," Redfield told, referring to the way all other coronaviruses that had emerged in animals and jumped onto humans had taken some time to evolve the ability to start spreading effectively among humans. The former CDC director also told, "You have a virus that is one of the most infectious viruses in the history of humanity, and yet that virus no longer can infect the bat? [...] No, this is highly abnormal." Redfield added:
"And, it does suggest that there's an alternative hypothesis that it went from a bat virus, got into a laboratory, where in the laboratory, it was taught, educated, it evolved, so that it became a virus that could efficiently transmit human to human."
The real "conspiracy is Collins, Fauci, and the established scientific community," told former CDC director Redfield, also stating, "Everyone had to agree to the narrative" pushed by Fauci and Collins that the pandemic originated in a wet market. "I was threatened, my life was threatened," Redfield said. "I have letters I got from prominent scientists, that previously gave me awards, telling me that the best thing I could do for the world was to shoot myself because of what I said," the ex-director told. "Nothing's going to happen as long as the Biden administration is here," Redfield also said.
On October 2022, the Senate Committee on Health Education, Labor and Pensions Minority Oversight Staff published their own analysis of the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, announcing in their interim report: "Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident." This report then falsely states "more information is needed to arrive at a more precise, if not a definitive, understanding of the origins of SARS-CoV-2." The investigators commissioned for this report have obviously missed way too many pieces of the puzzle that this article does include, leaving no doubt about the the fact that that traitors in the U.S. government have funded the creation of Sars-Cov-2 in the Wuhan lab in collaboration with the CCP.
Wuhan lab staff gets sick, Wuhan hospitals fill up, and the lab destroys its viral databases before the pandemic's announcement
And they're still saying we "can't be sure" if the virus came from the Wuhan Lab!
Putting aside the gaslighting efforts and blatantly false narratives fed to the unsuspecting masses, the CCP did not only destroy all of its evidence of the origins of SARS-CoV-2right before the pandemic was announced, but it also forced compromised U.S. officials to help obliterate where the virus came from, as the information below demonstrates.
"Bat lady" Shi Zhengli, who directs the coronavirus research efforts at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, claimed that the genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 does not match any of the sequences her team had been studying. But declassified U.S. intel has revealed that staff members at the lab fell ill with COVID-like symptoms in Autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the pandemic in late 2019. Again during the autumn of 2019, many international athletes, who had traveled to Wuhan for the Military World Games, got sick with Covid-19-like symptoms. Hospitals around the Wuhan lab had at that time also filled up, according to The House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff report titled "The Origins of Covid-19," which states:
"Satellite imagery of Wuhan in September and October 2019 [...] showed a significant uptick in the number of people at local hospitals surrounding the WIV’s [Wuhan Institute of Virology's] headquarters, coupled with an unusually high number of patients with symptoms similar to COVID-19."
The same autumn of 2019 when the Wuhan lab staff developed Covid-19-like symptoms and when hospitals near the lab filled up, the Wuhan Institute deleted its main database of more than 22,000 unpublished samples and sequences of bat and rodent viral genomic sequences on September 12, 2019. Eventually all of the 16 virus databases managed by the Wuhan Institute were taken offline. None of these databases could so far be recovered. Vanity Fair reports:
"Why would a database supported by U.S. tax dollars to help prevent and respond to a pandemic be made “inaccessible exactly when it was needed to fulfill its intended purpose?” asks Jamie Metzl, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, who was among the first to call for a full investigation of COVID-19’s origins."
In trying to learn about how SARS-CoV-2 originated and evolved, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo asked China to provide the U.S. with its earliest samples of the virus. But China destroyed these samples too and admitted to having destroyed them on January 3rd 2020.
All of the above leaves no doubt about the way China had everything to hide regarding how COVID-19 originated.
As if the destruction of the piles of evidence described above wasn't enough in trying to obfuscate the pandemic's origin, revisions had been made to the early viral genomic sequences in trying to mislead the world into accepting that the virus jumped from pangolins. This was unearthed by the nonprofit investigative research group U.S. Right to Know. These revisions had been made to the genomic datasets used in four high-profile studies claiming that SARS-CoV-2 evolved in bats, jumped onto pangolins from bats, and then onto humans.
Not only the Chinese but numerous treasonous and/or spineless U.S. officials and U.S. researchers have aided and abetted the CCP's cover-up attempts and misinformation campaign to deceive the world — except for a few good men...
Dr. Bloom resists the pressure, exposes the corruption of NIH's director Collins and grantee Andersen
Dr. Jesse Bloom reminds us that there are still researchers who value truth over trying to climb the academic or political ladder.
It would be academic suicide for most researchers to let themselves fall out of favor with the directors of the NIH and NIAID in a country where these 2 institutions provide a big portion of the grant funding for medical research. Without being able to win grant awards, researchers wouldn't be able to conduct the studies and publish the new findings they need to preserve or advance their academic positions. Thus the CCP only had to compromise key officials such as Collins as Fauci in a system that discouraged everyone else from getting on the wrong side of their grant providers. Grantees who kowtowed to Fauci and Collins kept getting published and rising, while those who refused to do so got eliminated.
But some researchers nevertheless selflessly resisted...
In June 2020, Wuhan University researchers emailed the NIH requesting that the institute also deletes its own early genomic sequences from its viral databases. Director Collins' NIH did comply with China's request. The fact that this deletion had occurred was discovered by evolutionary biologist Jesse Bloom, who succeeded at partially recovering the deleted sequences. Bloom had recovered "3 partial viral sequences collected from people in the city [of Wuhan] in the early days of the pandemic." Bloom published that his recovered sequences demonstrated the way SARS-CoV-2 had been around long before Covid-19's purported first outbreak at the Huanan seafood market. The deleted data demonstrated that the pandemic could not have originated at the seafood market.
Before Bloom published his paper on the deleted genomic sequences and the refutation of the seafood market origin hypothesis, he sent a copy to NIH's director Collins and NIAID's director Fauci. Upon receiving the paper before its publication, Collins organized a meeting with Bloom and 2 other virologists he invited. One of Collins' invitees was evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen, who repeatedly tried to dissuade Bloom from publishing his findings during their meeting. Andersen finally told Bloom he was a screener at the pre-print server where Bloom's paper still resided, which could let him either delete Bloom's paper or revise it “in a way that would leave no record that this had been done.” But Bloom refused to kowtow and allow Andersen to delete or alter his paper. He let the paper get published as is.
After it leaked to the press that Collins had invited to his meeting someone like Andersen who could alter the preprint server without any trace, more and more corruption kept surfacing as will be demonstrated, which finally forced NIH's director Collins to announce his resignation in October 5th 2021. Fauci has done the same much later despite the stench of his corruption surpassing that of Collins.'
Compromised Collins gets re-hired, investigations into the grants to the Wuhan lab get further stifled
Compromised ex-director Collins had proven too useful to the CCP to be left to retire in peace after his resignation.
After having been declared a "National Treasure" by gaslighting liberal outlets, compromised Collins rejoined compromised Biden’s administrative team like compromised birds of a feather, becoming a top science advisor to the Biden White Hose in February 2022. Collins became the co-chair of Biden's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, going right back to helping Fauci determine U.S. government policy.
Collins' new tasks include to "help find the next director of NIH" as of September 2022.
If Americans continue to do nothing about saving their country, God knows how many future NIH directors will keep sending U.S. taxpayer funds to China, letting the CCP keep improving their enhanced potential pandemic pathogens to destroy the masses with.
Currently, the duties of the director of the NIH are being performed by acting director Lawrence A. Tabak, who previously served as the NIH's Principal Deputy Director and Deputy Ethics Counselor. Some ethics counselor Tabak had been if it was his counsel that encouraged Collins to do the incredibly corrupt deeds leading to his resignation that will be outlined.
In performing the duties of NIH's acting director, Tabak continues to walk Collins' path in aiding and abetting the CCP, having made the NIH hide additional critical evidence on the pandemic's origin. On, February 20 2022, in response to litigation, the former "ethics counselor" sent the investigative outlet the Intercept 292 fully redacted pages rather than substantive material that could have shed light on how SARS-CoV-2 was created.
No joking — Tabak did send the Intercept 292 fully redacted pages of information about the grants the NIH provided to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, revealing the extent to which it wants to hide what was cooked up at the Wuhan lab and how. The fully redacted 292 pages start here after page 15.
The compromised Biden administration advised by Collins and Fauci has tried to mislead the world for the umpteenth time in their declassified COVID-19 Origin Intelligence Report released on Aug 27, 2021. This ridiculously brief report claimed the White House's investigation into the pandemic's origins is inconclusive, saying "China’s cooperation most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19." The Biden administration would like you to believe that the investigation into the pandemic's origin may conveniently never conclude, when China may never be expected to cooperate to incriminate itself. But as this article will continue to demonstrate, revealing the pandemic's origin doesn't need China at all. The NIH's attempts to delete, alter and avoid revealing key information indicates that the full truth can be learned by subpoenaing Collins, Tabak, Fauci and every other researcher named in this exposition, forcing them to unredact and hand over everything they've been hiding.
The compromised Biden White House continues to do all it can to further obfuscate how the pandemic started. On February 23, 2022, Biden cancelled a program called the China Initiative because of "increasing concerns from the academic and scientific community about the department’s pursuit of certain research grant fraud cases." This has been admitted by Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen in a speech at George Mason University, suggesting the stifling of the investigations into the gain of function research grants administered by Fauci and Collins. Assistant Attorney General Olsen told during this speech:
"We have heard that these prosecutions — and the public narrative they create — can lead to a chilling atmosphere for scientists and scholars that damages the scientific enterprise in this country."
Biden Administration launches its global network of biolabs and prepares for future pandemics
Having prevented any prosecutions that could damage the collaboration of the American and Chinese virologists engineering bioweapons of mass destruction, the Biden administration is already planning (loads slow) future pandemics, which has been caught on video. "We need more money to plan for the second pandemic. There’s gonna be another pandemic,” America's senile president has kept blurting out. The Infowars article reporting this features 2 videos of the 2 occasions Biden has announced that the next pandemic's on the way. This Infowars article ends with the words: "From which biolab will the second pandemic originate? Only time will tell."
On March 9, 2022, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian released a tweet alleging “The US has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone. It should give a full account of its biological military activities at home and abroad and subject itself to multilateral verification.” The U.S. has not responded to China's allegation, but the NIAID's website contains an August 2020 announcement titled "NIAID Establishes Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases," whose subtitle states "Global Network to Focus on Spillover Potential." This announcement states that "NIAID intends to provide approximately $82 million over 5 years to support the network." The NPR article covering the NIAID's funding of this global network of biolabs states:
"EcoHealth Alliance is only one of the 11 institutions and research teams receiving grants from NIH [...] to establish the Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases. The global network will monitor pathogens that emerge in wildlife and study how and where they go on to infect humans."
The NPR article adds:
"That will mean studying coronaviruses, of course, but also filoviruses, a family of viruses that includes Ebola, and paramyxoviruses, a group that includes the viruses that cause mumps, measles and Nipah, a highly lethal virus that inspired the 2011 movie Contagion."
NIAID's August 2020 announcement of the creation of its global network of biolabs further states that "Each Center in the network will involve collaborations with peer institutions in the United States and 28 other countries." This global network's own website states one of the network's goals as being "to prospectively develop a framework and the infrastructure necessary to respond quickly and effectively to future outbreaks."
Thus the worldwide infrastructure will be ready for the Great Reset to this time succeed when the next pandemic will inevitably occur due to the hundreds, or perhaps millions of additional pandemic pathogens being created in the Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases network all over the world.
Will the world end due to the compromised Biden Administration's efforts to fill it with pandemic pathogens or due to its efforts to start a nuclear World War III with Russia?
We may be able to win if and only if we don't postpone doing our part (or whatever more you believe we must do) in helping save the world.
Regarding the biolabs in Ukraine, when Sen. Marco Rubio asked US Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland "Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?," Nuland admitted under oath (50 seconds into the video):
"Ukraine has — biological research facilities — which, in fact — we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach."
It's ironic that the U.S. didn't mind developing in China the "research materials" it doesn't want Russia to gain access to.
When Fauci announced his retirement on December 2022, he told CBS News that he'll be stepping down "to pursue the 'next chapter' of his career." It's likely Fauci too will end up on Biden's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology just like Collins has done in his career's 'next chapter.' If not put in prison, Fauci is likely to continue to help mastermind the Great Reset and determine the U.S. policy that's been filling the world with countless new deadly viruses.
For the love of God, please help put an end to all this, please don't postpone doing your part in helping save the world.
Biden Administration agrees that the Wuhan Lab collaborates with CCP's Military, but continues to fund the lab, committing high treason
Fauci's willful dereliction of duty was such that he didn't even bother doing a simple Google search before funding the creation of potential bioweapons of mass destruction in the Wuhan lab, it seems. Wuhan Institute's multiple connections to the CCP's People's Liberation Army (PLA) had been listed on the lab's English language website before the pandemic began. This is pointed out in the the August 2021 addendum to the final report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff which states: "This website was scrubbed on May 28, 2020, and the lists of committee members removed. However, archived copies of the website are available online.”
Here is the archived copy (loads slowly) of the Wuhan Institute's webpage the CCP tried to obliterate, demonstrating how easily Fauci could have overcome his willful blindness if he'd wanted to. The PLA connections this archived copy reveals are summarized in the Foreign Affairs Committee addendum report:
“The Academic Committee of State Key Laboratory of Virology at the WIV included a Deputy Director from the Second Military Medical University and a member from the 302 Military Hospital of China. The Scientific Advisory Committee for the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases had among its members a researcher from the Institute of Military Veterinary at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences.”
In January 15, 2021, the Department of State declassified a fact sheet announcing that Wuhan Lab researchers have been secretly collaborating on publications and projects with China’s military since at least 2017. Trump’s former deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger affirmed this on March 30, 2021, saying:
“There is a body of research that's been taking place conducted by the Chinese military in collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has not been acknowledged by the Chinese government. We've seen the data. I've personally seen the data.”
"It should be noted that the WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology] has a Chinese Communist Party Committee within the institute, as well as a Commission for Discipline Inspection," states the addendum to the final report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. This report explains:
"The Party Committee is divided into four party branches, which are then divided into subbranches organized around the individual WIV departments, research centers, and offices. Each subbranch has its own Propaganda Committee. Committee Minority Staff were able to identify eight WIV researchers on these committees, including several who are affiliated with the Key Laboratory that Shi [Zhengli] directs."
After listing the names and CCP-affiliations of the 8 Wuhan Lab researchers who are on the Chinese Communist Party committees within the Wuhan Institute, the same report goes on to explain the activities of these committees, stating, "The Committee for Discipline Inspection is charged with “the implementation of the party's line, policy, party discipline, relevant laws and regulations, and the institute's rules and regulations." The report adds: "In addition to the researchers serving on propaganda committees, other key figures at the WIV also serve as CCP officials.” These key figures serving as CCP officials within the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their affiliations are summarized as follows in the final report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff:
"The Director General of the institute is Wang Yanyi,193 who joined the China Zhi Gong Party, a CCP controlled minority party, in 2010. In 2018, the same year she became the Director General of the WIV, she was elected the Deputy Director of the Wuhan Municipal Party Committee.194 Until early 2020, the BSL-4 lab was managed by Yuan Zhiming.195 Yuan is the President of the Chinese Communist Party Committee within the Wuhan Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, to which the WIV belongs.196 Local CCP leaders not only run the WIV itself, but also directly managed the BSL-4 lab.197 According to a French diplomat, Yuan’s performance and management was subpar – the lab has been underutilized and the most talented scientists have left. After the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak began, Yuan was replaced on January 31, 2020.198 In a possible fulfillment of the concerns raised by the French defense and intelligence services almost two decades prior, he was succeeded by Major General Chen Wei, the PRC’s top biowarfare expert.199"
This demonstrates the incredible extent of Fauci's criminal negligence in letting U.S. taxpayer dollars create bioweapons of mass destruction in such a lab. Fauci's willful blindness was such that during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Hearing on May 25, 2021, Fauci called the Chinese grantees he's funded "very competent, trustworthy scientists" when questioned by Senator John Kennedy. In this hearing, Fauci refused to comment on the Chinese Communist Party’s influence on these scientists, but said he knew these scientists to be "trustworthy." Such is the extent of Fauci's failure to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in exposing the world to a pandemic coming out of communist China.
In the declassified fact sheet of the Department of State, it also states that gain-of-function studies did get conducted at the Wuhan Lab. Among the bat viruses studied was a coronavirus named RATG13 that's genetically 96.2% similar to the virus causing COVID-19. Regarding this extremely close relative of SARS-CoV-2 that had been studied, former Clinton administration national security official Jamie Metzl wrote in The Wall Street Journal:
“suggesting that an outbreak of a deadly bat coronavirus coincidentally occurred near the only level 4 virology institute in all of China—which happened to be studying the closest known relative of that exact virus—strains credulity.”
Could an incredible coincidence really have occurred, making SARS-CoV-2 not come from the virology lab studying its 96.2% likeness in Wuhan where researchers had gotten sick and databases had been scrubbed right before the pandemic? The Biden Administration and their bought-out "mainstream" shills had been running out of straws to grasp in continuing to decry the lab leak theory as a "crazy conspiracy." On March 2021, the Washington Post published that the Biden Administration had agreed with the accuracy of the information in the fact sheet of the Trump State Department.
On January 15, 2021, the Department of State declassified a fact sheet announcing that Wuhan Lab researchers have been secretly collaborating on publications and projects with China’s military since at least 2017. Their article quotes an unnamed senior Biden State Department official explain:
“There wasn’t significant or meaningful disagreement regarding the information presented in the fact sheet,” [..] “No one is disputing the information, the fact that these data points exist, the fact that they are accurate. Where there was some discomfort was that [the Trump administration] put spin on the ball.”
The so-called "spin on the ball" refers to the way the Trump State Department leaned their interpretation all the way towards the Wuhan lab leak theory. "The Biden administration is trying to take a neutral stance on the issue," told the same unnamed senior Biden State Department official to the Washington Post.
The Washington Post also states that "There was certainly not consensus [inside the U.S. government] on the still unproven theory that this emerged from the lab." Regarding this so called "consensus" of the scientists advising the Biden White House including Fauci and Collins, the next section demonstrates exactly how this fake "consensus" against the lab leak theory was shaped by deceptive ploys and lies that have surfaced through Fauci's emails (slow-loading) obtained after Freedom of Information Act (FIOA) lawsuits.
But before moving on, it must be noted that the Biden White House has kept funding the creation of bioweapons of mass destruction in a PLA-affiliated lab for almost a year until August 19, 2022, despite having had to agree on January 15, 2021 that Wuhan Lab's researchers were collaborating with China’s military. This alone makes everyone responsible for continuing to fund the Wuhan lab guilty of high treason.
The CCP's huge disinformation campaign created with the help of compromised officials and researchers
A fake "consensus" gets created with Fauci and Collins' "advice and leadership," emails show
In a May 2021 interview, even Fauci finally had to admit he's no longer confident SARS-CoV-2 evolved naturally. A year before in May 4, 2020, Fauci had told National Geographic that scientific evidence "is very, very strongly" leaning toward the natural evolution origin. Fauci had been very, very wrong.
Back when the pandemic began, Fauci and Collins egregiously pushed the world's top scientists into fabricating the appearance of unanimity that misled the world into believing SARS-CoV-2 evolved naturally.
In describing the collusion of the CCP-compromised top science officials and kowtowing grantees, let's go back to compromised virologist Kristian Andersen who had suggested altering or deleting Dr. Bloom's paper exposing the NIH's deletion of the sequences showing SARS-CoV-2 didn't jump from pangolins. Andersen's only gift wasn't his ability to mess with the preprint server, but also his readiness to execute 180 degree turns in his views overnight. On February 4, 2020, Andersen wrote in an email: “The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered with intent and that is demonstrably not the case.” But only three days ago on February 1, 2020, Andersen and his colleagues had defended the lab leak hypothesis during a teleconference with the world's top virologists organized by Sir Jeremy Farrar, a powerful research grant administrator in London and a scientific advisor to the UK Government. Farrar's teleconference also included world's top science officials such as Sir Patrick Vallance who's the chief scientific adviser to the UK government.
Before his teleconference, Farrar had sent a warning email to all participants demanding: "Information and discussion is shared in total confidence and not to be shared until agreement on next steps." But what was discussed didn't stay confidential after FIOA lawsuits allowed the House Committee on Oversight and Reform to view the emails that participants had exchanged following the teleconference. These emails reveal that during the teleconference, Andersen and his colleagues had expressed "little doubt that the virus bore the fingerprints of manipulation." This was due to the presence of a genetic element called a furin cleavage site in the virus. The New York Post quotes teleconference participant Robert F. Garry explaining in an email sent one day after the teleconference that the virus's furin cleavage site is a a string of 12 units of RNA representing a precision that's unusual in nature. Garry wrote in this February 2, 2020 email: "I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature … it’s stunning. Of course, in the lab it would be easy to generate the perfect 12 base insert that you wanted."
One day after the teleconference organized by Farrar, another member of the Andersen group, Michael Farzan, had also emphasized the unlikeliness of SARS-CoV-2 acquiring its furin cleavage site naturally. Farzan had pointed out that the virus was likely to have acquired this element through direct insertion in a lab or through sustained interaction between human tissue and a chimeric virus engineered in a lab that lacked proper biocontainment protocols. Farzan had said, "I am 70:30 or 60:40 [lab]."
Again the day after Farrar's February 1 teleconference, participant Andrew Rambaut had expressed his agreement with his colleagues, stating: “From a (natural) evolutionary point of view the only thing here that strikes me as unusual is the furin cleavage site.” On February 4, 2020, another participant called Edward Holmes had also indicated he was “60-40 lab.”
If the world were to learn that SARS-CoV-2 had been engineered in the Wuhan lab, world governments could sooner or later try to hold China accountable for it. The CCP didn't want things to begin to slide in that direction.
A well-thought-out disinformation campaign was put into effect using the CCP's good old buddies in the U.S. and U.K. governments and their subservient grantees.
It was in a February 4, 2020 email to virologist Peter Daszak that Andersen had suddenly changed his mind and decried the lab release theory as a "crackpot theory." Peter Daszak has been leading the research on coronaviruses in partnership with China, being the president of EcoHealth Alliance which kept directing U.S. federal grant money to the Wuhan lab. In his email to Daszak, Andersen seems to have let the CCP's key contact person know his willingness to help China by putting the fear of ridicule into anyone who continued to entertain the lab leak idea or kept wondering if a bioweapon had been released. But only a month ago, Andersen had not yet turned against his country and was still speaking the truth on January 31, 2020. Just like all of his colleagues, Andersen too had initially favored the lab leak hypothesis in a memo he'd written to Fauci. Andersen had told Fauci in this memo: “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.” Andersen had also written in the same memo to Fauci: “after discussions earlier today, Eddie [Edward C. Holmes], Bob [Robert F. Garry], Mike [Michael Farzan] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from [natural] evolutionary theory.” Andersen isn't reported to have changed his mind a month later in Farrar's February 1 2020 teleconference he'd attended with the same colleagues Holmes, Garry and Farzan. Just 3 days after this teleconference, what or who, exactly, had caused Andersen to execute his 180 degree change of mind?
Andersen and his colleagues had reversed their opinions right after having received "advice and leadership" from Fauci and Collins, emails reveal.
On February 4 2020, on the same day Andersen had called the deliberate release theory a "crackpot theory," Andersen had emailed [page 2401 of 3234] Fauci, Collins and Farrar the final copy of a paper he'd written on the pandemic's origin, asking for “comments, suggestions, or questions.” Andersen had co-authored this paper with 4 colleagues who'd attended Farrar's teleconference, who included Rambaunt, Holmes and Garry who'd initially supported the lab leak hypothesis in their private communications 2 days ago. In his email [page 2401 of 3234] to Fauci, Collins and Farrar containing their paper as an attachment, Andersen had written: "Thank you again for your advice and leadership as we have been working through the SARS-CoV-2 'origins' paper."
The final version of Andersen's group's paper prepared with Collins' and Fauci's "advice and leadership" got published in the highly influential journal Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, announcing the opposite of its authors' original consensus, stating: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus. [...] We do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible." Fauci then used his position and influence to distribute this misleading paper and others like it to mainstream and social media platforms.
On May 5, 2020, W. Ian Lipkin, one of the 5 authors of the Andersen group's misleading Nature Medicine Article, sent an email to Fauci [page 706 of 3234], sucking up to the influential grant provider, thanking him for having steered them in the right direction. Lipkin has written to Fauci: “we deeply appreciate your efforts in steering and messaging.”
The situation is summarized in the January 11, 2022 letter of the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House of Representatives:
"It is unclear what, if any, new evidence was presented or if the underlying science changed in that short period of time, but after speaking with Drs. Fauci and Collins, the authors abandoned their belief COVID-19 was the result of a laboratory leak. It is also unclear if Drs. Fauci or Collins edited the [Nature Medicine] paper prior to publication."
It was again Farrar who had helped convened the Andersen group comprised of Rambaunt, Holmes and Garry and Lipkin who'd written the misleading Nature Medicine paper for Fauci to distribute to the media and social networks. Farrar's office had admitted this to the Daily Mail. Farrar had convened the study authors despite the way he had still not yet changed his mind on February 4 when Andersen had emailed their article to him, Fauci and Collins. Still speaking the truth, Farrar had written in an email sent that same day on February 4, 2020: "I am 50-50 [lab].” But whatever had gotten into Andersen's group caught up with Farrar too in a jiffy. 2 weeks after having emailed he was 50-50 for the lab leak hypothesis, on February 19, 2020, Farrar announced his 180 degree turn also by becoming one of the signatories of another highly influential misleading letter published in the world's top medical journal The Lancet. In this letter, 27 top scientists including Farrar "unanimously" declared: "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."
Thus everyone daring to oppose the fake "consensus" was "strongly" condemned by the world's top scientists for being crazy conspiracy theorists.
In September 11, 2021, the Daily Mail published that "26 out of the 27 Lancet scientists who trashed theory that Covid leaked from a Chinese lab have links to Wuhan researchers." This Daily Mail article covered an original investigation conducted by the Daily Telegraph, exposing the 26 researchers' affiliations with Wuhan lab's researchers. As may be recalled, the same Wuhan researchers had been secretly collaborating with China’s military since at least 2017 according to the State Department's fact sheet whose data points couldn't be disputed by the Biden administration.
The fake "consensus" letter published in the Lancet shaped the view of the mainstream media for more than a year, explains science writer Nicholas Wade. Likewise, the misleading Nature Medicine letter Fauci and Collins had "steered" the Andersen group to write has been cited 2607 times as of November 11, 2022, which indicates how frequently the mainstream media, social platforms and self-appointed "fact checkers" have referenced the fake "consensus" statement to deride the lab leak hypothesis and deem it "disinformation," censuring those pointing out the likelihood of an accidental or deliberate release from the lab. Those who questioned the "consensus" got accused of "letting fear and conspiratorial thinking" cloud their judgement. Among the numerous slam pieces decrying or ridiculing the lab leak and deliberate release theories is even a National Review article titled "The Lab Leak Hypothesis Is Unbearably Racist."
Thus the world was deceived.
"Anything more we can do?" Collins asks Fauci
It took a year and a half for the effects of the intimidation tactics to lose their grip on the scientific community, causing the Lancet to publish another letter on October 16, 2021 in support of the lab-leak theory from another group of scientists "who have pointed out the logical fallacies and questionable assumptions in the research that Daszak’s group [the 27 scientists who had signed the Lancet letter] cited," reports PJ Media.
On April 16, 2020, NIH's director Collins panicked upon seeing a Fox News report by Bret Baier, announcing that multiple sources briefed on the origins of COVID-19 believed it emerged from the Wuhan lab. Wondering if they may not have done enough to squelch the lab leak hypothesis, Collins emailed Fauci with a link to Baier's report, saying:
“Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy, with what seems to be growing momentum. [...]
I hoped the Nature Medicine article on the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would settle this. But probably didn’t get much visibility. Anything more we can do? Ask the National Academy [of Sciences] to weigh in?”
Fauci replied on April 17, 2020: “I would not do anything about this right now. It is a shiny object that will go away in times [sic].”
The lab leak and bioweapon release theories, which no reasonable person can dismiss, will never "go away in time" in a world where the voice of truth has convincing power over blatant lies, gaslighting efforts and cancel culture. The outraged masses hungry for the truth may never be expected to stop digging for it.
On October 5th, 2020, White House adviser Scott Atlas and Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar met with a conscientious group of scientists who'd been critical of the COVID-19 lockdown strategy, who'd released a statement called the “Great Barrington Declaration” advocating the alternative strategy of only protecting the elderly and the vulnerable and allowing children and younger people to return to work and school. When Collins heard of Atlas's meeting with the signatories of the declaration, he wrote to Fauci and other officials in an email, “There needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its [Great Barrington Declaration's] premises.”
The above reveals the extent to which Collins, Fauci and their collaborators work for the globalist cabal bent on destroying world economies.
Although the Great Barrington Declaration had quickly received almost one million signatures from infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, the voices of even such a large number of signatories have been cancelled by intense censorship efforts in a world where the Great Reset had been rolled out with tremendous momentum. The lockdowns did continue as Collins wished they would, causing untold harm and damage to the middle class and economy.
On May 5, 2021, about a month after Bret Baier's report had set Collins into panic, Nobel laureate biologist David Baltimore announced that the existence of the furin cleavage site in Covid-19’s genome is the “smoking gun” to the theory that SARS-CoV-2 is engineered in a lab. As may be recalled, the existence of this furin cleavage site was the main reason for the original consensus of world's top virologists who'd initially favored the lab leak hypothesis back in February 1, 2020 during Farrar's teleconference. Nobel laureate Baltimore's referral to the same furin cleavage site as a 'smoking gun' may have caused not just Collins but Fauci too to panic this time. God knows how many sleepless nights Fauci and Collins may have suffered before Baltimore did cave in to the threat of possibly a "quick and devastating" takedown looming over his head. Baltimore yielded and announced on June, 2021 that he'd overstated the case. When compromised liar Andersen tweeted that Baltimore had been incorrect, Baltimore responded by saying Andersen may be right. Baltimore told Los Angeles Times that he regrets using the phrase 'smoking gun' and that he should have softened it.
CCP-funded Peter Daszak: the public face of China's disinformation campaign
The CCP has one more extremely valuable traitor on their side who's reportedly created SARS-CoV-2 as will shortly be elaborated. This collaborator has also led the efforts to squash the lab leak and deliberate release hypothesis to protect China.
Peter Daszak, the director of EcoHealth Alliance and leader of the coronavirus studies conducted in partnership with China, has a deep history of enmeshment with the CCP and the PLA, as the National Pulse has unearthed. Daszak has completed over 20 research projects listing “affiliations” with Chinese Communist Party-linked entities. These projects include studies funded by the Chinese government and co-authored by military-linked researchers, reports the National Pulse. Fauci and Collins have had no qualms about continuing to fund such a researcher by egregiously violating numerous rules and policies, resorting to almost every form of deceit imaginable in their treasonous collaboration with the CCP, as the upcoming sections will demonstrate.
According to additional emails published after FIOA lawsuits, the previously described Lancet letter of the world's top virologists strongly condemning the "conspiracy theories" wasn't really written by the joint effort of the world's top virologists. This letter had been composed by Daszak after he'd been asked by his "collaborators" in China for a "show of support," according to a February 8 email.
To "show his support" for his Chinese collaborators, as Daszak began circulating his Lancet letter's draft among his colleagues to find cosigners, his email to his recruits warned them of his attempts to create the appearance of scientific unanimity, saying: “Please note that this statement will not have EcoHealth Alliance logo on it and will not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person.” Daszak wrote that he wanted the letter he'd composed to seem like “simply a letter from leading scientists.” Daszak added that he wanted “to avoid the appearance of a political statement.”
In further trying to make his political statement seem like a unanimous consensus statement, Daszak emailed his closest colleague Ralph Baric on February 6, 2020, mentioning in this email another close colleague of his called Linfa Wang, saying “I spoke with Linfa last night about the statement we sent round, He thinks, and I agree with him, that you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn't work in a counterproductive way." Daszak added in the same email, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.” Baric replied to Daszak saying “I also think this is a good decision.” “Otherwise it looks self-serving and we lose impact," Baric added. In the end, despite the way Baric and Wang didn't sign the letter, Daszak did sign it.
Daszak has been the “public face of a CCP disinformation campaign designed to suppress public discussion about a potential lab leak” of SARS-CoV-2, states the August 2021 report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff on the pandemic’s origins. Daszak, Farrar and the other 25 recruits Daszak could persuade to sign the Lancet letter had all lied in the 'Acknowledgements' section of their letter when they'd stated "We declare no competing interests.”. At least 6 signatories did have competing interests and had either worked at or been funded by EcoHealth Alliance, reports Vanity Fair. As previously mentioned, the Telegraph has also unearthed that 26 out of the 27 signatories of the Lancet letter have links to Wuhan lab's researchers. After all these affiliations got publicized, The Lancet invited all the 27 signatories to disclose their competing interests, but none of the signatories complied except Daszak who disclosed some of his affiliations. The Lancet published an addendum to its original letter in June 21, 2021 announcing only Daszak's ties to the Wuhan lab.
Daszak's treasonous deeds are far from being limited to the above as the rest of this investigation demonstrates. Despite the piles of evidence that has accumulated against Daszak, he still maintains his position as the president of Eco Health Alliance and keeps receiving funding from NIH/NIAID as has been described at the beginning of this feature. Sadly, the DOJ is doing nothing because it's also infiltrated with treasonous individuals, its corruption stinking as bad as the NIH's and NIAID's.
Many prominent scientists from around the world have come together and written a letter to the board of EcoHealth Alliance spelling out Daszak's corruption in detail and asking for his removal, but all such efforts are proving ineffective in the current incredibly corrupt political climate hell bent on letting Daszak improve his bioweapons.
Information warfare orchestrated by China's top military bio-warfare expert General Chen Wei
Daszak's ability to persuade his 27 colleagues to sign the Lancet letter, as well as all efforts to dismiss and decry the lab leak hypothesis seem to have stemmed from the persuasive tactics of CCP's top military bio-warfare expert General Chen Wei.
"Chen Wei, a Major General of the People's Liberation Army, was flown in to Wuhan by the central government late last month before officially taking the helm of Wuhan Institute of Virology," reports the Daily Mail. Here, "late last month" refers to late January 2020 when Wei took over the Biosafety Level-4 division of the Wuhan Institute.
The above is confirmed by the final report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, which states that "Major General Chen Wei, the PRC’s top biowarfare expert" took over the BSL-4 division of the Wuhan Institute of Virology on January 31, 2020. The report states:
"Until early 2020, the BSL-4 lab was managed by Yuan Zhiming.195 Yuan is the President of the Chinese Communist Party Committee within the Wuhan Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, to which the WIV belongs.196 [...] After the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak began, Yuan was replaced on January 31, 2020.198 [...] he was succeeded by Major General Chen Wei, the PRC’s top biowarfare expert.199"
Former biological warfare analyst Dany Shoham agrees with House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, stating that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is linked to Beijing’s covert bio-weapons program. Shoham has a doctorate in medical microbiology, he's studied Chinese biological warfare and was a senior analyst with Israeli military intelligence for biological and chemical warfare in the Middle East and worldwide between1970 and 1991. Interested readers may find more detail in Shoham's article published in the Institute for Defense Studies.
"The epidemic is like a military situation. The epicentre equals to the battlefield," biowarfare expert General Chen Wei has told. Below is a summary of the previously described events that have occurred within days of Wei's appointment to the Wuhan lab on January 31, 2020:
February 4, 2020: Andersen turned 180 degrees from his original opinion in support of the lab leak theory and referred to the lab leak theory as "crackpot theory" in his email to Daszak. That same day, Andersen emailed [page 2401 of 3234] Fauci, Collins and Farrar his deceptive Nature paper. The publication of this paper on March 17, 2020 shows the way all of its co-authors Rambaunt, Holmes and Garry and Lipkin had abandoned their original consensus.
February 6, 2020: Daszak began to recruit signatories for his misleading Lancet letter stating "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin." This letter's publication in the Lancet shows the way the 27 top scientists who signed the letter lied in favor of the CCP.
Between February 4, 2020 and February 19, 2020: Farrar announced his 180 degree turn from the lab leak hypothesis by becoming one of the signatories of Daszak's misleading Lancet letter.
It should never be forgotten that General Wei and higher ranking PLA members may never have accomplished so much without the "advice and leadership" of collaborating grant providers Fauci and Collins.
Biowarfare expert General Chen Wei's misinformation campaign to protect China is still ongoing as American media and social platforms are still heavily plagued by CCP-style censorship coupled with misleading narratives.
The fake "consensus" falls apart, liberal outlets eat crow
The CCP's "clever" disinformation campaign implemented through Fauci and Collins' "guidance" and "steering" could fool the world only for so long.
In addition to all of the articles unearthing the ploys described that have been referenced in the included links above, many additional publications by conscientious journalists and scientists did manage to reach the masses despite the cancel culture. These publications kept emphasizing the way the pandemic's natural origin hypothesis had been embraced without any legitimate evidence backing it up, and the lab leak and bioweapon release theories had been dismissed way too readily without valid justification. On March 4, 2021, many prominent uncompromised scientists from around the world published an open letter to the WHO calling for a new investigation into the pandemic's origin.
Eventually, enough of the reality got exposed to force the compromised Biden Administration and its bought-out propaganda outlets to start eating crow. In July 2021, CNN announced "Senior Biden officials finding that Covid lab leak theory as credible as natural origins explanation." On May 2021, the Washington Post published an article titled "Timeline: How the Wuhan lab-leak theory suddenly became credible, highlighting the key reasons why the fake "consensus" of the top virologists had became unsustainable. In this Washington Post article, scrolling down to the section "New evidence emerges" lets one see the most influential articles and papers pointing out the facts.
On May 2001, strongly leftist Politico announced that "Facebook no longer treating 'man-made' Covid as a crackpot idea," describing the platform's new policy of no longer censoring the posts calling Covid-19 man-made.
On May 2002, left-biased Politifact retracted its Wuhan Lab Leak theory fact check.
In June 2021, the Washington Post was forced to revise a hit piece it had published whose original headline read “Tom Cotton keeps repeating a coronavirus conspiracy theory that was already debunked.” The slightly softened version of this hit piece now includes the correction, "The term ‘debunked’ and The Post’s use of ‘conspiracy theory’ have been removed because, then as now, there was no determination about the origins of the virus."
These are just a few examples of the way the fake-news outlets have been forced to choose between losing all credibility with the American public or toning down their efforts to protect the CCP and its treasonous collaborators.
Despite the severe wounds Fauci and Collins' credibility have received and despite the way they've announced their resignations, these traitors have still not given up on trying to deceive the world as of September 2022 as the next section lays out, helping demonstrate their criminal mental state.
Relaxing the definition of "gain of function" in 2017 to avoid having to flag the deadly studies for independent risk analysis, and finally completely eliminating the definition in 2021
On May 11, 2021, Fauci shamelessly lied during his testimony before the senate, claiming: "the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” "Gain of function is a very nebulous term,” Fauci told Rand Paul at a November 4, 2021 senate hearing (2:58 into the video).
Just a few days before Fauci claimed that the definition of gain of function is "very nebulous," he'd had this definition scrubbed from the NIH's website.
Could this stupid trick help ploy-master Fauci fool the world into believing he's never funded the creation of enhanced potential pandemic pathogens with bioweapon applications in communist China?
Fauci went even further in a November 18, 2021 interview, calling 'gain of function' a “completely meaningless term."
The deletion of the definition of gain of function research from the NIH's website had occurred sometime between Oct. 19, 2021 and Oct. 21, 2021, reports the Epoch Times. But when the NIH's staff deleted the definition from their website, they didn't seem to know about the existence of a Web utility which makes periodic digital archives of the World Wide Web. This backup utility has allowed reporters as well as congress and senate to view the original version of the webpage defining gain of function research. On the Wayback machine's archive, here is the NIH's original definition (loads slow):
The term gain-of-function (GOF) research describes a type of research that modifies a biological agent so that it confers new or enhanced activity to that agent. Some scientists use the term broadly to refer to any such modification. However, not all research described as GOF entails the same level of risk. The subset of GOF research that is anticipated to enhance the transmissibility and/or virulence of potential pandemic pathogens, which are likely to make them more dangerous to humans, has been the subject of substantial scrutiny and deliberation. [...] This research poses biosafety and biosecurity risks, and these risks must be carefully managed.
According to this definition, a gain of function (GOF) study would be deemed a risky GOF study if it's anticipated to enhance the transmissibility and/or virulence of potential pandemic pathogens to make those pathogens more dangerous to humans.
The above definition sounds as if the risky subset of gain of function research would have to enhance only those viruses that are potential pandemic pathogens to begin with, discluding the studies that turn initially benign viruses into potential pandemic pathogens. This strange definition is the relaxed version of yet another original definition, points out the Washington Post in their article titled "A Science in the Shadows." The first change to the definition of gain of function research had been made in 2017, to let NIH/NIAID refer fewer gain of function studies to an independent HHS review board for risk analysis. The new definition had given "NIH leaders greater leeway to approve projects without referring them to the review committee," explains the Washington Post. This reveals that the deletion of the definition of gain of function research from the NIH's website on October 20, 2021 wasn't Fauci and Collins' only attempt to muddy the waters, obfuscating the extent to which they exposed the world to pandemic risk.
The url of the definition of 'gain of function' the NIH obliterated in 2021 used to say "gain-function-research-involving-potential-pandemic-pathogens," but the updated url now says "research-involving-potential-pandemic-pathogens." Because the phrase "gain-function" has been removed from the url, Fauci has not funded gain of function research in collaboration with China. Makes sense to anybody?
The NIH's updated page that used to define gain of function research now only defines "ePPP [Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogen] Research." The only reference to "gain-of-function” (GOF) research on this updated page is in a misleading sentence saying: "While ePPP research is a type of so called “gain-of-function” (GOF) research, the vast majority of GOF research does not involve ePPP and falls outside the scope of oversight required for research involving ePPPs." In this sentence, it may be noted that since the definition of gain of function research no longer exists, it's being referred to as "so called" gain of function research in a world where Fauci has never funded such "so called" stuff in Wuhan. Funny?
In 2016, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) invented the synonym 'gain of function research of concern (GOFROC)' for the risky subset of gain of function studies enhancing the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens to make them more dangerous to humans in ways that can cause pandemics. Gain of function research of concern (GOFROC) is clearly defined in a straight forward manner in NSABB's 2016 guidelines as "gain-of function studies with the potential to generate pathogens with pandemic potential in humans by exhibiting high transmissibility and high virulence."
What on earth is "very nebulous" about that?
And why on earth should it matter if the resulting pathogens "exhibiting high transmissibility and high virulence" get created out of originally benign pathogens or other deadly pathogens?
If Fauci were to be asked if he's ever funded gain of function research of concern as defined in NSABB's guidelines, what would he have to say? The NIH's updated page actually answers this question for Fauci, stating:
"On limited occasions, when justified by compelling public health need and conducted in very high biosecurity laboratories, NIH has supported certain research that may be reasonably anticipated to create, transfer or use potential pandemic pathogens resulting from the enhancement of a pathogen’s transmissibility and/or virulence in humans."
The above is equivalent to saying that the NIH has funded gain of function research of concern, according to NSABB's guidelines. Some of those risky gain of function studies were definitely conducted in the Wuhan lab, as the next sections demonstrate. Such risky gain of function research was not conducted "in very high biosecurity laboratories" as the NIH's updated page claims, but was conducted under extremely lax biosecurity conditions in China, as will also be demonstrated. And the genetic engineering of novel potential pandemic pathogens with bioweapon applications in communist China was absolutely not justifiable by any "compelling public health need" as NIH's updated page claims — thinking so represents a "gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person."
Senator Rand Paul has summed up the situation on November 4, 2020 when he exclaimed to Fauci: "What you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically." Fauci's reply began with the words "According to the definition that is currently operable,” causing Paul to burst out laughing. Such is the farce created by one evil little garden gnome who still holds the reins of America's equally ridiculous senile president as of September 2022.
In response to criticism of his ridiculous word-game farce, ploy-master Fauci has arrogantly told the world, "They're really criticizing science because I represent science. That's dangerous." Such is the extent of the narcissistic personality of history's perhaps biggest monster who's knowingly murdered over 6 million people as of September 2022 with his never-ending ploys and tricks.
The CDC's former director John Redfield has stated that Fauci knows he funded risky gain-of-function research and misled Congress by denying it. But the incredibly corrupt Biden White House still does nothing.
The next section demonstrates which risky gain of function studies, as defined by NSABB's guidelines, Fauci and Collins funded in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in communist China, failing to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in doing so.
"Gain of function.pdf" Fauci had named as such, describing a risky gain of function study Fauci had funded in partnership with Wuhan
On February 1, 2020, Fauci sent out an email (p.3221 of 3234) with an attachment he'd named 'gain of function.pdf.' This attachment is the 2015 research paper of a risky gain of function study funded by Fauci and conducted in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, contrary to Fauci's claim he's never funded risky gain of function research in Wuhan. This deadly study has also taught the CCP how to create lab-engineered viruses in a way indistinguishable from natural viruses.
The full name Fauci had given to the pdf he'd attached to his email was "Baric, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf." In the file name, Shi refers to study author Shi Zhengli, the Director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Shi had co-authored this study with Ralph Baric, a U.S. researcher who's received millions of dollars in funding from Fauci's NIAID for research into coronaviruses.
The 2015 paper Fauci had attached which was produced by Baric's collaboration with Shi describes the enhancement of a SARS-like coronavirus that could originally only infect bats, which had been genetically enhanced to become capable of binding to human cells. The engineered viruses could not only "replicate 'efficiently' in primary human airways cells," but they could also "withstand antibodies and vaccines," summarizes the Addendum to the Final Report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. Baric and Shi's 2015 paper also states the spike proteins of the SARS variant had been modified "to maximize the opportunity for pathogenesis." Fauci's NIAID and one more branch of Collins' NIH had provided the grant that created such a virus.
The risks that the engineered SARS-like viruses pose to humans had been acknowledged by the study authors who'd explicitly stated in their paper that similar studies may be "too risky to pursue." This paper Fauci had named "gain of function.pdf" contains the following paragraph describing the study's risky nature:
"Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue, as increased pathogenicity in mammalian models cannot be excluded. [...] the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens. In developing policies moving forward, it is important to consider the value of the data generated by these studies and whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved."
The risks of "gain of function.pdf," which Fauci had funded in partnership with study author Shi's Wuhan lab, worried other scientists to the extent another paper was published in Nature covering the pandemic risk created by the studies described in Baric and Shi's 2015 paper. This Nature paper titled "Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research" states: "The argument is essentially a rerun of the debate over whether to allow lab research that increases the virulence, ease of spread or host range of dangerous pathogens — what is known as ‘gain-of-function’ research."
The Nature paper on the risks of Baric and Shi's research states that "In October 2014, the US government imposed a moratorium on federal funding of such research on the viruses that cause SARS, influenza and MERS." Baric and Shi's risky research should have been paused by the 2014 moratorium since it had started before the moratorium, which is explicitly stated in the Nature paper that says the risky research was "initiated before the US Government Deliberative Process Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS and SARS Viruses." Why had such risky gain of function research not been paused?
"The NIH eventually concluded that the work was not so risky as to fall under the moratorium," states Baric in the Nature paper.
Criminally negligent Fauci and Collins had decided the moratorium shouldn't halt a study enabling a SARS-like bat virus to infect human populations, because, well — it wasn't deemed risky in a world where Fauci believes the definition of risky gain of function research is "very nebulous." The ploys Fauci and Collins had utilized to bestow upon themselves the full power to unilaterally decide which studies should and should not continue are laid out in the next section.
The Nature paper quotes several researchers who had fervently disagreed with Fauci and Collins's conviction that Baric and Shi's work wasn't risky gain of function research. Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, had stated the obvious, saying: “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory.” This opinion was shared by Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and biodefense expert at Rutgers University, who'd said, “The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk.”
There are not only a few but hundreds of conscientious scientists opposing the continuation of such risky gain of function studies as will shorty be elaborated, demonstrating the extent to which Fauci and Collins have turned a deaf ear to the voice of reason and common sense for decades.
The numerous ploys Fauci and Collins utilized and the policies violated to nullify the 2014 moratorium and nullify the P3CO framework for risk analysis and mitigation
In aiding and abetting communist China develop enhanced potential pandemic pathogens with bioweapon applications, Fauci and Collins's criminal mental state was such that they've breached the numerous regulations and policies described below.
As has been mentioned in the previous section, Baric and Shi's deadly studies described in the email attachment Fauci had named 'gain of function.pdf" had not been paused by the 2014 moratorium, despite having began before the moratorium's enactment. One of the reasons "justifying" letting the research continue was an escape clause that had been worked into the moratorium, giving Fauci and Collins an "excuse" to override it whenever they wished at their sole discretion. This escape clause was a footnote on the first page of the moratorium document, stating “An exception from the research pause may be obtained if the head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.” Study author Baric had taken advantage of this escape clause and applied for an exemption from the moratorium. Baric "felt that his research was urgent: new cases of MERS, spread by camels, were even then popping up in the Middle East," explains the article titled 'Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan,' published in MIT Technology Review. Baric's research had supposedly served to “move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger,” Daszak had claimed. Fauci and Collins, of course, had agreed, granting Baric his exemption and letting the deadly pandemic pathogens resume getting engineered in collaboration with Shi working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
"Not only were Baric’s studies allowed to move forward, but so were all studies that applied for exemptions," states the MIT Technology Review article titled 'Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan.'
Out of all the studies that had at first been paused, "about half were later allowed to continue because the work didn't fit the definition [of risky gain of function research] or was deemed essential to public health," Science reports.
Fauci and Collins had thus unilaterally just about completely nullified the moratorium.
In December 2017, the moratorium that was never allowed to fulfill its intended purpose officially got lifted, getting replaced by a set of guidelines called the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight (P3CO) Framework. This framework required a review board to be formed within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which would utilize the new P3CO guidelines to determine "whether grants that involve enhancing dangerous pathogens, such as coronaviruses, are worth the risks and that proper safeguards are in place," reports the Daily Caller. But Fauci and Collins had again prevented all of Baric and Daszak's deadly coronavirus studies from reaching this HHS review board. This was done using yet another loophole that had been incorporated into the P3CO framework, the Daily Caller points out. "In 2017, a change made under their [Fauci and Collins'] watch removed the [HHS] committee’s power to block the projects, recasting the panel as strictly an advisory body," reports the Washington Post. The Daily Caller article quotes an HHS spokesperson who'd told that according to the framework's rules with the loophole inserted, the HHS review board would be "kept in the dark on any grant" until its funding agency flagged that grant for review. Thus the HHS’s P3CO Review Committee could only review those grants refereed to them by Fauci and Collins, if they flagged the studies as risky.
Having transferred to themselves the power to forward or not forward any risky grants for review and having relaxed the definition of risky gain of function research to have "greater leeway to approve projects without referring them to the review committee," as the Washington Post explains, NIH/NIAID had succeeded at completely nullifying the P3CO framework too just like they'd done to the moratorium. We know that no coronavirus study was ever flagged to go through the HHS's P3CO review committee because Fauci was told so in the reply to his email that he'd attached "gain of function.pdf" to. This reply came from Fauci's top deputy at the NIAID, Hugh Auchincloss. Auchincloss wrote to Fauci in his reply [p.3206 of 3234],
"Emily is sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work [Shi and Baric's work Fauci had attached as 'gain of function.pdf'] abroad."
Here, 'Emily' refers to Dr. Emily Erbelding, Director of the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at the NIH. This NIH department director was certain that Fauci and Collins had never let any coronavirus study get evaluated by the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight (P3CO) framework. The framework too had thus been prevented from serving its intended purpose of evaluating "whether grants that involve enhancing dangerous pathogens, such as coronaviruses, are worth the risks and that proper safeguards are in place." The Washington Post reports:
“From 2017 to 2020, no more than 'three or four' projects were forwarded to the review committee, said Robert Kadlec, who oversaw the panel and served as the Trump administration’s assistant HHS secretary for preparedness and response."
The Post article states Kadlec's senior aide Christian Hassell "suggested the lack of reviews reflected how narrowly the revised policy defines gain-of-function research."
If only Hassel had known that the definition of gain-of-function research was on its way to disappearing completely on October 20, 2021!
Under Fauci and Collin's compromised "leadership," not only just about no experiment was flagged for the HHS's review board, but the HHS boards' member names were also never disclosed to the public. The deliberations of these secret members were also kept "confidential," allowing no transparency in how the reviews were conducted. The Washington Post summarizes:
"HHS, which administers the review committee, has kept its work confidential: No agendas, meeting minutes or other records of its proceedings are public. Even the names of the federal officials assigned to serve on the committee, which has spanned the Obama, Trump and Biden administrations, are kept secret."
"This secrecy means we don't know how these requirements [of the P3CO framework] were applied, if at all, to the experiments now funded by the government," state influential epidemiologists Dr. Marc Lipsitch and Dr. Tom Ingles. In their op-ed titled "The U.S. is funding dangerous experiments it doesn't want you to know about." Lipsitch and Ingles identify themselves as "two of the hundreds of researchers, medical and public-health professionals, and others who publicly opposed these experiments when they were first announced." "This lack of transparency is unacceptable," state Lipsitch and Ingles in their op-ed. The researchers add:
"Making decisions to approve potentially dangerous research in secret betrays the government's responsibility to inform and involve the public when approving endeavors, whether scientific or otherwise, that could put health and lives at risk."
With the 2014 moratorium nullified, the loophole in the P3CO Framework in place, the definition of gain of function research narrowed-down, and the deliberations of the HHS review board set to be remain "confidential" and shrouded in secrecy in case any risky study may have to get forwarded to them, traitors Fauci and Collins continued to develop the CCP's bioweapons with U.S. funds by violating numerous additional rules and regulations this article will keep demonstrating.
Fauci is so used to lying and deceiving the public that, despite having nullified the P3CO Framework's guidelines as described, he has falsely claimed in his senate testimony, “Dr. Baric does not do gain of function research and if it is, it is according to the guidelines and is being conducted in North Carolina, not in China.” Here, the first lie Fauci tells is a lie by omission when Fauci doesn't mention the way Baric didn't do his gain of function work alone in North Carolina. Baric did collaborate with Shi in China as their joint papers, including their paper attached as "gain of function.pdf" whose study authors include Shi as the paper states. The second lie in this statement is that Baric and Shi's gain of function work on coronaviruses was never evaluated against the P3CO framework's guidelines as has been demonstrated, giving Fauci no right to claim it was 'according to the guidelines.' For the third lie the same statement contains, please note that the "if it is" part of the sentence negates the part before it saying "Dr. Baric does not do gain of function research."
God only knows for how long Fauci will be allowed to keep lying like a rug and flopping like a fish out of water during the equally corrupt Biden regime.
'Gain of function.pdf' has taught the CCP how to create pandemic pathogens without leaving traces of lab manipulation
During his collaboration with Shi Zhengli, Baric had taught the CCP how to create potential bioweapons of mass destruction with viruses containing no traces of lab manipulation.
As may be recalled, Auchincloss, Fauci's top deputy at the NIAID, had written to Fauci in his reply to the email containing the attachment 'gain of function.pdf, "She [Dr. Emily Erbelding] will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad." This, as well as the rest of the information laid out above that had surfaced, caused 13 pissed-off members of congress to send a letter to Fauci, asking him many questions including asking him to "provide the findings of Dr. Ebeling's review of NIAID ties to gain-of-function-research abroad." Fauci didn't respond to this letter, ignoring its 30 day response deadline.
What could Dr. Erbelding have uncovered in her review of NIAID's ties to "gain of function.pdf?" How exactly Baric and Shi, authors of the paper attached as "gain of function.pdf," had collaborated during the research they'd conducted? And most importantly, which part of their deadly gain of function studies had been conducted in the Wuhan Institute whose researchers had been secretly collaborating with China’s military at least since 2017, which the Biden administration hasn't been able to dispute?
We do have some partial answers.
Regarding Baric's cooperation with Shi working in China, prominent Columbia University virologist Dr. Vincent Racaniello explains:
"EcoHealth Alliance provided funds to Zengli Shi at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to conduct bat surveillance for SARS-like CoVs. [...] Baric then received the spike sequences from Wuhan to do his experiments independently."
Baric's interaction with co-author Shi wasn't limited to receiving spike protein sequences, according to the article 'Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan,' published in MIT Technology Review. This article states:
"They did share resources—for example, Baric sent the transgenic mice with [genetically engineered] human lung receptors to Wuhan. But after their initial collaboration, the two centers were more like competitors. They were in a race to identify dangerous coronaviruses, assess the potential threat, and develop countermeasures like vaccines."
This suggests Shi had learned plenty from Baric...
Could fighting health threats and vaccine development really be the main reason for the cooperation of a military-affiliated Chinese lab and an American virologist expert at making bat viruses pathogenic for humans?
Of course not.
The study described in "Gain of function.pdf" had taught the CCP how to create lab-engineered viruses in a way indistinguishable from natural viruses.
Baric was one of the developers of a technique called the 'no-see-um method' of leaving no trace of genetic modification in lab-engineered viruses. Baric had confirmed this interpretation of his work in a September 2020 interview where he'd admitted, “You can engineer a virus without leaving any trace." "As early as 2016, scientists working at the WIV were able to do the same,” states the report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, adding that China had learned to do such a thing during Baric and Shi's interactions between 2014 and 2016. This means that Baric had taught China how to engineer bioweapons that couldn't be traced to a lab during the studies described in the 2015 paper attached as "gain of function.pdf."
Before collaborating with Shi, Baric had first published in 2005 a paper mentioning that they'd discovered how to engineer viruses “indistinguishable from wild type.”
In addition to enhancing the pathogenicity of SARS-like viruses, Baric had also been making the MERS virus more transmissible in humans in a way that leaves no traces of lab manipulation.
Can there still be any doubt in any idiot's mind about the way the CCP had been developing high-tech bioweapons with American taxpayer dollars, using the U.S. officials and researchers it had compromised?
Baric's collaboration with Daszak who'd announced moving "closer and closer" to creating "killer" viruses weeks before the pandemic
With their path cleared by Fauci and Collins, Baric and Daszak had not only been collaborating with Shi Zhengli in Wuhan, but with each other as well in turning bat viruses into human killers just weeks before the pandemic, as has been captured on video.
As may be recalled, Baric was one of Daszak's closest allies he'd emailed while gathering signatures for his misleading Lancet letter. Daszak had asked Baric not to sign this letter, to make it look like it "has some distance" from them. “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration,” Daszak had written to Baric. Regarding the nature of Daszak's collaboration with Baric, Daszak told during a podcast interview (video at the very end of page) filmed on December 9, 2019, just a few weeks before the pandemic was announced on December 31, 2019:
“You can manipulate them [coronaviruses] in the lab pretty easily [...] Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus. Zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, you can build the protein — and we work with Ralph Baric at [the University of North Carolina] to do this — and insert the backbone of another virus and do some work in the lab.”
Daszak had also described the nature of his and Baric's collaboration in an earlier 2016 interview. Here, Daszak had explicitly stated their goal as "moving closer and closer to" creating “viruses that really do look like killers.” Daszak had also admitted in this interview that part of their work was done by his "colleagues in China." Daszak had described how they had been engineering "killers" in collaboration with communist China:
“Some of these viruses will be killers, some of them won't, how do we work that out? From a viral sequence. It's not straightforward [...] so we sequence the spike protein, the protein that attaches to cells, then we — well, I didn’t do this work but my colleagues in China did the work — you create pseudoparticles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they'd bind to human cells.
Each step of this, you move closer and closer to [see if] this virus could really become pathogenic in people.
So you narrow down the field, you reduce the cost, and you end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.”
This was how Daszak had been developing human "killers" out of bat viruses right before the pandemic's announcement.
In an October 20, 2021 letter to Congressman James Comer, the NIH's acting director Tabak falsely claimed that the viruses Daszak engineered had gained in function as "an unexpected result of the research, as opposed to something the researchers set out to do." This claim easily falls apart in the light of the above interview in which Daszak had explained his purpose as narrowing down the field to "end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.” Each step of this methodology had let Daszak deliberately and intentionally move "closer and closer to [see if] this virus could really become pathogenic in people."
There was nothing "unintentional" or "unexpected" about any of it.
Former Vice President of EcoHealth Alliance alleges Daszak's group did create SARS-CoV-2
A big rat jumped out of the sinking ship after Fauci announced his resignation following investigation threats before the 2022 midterm elections.
Below are the chronological order of the events that caused increasing panic among those responsible for creating SARS-CoV-2, causing Andrew Huff, the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, to decide to lawyer up and declare it was Daszak's EcoHealth alliance which created SARS-CoV-2.
On May 1 2022, Senator Rand Paul promised to "wage a vigorous review into the origins of the coronavirus if Republicans retake the Senate and he lands a committee chairmanship," reports the Guardian. On July 20, 2022, Paul issued another warning to Fauci, saying, "If the GOP takes back Congress in the midterms, be prepared to testify under oath regarding the coronavirus pandemic." Paul added, "the NIH was funding that lab and that there was reasonable scientific evidence that suggests that it came from the lab. So he's going to be made to testify under oath. And I hope he sticks around because we do have some questions." On Aug 04, 2022, Sen. Rand Paul led a first-ever congressional hearing on the origin of the pandemic during which the the possibility of bioweapon release from the Wuhan lab was also discussed. On August 22, 2022, panicked Fauci announced his resignation despite the way he had previously announced he'd resign in 2025.
On September 2022, EcoHealth Alliance's former vice president Andrew Huff approached Renz Law, LLC., alleging that SARS-CoV-2 was created during the project “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” that EcoHealth Alliance had been awarded by Fauci's NIAID. In the packet his attorney has released, Huff describes as follows the way he had been tasked with reviewing this project's grant proposal:
"In late 2014, I was asked to review (provide edits, comments, and feedback) on a research proposal that was in preparation to be submitted to the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) National Institute for Allergens and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to conduct Gain of Function research and development with numerous partners including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was supported by Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina (UNC)."
Huff further describes how SARS-CoV-2 was created by the grant whose proposal he'd reviewed:
- "I attest that I reviewed the proposal that was submitted to NIH which detailed the gain of function virology work that was being conducted to create the agent known as SARS-COV2, which causes the disease known as COVID-19.
- I attest that the proposal clearly stated that the gain of function work on SARSCOV2 was already underway in China, prior to October 2014, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), with the support of USAID in collaboration with EcoHealth Alliance and EcoHealth Alliance’s partners and sponsors.
- I attest that I made Dr. Peter Daszak aware of the lack of a Biological Security Officer (BSO) and Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) at EcoHealth Alliance in reference to the Select Agent Form on in the “Understanding the risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” proposal in accordance NIH requirements.
- I witnessed firsthand presentations by Dr. Shi Zhengli (WIV) and Dr. Ralph Baric (UNC) at EcoHealth Alliance related to their Gain of Function work managed and supported by EcoHealth Alliance.
- I witnessed firsthand presentations by the executive team at EcoHealth Alliance related to the gain of function work conducted at EcoHealth Alliance.
- I attest that EcoHealth Alliance’s developed SARS-COV2 and is responsible for the development of the agent SARS-COV2 during my employment at the organization.
- I attest that I informed the EcoHealth Alliance executive team that I believed there were biosafety and biosecurity risks in contract laboratories during an executive meeting. Specifically, I was concerned that EcoHealth Alliance did not have enough visibility or firsthand knowledge of what was happening at foreign laboratories contracted and managed by EcoHealth Alliance. During this meeting I discussed bio-risk management with the team due to these concerns. Dr. Daszak refused to mitigate the risks without any objection or discussion from the other executives. In my opinion, Daszak was dismissive of my concerns. He did not seem concerned about EcoHealth’s lack of oversight which I felt was strange because it is typically the CEO’s duty to protect the organization from organizational threats and risks. After raising my concern, I accepted Peter’s position that our control measures were adequate."
As the verification of Huff's allegations, the packet released by Huff's attorney contains "Dr. Huff’s documents retained from his employment at EcoHealth Alliance."
But the corrupt Biden White House filled with stooges for the Great Reset agenda is still fighting back as of October 2022. Here is a video of Andrew Huff describing the government's cover-up of EcoHealth Alliance's creation of the pandemic.
Huff's supporting documents will hopefully be the icing on the cake for the plethora of evidence that proves beyond reasonable doubt that Daszak, Fauci, Collins have created the COVID-19 pandemic, as this article will continue to demonstrate.
The numerous regulations Fauci and Collins have violated to push through Daszak's project that created SARS-CoV-2
The unearthing of the timely version of Daszak's supposedly "very late" 4th year progress report, proving the extent of the NIH's fraudulent and treasonous conduct
Fauci and Collins had devised additional unethical ploys and violated additional policies in their efforts to keep removing the obstacles in the path of developing Daszak's 'killer viruses' during the project “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” which is the project that created SARS-CoV-2, according to EcoHealth Alliance's former vice president Andrew Huff. These additional ploys and policy violations have been exposed in a series of 5 articles written by the news organization the Intercept after the organization won 2 FIOA lawsuits against NIH/NIAID. These numerous violations that have been exposed leave no doubt about the reality of Andrew Huff's allegations and the egregious extent of Collins and Fauci's treasonous conduct in engineering bioweapons of mass destruction in collusion with the CCP, as this section demonstrates.
The first of the 2 FIOA lawsuits against the NIH was won by the the Intercept in September 2021, letting the organization gain access to more than 900 pages of materials on Daszak's U.S.-funded grant "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence." This grant was initially awarded for a five-year period from 2014 to 2019, its funding was renewed in 2019 for another 5 year period, suspended by the Trump administration on April 2020, re-instated by the Biden administration on August 29, 2020, stopped again 2 years later on August 19, 2022, and re-initiated again on September 21, 2022 without the involvement of the Wuhan lab. Regarding this still ongoing project, the Intercept hired and consulted 11 prominent virologists, asking them if risky gain of function research had been conducted during any phase. 7 out of the 11 top virologists said they believed risky gain-of-function research had indeed been conducted.
Just a few weeks after The Intercept published the conclusions of the top virologists it had hired, Collins announced his resignation from his position as the NIH's director. This occurred after the accusations of molecular biologist Dr. Richard Ebright who had told Newsweek one year earlier the very same conclusion the Intercept's 7 experts arrived at, having told Newsweek that risky gain of function research had been conducted in Wuhan during Daszak's project. This had not received much media attention at that time, but after the Intercept's 7 virologists backed his conclusion, Ebright publicly accused Fauci and Collins of having lied to congress. Collins decided to step down a month later in October 5th 2021, after having previously stated that the NIH had never approved “any grant that would have supported gain of function research on dangerous coronaviruses to see if they could be more transmissible or lethal for individuals in the human species.”
"Hardly any media or news outlets mentioned the resignation," points out the Alliance for Human Research Protection, stating:
"The silence of the media is but an indication of the TOTAL subservience of the media to its funders which has incapacitated the mainstream press and media. Reporters are tethered to a prescribed script - no longer capable of honest journalism."
The same subservient and incapacitated mainstream outlets have also not paid attention to the following incriminating facts revealed by the Intercept's 5 articles.
As Daszak's grant had been awarded from 2014 to 2019 and renewed on 2019, the first 3 years of his work had taken place during the 2014 moratorium against risky gain of function studies, and his work after 2017 was supposed to have been independently reviewed against the P3CO framework's guidelines put in place after the moratorium was ended. But when the Intercept had asked the NIH if Daszak's research had been paused by the moratorium in 2014 or had been sent to the HHS's review board for risk evaluation against the P3CO Framework in 2017, NIH spokesperson Elizabeth Deatrick had replied "NIAID determined that the work was not subject to the Gain-of-Function (GoF) research funding pause and the subsequent HHS P3CO Framework.” Daszak's work was allowed to continue with the help of the same loopholes and ploys described that had been utilized to allow Baric's risky gain of function studies to continue. The Daily Caller reports:
"Had EcoHealth’s grant been subjected to P3CO review, an HHS panel would have independently evaluated the grant and, if necessary, recommended additional biocontainment measures to prevent potential lab leaks — or even recommended that the grant be denied entirely."
But none of the above occurred when Fauci and Collins had been aiding the CCP shove the world headlong into the COVID-19 pandemic. Fauci and Collins allowed no coronavirus study to be independently reviewed against the P3CO framework's guidelines as has been previously demonstrated, hiding their efforts that created Daszak's killer viruses including SARS-CoV-2.
On November 3, 2021, the Intercept published another article in their series describing the way the NIH and NIAID had done even more for Daszak than they had done for Baric. NIH/NIAID had worked with Daszak to help him evade the existing protocols to let him police his own research in an unprecedented manner. According to the email communications between Daszak and NIAID officers, "Initially, NIH staff appeared intent on enforcing the funding pause [2014 moratorium]," the Intercept reports. Jenny Greer, a grants management specialist at the NIH, and Erik Stemmy, a NIH officer handling coronavirus research, had initially emailed Daszak saying that his experiments “appear to involve research covered under the pause.” But then something quite unusual had taken place.
In a July 7 2018 letter to EcoHealth Alliance, NIH officers Greer and Stemmy had formally allowed Daszak to worm his way out of the pause by letting Daszak-suggested language get inserted into his grant's terms and conditions. According to this Daszak-proposed language added to the grant proposal, the experiments deemed risky gain of function studies by the Intercept's top virologists would get a pass from the restrictions for as long as the engineered chimeric viruses didn't grow more quickly than the original viruses on which they were based. If the engineered viruses showed evidence of enhanced virus growth greater than 1 log (or 10 times) over the original viruses and grew more efficiently in human lung cells, Daszak was to immediately stop his experiments and inform his NIAID program officer and wait for a secondary review.
But Daszak's experiments never stopped despite the way his killer viruses did multiply faster than 10 times over the original viruses in human lung cell receptors...
During 2018, the 4th year of Daszak's project, one of the engineered chimeric coronaviruses did grow at a rate much quicker than the original viruses on which it was based. The enhanced growth of the engineered chimeric viruses in human lung cells was, "at one point, up to 4 log greater — or 10,000 times — the rate of the original virus. But there are no indications the research was stopped," reports the Intercept. "In fact, the bat coronavirus grant was renewed for a five-year period in 2019," adds the same Intercept article.
As if it wasn't enough that Daszak had been allowed to evade the moratorium and evade the P3CO Framework, Daszak had also been allowed to evade the rules he'd himself been permitted to insert into his own grant. Such was the extent of the rules Fauci and Collins had ignored in ensuring the continuation of the studies developing SARS-CoV-2.
The enhanced coronaviruses that grew 10,000 times faster than the original viruses in the lungs of humanized mice (genetically engineered mice with human lung cell receptors) caused the "mice to lose significant weight," states the Intercept, indicating that the "humanized" mice had become very sick. "From the weight loss, it’s gain of function. Tony Fauci is wrong saying it’s not.” told Vincent Racaniello, a professor of microbiology who was one of the top virologists The Intercept had consulted.
Tabak's silly ploy to try to lessen NIH/NIAID's culpability, which went awry and blew up all over his face
And then the NIH's acting director Lawrence Tabak had begun his own ploys to try to reduce the NIH's culpability for not having stopped Daszak's research for a secondary review as his grant proposal had required if his new viruses grew too fast. Tabak had tried to make it seem like the NIH didn't know how pathogenic the viruses had become, which violated Daszak's grant's terms. Tabak tried to accomplished this by making the NIH hand out to the Intercept an apparently very late version of Daszak's yearly progress report for 2018, which was Daszak's 4th year during which the engineered viruses had multiplied way faster than the original viruses. This supposedly "very late" 2018 progress report that was handed to the Intercept after their first FIOA lawsuit was dated September 2020, seemingly submitted 2 years after its due date.
"Adding to the evidence that the annual update [2018 yearly progress report] was submitted in 2020 are references to studies that were published after 2018," states the Intercept. But this so-called "evidence" had been fabricated by Tabak to make it seem like the report had been submitted late. Tabak had also lied as follows in his October 20, 2021 letter to Rep. James Comer, ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform:
"language was included in the terms and conditions of the grant awarded to Eco Health that outlined criteria for a secondary review such as a requirement that the grantee report immediately a one log increase in growth. These measures would prompt a secondary review to determine whether the research aims should be reevaluated or new biosafety measures should be enacted. Eco Health failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant."
Even if the above had been true, NIH/NIAID would still be guilty of gross negligence due to having renewed Daszak's funding for risky gain of function research without having received and reviewed Daszak's 4th year's progress report. Tabak perhaps believed this to be a lesser violation somehow.
But no one was fooled by Tabak's silly ploy, his false narrative fell apart right away due to the following 2 reasons.
Firstly, Daszak's supposedly "late" yearly progress report for 2018 wasn't the only place where he'd reported the up to 4 log (10,000 times) increase in the growth rate of the enhanced viruses. Daszak had reported the same result in the application for his grant's 2019 renewal as well. The Intercept had noted this in the more than 900 documents on Daszak's research it had obtained, which Tabak seems to have missed. When the Intercept had pointed this out to the NIH, asking the agency if it had reviewed Daszak's renewal application informing them of the 4 log increase in the viral growth rate, the NIH had confirmed it had reviewed the renewal application, unable to back Tabak who'd wanted to feign ignorance of the violation of Daszak's grant's terms.
Tabak's claim that Daszak had not submitted his report also didn't hold water because Daszak had emailed a copy of the 4th year's report to his Program Officer at the NIAID after he'd filed it in a timely manner "in the NIH system on April 13th 2018," Daszak told the NIH in a letter contesting Tabak's accusation. Attached to this letter was the proof of his timely submission of the 4th year's report, as well as the report's copy he'd emailed to his program officer, Daszak wrote in this letter. Such an email correspondence with another officer could easily disprove Tabak's claim that there wasn't a 2018 version of Daszak's report.
To make matters worse for Tabak, NIH's spokesperson Elizabeth Deatrick had verified that Daszak's team had reported to them the increase in the viral growth rate in 2 places. Deatrick had told the Intercept: “The PI [principal investigator] reported these results in the year 4 progress report and grant renewal application," telling the truth perhaps because she didn't wanting culpability for backing Tabak's obvious lie.
To make matters even worse for Tabak, NIH officials who didn't want to violate the requirements of the FIOA lawsuit the Intercept had won had handed out to the Intercept Dazsak's original 2018 yearly report having the timely submission date on it.
Tabak's stupid little blame-game had thus blown up big time all over his face.
The Intercept summarizes the situation after having been handed the original 2018 report with the timely submission date on it, which Tabak had claimed didn't exist:
"Among the documents NIH released to The Intercept yesterday was the original  version of an annual report from the fourth year of the bat coronavirus grant. The version released to The Intercept in September indicated that it had been submitted in 2020, after the pandemic began and more than two years after it was due. The two versions appear to be almost identical, though they include different reference publications."
Useful idiot Tabak is still allowed to remain as the NIH's director as of September 2022, despite being such a complete idiot.
Daszak's letter to the NIH contesting Tabak's lie contains sentences demonstrating how eagerly Fauci and Collins had rushed the development of his killer viruses including SARS-CoV-2 for the CCP with our taxpayer dollars. Daszak states in this letter that despite the way he had informed his supervisors of the increase in the viral growth rate in 2018, the NIH had never asked for "further clarification or secondary review," adding, "In fact, our report was deemed sufficient for the Year 5 to be awarded without delay."
Daszak's 5th year's progress report which is again supposedly "missing," which may reveal exactly how SARS-CoV-2 was created if subpoenaed
Which pathogens had Daszak been rushed into creating in 2019 right before the Covid-19 pandemic was announced that same year, after his funding had been renewed "without delay" and without the secondary review required by his grant's terms?
The NIH had been so eager to move Daszak onto his 5th year because in 2019, Daszak's research included gain of function experiments on MERS viruses that were even riskier than the experiments of 2018.
The MERS virus was actually only one of the pathogens Daszak had been working on right before the pandemic was announced at the end of 2019. Daszak had been creating hundreds of more new enhanced pandemic pathogens. The loose-mouthed virologist told this to the NPR a year later right after his grant was suspended by the Trump Administration on April 2020. The NPR describes what Daszak had told them:
"He [Daszak] says the project [“Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence”] had identified fragments of genetic sequences for hundreds of wholly new bat coronaviruses, including some that were close relatives of SARS-COV-2, the virus causing the current pandemic. "The next step in that research is to sequence the whole genome of those viruses and say, could they bind to human cells? Does this look like a virus that could potentially emerge?""
More information on these hundreds of "close relatives" of SARS-COV-2 Daszak had been trying to make pathogenic in humans would have been available in Daszak's 5th year progress report — if only NIH/NIAID would release its original version!
In the more than 900 pages of documents on Daszak's grant that the Intercept had obtained after its first lawsuit, the only anomaly wasn't the supposedly "very late" submitted 4th year progress report described in the previous section. Daszak's 5th year progress report had also been "missing." The Intercept had had to sue the NIH for the 2nd time in its efforts to obtain the 5th year's report. But when the report was finally provided after the organization won their second lawsuit, it was handed out with a "very late" submission date on it just like the 4th year's progress report. Again!
According to the 5th year's progress report handed to the Intercept with the "very late" submission date, Daszak had in 2019 genetically enhanced the pathogenicity of the MERS virus which is one of the deadliest human pathogens with a fatality rate of 35%. In the grant proposal documents obtained after the first lawsuit, the Intercept had seen references to proposed experiments on the MERS coronavirus, but when the organization had asked Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance about these experiments at that time, EcoHealth spokesperson Robert Kessler had lied, saying Daszak's group had not conducted the work. “The MERS work proposed in the grant is suggested as an alternative and was not undertaken,” Kessler had told in his email. Kessler's lie was revealed when the second FIOA lawsuit forced the NIH to produce the supposedly "very late" submitted progress report dated August 2021, despite the way the 5th year's annual progress report covered the grant period ending May 2019.
Was desperate Tabak really desperate enough to try to play the same stupid blame-game he'd played with Daszak's 4th year report, which had blown up all over his face?
Did Tabak still hope anyone would believe NIH/NIAID hadn't known that Daszak would be enhancing the pathogenicity of the MERS virus at the time they'd renewed Daszak's funding for another 5 years?
Daszak claimed he had not been allowed to submit his 2019 progress report on time due to the way the NIH's system had locked him out of being able to submit an annual 5th year report. This had occurred, according to Daszak, because the NIH had gone ahead and renewed the funding for his grant for another 5 years before waiting for his 5th year's progress report to be submitted, causing the system to not accept the yearly report normally received before renewal. Daszak explains how all this happened before his report's submission deadline:
"As is documented by the NIH receipt system itself (PDF attachment #5), we first uploaded this report on time, in July 2019 (the final allowable date for submission would have been September 30th 2019). However, by the time we tried to officially submit, our R01 grant had been renewed (July 24th 2019) and the system locked us out from submitting a normal annual final Year 5 report at that point. On July 30th 2019, we requested further information about the submission of the Year 5 report from the NIH Grants Management Specialist who had been dealing with our renewal, but we did not receive a response to our questions (PDF attachment #6). NIH also did not send any subsequent request to us for the Year 5 report, despite the reality that we were in frequent communication with staff during that period."
Could Daszak be telling the truth?
Knowing that both Daszak and Tabak are corrupt and lie very easily, which one of them should be believed?
If Daszak is telling the truth, it makes the NIH guilty of having renewed Daszak's funding even more eagerly than the renewal of his previous year's funding, this time without even bothering to wait for an annual progress report. Nothing can better showcase Collins and Fauci's incredibly gross willful blindness, given that they'd known the viruses engineered in year 4 had become more dangerous for humans, and given that they'd known Daszak was to enhance the MERS virus as the Intercept had seen described in Daszak's grant proposal.
It may very well be the case that that both Daszak and Tabak are lying. If 2019's progress report contains how Daszak created SARS-CoV-2 or even deadlier enhanced pandemic pathogens, Tabak and Daszak may have collaborated to obliterate the original 2019's report. Daszak and Tabak may then have crafted the story Daszak told, also creating a revised "very late" version of the original report, taking out the parts on the creation of SARS-CoV-2 and any similar "killer viruses." If this may have been done, subpoenaing and unearthing the original 2019's progress report may uncover exactly how SARS-CoV-2 has been created.
There were additional lies told by pathological liars Daszak and Tabak before the Intercept won its second FIOA lawsuit that caused the 5th year's "very late" report to be turned in, demonstrating the full extent of Daszak, Tabak, Fauci and Collins' gross departure from the conduct of an ordinary prudent and careful person. Although Daszak's 4th year's experiments did involve risky gain of function studies according to the 7 experts the Intercept had commissioned, Daszak and Tabak had claimed the studies were not risky because the SARS-like bat viruses on which the engineered viruses had been based couldn't originally infect humans. This claim was based on the relaxed definition of risky gain of function research that had been loosened in 2017 to be able to deem any gain of function study "not risky" if it didn't start out with potential pandemic pathogens. The definition had been relaxed by NIH/NIAID in such a counter-intuitive manner to avoid having to flag deadly coronavirus studies for independent review and risk evaluation against the PCO3 Framework's guidelines, as has been previously described. Tabak had written to congressman James Comer that Daszak's experiments "did not fit the definition of research involving enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential (ePPP)," because "These bat coronaviruses [on which the resulting virus was based] had not been shown to infect humans." Tabak had added, "As such, the research was not subject to departmental review under the HHS P3CO Framework." This argument was backed by the lying communications manager of EcoHealth Alliance, Robert Kessler, who'd given the same reason for not having deemed year 4's work risky. The Intercept states, "Robert Kessler, communications manager for EcoHealth Alliance, denied that the work on the humanized mice met the definition of gain-of-function research," because the original bat viruses were "not known to be able to infect humans.”
This shows the extent to which the heads of the NIH, NIAID and EcoHealth Alliance have failed to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in creating enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential out of viruses that were originally not pathogenic in people. Making animal viruses pathogenic in people and calling it not risky because the animal viruses could originally not infect humans represents a gross "departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person."
It's important to note that the counter-intuitive reasoning of the traitors running NIH/NIAID and EcoHealth Alliance based on the loosened definition of risky gain of function research doesn't apply to the MERS virus "known to infect and spread in humans, and was specifically designated under the NIH’s former pause [2014 moratorium] on funding gain-of-function research of concern," explains the Intercept. The fact that the MERS virus experiments had been carried out dismantles the claim that NIH/NIAID has never funded risky gain of function research in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, even according to their loosened definition.
It's also important to note that when the MERS virus experiments caused even the loosened definition of risky gain of function research to stop being able to cover Fauci and Collin's 'ass,' as Rand Paul put it, Fauci finally completely got rid of the definition on the NIH's website.
"Changing the receptor binding site on MERS is sort of crazy,” top virologist Jack Nunberg wrote in an email to the Intercept, explaining: "engineering of a known human pathogen raises new and unpredictable risks beyond those posed by their previously reported studies using a non-pathogenic [to humans] bat virus backbone.”
Comer needs to ask Tabak and Kessler why the enhancement of an already deadly human pathogen like the MERS virus hasn't even deserved to have its yearly report reviewed, let alone getting reviewed under the P3CO framework.
To enable Congressman Comer to not let go of holding all of the traitors named here accountable, please don't postpone taking action.
Re-instating the grant that created SARS-CoV-2 despite numerous non-compliance issues which expose the world to a second pandemic risk
The project "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" that created SARS-CoV-2, according to the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, Andrew Huff, still continues despite the NIH's, NIAID's and Daszak's countless policy violations responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. The world is being filled with God knows how many new deadly "killer viruses" that will sooner or later create God knows how many future pandemics.
On January 6, 2022, the NIH's deputy director Michael Lauer sent EcoHealth Alliance a letter listing numerous additional non-compliance issues, demanding that EcoHealth Alliance provide original laboratory notebooks and electronic files related to the research under investigation as the cause of the pandemic. "The records have yet to be provided," reports the Intercept. Deputy director Lauer was just putting on a show of intending to enforce compliance, when NIH/NIAID actually continues to give Daszak's team free rein to finish what they'd started.
As mentioned at the beginning of this article, the NIH has waited until August 19, 2022 to finally cut off Daszak's subaward to China, followed by re-instating the same grant R01AI110964 just a month later on September 21, 2022, this time without the involvement of the Wuhan lab. This has outraged Rep. James Comer (R-KY), the ranking member on House Oversight, who stated:
“It’s unacceptable that the NIH continues to allow EcoHealth Alliance to receive taxpayer dollars even though it is confirmed EcoHealth violated the terms of its grant contract. EcoHealth conducted gain of function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, knew about the Chinese Communist Party’s coverup, and failed to inform the U.S. government.”
Molecular biologist Richard Ebright, has said it's “disturbing that additional funding continues to be awarded to a contractor that the NIH has reported to have repeatedly and seriously violated contractual terms and conditions of a grant,” reports the Intercept.
"The new grant comes despite an open congressional investigation into the organization [EcoHealth Alliance], which has two other ongoing NIH grants and a third in negotiation," the Intercept states.
The exact recipe for SARS-CoV-2: Daszak's proposal to create furin cleavage sites in bat coronaviruses
One of the grants Fauci's NIAID had awarded Daszak proposed to insert novel furin cleavage sites into SARS-like viruses to improve their transmissibility in humans. As may be recalled, Nobel laureate biologist David Baltimore had deemed the presence of such a furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2's genome the “smoking gun” to the theory that the virus was engineered in a lab (before he'd been pressured to retract this statement.) As may also be recalled, the world's top virologists had initially all agreed that the presence of the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 indicated its lab origin. This was their real consensus before they'd all made 180 degree turns in their opinion after having been "steered" by Fauci and Collins.
The fact that Fauci funded Daszak for a grant proposing to insert furin cleavage sites into genetically engineered viruses was unearthed by whistleblower Commandant of the Marine Corps Fellow Joseph Murphy, who was working for the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) at that time.
Murphy had put the final touch on the efforts of a group of amateur detectives who call themselves DRASTIC, which stands for Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Teams Investigating Covid-19. DRASTIC has about 24 correspondents from different countries who work independently to search for clues about the pandemic's origin. "For a long time, DRASTIC's discoveries stayed confined to the strange world of Twitter, known only to a few nerdy followers," reports Newsweek. "Gradually, the quality of their research and the rigor of their thinking drew a larger following, including many professional scientists and journalists," adds the Newsweek article describing this group's accomplishments. In September 2021, these amateur sleuths got contacted by an anonymous person who'd brought to their attention a specific grant proposal submitted to a special program called Preventing Emerging Pathogenic Threats (PREEMPT) that had been initiated by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). This proposal was one of many that had been solicited by DARPA's PREEMPT program to "develop new tools and models to quantify the likelihood of a virus to jump from an animal host into humans."
The grant proposal submitted to the PREEMPT program that had been pointed out to DRASTIC describes a research project called "DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses," which appears to have been rejected by DARPA. Project DEFUSE was led by Daszak who'd authored over 20 CCP/PLA affiliated studies, as well as being conducted by none other than Baric who'd taught the CCP how to engineer pandemic pathogens without leaving traces of lab manipulation. Daszak and Baric were to work with their Chinese buddy "bat woman" Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan lab which had been collaborating with China’s military since at least 2017. Another participant of Daszak's DEFUSE project was Chinese researcher Linfa Wang, who was one of Daszak's 2 closest allies Daszak had wanted to distance from his efforts of creating a fake consensus against the lab leak theory.
Project DEFUSE proposed by Daszak and his comrades had been turned down by DARPA, mainly because it involved risky gain of function (GoF) research without mentioning or assessing the risks. The project had also been turned down for not having a risk mitigation plan for dual use research of concern (DURC), meaning research that can be used for both beneficial and nefarious purposes.
DARPA's rejection letter explicitly states that Daszak's team's proposal does involve gain of function research/dual use research of concern, contrary to Fauci's testimony claiming he's never funded such research in Wuhan:
"The team's approach does potentially involve GoF/DURC research (they aim to synthesize spike glycoproteins which bind to human cell receptors and insert them into SARSr-CoV backbones to assess whether they can cause SARS-like disease)."
DRASTIC's analysis of DARPA's rejection letter further explains why DARPA had not funded this proposal, laying out the extent to which Daszak had been unconcerned with the risks of his GoF/DURC research, showcasing his disregard for human life and criminal mental state. As had been demonstrated, Daszak and NIH/NIAID had broken countless rules and regulations to be able to rush the development of China's bioweapons, which explains their lack of concern for preventing the nefarious use of their DURC research.
The Atlantic has verified the authenticity of the grant proposal for project DEFUSE. Their article states: "There is good reason to believe the document is genuine. The Atlantic has confirmed that a grant proposal with the same identifying number and co-investigators was submitted to DARPA in 2018."
DRASTIC has published on their website the proposal of project DEFUSE that DARPA has rejected, which has caused the story to get picked up by many outlets including The Atlantic that reported "A new leaked document is stirring up another frenzy over the pandemic’s origins." The reason for this frenzy was the way "The 2018 DEFUSE research grant application explicitly states the applicants’ intention to artificially insert furin polybasic cleavage sites into high abundance, but low risk bat coronaviruses found in China," reports the Gateway Pundit.
About Project DEFUSE, the Intercept reports that molecular biologist Richard Ebright has emphasized:
“The relevance of this is that SARS Cov-2, the pandemic virus, is the only virus in its entire genus of SARS-related coronaviruses that contains a fully functional [furin] cleavage site at the S1, S2 junction. And here is a proposal from the beginning of 2018, proposing explicitly to engineer that sequence at that position in chimeric lab-generated coronaviruses.”
The Intercept also quotes molecular biologist Alina Chan saying:
“Let’s look at the big picture: A novel SARS coronavirus emerges in Wuhan with a novel cleavage site in it. We now have evidence that, in early 2018, they had pitched inserting novel cleavage sites into novel SARS-related viruses in their lab."
In a May 5, 2021 article published in The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, renowned science writer Nicholas Wade articulately describes to laymen all of the reasons why it's extremely improbable for SARS-CoV-2's furin cleavage site to have naturally evolved. Towards the end of his article, Wade concludes:
"For the furin cleavage site to arise naturally in SARS2, a chain of events has to happen, each of which is quite unlikely for the reasons given above [in Wade's article]. A long chain with several improbable steps is unlikely to ever be completed."
In a September 2021 article titled "New Routes to Making Covid-19 In the Lab," Nicholas Wade deems the insertion of such a novel furin cleavage site into a SARS-like virus "the exact recipe for generating SARS2 [SARS-CoV-2]."
"In May 2020, only a few months into the pandemic, EcoHealth’s Peter Daszak had ridiculed discussions of the furin cleavage site," reports the Atlantic. But just a few years earlier, Daszak had proposed to accomplish, in a lab, the very same thing he'd ridiculed as being fabricated by conspiracy theorists.
The Intercept reports that anonymous scientists the outlet contacted had told them "there is published evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was already engaged in some of the genetic engineering work described in the proposal."
But it wasn't the Chinese who'd ended up fully funding Daszak's proposal, it was the U.S. through Fauci's NIAID.
Whistleblower Commandant of the Marine Corps Fellow Joseph Murphy had seen, during his work at DARPA, hidden in a "(top secret) share drive," certain unclassified documents that didn't belong in this classified drive. These were the grant proposal documents for project DEFUSE as well as an Eco Health Alliance letter responding to having been awarded funding by Fauci's NIAID.
"Being Defense related, it makes sense that Eco Health submitted the proposal first to the Department of Defense, before it settled with NIH/NIAID," explains Commandant Murphy on the 3rd page of his report that he's submitted to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense. Murphy adds in this report that the work had taken place at "the WIV and at several sites in the U.S., identified in detail in the proposal."
In his report submitted to the Inspector General on the letterhead of DARPA on August 13, 2021, Murphy had specified the exact location of the documents supporting his claim as:
"The EcoHealth Alliance response to the PREEMPT BAA is placed along with other proposal documents in the PREEMPT folder on the DARPA Biological Technologies Office JWICS (top secret) share drive, address: Network/filer/BTO/CI Folder/PREEMPT"
Which compromised DARPA officer had hidden in a top secret drive the unclassified documents of Daszak's proposal and his response to having been awarded funding by Fauci?
And what has the Inspector General of the Department of Defense done with the hidden documents whose exact location had been pointed out to him by Murphy?
If you'd like to know the answers, please contact your representatives and senators, linking to this article and politely letting them know you'll only vote for those who'll hold all the guilty parties named here accountable.
When Murphy had filed his report with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, he'd handed a copy to Project Veritas, a non-profit journalism enterprise exposing corruption and other misconduct. Project Veritas has published Murphy's report in its entirety, revealing Murphy's own analysis of what he'd seen in the top secret classified drive at DARPA and why he believes project DEFUSE must have created SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 has been created during the project “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” by EcoHealth Alliance, as has later been confirmed by the former vice president of the EcoHealth Alliance Andrew Huff on September 2022. Murphy states in his analysis dated August 13, 2021, before the former vice president of the EcoHealth Alliance admitted that he was right:
“SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), as suggested by the reporting surrounding the lab leak hypothesis. The details of this program have been concealed since the pandemic began. These details can be found in the EcoHealth Alliance proposal response to the DARPA PREEMPT program Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HR00118S0017, dated March 2011 — a document not yet publicly disclosed.”
In his Substack Post, Robert Malone states he feels Murphy’s letter “appears to be the real deal so far.” adding,
“If validated, it is as big as the Pentagon papers. This would mean that research funded and conducted by the US Government has caused the death of millions of people world wide. Just ponder that. I can’t hardly wrap my head around the idea. Shocking doesn’t describe how important this is. History will remember.”
Attorney Thomas Renz's lawsuit against EcoHealth Alliance is continuing as of December 2022. Mr. Renz states:
"In terms of the accountability, please know that this is only the first step. On a personal level I do not know that I will ever fully recover from the hundreds or thousands of people I spoke to, begging for help, that ended up dying or losing loved ones because I simply could not make more time in the day. For my part, this simply cannot end until there is accountability for all involved and I have many more things I’m working on to ensure it. With that said, please understand that I am one person, with a small team, very limited funding, and cannot make more time in the day so this will not happen tomorrow. I pray frequently for strength to continue the fight and that God keeps me from deviating from the path (I would be honored by prayers from anyone reading this that is inclined to provide them).
At the end of the day, the crime that was and is COVID-19 will be revealed. We will win this fight and there will be accountability. There will be accountability for the disease, the hospital murders, the jabs, the lockdowns, and everything else and we will do everything we can to ensure that EVERY single person that profited from this crime against humanity pays the price."
Decades-long history of ignoring fervent pandemic warnings coming from hundreds of conscientious scientists
After having demonstrated the way Fauci and Collins have funded the creation of SARS-CoV-2, this feature article will keep demonstrating the full extent of Fauci's criminal mental state, demonstrating how well he'd been warned countless times about the pandemic risk of causing animal viruses to become capable of massacring human populations.
The risky gain-of-function studies funded by Fauci's NIAID first started attracting widespread attention in 2011, when two scientific papers announced the way virologists had successfully enhanced the transmissibility of a bird flu virus strain (H5N1 avian influenza strain). Being originally only transmissible between birds, the H5N1 virus had been genetically modified to gain the function of becoming "easily transmissible between ferrets, the animals that most closely mimic the human response to flu," Science magazine reports. This article adds:
"Scientists believe it's likely that the pathogen, if it emerged in nature or were released, would trigger an influenza pandemic, quite possibly with many millions of deaths."
The same Science article quotes Paul Keim, microbial geneticist and chair of U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, stating "I can't think of another pathogenic organism that is as scary as this one."
Fauci kept defending and funding the deadly gain of function studies
Amid the outcry and protests to ban the risky gain-of-function research (GOFR), Fauci publicly defended their continuation as the director of the NIAID which controls a large portion of the funds allotted for medical research in the U.S. If Fauci were to say the moon is made of cheese, everyone would have to agree if they were to keep getting the funding they needed to continue their careers as researchers. Fauci, who had the power to drag the rest of the scientific community behind him and determine the "consensus" as such, told Scientific American:
"I think the benefit that will come out of the Fouchier paper [one of the 2 papers on enhancing the H5N1 bird flu virus] in stimulating thoughts and ways to better understand transmissibility and adaptability and pathogenesis, in my mind, far outweigh the risk of nefarious use of this information."
Fauci further touted the supposed "benefits" of gain-of-function studies in a Washington Post op-ed he co-authored with Collins, titled "A Flu Virus Risk Worth Taking." Fauci and Collins' op-ed claims: "important information and insights can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory."
But Fauci and Collins' insane voices were temporarily drowned by their conscientious opposition on January 2012, when many influential scientists agreed to put a voluntary moratorium (temporary suspension) on the risky gain-of-function studies. Fauci fought back, participating in a New York meeting during which he tried to persuade the scientific community to lift the voluntary pause on the mad science he'd been funding. NPR summarizes:
"At a recent press briefing, Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which funded the controversial [gain of function] experiments, said that he intended to go to the meeting and 'discuss in some detail with the group the kinds of approaches we can have to try and expedite as quickly as possible the lifting of the moratorium.'"
In his efforts to get the moratorium lifted and rush the creation of the CCP's bioweapons as the previous sections demonstrate, Fauci told the Guardian on March 2012, "There cannot be any impediment to science that will ultimately be good to the general public." Such was the extent of Fauci's inverted logic representing a gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person.
The influential voice of Fauci did manage to drown the voice of prudence and common sense within a year. The voluntary 2012 moratorium did get lifted and the risky studies resumed on January 2013. The Independent announced the continuation of the gain of function studies in an article with an eerily prophetic image of a girl in a face mask, with the image caption stating "Scientists fear that if airborne transmission became possible it would lead to a deadly flu pandemic."
CDC: accidents involving dangerous pathogens "occur on average twice a week"
Fauci's appalled opposition kept fighting back, forming an alliance called the Cambridge Working Group against the risky studies. This huge group of hundreds of scientists (scroll for the list of hundreds of members) has published numerous papers and articles spelling out the grave dangers of enhancing the pathogenicity of viruses. Their efforts did persuade the Obama Administration to impose a second moratorium on GOF studies starting October 2014. This is the moratorium that Fauci and Collins unilaterally nullified and prevented from serving its intended purpose as has been previously described.
The decision to impose this second moratorium on 2014 was partly due to three accidents that had occurred in the handling of the enhanced flu viruses, explains the Scientific American article subtitled: "The third recent mistake in handling of pathogens is a 'wake-up call,' says Centers for Disease Control head." Scientific American summarizes the situation in another article titled "Bio-Unsafety Level 3: Could the Next Lab Accident Result in a Pandemic?" This article states the shocking frequency of the occurrence of dangerous lab accidents as follows:
"In 1977 a flu virus swept the world in an event that became known as the Russian flu. It was caused by a strain of flu that, later genetic tests showed, looked remarkably like those that had circulated in 1950. The belief is that the virus escaped from a laboratory or was used in a vaccine project that went awry. [...] The CDC, which oversees laboratory safety in the U.S., reported in 2011 that lab errors involving select agents — the most dangerous pathogens — occur on average twice a week in U.S. labs."
“It’s not hard to predict rain in England and it’s not hard to predict select agent mistakes in the U.S.," said Public Health professor Marc Lipsitch, one of the leading voices in the debate against gain of function research.
Right before the decision to enact the 2014 moratorium, a congressional hearing had taken place about the lab accidents, their frequency, and the possibility that "a lab accident could allow such manmade flu strains to escape." Presented to the congressional hearing was a consensus statement signed by the several hundred conscientious scientists making up the Cambridge Working Group alliance against risky gain-of-function research. This consensus statement the alliance presented to the hearing says:
"Laboratory creation of highly transmissible, novel strains of dangerous viruses, especially but not limited to influenza, poses substantially increased risks. An accidental infection in such a setting could trigger outbreaks that would be difficult or impossible to control. Historically, new strains of influenza, once they establish transmission in the human population, have infected a quarter or more of the world's population within two years."
On August 17, 2020, ProPublica published an article titled "Here Are Six Accidents UNC Researchers Had With Lab-Created Coronaviruses." This article spells out some of the accidents that have occurred in the laboratory of CCP's good old ally Ralph Baric who has taught China how to engineer pandemic pathogens without leaving traces of lab manipulation. This article states: "There have been mouse bites and spills and other mishaps during experiments involving genetically altered coronaviruses at a high-security lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill." Such accidents had occurred despite the way this lab is "probably one of the safest BSL-3 facilities in the world," points out the MIT Technology Review. As may be recalled, Baric continues to conduct his deadly gain of function experiments in his human-error-prone lab as of September 2022.
And then there have been countless deadly lab accidents kept out of the public's eye...
"In America’s biolabs, hundreds of accidents have gone undisclosed to the public," reports the Intercept. The outlet has published a great 3 part series titled "Experimenting With Disaster" based on over 5,500 pages of NIH documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The outlet reports in Part 1 of its series:
An Intercept investigation based on over 5,500 pages of NIH documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act has uncovered a litany of mishaps: malfunctioning equipment, spilled beakers, transgenic rodents running down the hall, a sedated macaque coming back to life and biting a researcher hard enough to lacerate their hand. Many of the incidents involved less dangerous pathogens that can be handled with basic safety equipment, and most did not lead to infection. But several accidents happened while scientists were handling deadly or debilitating viruses in highly secure labs, and a few, like the Chikungunya virus slip-up, did lead to illness.
“People have it in their minds that lab accidents are very, very rare, and if they happen, they happen only in the least well-run overseas labs,” said Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University and an advocate for better biosafety standards. “That simply isn’t true.”
The history of the lab accidents summarized may be enough to convince any 'ordinary careful and prudent person' of the fact that in a world inevitably prone to human error, once a pandemic pathogen is created, it's only a matter of time until it finds its way out of even the world's "safest" lab and start infecting human populations, killing millions of people like SARS-CoV-2 has done. In a world where there's always room for human carelessness and error, continuing to allow the genetic enhancement of any virus for any reason whatsoever must be deemed criminally negligent conduct "incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences."
In my opinion, there may be no legitimate justification of conducting any kind of gain of function research whatsoever to enhance the pathogenicity of any virus, because trying to differentiate between what's risky and what's not risky gain of function research would leave the door wide open for malicious parties to keep trying to muddy the waters, playing with definitions and inventing various loopholes and ploys in trying to blur the line between what constitutes risk and what doesn't, just like Fauci and Collins have done. Permitting some gain of function studies and banning others would be leaving room for nefarious efforts to make the simple truth appear "very nebulous."
Moratorium gets lifted after Fauci and Collins fire the 11 opposing White House biosecurity advisors
To get the 2014 moratorium lifted and the deadly gain of function studies resumed, ploy-masters Fauci and Collins had pulled yet another fast one, unrightfully "releasing from duty" all of the White House biosecurity advisors who had publicly opposed the deadly gain of function studies.
On October 2014, the White House had announced a decision regarding weather and when to lift the 2014 moratorium on gain of function studies. Nature explains:
"The White House says that it will wait for recommendations from the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) and the National Research Council before deciding whether and how to lift the ban. The groups are expected to finish their work within a year. As Nature went to press, the NSABB was set to convene on 22 October, its first meeting in two years."
"NSABB [the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] advises and guides the U.S. government about 'dual use' research that involves biological agents that could be used as bioweapons," explains Science. About this advisory board's meeting to come up with recommendations for the White House on whether or not to resume the risky studies, NSABB member Arturo Casadevall had assumed: "The NSABB meeting is certain to see heated debate as scientists from all sides convene." But there had been no debates at all when the board had actually convened on October 22, 2014, let alone heated debates. Fauci and Collins had come up with a "great" way to end all debate about whether U.S. should or should not continue to bestow upon animal viruses the ability to destroy human populations.
On July 2014, just a few months before NSABB was expected to meet on October 2014, NIH/NIAID dismissed NSABB's 11 (out of 23) members who had publicly opposed the risky gain of function studies.
Microbiologist Arturo Casadevall, one of NSABB's biosecurity advisors who had gotten dismissed, explains: "all the members who have been through the H5N1 [enhanced bird flu virus] debates have been replaced at the same time." Science reports:
"The 11 members learned they were being dismissed Sunday evening in an e-mail from the board's executive director, Mary Groesch, who works at the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), NSABB's overseer. "
The same Science article adds that a NIH representative has said these 11 members had been dismissed "so that fresh and diverse perspectives can be brought to bear on the committee's deliberations."
Fauci and Collins had thus never allowed the White House to hear the advice of its biosecurity advisors who'd been opposed to creating bioweapons of mass destruction capable of killing countless humans. When the re-staffed National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity had convened, the "fresh and diverse perspectives" of the new board members got the moratorium lifted on December 2017.
A huge step had been taken towards moving the world headlong into a pandemic.
Beyond reasonable doubt: the globalists did know SARS-CoV-2 was to "escape" from the Wuhan Lab
This last section proves beyond reasonable doubt the fact that SARS-CoV-2 has been deliberately allowed to "escape" from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Below is a summary of the main reasons for believing so, followed by more details on each:
- On October 2019, just 2 months before the announcement of the COVID-19 pandemic, Fauci and the HHS officials have been caught on video discussing releasing the "virus from China" to speed up the process of launching their mRNA vaccines without having to go through the usual lengthy testing procedures.
- Again the same month on October 2019, only 2 months before the pandemic was announced, a high-level pandemic response drill called Event 201 was hosted by the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, adding to the evidence that the masterminds of the Great Reset did know the virus was about to "escape."
- On September 2019, just one month before the Event 201 pandemic response drill took place and Fauci and the HHS officials were caught on video discussing releasing the "virus from China," the Wuhan Institute's biosecurity measures had been allowed to become so inadequate that the institute's director got fed up and published an article listing all the biosecurity shortcomings allowed to go on due to the way the Chinese government wasn't providing sufficient resources to fix the issues. This shows the way the CCP allowed the virus to escape in a way creating plausible deniability about deliberate release.
It first occurred to fiction writer Dean Koontz that the biolabs in Wuhan would be the ideal place for developing deadly bioweapons of mass destruction behind the iron curtain. Koontz's uncanny 1981 novel "The Eyes of Darkness" mentions a virus called Wuhan-400 that gets released from China as a bioweapon. Probably inspired by this novel, the globalists and their collaborators Fauci and Collins have slipped their deadly coronavirus research to Wuhan, knowing that the Wuhan Institute would be maintaining (or not maintaining) its own biosafety measures entirely at its own discretion. There could be no better way to hide what happened behind the iron curtain if the virus "escaped."
Rowan Jacobsen's article titled "Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan," published in MIT Technology Review, explains that as a result of the collaboration of the Chinese and American researchers, the Wuhan lab "soon used its own reverse-genetics technology to make numerous coronavirus chimeras." But the gain of function research in Wuhan was conducted under way riskier conditions than similar research conducted in America. Jacobsen's article summarizes the situation:
"The Chinese work was carried out at biosafety level 2 (BSL-2), a much lower tier than Baric’s BSL-3+. [...] That meant the same viruses that Daszak was holding up as a clear and present danger to the world were being studied under conditions that, according to Richard Ebright, matched “the biosafety level of a US dentist’s office.”"
Jacobsen's article goes on to explain:
"But the WIV was not breaking any rules by working at BSL-2, says Filippa Lentzos, a biosecurity expert at King’s College London “There are no enforceable standards of what you should and shouldn’t do. It’s up to the individual countries, institutions, and scientists.” And in China, she says, the vertiginous rise of high-tech biological research has not been accompanied by an equivalent increase in oversight."
The Washington Post quotes Beth Cameron, vice president for global biological policy and programs at the nonprofit Nuclear Threat Initiative, who has also stated that when conducting risky studies, there are no enforceable standards of what individual institutions, countries and scientists should or shouldn't do. Cameron has told the Post that safety would "depend largely on strong security measures at each lab to protect against an accidental release and govern who is allowed to work on the experiments."
Thus there was nothing Fauci or Collins or any other U.S. official could do to oversee what was taking place out of sight and out of mind in communist China. Knowing this, NIH/NIAID has kept funding the Wuhan lab by violating the numerous rules and procedures that have been described as they allowed Daszak and Baric teach China how to create bioweapons of mass destruction with U.S. funds.
Jacobsen's MIT Technology Review article states that Daszak, "In response to questions about the decision to do the research in BSL-2 conditions," forwarded a statement from EcoHealth Alliance saying, "the organization "must follow the local laws of the countries in which we work," adding that the NIH had determined the research was "not gain-of-function.""
Biosafety procedures at the Wuhan Institute had been inadequate at least since January 2018, the Washington Post reports. Their article states that "In January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing took the unusual step of repeatedly sending U.S. science diplomats to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)." These U.S. diplomats had explicitly warned Washington that the Wuhan Institute's biosecurity measures were so lax they could cause a SARS-like pandemic. The Washington Post article summarizes:
"What the U.S. officials learned during their visits concerned them so much that they dispatched two diplomatic cables [special diplomatic text-based messages] categorized as Sensitive But Unclassified back to Washington. The cables warned about safety and management weaknesses at the WIV lab and proposed more attention and help. The first cable, which I [the reporter] obtained, also warns that the lab's work on bat coronaviruses and their potential human transmission represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic."
On September 2019, 3 months before the pandemic, the CCP had allowed the biosecurity measures at the Wuhan Institute to become so lax that Yuan Zhiming, the head of China's CDC, then Director of Wuhan's BSL-4 lab and bat lady Shi’s superior, seems to have had it, publishing an article documenting the key biosecurity shortcomings of his Institute in the Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity. These shortcomings include "inadequate biosafety management systems, insufficient resources for efficient laboratory operation, and deficiency of professional capacity," states the addendum to the final report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. This addendum also states that "With a surprising level of transparency, Yuan admits that the enforcement of pathogen, waste, and laboratory animal management regulations “needs to be strengthened.”" This addendum report states that Zhiming's article discusses the "insufficient level of resources being provided by the PRC [People's Republic of China] government."
"There have been several reports of safety concerns at PRC [People's Republic of China] labs starting as early as 2004, when it was discovered SARS leaked from a lab in Beijing. Several other accidental releases have happened in the years since," states the addendum to the final report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff.
All of the above demonstrates how both the U.S. and Chinese authorities were well aware of the extent to which the world was being subjected to pandemic risk. But in response, instead of focusing on prevention, they had focused on preparation, having practiced, as shown in these simulation videos, how to shut down world economies, schools, top travel, and how to distribute their vaccines to immensely enrich themselves.
The creators of the pandemic had even prepared an ironic report warning the world that a pandemic is about to occur just weeks before their "prophecy" did actualize as expected, as the next paragraphs elaborate.
On Fauci helped oversee a World Health Organization report whose title starts with the worlds "A World at Risk," highlighting an increasing risk of global pandemic from a pathogen escaping after being engineered in a lab. Downloading the report reveals on page 32 that Fauci is a member of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board who'd authored the report. This report that Fauci had helped prepare states:
“The chances of a global pandemic are growing. While scientific and technological developments provide new tools that advance public health (including safely assessing medical countermeasures), they also allow for disease-causing microorganisms to be engineered or recreated in laboratories. A deliberate release would complicate outbreak response [...] Taken together, naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate events caused by high-impact respiratory pathogens pose 'global catastrophic biological risks.'"
All of this demonstrates how well aware the authorities, including Fauci, had been of the way their efforts exposed the world to pandemic risk. But the deadly experiments have not just resumed but resumed solely under the CCP's control in Wuhan.
The pandemic has been allowed to occur due to the way it was all a match made in heaven for everyone in charge of the operation. Vaccine developer Gates and his cabal of wealthy elites have multiplied their wealth many times over by the vaccines they've made world governments force on their populations. The CCP has reached its goal of shutting down and weakening world economies. The masterminds of globalism have almost reached their goal of easing in their totalitarian one-world regime. Millions of "non-essential" little people have died, but they were just over-crowding the world, according to Claus Schwab and his demonic alliance of arrogant billionaire elites playing God.
One of the main reasons why Fauci and Collins knowingly allowed the pandemic to occur is summarized in this video dating back to October 2019, recorded just 1 month after Fauci's September 2019 report predicted the pandemic. Here, you can watch Fauci and HHS officials pre-plan the pandemic for the purpose of avoiding having to wait up to a decade before releasing their new mRNA vaccines. This video includes a Rockefeller Foundation-affiliated HHS officer openly state that the "virus from China" can be used to "explode the system" and rush the approval process of the mRNA vaccines. Despite being hard to believe, this is all absolutely real, please do watch this entire video exposing how the pandemic was pre-planned, not omitting OANN's Pierson Sharp's interpretation.
The masterminds of the Great Reset are letting Daszak continue to create killer viruses as has been pointed out before as of October 2022, now without the involvement of the Wuhan Lab of Virology. How naive it would be to assume that just by no longer partnering with the Wuhan lab, communist China can be kept in the dark about Daszak's progress and new pathogens, given Daszak's deep history of enmeshment with the CCP and PLA and how deeply compromised his overseers also are as has been demonstrate din this article? With such relationships in place, the globalists will never let NIH/NIAID stop funding Daszak unless the Great Reset operation is dismantled from the ground up. Until then, Daszak and Baric will continue to prefect their modern bioweapons in a country where the CCP and globalist millionaires have simultaneously captured both the NIH/NIAID and the compromised White House.
For the love of God, please don't postpone doing the grassroots activism described here if you wish to help save humanity from an unthinkable end. Together we can accomplish a lot, but only if each of us does his/her part in shaping the world's future.