OF BATS AND FAUCI: Piles of censored evidence proving SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon released intentionally

CHAPTER 1 – The most heavily censored atrocities that you may have missed

This unprecedented exposé paints the complete picture of the heinous attempt to ease in a global totalitarian regime through new generation warfare techniques comprised of releasing bioweapons and an insidious psyop strategy. If you're not yet sure if the Great Reset is happening, please first self-verify its reality.

Here is an explosive interview with International law professor Dr. Francis Boyle who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 signed into law by George H. W. Bush. In this interview, Boyle gives a detailed statement on the way the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive biological warfare weapon. But unfortunately, such authoritative sources continue to be obliterated in the current cancel culture fueled by the censorship industrial complex that's enveloped the world.

After 2020's coup that installed CCP-compromised Biden, the very same grant that created the COVID-19 pandemic still continues to be funded with our taxpayer dollars in a country so thoroughly infiltrated that no one's stopping it. This is absolutely real as this chapter demonstrates.

On August 19, 2022, the U.S. appeared to have stopped funding gain of function research on coronaviruses in the Wuhan Institute when the NIH finally announced cutting off grant R01AI110964's subaward to China. But despite cutting off the subaward, the NIH's Deputy Director Michael Lauer told the Washington Examiner that his agency may continue to fund EcoHealth Alliance for the same grant R01AI110964 without the involvement of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Sure enough, on September 21, 2022, the NIH did resume EcoHealth Alliance's funding of grant R01AI110964 to "collect samples of viruses from wildlife and then “rapidly supply viral sequences and isolates for use in vaccine and therapeutic development,” reports the Intercept. Which idiot would believe that no longer funding Wuhan Institute's subaward can prevent China from learning all about the new viruses CCP-owned Daszak creates, given Daszak's deep history of enmeshment with the CCP and the PLA, in a country with a "president" owned by the CCP?

The terminated and re-instated R01AI110964 grant to EcoHealth Alliance is the same one that created the pandemic, admitted the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance Andrew Huff. After lawyering up, Huff has come forward stating that Daszak's group did create Sars-CoV-2 while he was Vice President.

Abominable?

But it gets even worse.

EcoHealth Alliance is just 1 of the 11 similar institutions studying the spillover potential of viruses in the global network of hundreds of biolabs funded by the U.S. The above grant is only one of God knows how many other deadly grants causing animal viruses to become transmissible among human populations.

If the lunatic billionaires and compromised officials aiding this heinous operation are not stopped, they will continue to enrich themselves immeasurably as they'll keep forcing the world to take their "vaccines" for God knows how many new viruses. They'll keep the world indefinitely suppressed through "healthcare" tyranny in a totalitarian hellscape.

Did you know that researchers at Boston University have already succeeded at creating a much deadlier variant of SARS-CoV-2 which has an 80% kill rate? Congratulations!

On July 5, 2022, Forbes published an article, titled "The US Is Funding a Massive Virus Hunt That Might Cause Another Pandemic. Great Idea!"

In a congress filled with 388 traitors, who's there to stop this ultimately evil operation in a White House with an illegitimate puppet president?

It's my strong opinion that only We the People can stop these evil lunatics, if each and every one of us does his/her part according to the edicts of the Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

All gain of function research must be criminalized with severe penalties for violators.

All those who've suffered side effects from the COVID shots must be allowed to sue the vaccine manufacturers for damages.

It's imperative for all citizens to not waste time resisting what's being done to the world, blocking the Great Reset agenda.

CHAPTER 2 – Beyond reasonable doubt: SARS-CoV-2 was deliberately allowed to "escape"

This chapter of this exposé proves beyond reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 was deliberately allowed to "escape" from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Below is a summary of my main reasons for believing so, followed by more details:

• On October 2019, just 2 months before the announcement of the COVID-19 pandemic, Fauci and the HHS officials have been caught on video discussing releasing the "virus from China" to launch their mRNA vaccines without going through the conventional lengthy testing procedures. Please watch this entire video until the end to hear a Rockefeller Foundation-affiliated HHS officer openly say the "virus from China" can be used to "explode the system" and rush the approval process of the new mRNA vaccines. This is absolutely real, please also don't miss Pierson Sharp's interpretation in this video.
• Again the same month on October 2019 (only 2 months before the pandemic's announcement), a high-level pandemic response drill called Event 201 was hosted by the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, adding to the evidence that the masterminds of the Great Reset had known the virus would "escape."
• On September 2019, just one month before Fauci and the HHS officials discussed releasing the "virus from China" and hosted the Event 201 pandemic response drill that month, the Wuhan Institute's biosecurity measures had been allowed to become so inadequate that the biosecurity-4 lab's director Yuan Zhiming felt compelled to publish an article listing all the biosecurity shortcomings allowed to go on. Zhiming wrote that these shortcomings resulted from "insufficient level of resources being provided by the PRC [People's Republic of China] government," states the addendum to the final report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. This shows the way the CCP allowed the virus to escape in a way creating plausible deniability about deliberate release.

It first occurred to fiction writer Dean Koontz that the biolabs in Wuhan would be the ideal place for developing deadly bioweapons of mass destruction behind the iron curtain. Koontz's uncanny 1981 novel "The Eyes of Darkness" mentions a virus called Wuhan-400 that gets released from China as a bioweapon. Probably inspired by this novel, the Deep State made of imperialist billionaires colluding with the CCP had their coronavirus research shipped to Wuhan. Away from inquiring eyes, the Wuhan Institute could maintain (or not maintain) its own biosafety measures entirely at the discretion of the billionaires. There could be no better way to hide what happened if the virus "escaped."

Rowan Jacobsen's article titled "Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan" explains how the Chinese researchers learned everything the American researchers knew during their collaboration. Wuhan institute "soon used its own reverse-genetics technology to make numerous coronavirus chimeras," states Jacobsen. But the gain of function research in Wuhan was conducted under way riskier conditions than similar research conducted in America. Jacobsen's article summarizes the situation:

"The Chinese work was carried out at biosafety level 2 (BSL-2), a much lower tier than Baric’s BSL-3+. [...] That meant the same viruses that Daszak was holding up as a clear and present danger to the world were being studied under conditions that, according to Richard Ebright, matched “the biosafety level of a US dentist’s office.”"

Jacobsen's article goes on to explain:

"But the WIV was not breaking any rules by working at BSL-2, says Filippa Lentzos, a biosecurity expert at King’s College London “There are no enforceable standards of what you should and shouldn’t do. It’s up to the individual countries, institutions, and scientists.” And in China, she says, the vertiginous rise of high-tech biological research has not been accompanied by an equivalent increase in oversight."

The Washington Post quotes Beth Cameron, vice president for global biological policy and programs at the nonprofit Nuclear Threat Initiative, also explain that when conducting risky studies, there are no enforceable standards of what individual institutions, countries and scientists should or shouldn't do. Cameron has told the Post that safety would "depend largely on strong security measures at each lab to protect against an accidental release and govern who is allowed to work on the experiments."

Thus there was nothing the world could do to oversee and prevent what was taking place out of sight and out of mind in communist China. Knowing this, NIH/NIAID had persistently kept funding the Wuhan lab by violating the numerous rules and procedures that have been described in this exposé. All these violations have made it possible for Daszak and Baric to teach communist China how to create bioweapons of mass destruction that couldn't be traced back to a lab origin.

Jacobsen's MIT Technology Review article states that Daszak, "In response to questions about the decision to do the research in BSL-2 conditions," forwarded him a statement from EcoHealth Alliance saying, "the organization must follow the local laws of the countries in which we work," adding that the NIH had determined the research was "not gain-of-function."

Biosafety procedures at the Wuhan Institute had been inadequate at least since January 2018, the Washington Post reports. Their article states that "In January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing took the unusual step of repeatedly sending U.S. science diplomats to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)." These U.S. diplomats explicitly warned Washington that the Wuhan Institute's biosecurity measures were so lax they could cause a SARS-like pandemic. The Washington Post article summarizes:

"What the U.S. officials learned during their visits concerned them so much that they dispatched two diplomatic cables [special diplomatic text-based messages] categorized as Sensitive But Unclassified back to Washington. The cables warned about safety and management weaknesses at the WIV lab and proposed more attention and help. The first cable, which I [the reporter] obtained, also warns that the lab's work on bat coronaviruses and their potential human transmission represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic."

On September 2019, 3 months before the pandemic, the CCP had allowed the biosecurity measures at the Wuhan Institute to become so lax that Yuan Zhiming, the head of China's CDC, then Director of Wuhan's BSL-4 lab and bat lady Shi’s supervisor, got so fed up, he published an article documenting the key biosecurity shortcomings of his Institute in the Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity. These shortcomings include "inadequate biosafety management systems, insufficient resources for efficient laboratory operation, and deficiency of professional capacity," states the addendum to the final report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. This addendum also states that "With a surprising level of transparency, Yuan admits that the enforcement of pathogen, waste, and laboratory animal management regulations “needs to be strengthened.”" For more detail, please see in Zhiming's article the sections titled "3.3. Insufficient resources for efficient laboratory operation" and "3.4. Deficiency of professional capacity."

Perhaps the most interesting part of Zhiming's article is the director's admission revealing that if an "accident" occurred, it would be hard to identify who was responsible. Zhiming wrote:

"Currently, most laboratories lack specialized biosafety managers and engineers. In such facilities, some of the skilled staff is composed by part-time researchers. This makes it difficult to identify and mitigate potential safety hazards in facility and equipment operation early enough. "

The outcries of both the U.S. diplomats and biosecurity-4 lab's own director didn't cause the U.S. or Chinese authorities to lift a finger. Instead of helping fix the biosecurity shortcomings, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted a pandemic response drill. The "philanthropic" billionaires focused on preparation instead of prevention. During their drill, they practiced, as shown in these simulation videos, how to shut down world economies, schools, restrict travel, and how to distribute their mRNA vaccines to immensely enrich themselves in a country so corrupt no one can sue vaccine manufacturers for side effects.

It can't be emphasized enough the way the above drills occurred the very same month Fauci and the HHS officials plotted releasing the "virus from China" to speed up launching their mRNA vaccines. Sure enough, the pandemic did start 2 months later.

Most ironically, the creators of the COVID-19 pandemic also prepared a report warning the world that a pandemic was about to occur, doing so just weeks before their "prophecy" actualized. On September 2019, Fauci helped prepare a World Health Organization report whose title starts with the worlds "A World at Risk," mentioning the increasing risk of global pandemic from a pathogen escaping after being engineered in a lab. Downloading the report reveals on page 32 that Fauci is a member of the board who'd authored the report. This report that Fauci had helped prepare states:

“The chances of a global pandemic are growing. While scientific and technological developments provide new tools that advance public health (including safely assessing medical countermeasures), they also allow for disease-causing microorganisms to be engineered or recreated in laboratories. A deliberate release would complicate outbreak response [...] Taken together, naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate events caused by high-impact respiratory pathogens pose 'global catastrophic biological risks.'"

Not funny?

All of the above demonstrates how well aware the authorities, including Fauci, had been of the way their efforts exposed the world to 'global catastrophic biological risks.'

Please never forget the way NIH, NIAID and HHS's deadly experiments have still not stopped as of March 2023 even after the pandemic has been created by virologist Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance.

Why should the gain of function studies stop, as it's so far been a match made in heaven for everyone in charge of the operation? Vaccine developer Gates and his cabal of wealthy elites have multiplied their wealth many times over by the untested mRNA vaccines they've made world governments force on their populations. The CCP has reached its goal of shutting down and weakening world economies. The masterminds of globalism have almost reached their goal of easing in their totalitarian one-world government modeled after the CCP.

Everyone's benefited except for the 7 million "non-essential" little people who have died as of March 2023.

"We need more money to plan for the second pandemic. There’s gonna be another pandemic,” America's senile president blurted out.

Such is the plight of the world perhaps approaching its end in the hands of a few insane old billionaires holding the strings of their senile "president."

The globalists will never let NIH/NIAID stop funding Daszak unless the Great Reset operation is dismantled from the ground up. Until then, Daszak and Baric will openly continue to prefect their modern bioweapons in a country where the CCP and globalist millionaires have not only captured the NIH/NIAID but also the White House.

For the love of God, please don't postpone doing the grassroots activism described here if you wish to help save humanity from an unthinkable end. Together we can accomplish a lot, but only if each of us does his/her part in shaping the world's future. Please also do whatever else you can think of in accord with the edicts of the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

CHAPTER 3 – The insidious psyop technique accompanying bioweapon's release

Who could be naïve enough to believe that the CCP would let the U.S. engineer potential bioweapons in its own country — without having complete control of the process?

And who on their right minds could believe humankind would "benefit" from the genetic enhancement of animal viruses to cause them to rapidly infect human populations?

Insane?

But remember... It’s you who’s "crazy" — we were all deemed crazy little conspiracy theorists daring to doubt the superior wisdom of top scientists with PhD degrees when the pandemic began, when "authoritative sources" deemed Fauci the “hero of the pandemic” instead of the villain. Mainstream channels and social platforms were colluding to give the impression that no legitimate authority agreed with us, maintaining a façade of unanimity while censoring or deriding the truth and promoting false narratives to deceive the masses. We were kept in isolation while this occurred and not allowed to be with others who could affirm our thoughts and feelings about the shutting down of our businesses. As you may have stayed glued to your TV in terror watching the strange "reality" they kept feeding you, did you ever wonder if something was wrong with your mind?

For those unfamiliar with this psyop strategy, it’s commonly referred to as “gaslighting,” defined by Britannica as ”an elaborate and insidious technique of deception and psychological manipulation” serving to “gradually undermine the victim’s confidence in his own ability to distinguish truth from falsehood, right from wrong, or reality from appearance, thereby rendering him pathologically dependent on the gaslighter in his thinking or feelings.”

How many Americans may have lost confidence in their own ability to "distinguish truth from falsehood, right from wrong, or reality from appearance" after the pandemic began, having become "pathologically dependent" on CNN, MSNBC or Google Feeds in their thinking or feelings? Plenty of Americans, apparently, as too few people opposed the insanity of keeping the economy shut down even after it became apparent the hospitals were never going to exceed their treatment capacities.

The Britannica article on gaslighting goes on to describe that the basic elements of the technique may include:

• "Isolating the victim from independent sources of information and validation, including other people."
• "Attempting to convince the victim of the truth of something intuitively bizarre or outrageous by forcefully insisting on it or by marshaling superficial evidence."
• "Dismissing the victim’s contrary perceptions or feelings as invalid or pathological [i.e., deeming us "conspiracy theorists"]; questioning the knowledge and impugning the motives [i.e., deeming us "racists"] of persons who contradict the viewpoint of the gaslighter."

This exposé showcases everything we, the "crazy conspiracy theorists," were never meant to find out as we were "supposed to" continue to let Cable TV and fake news sources shape our "reality."

CHAPTER 4 – Charging Fauci and Collins with criminally negligent homicide

As of March 2023, International law professor Dr. Francis Boyle, who's drafted the United States Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 (BWATA), is still trying to find a courageous Attorney General willing to indict Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Dr. Francis Collins, the former director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) which oversees Fauci's NIAID. Boyle is accusing Fauci and Collins of having violated his Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, accusing them of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The details are found in Boyle's great interview.

This article hopes to help Boyle and others succeed at indicting the creators of the pandemic, as well as indicting everyone who's aided and abetted Fauci and Collins.

What are the crimes Fauci and Collins can most easily be indicted for in the light of the existing evidence?

According to US Legal, criminal negligence is defined as:

"Conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences"

Which "ordinary prudent or careful person" can be expected support and fund the genetic enhancement of bat viruses to make them capable of rapidly infecting human populations?

To convict someone of criminal negligence, US Legal states that the courts must be able to prove his criminal mental state, explaining:

"Proof of that mental state requires that the failure to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk that a result will occur must be a gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person."

Representing an incredibly "gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person," Fauci and Collins have failed to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in funding the creation of bioweapons of mass destruction in a CCP-affiliated laboratory in communist China. This represents the simple truth obfuscated by treasonous top scientists and mainstream media colluding with the CCP.

In the 2016 paper titled "Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis," the world was warned that "advances in biotechnology may enable development and use of a new generation of biological weapons of mass destruction." This paper defined gain of function research (GOFR) as follows:

"Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens."

This 2016 paper details the risks and biosafety concerns of artificially enhancing "the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens," explicitly stating that "a devastating pandemic could potentially result from a laboratory accident involving an especially dangerous pathogen created via GOFR [gain of function research]." The same 1916 paper explains the purported benefits of GOFR such as attempts to develop vaccines and medical countermeasures, adding:

"Critics questioned the validity of claims about such benefits and argued that the studies might facilitate creation of biological weapons agents that could kill millions, or possibly even billions, of people."

This is just one of the countless warnings Collins' NIH and Fauci's NIAID had been given. NIH/NIAID nevertheless kept facilitating the "creation of biological weapons agents that could kill millions, or possibly even billions," in a PLA-affiliated lab in communist China through numerous unethical ploys and policy violations the upcoming sections spell out in detail.

In late 2019 when the pandemic began, with the mainstream media eerily avoiding mentioning the possibility of a lab accident or bioweapon release, Fauci was allowed to assume the role of an unelected autocrat shaping almost all aspects of U.S. policy. The way Fauci's role overrode even the president's has been blurted out by Joe Biden in a December 2, 2021 speech whose video is available. In this speech, Biden irritably utters "I've seen more of Dr. Fauci than I have my wife... Look, who's president? Fauci!" They say one hears the truth from children, but it's taken a demented old man to voice the extent to which America was for several years run by a CCP-compromised "health" official.

On August 22, 2022, Fauci announced he'll be "stepping down from the positions of Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Chief of the NIAID Laboratory of Immunoregulation, as well as the position of Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden." His retirement pension "will amount to over $400,000 and top the annual salary that the President of the United States brings in," reports Fox News. Instead of spending his retirement in the lap of luxury after having caused more than 6 million people to die as of September 2022, this monster should spend his retirement in prison as this article will hopefully help bring on.

CHAPTER 5 – Piles of evidence lead to the Wuhan Institute of Virology

On March 2023, the FBI and U.S. Department of Energy announced SARS-CoV-2 may indeed have come from the Wuhan lab, with the media finally being allowed to report freely on the lab leak hypothesis. On March 10 2023, the House voted unanimously to declassify U.S. intelligence on the origins of COVID-19. "It's unclear whether the president will sign the measure into law, and the White House said the matter was under review," reported ABC News on March 10, 2023.

Back in August 2021, few media outlets had dared cover the way the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff had announced that the pandemic came from the Wuhan lab in their August 2021 addendum to their report titled "The Origins of Covid-19, an Investigation of the Wuhan Institute of Virology." This report states:

"It is the opinion of Committee Minority Staff, based on the preponderance of available information; the documented efforts to obfuscate, hide, and destroy evidence; and the lack of physical evidence to the contrary; that SARS-CoV-2 was accidentally released from a Wuhan Institute of Virology laboratory sometime prior to September 12, 2019."

There was nothing "accidental" about the virus's intentional release, as the upcoming parts of the exposé will demonstrate.

In an August 2, 2021 op-ed, Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe announced the way he's “had access to all of the U.S. government’s most sensitive intelligence related to the pandemic," which caused him to conclude:

"although the CCP has gone to great lengths to ensure there is no "smoking gun," every piece of evidence I have seen points to the pandemic’s origin being a leak out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."

On August 8, 2022. Professor Jeffrey Sachs, the head of the COVID-19 commission of the world's most influential top medical journal the Lancet, stated that after 2 years of intensive investigation, he's "pretty convinced" SARS-CoV-2 was engineered in a lab. Sachs has declared (scroll for video):

"I chaired the commission for the Lancet for 2 years on Covid. I'm pretty convinced it came out of US lab biotechnology, not out of nature, just to mention, after 2 years of intensive work on this. So it's a blunder, in my view, of biotech [...] it's not being investigated, not in the United States, not anywhere, and I think for real reasons, that they don't want to look underneath the rug."

Dr. Robert Redfield, the former director of the CDC, also announced that he believed a lab leak is the most likely explanation for the COVID-19 pandemic. Redfield explained:

"I'm just giving my best opinion as a virologist, and I don't think it's plausible that this virus went from a bat to an animal – we still don't know that animal – and then went into humans and immediately learned how to be human-to-human transmissible to the point of now causing one of the greatest pandemics we've had in the history of the world."

"That's not consistent with how other coronaviruses have come into the human species," Redfield told, referring to the way all other coronaviruses that had emerged in animals and jumped onto humans had taken some time to evolve the ability to start spreading effectively among humans. The former CDC director also pointed out, "You have a virus that is one of the most infectious viruses in the history of humanity, and yet that virus no longer can infect the bat? [...] No, this is highly abnormal." Redfield added:

"And, it does suggest that there's an alternative hypothesis that it went from a bat virus, got into a laboratory, where in the laboratory, it was taught, educated, it evolved, so that it became a virus that could efficiently transmit human to human."

The real "conspiracy is Collins, Fauci, and the established scientific community," told former CDC director Redfield, also stating, "Everyone had to agree to the narrative" pushed by Fauci and Collins that the pandemic originated in a wet market. "I was threatened, my life was threatened," Redfield said. "I have letters I got from prominent scientists, that previously gave me awards, telling me that the best thing I could do for the world was to shoot myself because of what I said," the ex-director told. "Nothing's going to happen as long as the Biden administration is here," Redfield also added.

On October 2022, the Senate Committee on Health Education, Labor and Pensions Minority Oversight Staff published their own analysis of the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, announcing in their interim report: "Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident." This report then falsely states "more information is needed to arrive at a more precise, if not a definitive, understanding of the origins of SARS-CoV-2." The investigators commissioned for this report have, possibly through willful blindness, have missed way too many pieces of the puzzle included in this exposé. The next 2 sections immediately erase all doubts about the fact that the virus did escape from the lab.

CHAPTER 6 – Wuhan lab staff gets sick, Wuhan hospitals fill up, and the lab destroys its viral databases right before pandemic's announcement

Right before the COVID-10 pandemic's announcement, the CCP did not only destroy all of its viral databases that could lead to the origins of SARS-CoV-2, but it also forced compromised U.S. officials to destroy their databases. Demonstrating how this occurred leaves no doubt about the way the virus must have escaped from the Wuhan lab.

The destruction of the databases of the Wuhan lab is described in this section, and the destruction of collaborating NIH's databases are described in the next section.

"Bat lady" Shi Zhengli, who directs the coronavirus research efforts at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, has claimed that the genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 does not match any of the viral sequences her team had been studying. But declassified U.S. intel has revealed that staff members at the lab fell ill with COVID-like symptoms in the Autumn of 2019, before the first reported case of the pandemic in late 2019. Again during the autumn of 2019, many international athletes, who had traveled to Wuhan for the Military World Games, got sick with Covid-19-like symptoms. Hospitals around the Wuhan lab at that time had also filled up, states the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff report titled "The Origins of Covid-19." The report explains:

"Satellite imagery of Wuhan in September and October 2019 [...] showed a significant uptick in the number of people at local hospitals surrounding the WIV’s [Wuhan Institute of Virology's] headquarters, coupled with an unusually high number of patients with symptoms similar to COVID-19."

The same autumn of 2019 when the Wuhan lab staff developed Covid-19-like symptoms and the hospitals near the lab filled up, the Wuhan Institute deleted its main database of more than 22,000 unpublished samples and sequences of bat and rodent viral genomic sequences on September 12, 2019. Eventually all of the 16 virus databases managed by the Wuhan Institute were taken offline. None of these databases could so far be recovered. Vanity Fair reports:

"Why would a database supported by U.S. tax dollars to help prevent and respond to a pandemic be made “inaccessible exactly when it was needed to fulfill its intended purpose?” asks Jamie Metzl, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, who was among the first to call for a full investigation of COVID-19’s origins."

In trying to learn how SARS-CoV-2 originated, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo asked China to provide the U.S. with its earliest samples of the virus. But China destroyed these samples too and admitted to having destroyed them on January 3rd 2020.

All of the above indicates that China had everything to hide regarding how COVID-19 originated.

As if the destruction of the piles of evidence the deleted databases contained wasn't enough in trying to obfuscate the pandemic's origin, revisions had been made to the early viral genomic sequences in trying to mislead the world into believing that the virus jumped from pangolins. This was uncovered by the nonprofit investigative research group U.S. Right to Know. These revisions had been made to the genomic datasets of four high-profile studies claiming that SARS-CoV-2 evolved in bats, jumped onto pangolins from bats, and then onto humans.

Not only the Chinese researchers but numerous U.S. researchers and officials also aided and abetted the CCP's cover-up attempts and following misinformation campaign to deceive the world about where SARS-CoV-2 came from. The next section starts naming these people and how they betrayed the world.

But not everyone had been willing to kowtow to the CCP...

CHAPTER 7 – Dr. Bloom courageously resists and exposes the corruption of NIH's director Collins and grantee Andersen

Dr. Jesse Bloom reminds us that there are still researchers who value truth over trying to climb the academic or political ladder.

In a country where the NIH and NIAID provide a big portion of the grant funding for medical research, it would be academic suicide for most researchers to let themselves fall out of favor with NIAID's director Fauci and NIH's director Collins. Without being able to win grant awards from Fauci and Collins, researchers wouldn't be able to conduct the studies and publish the new findings needed to retain or advance their academic positions. Thus the CCP only had to compromise key officials such as Collins and Fauci in a system that discouraged everyone else from getting on the wrong side of their grant providers. Grantees who kowtowed to Fauci and Collins kept getting funded and kept rising. Those who refused to do Fauci and Collins' bidding got no funds.

But one researcher nevertheless selflessly resisted.

On June 2020, Wuhan University researchers emailed the NIH requesting that the U.S. institute also deletes its own early genomic sequences from its viral databases. Collins' NIH did comply with China's request. The fact that this deletion had occurred was discovered by evolutionary biologist Jesse Bloom, who succeeded at partially recovering the deleted sequences. Bloom was able to recover "13 partial viral sequences collected from people in the city [of Wuhan] in the early days of the pandemic." Bloom then wrote a paper explaining, "the Huanan Seafood Market sequences are not fully representative of the viruses in Wuhan early in the epidemic." The recovered data demonstrated "that the coronavirus was circulating in the city long before the December 2019 outbreak at the city’s Huanan seafood market, which was a major focus of the recent WHO report on the origins of the pandemic," reports the Intercept. The WHO's seafood market origin theory had been fabricated.

The same Intercept article states, "It turned out that researchers from Wuhan University had emailed the NIH in June 2020 to request that the sequences be deleted."

Before Bloom published his paper on the deleted genomic sequences, he'd sent a copy to NIH's director Collins and NIAID's director Fauci. Upon receiving the paper before its publication, Collins organized a meeting with Bloom and 2 other virologists he invited. One of Collins' invitees was evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen, who repeatedly tried to dissuade Bloom from publishing his findings during their meeting. Andersen finally told Bloom he was a screener at the pre-print server where Bloom's paper still resided, he would be able to either delete Bloom's paper or revise it “in a way that would leave no record that this had been done.” But Bloom refused to allow Andersen to delete or alter his paper, letting it get published as is.

After it leaked to the press that Collins had invited to his meeting someone like Andersen who could alter the preprint server without any trace, more and more corruption kept surfacing as will be demonstrated, which finally forced NIH's director Collins to announce his resignation in October 5th 2021. Fauci has done the same much later despite the stench of his corruption surpassing that of Collins.'

CHAPTER 8 – NIH's disgraced ex-director becomes Biden's top science advisor, NIH's acting director "reveals" 292 fully redacted pages

Compromised ex-director Collins had proven too useful to the CCP to be left to retire in peace after his resignation.

After getting declared a "National Treasure" by gaslighting propaganda-spewing outlets, compromised Collins rejoined compromised Biden’s administrative team like compromised birds of a feather. Collins became a top science advisor to the Biden White House on February 2022. Collins had gone right back to helping Fauci determine U.S. government policy by having become he co-chair of Biden's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

Collins' new tasks included to "help find the next director of NIH" as of September 2022.

If Americans continue to do nothing about saving their country, God knows how many future NIH directors will keep sending U.S. taxpayer funds to China, Ukraine, and God knows where else for creating more pandemic pathogens. There needs to be a huge outcry about this, please don't postpone doing your part.

As Collins was looking for the NIH's new director, the duties of the director of the NIH were being performed by acting director Lawrence A. Tabak, who had previously been serving as the NIH's Principal Deputy Director and Deputy Ethics Counselor. Some ethics counselor Tabak had been if it was his counsel that had encouraged Collins to do the incredibly corrupt deeds this exposé will keep documenting.

In performing the duties of NIH's acting director, Tabak has continued to walk Collins' path in aiding and abetting the CCP, causing the NIH to hide additional critical evidence on the pandemic's origin. On, February 20 2022, in response to litigation, the former "ethics counselor" sent to the Intercept 292 fully redacted pages rather than substantive material that could have shed light on how SARS-CoV-2 was created!

No joking — Tabak did send the Intercept 292 fully redacted pages of "information" about the grants the NIH provided to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, revealing his unwillingness to come clean about NIH/NIAID's collaboration with the CCP in engineering the SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon. Please see the fully redacted 292 pages start here after page 15!

The story of NIH/NIAID's ridiculous attempts to cover up the pandemic's origin unfortunately does not end here.

The deeply compromised Biden administration advised by Collins and Fauci tried to mislead the world for the umpteenth time in their declassified COVID-19 Origin Intelligence Report released on Aug 27, 2021. This absurdly brief report claimed the White House's investigation into the pandemic's origins is inconclusive, saying "China’s cooperation most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19." The Biden administration would like you to believe that the investigation into the pandemic's origin may conveniently never conclude, when China may never be expected to cooperate to incriminate itself. But as this article will continue to demonstrate, revealing the pandemic's origin doesn't need China at all. The NIH's attempts to delete, alter and avoid revealing key information indicates that the full truth can be learned by subpoenaing Collins, Tabak, Fauci and every other corrupt researcher this exposé will continue to name, and by forcing these corrupt researchers to un-redact and hand in everything they've been hiding.

The compromised Biden White House continues to do all it can to further obfuscate how the pandemic started. On February 23, 2022, Biden cancelled a program called the China Initiative because of "increasing concerns from the academic and scientific community about the department’s pursuit of certain research grant fraud cases." This has been admitted by Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen in a speech at George Mason University, suggesting the stifling of the investigations into the gain of function research grants administered by Fauci and Collins. Assistant Attorney General Olsen told during this speech:

"We have heard that these prosecutions — and the public narrative they create — can lead to a chilling atmosphere for scientists and scholars that damages the scientific enterprise in this country."

The authorities are thus still telling us they can't be sure if the virus came from the Wuhan lab as of March 2023 (not satire).

CHAPTER 9 – After the launch of America's global network of biolabs, Biden announces second pandemic's coming

Having prevented any prosecutions that could damage the collaboration of the American and Chinese virologists engineering bioweapons of mass destruction, the Biden administration plans for (loads slow) future pandemics, which has been caught on video. "We need more money to plan for the second pandemic. There’s gonna be another pandemic,” America's senile president has blurted out multiple times. The Infowars article reporting Biden say such words includes 2 videos of the 2 occasions Biden has announced that the next pandemic's on its way. This Infowars article ends with the words: "From which biolab will the second pandemic originate? Only time will tell."

On March 9, 2022, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian released a tweet alleging “The US has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone. It should give a full account of its biological military activities at home and abroad and subject itself to multilateral verification.” The U.S. has not responded to China's allegation, but the NIAID's website contains an August 2020 announcement titled "NIAID Establishes Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases," whose subtitle states "Global Network to Focus on Spillover Potential." This announcement states that "NIAID intends to provide approximately $82 million over 5 years to support the network." The NPR article covering the NIAID's funding of this global network of biolabs states:

"EcoHealth Alliance is one of the 11 institutions and research teams receiving grants from NIH [...] to establish the Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases. The global network will monitor pathogens that emerge in wildlife and study how and where they go on to infect humans."

The NPR article adds:

"That will mean studying coronaviruses, of course, but also filoviruses, a family of viruses that includes Ebola, and paramyxoviruses, a group that includes the viruses that cause mumps, measles and Nipah, a highly lethal virus that inspired the 2011 movie Contagion."

NIAID's August 2020 announcement of the creation of its global network of biolabs further states that "Each Center in the network will involve collaborations with peer institutions in the United States and 28 other countries."

NIAID's global network's own website states one of the network's goals as being "to prospectively develop a framework and the infrastructure necessary to respond quickly and effectively to future outbreaks." This shows the way the worldwide infrastructure will be ready for the Great Reset to rapidly succeed at getting implemented when the next pandemic will inevitably occur due to the hundreds, or perhaps millions of additional pandemic pathogens being created in the hundreds of biolabs of the worldwide Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases network.

Will the world end due to the compromised Biden Administration's efforts to fill it with pandemic pathogens or due to its efforts to start a nuclear World War III with Russia and China?

Or are We the People going to start acting to stop this ultimately evil agenda in the light of the edicts of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence?

Regarding the biolabs in Ukraine, when Sen. Marco Rubio asked US Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland "Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?," Nuland admitted under oath (50 seconds into the video):

"Ukraine has — biological research facilities — which, in fact — we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach."

It's ironic the way the U.S. didn't have any problem with developing in China the "research materials" it doesn't want Russia to gain access to.

When Fauci announced his retirement on December 2022, he told CBS News that he'll be stepping down "to pursue the 'next chapter' of his career." It's likely Fauci too will end up on Biden's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology just like Collins has done in his career's 'next chapter.' If not put in prison, Fauci is likely to continue to help mastermind the Great Reset and determine the U.S. policy that's been filling the world with countless new deadly viruses.

For the love of God, please help put an end to all this, please don't postpone doing your part in helping save the world.

CHAPTER 10 – Biden officials agree Wuhan Institute collaborates with CCP's Military, then continue to fund lab, committing high treason

Fauci's willful dereliction of duty has been such that he didn't even bother doing a simple Google search, apparently, before funding the creation of potential bioweapons of mass destruction in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Wuhan Institute's multiple connections to the CCP's People's Liberation Army (PLA) was listed on the lab's English language website before the pandemic began. This is pointed out in the the August 2021 addendum to the final report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, which states: "This website was scrubbed on May 28, 2020, and the lists of committee members removed. However, archived copies of the website are available online.”

Here is the archived copy (loads slowly) of the Wuhan Institute's webpage the CCP tried to obliterate, demonstrating how easily Fauci could have overcome his willful blindness if he'd wanted to. The PLA connections this archived copy reveals are summarized as follows in the Foreign Affairs Committee addendum report:

“The Academic Committee of State Key Laboratory of Virology at the WIV included a Deputy Director from the Second Military Medical University and a member from the 302 Military Hospital of China. The Scientific Advisory Committee for the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases had among its members a researcher from the Institute of Military Veterinary at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences.”

On January 15, 2021, the Department of State declassified a fact sheet announcing that Wuhan Lab researchers have been secretly collaborating on publications and projects with China’s military since at least 2017. Trump’s former deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger affirmed this on March 30, 2021, saying:

“There is a body of research that's been taking place conducted by the Chinese military in collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has not been acknowledged by the Chinese government. We've seen the data. I've personally seen the data.”

"It should be noted that the WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology] has a Chinese Communist Party Committee within the institute, as well as a Commission for Discipline Inspection," states the addendum to the final report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. This report explains:

"The Party Committee is divided into four party branches, which are then divided into subbranches organized around the individual WIV departments, research centers, and offices. Each subbranch has its own Propaganda Committee. Committee Minority Staff were able to identify eight WIV researchers on these committees, including several who are affiliated with the Key Laboratory that Shi [Zhengli] directs."

After listing the names and CCP-affiliations of the 8 Wuhan Lab researchers on the Chinese Communist Party committees within the Wuhan Institute, the same report goes on to explain the activities of these committees, stating, "The Committee for Discipline Inspection is charged with “the implementation of the party's line, policy, party discipline, relevant laws and regulations, and the institute's rules and regulations." The report adds: "In addition to the researchers serving on propaganda committees, other key figures at the WIV also serve as CCP officials.” These key figures serving as CCP officials within the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their affiliations are summarized as follows in the final report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff:

"The Director General of the institute is Wang Yanyi,¹⁹³ who joined the China Zhi Gong Party, a CCP controlled minority party, in 2010. In 2018, the same year she became the Director General of the WIV, she was elected the Deputy Director of the Wuhan Municipal Party Committee.¹⁹⁴ Until early 2020, the BSL-4 lab was managed by Yuan Zhiming.¹⁹⁵ Yuan is the President of the Chinese Communist Party Committee within the Wuhan Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, to which the WIV belongs.¹⁹⁶ Local CCP leaders not only run the WIV itself, but also directly managed the BSL-4 lab.¹⁹⁷ According to a French diplomat, Yuan’s performance and management was subpar – the lab has been underutilized and the most talented scientists have left. After the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak began, Yuan was replaced on January 31, 2020.¹⁹⁸ In a possible fulfillment of the concerns raised by the French defense and intelligence services almost two decades prior, he was succeeded by Major General Chen Wei, the PRC’s top biowarfare expert.^199"

This demonstrates the incredible extent of Fauci's criminal "negligence," so to speak, in letting U.S. taxpayer dollars create bioweapons of mass destruction in CCP's lab.

Fauci's willful "blindness" was such that during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Hearing on May 25, 2021, Fauci called the Chinese grantees he's funded "very competent, trustworthy scientists" when questioned by Senator John Kennedy. In this hearing, Fauci refused to comment on the Chinese Communist Party’s influence on these scientists, but said he knew these scientists to be "trustworthy." Such is the extent of Fauci's failure to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in exposing the world to a pandemic coming out of communist China.

In the declassified fact sheet of the Department of State, it also states that gain-of-function studies did get conducted at the Wuhan Lab. Among the bat viruses studied was a coronavirus named RATG13 that's genetically 96.2% similar to the virus causing COVID-19. About this extremely close relative of SARS-CoV-2 that had been studied, former Clinton administration national security official Jamie Metzl wrote in The Wall Street Journal:

“suggesting that an outbreak of a deadly bat coronavirus coincidentally occurred near the only level 4 virology institute in all of China—which happened to be studying the closest known relative of that exact virus—strains credulity.”

Could an incredible coincidence really have occurred, making SARS-CoV-2 not come from the virology lab studying its 96.2% likeness in Wuhan where researchers had gotten sick and all databases had been scrubbed right before the pandemic?

Funny?

The Biden Administration and their bought-out "mainstream" shills had run out of straws to grasp in continuing to decry the lab leak theory as a "crazy conspiracy." On March 2021, the Washington Post published that the Biden Administration had agreed with the accuracy of the information in the fact sheet of the Trump State Department. Their article quotes an unnamed senior Biden State Department official explain:

“There wasn’t significant or meaningful disagreement regarding the information presented in the fact sheet,” [..] “No one is disputing the information, the fact that these data points exist, the fact that they are accurate. Where there was some discomfort was that [the Trump administration] put spin on the ball.”

The so-called "spin on the ball" refers to the way the Trump State Department leaned their interpretation all the way towards the Wuhan lab leak theory. "The Biden administration is trying to take a neutral stance on the issue," told the same unnamed senior Biden State Department official to the Washington Post.

The Washington Post article also states that "There was certainly not consensus [inside the U.S. government] on the still unproven theory that this emerged from the lab." Regarding this so called "consensus" of the scientists advising the Biden White House including Fauci and Collins, the next section demonstrates exactly how this fake "consensus" against the lab leak theory was shaped by a web of egregious ploys and lies that have surfaced as a result of Fauci's emails (slow-loading) obtained after Freedom of Information Act (FIOA) lawsuits.

But before moving on, it must be noted that the Biden White House kept funding the creation of bioweapons of mass destruction in a PLA-affiliated lab for almost a year until August 19, 2022, doing so AFTER having had to agree on January 15, 2021 that Wuhan Lab's researchers were collaborating with China’s military. This alone makes everyone responsible for continuing to fund the Wuhan lab guilty of high treason.

CHAPTER 11 – The CCP's huge disinformation campaign created with the help of compromised officials and researchers

In a May 2021 interview, even Fauci finally had to admit he's no longer confident SARS-CoV-2 evolved naturally. A year before in May 4, 2020, Fauci had told National Geographic that scientific evidence "is very, very strongly" leaning toward the natural evolution origin. Fauci had been "very, very" wrong.

Back when the pandemic began, Fauci and Collins had pushed top scientists into pretending to unanimously agree on SARS-CoV-2's natural origin theory, misleading the world through a fake "consensus." The creation of the fake "consensus" was accomplished with Fauci and Collins' "advice and leadership," according to emails.

In describing the collusion of the CCP-compromised top science officials and their corrupt grantees who's misled the world, let's start with unethical virologist Kristian Andersen. As may be recalled, Andersen had offered to alter or delete Dr. Bloom's paper exposing the NIH's deletion of certain viral sequences. The deleted sequences, which were partially recovered by Dr. Bloom, proved that the virus couldn't have emerged from the Huanan seafood market the way the WHO had "determined." Corrupt grantee Andersen's only gift wasn't his ability to mess with and alter papers in the preprint server, but also his readiness to execute 180 degree turns in his opinions. On February 4, 2020, Andersen wrote in an email: “The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered with intent and that is demonstrably not the case.” But only three days ago on February 1, 2020, Andersen and his colleagues had defended the lab leak hypothesis during a teleconference with the world's top virologists organized by Sir Jeremy Farrar, a powerful research grant administrator in London and a scientific advisor to the UK Government. Farrar's teleconference included world's most powerful science officials such as Sir Patrick Vallance who's the chief scientific adviser to the UK government.

Before his teleconference, Farrar had sent a warning email to all participants demanding: "Information and discussion is shared in total confidence and not to be shared until agreement on next steps." But what was discussed during this teleconference didn't stay confidential after FIOA lawsuits allowed the House Committee on Oversight and Reform to view the emails that participants had exchanged following the teleconference. These emails reveal that during the teleconference, Andersen and his colleagues had expressed "little doubt that the virus bore the fingerprints of manipulation." This was due to the presence of a genetic element called a furin cleavage site in the virus. The New York Post quotes teleconference participant Robert F. Garry explaining in an email sent one day after the teleconference that the virus's furin cleavage site is a a string of 12 units of RNA representing a precision unusual in nature. Garry wrote in his February 2, 2020 email: "I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature … it’s stunning. Of course, in the lab it would be easy to generate the perfect 12 base insert that you wanted."

One day after the teleconference organized by Farrar, another member of the Andersen group, Michael Farzan, had also emphasized the unlikeliness of SARS-CoV-2 acquiring its furin cleavage site naturally. Farzan had pointed out that the virus was likely to have acquired this element through direct insertion in a lab or through sustained interaction between human tissue and a chimeric virus engineered in a lab that lacked proper biocontainment protocols. Farzan had said, "I am 70:30 or 60:40 [lab]."

Again the day after Farrar's February 1 teleconference, participant Andrew Rambaut had expressed his agreement with his colleagues, saying: “From a (natural) evolutionary point of view the only thing here that strikes me as unusual is the furin cleavage site.” On February 4, 2020, another participant called Edward Holmes had also indicated he was “60-40 lab.”

If the world were to ever learn that SARS-CoV-2 had been engineered in the Wuhan lab, world governments could sooner or later try to hold China accountable for it. The CCP didn't want things to begin to slide in that direction. A well-thought-out disinformation campaign was put into effect using the CCP's good old buddies in the U.S. and U.K. governments and their subservient grantees.

Going back to Andersen who had suddenly changed his mind and decried his colleagues' initial consensus as a "crackpot theory," he'd done so in an email to virologist Peter Daszak who's been leading the research on coronaviruses in partnership with China, being the president of EcoHealth Alliance which kept directing U.S. federal grant money to the Wuhan Institute. In his email to Daszak, Andersen seems to have let the CCP's key contact person know his willingness to help China by putting the fear of ridicule into anyone who continued to entertain the lab leak idea or kept wondering if a bioweapon had been released. But only a month ago, on January 31, 2020, Andersen had written to Fauci in a memo that he too favored the lab leak hypothesis. Andersen had told Fauci in this memo: “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.” Andersen had also written in the same memo to Fauci: “after discussions earlier today, Eddie [Edward C. Holmes], Bob [Robert F. Garry], Mike [Michael Farzan] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from [natural] evolutionary theory.” Andersen isn't reported to have changed his mind a month later in Farrar's February 1 2020 teleconference he'd attended with the same colleagues Holmes, Garry and Farzan. Just 3 days after this teleconference, what or who, exactly, had caused Andersen to execute his 180 degree change of mind?

Andersen and his colleagues had reversed their opinions right after having received "advice and leadership" from Fauci and Collins, emails reveal.

On February 4 2020, on the same day Andersen had called the deliberate release theory a "crackpot theory," Andersen had emailed [page 2401 of 3234] Fauci, Collins and Farrar the final copy of a paper he'd written on the pandemic's origin, asking for “comments, suggestions, or questions” from his grant providers. Andersen had co-authored this paper with 4 colleagues who'd attended Farrar's teleconference, who included Rambaunt, Holmes and Garry who'd initially supported the lab leak hypothesis in their private communications 2 days ago. In his email [page 2401 of 3234] to Fauci, Collins and Farrar containing him and his colleagues' paper as an attachment, Andersen had written: "Thank you again for your advice and leadership as we have been working through the SARS-CoV-2 'origins' paper."

The final version of Andersen's group's paper prepared with Collins' and Fauci's "advice and leadership" got published in the highly influential journal Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, announcing the opposite of its authors' original consensus, stating: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus. [...] We do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible." Thus had Fauci and Collins' grantees lied through their teeth to deceive the masses.

After the Nature paper was published, Fauci used the power of his position to distribute this misleading paper and others like it to the media according to emails.

On May 5, 2020, W. Ian Lipkin, one of the 5 authors of the Andersen group's misleading Nature Medicine Article, sent an email to Fauci [page 706 of 3234], sucking up to the influential grant provider, thanking him for having steered them in the right direction. Lipkin has written to Fauci: “we deeply appreciate your efforts in steering and messaging.”

The situation is summarized as follows in the January 11, 2022 letter of the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House of Representatives:

"It is unclear what, if any, new evidence was presented or if the underlying science changed in that short period of time, but after speaking with Drs. Fauci and Collins, the authors abandoned their belief COVID-19 was the result of a laboratory leak. It is also unclear if Drs. Fauci or Collins edited the [Nature Medicine] paper prior to publication."

Farrar had helped convene the 5 authors of the misleading Nature Medicine paper, which was admitted by Farrar's office to the Daily Mail. Farrar had convened the 5 authors despite the way he had not yet changed his mind about the virus's origin on February 2, 2 days before Andersen had cc'd their article to him. Still speaking the truth, Farrar had written in his February 2 email, "On a spectrum if 0 is nature and 100 is release—I am honestly at 50!” But whatever had gotten into Andersen's group caught up with Farrar too in a jiffy. About 2 weeks after having emailed he was 50-50 for the lab leak hypothesis, on February 19, 2020, Farrar too announced his turn by becoming one of the signatories of another highly influential misleading letter published in the world's top medical journal The Lancet. In this letter, 27 top scientists including Farrar "unanimously" declared: "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."

The world's top scientific minds had thus "strongly" condemned as conspiracy nuts everyone daring to oppose their "consensus." Which esteemed academic or journalist could still push the issue?

Ordinary citizens and influencers alike had not only been mislead but also deviously manipulated by their fear of ridicule.

The fake "consensus" letter published in the Lancet shaped the view of the mainstream media for more than a year, explains science writer Nicholas Wade. Likewise, the misleading Nature Medicine letter Fauci and Collins had "steered" the Andersen group to write has been cited 2759 times as of March 17, 2022, which indicates how frequently the mainstream media, social platforms and self-appointed "fact checkers" have referenced the lies deriding the lab leak hypothesis and deemed it "disinformation," censuring those pointing out the likelihood of the lab origin. Those who opposed were "letting fear and conspiratorial thinking" cloud their judgement, wrote Forbes in its article titled "The Wuhan Lab Leak Hypothesis Is A Conspiracy Theory, Not Science." Among the numerous slam pieces decrying or ridiculing the lab leak and deliberate release theories is even a National Review article titled "The Lab Leak Theory Is Unbearably Racist."

On September 11, 2021, the Daily Mail published that "26 out of the 27 Lancet scientists who trashed theory that Covid leaked from a Chinese lab have links to Wuhan researchers." This Daily Mail article covers an original investigation conducted by the Daily Telegraph exposing the 26 researchers' affiliations with Wuhan lab's researchers. These Wuhan researchers, as may be recalled, had been secretly collaborating with China’s military since at least 2017, according to the State Department's fact sheet whose data points couldn't be disputed by the Biden administration.

CHAPTER 12 – Email reveals Collins asked Fauci how else to squelch the lab leak theory

It took about a year and a half for the CCP's intimidation methods to start losing their grip on the scientific community.

On October 16, 2021, the Lancet published a letter this time in support of the lab-leak theory, coming from a conscientious group of scientists who "pointed out the logical fallacies and questionable assumptions in the research that Daszak’s group [the 27 scientists who had signed the previous Lancet letter] cited," reports PJ Media.

On April 16, 2020, NIH's director Collins panicked upon seeing a Fox News report announcing that multiple sources briefed on the origins of COVID-19 believed it emerged from the Wuhan lab. Wondering if they may not have done enough to squelch the lab leak hypothesis, Collins emailed Fauci with a link to the Fox News report, saying:

“Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy, with what seems to be growing momentum. [...]

I hoped the Nature Medicine article on the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would settle this. But probably didn’t get much visibility. Anything more we can do? Ask the National Academy [of Sciences] to weigh in?”

Fauci replied on April 17, 2020: “I would not do anything about this right now. It is a shiny object that will go away in times [sic].”

The lab leak and bioweapon release theories, which no reasonable person could have dismissed, will never "go away in time" in a world where the voice of truth has convincing power over blatant lies, gaslighting efforts and cancel culture. The outraged masses hungry for the truth may never be expected to stop digging up the facts.

On October 5th, 2020, White House adviser Scott Atlas and Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar met with a conscientious group of scientists who'd been critical of the COVID-19 lockdown strategy, who'd released a statement called the “Great Barrington Declaration” advocating the alternative strategy of only protecting the elderly and the vulnerable and allowing children and younger people to return to work and school. When Collins heard of Atlas and Azar's meeting with the declaration's signatories, he wrote to Fauci and other officials in an email, “There needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its [Great Barrington Declaration's] premises.”

The above reveals the extent to which Collins, Fauci and their collaborators work for the globalist criminal cabal bent on destroying world economies to establish a totalitarian One World Government. Please resist letting yourself get manipulated into believing that the Great Reset is a "crazy conspiracy theory," please spread this 10-minute irrefutable proof of the world's takeover far and wide.

Going back to the Great Barrington Declaration which has received almost one million signatures from infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, it's sad the way the voices of even such a large number of signatories have been cancelled by worldwide intense censorship efforts ramped up after the bioweapon's release. The lockdowns did continue as Collins wished they would, causing untold harm and damage to the the entire world's economy.

On May 5, 2021, about a month after Fox News' report had set Collins into panic, Nobel laureate biologist David Baltimore announced (this website is NOT "suspicious," they just don't want you to see it) that the existence of the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2’s genome is the “smoking gun” to the theory that SARS-CoV-2 is engineered in a lab. As may be recalled, the existence of this furin cleavage site was the main reason for the original real consensus of world's top virologists who'd initially favored the lab leak hypothesis. Nobel laureate Baltimore's referral to the same furin cleavage site as a 'smoking gun' may have caused not just Collins but Fauci too to panic this time. God knows how many sleepless nights Fauci and Collins may have suffered before Baltimore did cave in to the threat of the "quick and devastating" takedown looming over his head. Baltimore quickly caved in and announced on June, 2021 that he'd overstated the case. When pathological liar virologist Andersen tweeted that Baltimore had been incorrect, Baltimore responded by saying Andersen may be right. Baltimore told Los Angeles Times that he regrets using the phrase 'smoking gun' and that he should have softened it.

CHAPTER 13 – Peter Daszak: the public face of the CCP

Dr. Peter Daszak, the director of EcoHealth Alliance and leader of the coronavirus studies conducted in partnership with China, is perhaps the most valuable American traitor on the CCP's side, who's helped lead the immense efforts described to squash the lab leak and deliberate release hypothesis to protect China.

Daszak, who created SARS-CoV-2, according to the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, as will shortly be elaborated, has a deep history of enmeshment with the CCP and the PLA. This has been uncovered by the National Pulse which reports that Daszak has completed over 20 research projects listing “affiliations” with Chinese Communist Party-linked entities. These projects include studies funded by the Chinese government and co-authored by military-linked researchers, reports the National Pulse. Fauci and Collins have had no qualms about continuing to fund such a researcher by egregiously violating numerous rules and policies, resorting to almost every form of deceit imaginable in their treasonous collaboration with the CCP, as the upcoming sections will demonstrate.

According to additional emails published after FIOA lawsuits, the previously described Lancet letter strongly condemning the "conspiracy theories" wasn't really written by the joint effort of the world's top virologists. This letter had been composed by Daszak after he'd been asked by his "collaborators" in China for a "show of support," according to a February 8, 2020 email.

In showing "his support" for his Chinese collaborators, as Daszak began circulating his Lancet letter's draft among his colleagues to find cosigners, his email to his recruits warned them of his attempts to create the appearance of scientific unanimity, saying: “Please note that this statement will not have EcoHealth Alliance logo on it and will not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person.” Daszak wrote that he wanted the letter he'd composed to seem like “simply a letter from leading scientists.” Daszak added that he wanted “to avoid the appearance of a political statement.”

In further trying to make his political statement seem like a unanimous scientific consensus statement, Daszak emailed his closest colleague Ralph Baric on February 6, 2020, mentioning in this email another close colleague of his called Linfa Wang, saying “I spoke with Linfa last night about the statement we sent round, He thinks, and I agree with him, that you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn't work in a counterproductive way." Daszak added in the same email, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.” Baric replied to Daszak saying “I also think this is a good decision.” “Otherwise it looks self-serving and we lose impact," Baric added. In the end, despite the way Baric and Wang didn't sign the letter, Daszak did sign it.

Daszak has been the “public face of a CCP disinformation campaign designed to suppress public discussion about a potential lab leak” of SARS-CoV-2, states the August 2021 report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff on the pandemic’s origins. Daszak, Farrar and the other 25 recruits Daszak could persuade to sign the Lancet letter had all lied flat out in the 'Acknowledgements' section of their letter when they'd stated "We declare no competing interests.” At least 6 signatories did have competing interests and had either worked at or been funded by EcoHealth Alliance, reports Vanity Fair. As previously mentioned, the Telegraph has also unearthed that 26 out of the 27 signatories of the Lancet letter have links to Wuhan Institute researchers. After the revelation of these affiliations by the Telegraph and Vanity Fair, the Lancet invited all the 27 signatories to disclose their competing interests, but none of the signatories complied except Daszak who disclosed some of his affiliations. The Lancet has had to publish an addendum to its original letter in June 21, 2021 announcing only Daszak's ties to the Wuhan lab.

Daszak's treasonous deeds are far from being limited to the above as the rest of this investigation demonstrates. Despite the piles of evidence that has accumulated against Daszak, he still maintains his position as the president of Eco Health Alliance and keeps receiving funding from NIH/NIAID as has been pointed out at the beginning of this exposé. Sadly, the DOJ is doing nothing because it's also infiltrated with treasonous individuals, its corruption stinking even worse that the NIH's and NIAID's.

Many prominent scientists from around the world have come together and written a letter to the board of EcoHealth Alliance spelling out Daszak's corruption in detail and asking for his removal, but all such efforts are proving ineffective in the current incredibly corrupt political climate hell bent on letting Daszak improve his bioweapons.

CHAPTER 14 – Information warfare orchestrated by China's top military bio-warfare expert General Chen Wei

Daszak's ability to persuade his 27 colleagues to sign the Lancet letter and the efforts to dismiss the lab leak hypothesis seem to have stemmed from the persuasive tactics of CCP's top military bio-warfare expert General Chen Wei.

"Chen Wei, a Major General of the People's Liberation Army, was flown in to Wuhan by the central government late last month before officially taking the helm of Wuhan Institute of Virology," reports the Daily Mail. Here, "late last month" refers to late January 2020 when Wei took over the Biosafety Level-4 division of the Wuhan Institute.

The above is confirmed by the final report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, which states that "Major General Chen Wei, the PRC’s top biowarfare expert" took over the BSL-4 division of the Wuhan Institute of Virology on January 31, 2020. The report states:

"Until early 2020, the BSL-4 lab was managed by Yuan Zhiming.¹⁹⁵ Yuan is the President of the Chinese Communist Party Committee within the Wuhan Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, to which the WIV belongs.¹⁹⁶ [...] After the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak began, Yuan was replaced on January 31, 2020.¹⁹⁸ [...] he was succeeded by Major General Chen Wei, the PRC’s top biowarfare expert.^199"

Former biological warfare analyst Dany Shoham agrees with House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, stating that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is linked to Beijing’s covert bio-weapons program. Shoham has a doctorate in medical microbiology, he's studied Chinese biological warfare and was a senior analyst with Israeli military intelligence for biological and chemical warfare in the Middle East and worldwide between1970 and 1991. Interested readers may find more detail in Shoham's article published in the Institute for Defense Studies.

"The epidemic is like a military situation. The epicentre equals to the battlefield," biowarfare expert General Chen Wei has stated. Showcasing Chen Wei's possible accomplishments, below is a summary of the previously described events that have occurred within days of Wei's appointment to the Wuhan Institute on January 31, 2020:

February 4, 2020: Andersen turned away from his confidentially-expressed initial opinion in favor of the lab leak theory and referred to the lab leak theory as "crackpot theory" in his email to Daszak. That same day, Andersen emailed [page 2401 of 3234] Fauci, Collins and Farrar his deceptive Nature paper. The publication of this paper on March 17, 2020 shows the way all of its co-authors Rambaunt, Holmes and Garry and Lipkin had abandoned their original consensus in favor of the lab leak theory.

February 6, 2020: Daszak began to recruit signatories for his misleading Lancet letter stating "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin." This letter's publication in the Lancet shows the way the 27 top scientists who signed the letter lied in favor of the CCP.

Between February 4, 2020 and February 19, 2020: Farrar too announced his 180 degree turn from the lab leak hypothesis by becoming one of the signatories of Daszak's misleading Lancet letter.

It should never be forgotten that General Wei and higher ranking PLA members may never have accomplished so much without the "advice and leadership" of collaborating grant providers Fauci and Collins.

Biowarfare expert General Chen Wei's misinformation campaign to protect China is still ongoing as American media and social platforms are still heavily plagued by CCP-style censorship coupled with misleading narratives.

CHAPTER 15 – Fake "consensus" falls apart, liberal outlets eat crow

The CCP's "clever" disinformation campaign implemented through Fauci and Collins' "guidance" and "steering" could fool the world only for so long.

In addition to all of the publications whose links have been included in the previous sections unearthing SARS-CoV-2's origin, numerous additional publications by conscientious journalists and scientists did manage to reach the public despite the cancel culture. These articles and papers kept emphasizing the way the pandemic's natural origin hypothesis had been embraced without any legitimate evidence backing it up, and the lab leak and bioweapon release theories had been dismissed way too readily without valid justification. On March 4, 2021, many prominent conscientious scientists from around the world published an open letter to the WHO calling for a new investigation into the pandemic's origin.

Eventually, enough of the reality got exposed to force the compromised Biden Administration and its bought-out propaganda outlets to start eating crow. In July 2021, CNN announced "Senior Biden officials finding that Covid lab leak theory as credible as natural origins explanation." On May 2021, the Washington Post published an article titled "Timeline: How the Wuhan lab-leak theory suddenly became credible, highlighting the key reasons why the fake "consensus" of the top virologists had became unsustainable. In this Washington Post article, scrolling down to the section "New evidence emerges" lets one see the most influential articles and papers pointing out the facts.

On May 2001, strongly leftist Politico announced, "Facebook no longer treating 'man-made' Covid as a crackpot idea," describing the platform's new policy of no longer censoring the posts calling Covid-19 man-made.

On May 2002, left-biased Politifact retracted its Wuhan Lab Leak theory fact check.

In June 2021, the Washington Post was forced to revise a hit piece it had published whose original headline read “Tom Cotton keeps repeating a coronavirus conspiracy theory that was already debunked.” The slightly softened version of this hit piece now includes the correction, "The term ‘debunked’ and The Post’s use of ‘conspiracy theory’ have been removed because, then as now, there was no determination about the origins of the virus."

These are just a few examples of the way the fake-news outlets had been forced to choose between losing all credibility with their leftist audience or toning down their efforts to protect the CCP and its treasonous collaborators.

CHAPTER 16 – Relaxing the definition of "gain of function" research in 2017 and completely getting rid of the definition in 2021

On May 11, 2021, Fauci shamelessly lied under oath during his testimony before the senate, claiming: "the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” "Gain of function is a very nebulous term,” Fauci further lied to Rand Paul during a November 4, 2021 senate hearing (2:58 into the video). Just a few days before Fauci claimed that the definition of gain of function is "very nebulous," he'd had this definition scrubbed from the NIH's website.

Fauci went even further in a November 18, 2021 interview, calling 'gain of function' a “completely meaningless term."

The deletion of the definition of gain of function research from the NIH's website had occurred sometime between Oct. 19, 2021 and Oct. 21, 2021, reports the Epoch Times. But when the NIH's staff deleted the definition from their website, they didn't seem to know about the existence of a Web utility which makes periodic digital archives of the World Wide Web. This backup utility has allowed reporters as well as congress and senate to view the original version of the webpage defining gain of function research. On the Wayback machine's archive, here is the NIH's original definition (loads slow):

Gain-of-Function Research

The term gain-of-function (GOF) research describes a type of research that modifies a biological agent so that it confers new or enhanced activity to that agent. Some scientists use the term broadly to refer to any such modification. However, not all research described as GOF entails the same level of risk. The subset of GOF research that is anticipated to enhance the transmissibility and/or virulence of potential pandemic pathogens, which are likely to make them more dangerous to humans, has been the subject of substantial scrutiny and deliberation. [...] This research poses biosafety and biosecurity risks, and these risks must be carefully managed.

According to this definition, a gain of function (GOF) study would be deemed a risky GOF study if it's anticipated to enhance the transmissibility and/or virulence of potential pandemic pathogens to make those pathogens more dangerous to humans.

The above definition sounds as if the risky subset of the gain of function studies would have to enhance only those viruses that are potential pandemic pathogens to begin with, discluding the studies that turn initially benign viruses into potential pandemic pathogens. This strange language is the relaxed version of yet another original definition, points out the Washington Post in their article titled "A Science in the Shadows." The first change to the original definition had been made in 2017, to let NIH/NIAID refer fewer gain of function studies to an independent HHS review board for risk analysis. The new definition had given "NIH leaders greater leeway to approve projects without referring them to the review committee," explains the Washington Post. This reveals that the deletion of the definition of gain of function research from the NIH's website on October 20, 2021 wasn't Fauci and Collins' only attempt to muddy the waters, obfuscating the extent to which they've been exposing the world to pandemic risk.

As may be noted, making benign viruses capable of destroying human populations and calling it not risky because the experiments didn't start with potential pandemic pathogens represents "Conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences." This makes Fauci and Collins guilty of criminal negligence.

The url of the relaxed definition of 'gain of function' research that the NIH obliterated in 2021 used to say "gain-function-research-involving-potential-pandemic-pathogens," but the updated url now says "research-involving-potential-pandemic-pathogens." Because the phrase "gain-function" has been removed from the url, Fauci has not funded gain of function research in collaboration with China. Makes sense to anybody?

The NIH's current page that used to define gain of function research now only defines "ePPP [Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogen] Research." The only reference to "gain-of-function” (GOF) research on this updated page is in a misleading sentence saying: "While ePPP research is a type of so called “gain-of-function” (GOF) research, the vast majority of GOF research does not involve ePPP and falls outside the scope of oversight required for research involving ePPPs." In this sentence, it may be noted that since the definition of gain of function research no longer exists, it's referred to as "so called." Funny?

In 2016, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) invented the synonym 'gain of function research of concern (GOFROC)' for the risky subset of gain of function studies enhancing the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens to make them more dangerous to humans in ways that can cause pandemics. Gain of function research of concern (GOFROC) is clearly defined in a very clear and straightforward manner in NSABB's 2016 guidelines as "gain-of function studies with the potential to generate pathogens with pandemic potential in humans by exhibiting high transmissibility and high virulence."

What on earth is "very nebulous" about that?

And why should it matter if the resulting pathogens "exhibiting high transmissibility and high virulence" are created out of originally benign pathogens or other deadly pathogens? Isn't it the result that matters?

If Fauci were to be asked if he's ever funded gain of function research of concern as defined in NSABB's guidelines, what would he have to say? The NIH's updated page actually answers this question for Fauci, stating:

"On limited occasions, when justified by compelling public health need and conducted in very high biosecurity laboratories, NIH has supported certain research that may be reasonably anticipated to create, transfer or use potential pandemic pathogens resulting from the enhancement of a pathogen’s transmissibility and/or virulence in humans."

The above is equivalent to saying that the NIH has funded gain of function research of concern, according to NSABB's guidelines. Some of those risky gain of function studies have definitely been conducted in the Wuhan lab, as the next sections demonstrate. Such risky gain of function research was not conducted "in very high biosecurity laboratories" as the NIH's updated page claims, but was conducted under extremely lax biosecurity conditions in China, as will also be demonstrated. And the genetic engineering of novel potential pandemic pathogens with bioweapon applications in communist China was absolutely not justifiable by any "compelling public health need" as NIH's updated page claims — thinking so represents a "gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person."

Senator Rand Paul has summed up the situation on November 4, 2020 when he exclaimed to Fauci: "What you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically." Fauci's reply began with the words "According to the definition that is currently operable,” causing Paul to burst out laughing. Such is the farce created by one evil little garden gnome who's held the reins of America's equally ridiculous senile president for more than 2 years.

In response to criticism of his ridiculous word-game farce, ploy-master Fauci has arrogantly told the world, "They're really criticizing science because I represent science. That's dangerous." This shows is the extent of the narcissistic personality disorder of perhaps history's biggest monster who's knowingly murdered almost 7 million people as of March 2023.

The next section demonstrates which risky gain of function studies, as defined by NSABB's guidelines, Fauci and Collins funded in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in communist China, failing to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in doing so.

CHAPTER 17 – "Gain of function.pdf" Fauci had named as such

Fauci, who'd told congress under oath that NIH/NIAID never funded gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute, had on February 1, 2020 sent an email (p.3221 of 3234) with an attachment he'd named 'gain of function.pdf.' This attachment is the 2015 research paper of a risky gain of function study funded by Fauci (funny?) and conducted in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This deadly study whose paper was named 'gain of function.pdf' by Fauci has taught the CCP how to create lab-engineered viruses in a way indistinguishable from natural viruses.

The full name Fauci had given to the pdf he'd attached to his email was "Baric, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf." In this file name, Shi refers to study author Shi Zhengli, the Director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology known as China's "bat woman." Shi had co-authored this study with Ralph Baric, a U.S. researcher who's received millions of dollars in funding from Fauci's NIAID for research into coronaviruses.

The 2015 paper Fauci had attached as 'gain of function.pdf' produced by Baric's collaboration with "bat woman" Shi describes the enhancement of a SARS-like coronavirus that could originally only infect bats, which had been genetically enhanced to become capable of binding to human cells. The engineered viruses could not only "replicate 'efficiently' in primary human airways cells," but they could also "withstand antibodies and vaccines," summarizes the Addendum to the Final Report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. Baric and Shi's 2015 paper also states that the spike proteins of the SARS variant had been modified "to maximize the opportunity for pathogenesis." Fauci's NIAID and another branch of Collins' NIH had provided the grant that created such a pathogen.

The deadly nature of the the SARS-like viruses Shi and Baric described creating had been acknowledged by the study authors who'd explicitly stated in their paper that similar studies may be "too risky to pursue." This paper Fauci had named "gain of function.pdf" contains the following paragraph describing the study's risky nature:

"Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue, as increased pathogenicity in mammalian models cannot be excluded. [...] the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens. In developing policies moving forward, it is important to consider the value of the data generated by these studies and whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved."

The risks of "gain of function.pdf," which Fauci had funded in partnership with study author Shi's Wuhan lab, worried the scientific community to the extent another paper was published in Nature titled "Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research," covering the pandemic risk created by the studies described in Baric and Shi's 2015 paper. This Nature paper titled "Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research" states: "The argument is essentially a rerun of the debate over whether to allow lab research that increases the virulence, ease of spread or host range of dangerous pathogens — what is known as ‘gain-of-function’ research."

The Nature paper on the risks of Baric and Shi's research explains that "In October 2014, the US government imposed a moratorium on federal funding of such research on the viruses that cause SARS, influenza and MERS." Although Baric and Shi's risky gain of function studies had started before the 2014 moratorium, they had not been paused by the moratorium. The Nature paper explicitly points out the way Shi and Baric's gain of function studies had been "initiated before the US Government Deliberative Process Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS and SARS Viruses," pointing out the way such research should have been paused. Why had such gain of function studies not been paused?

"The NIH eventually concluded that the work was not so risky as to fall under the moratorium," states Baric in the Nature paper.

Criminally negligent Fauci and Collins had decided the moratorium shouldn't halt a study enabling a bat virus to infect human populations, because, well — it wasn't deemed risky in a world where Fauci believes the definition of risky gain of function research is "very nebulous."

The Nature paper quotes several researchers who had fervently disagreed with Fauci and Collins's conviction that Baric and Shi's work wasn't risky gain of function research. Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, had stated the obvious, saying: “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory.” This opinion was shared by Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and biodefense expert at Rutgers University, who'd said, “The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk.”

There are not only a few but hundreds of conscientious scientists opposing the continuation of such risky gain of function studies as will shorty be elaborated, demonstrating the extent to which Fauci and Collins have turned a deaf ear to the voice of reason and common sense for decades.

The next section delves into the "clever" ploys Fauci and Collins had utilized to bestow upon themselves the full power to unilaterally decide which risky studies should and should not be conducted.

CHAPTER 18 – The numerous ploys Fauci and Collins utilized and the policies they violated to nullify the 2014 moratorium and nullify the P3CO framework for risk analysis and mitigation

In aiding and abetting communist China develop enhanced potential pandemic pathogens as bioweapons with U.S. dollars, Fauci and Collins's criminal mental state was such that they breached the numerous regulations and policies described below.

As has been described in the previous section, despite the way Baric and "bat woman" Shi's deadly gain of function studies had began before the 2014 moratorium's enactment, they had not been paused by the moratorium halting risky gain of function studies. One of the reasons "justifying" letting the risky research continue was an escape clause that had been worked into the moratorium, giving Fauci and Collins an "excuse" to override it whenever they wished at their sole discretion. This escape clause was a footnote on the first page of the moratorium document stating “An exception from the research pause may be obtained if the head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.” Study author Baric had taken advantage of this escape clause and applied for an exemption from the moratorium. Baric "felt that his research was urgent: new cases of MERS, spread by camels, were even then popping up in the Middle East," explains the article titled 'Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan,' published in MIT Technology Review. Baric's research supposedly served to “move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger,” Daszak had claimed. Fauci and Collins, of course, had agreed, granting Baric his exemption and letting the deadly pandemic pathogens resume getting engineered in collaboration with Shi working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

"Not only were Baric’s studies allowed to move forward, but so were all studies that applied for exemptions," states the MIT Technology Review article titled 'Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan.'

Out of all the studies that had at first been paused, "about half were later allowed to continue because the work didn't fit the definition [of risky gain of function research] or was deemed essential to public health," Science reports.

Fauci and Collins had thus unilaterally nullified the moratorium.

In December 2017, the moratorium that was never allowed to fulfill its intended purpose officially got lifted, getting replaced by a set of guidelines called the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight (P3CO) Framework. This framework required a review board to be formed within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which would utilize the new framework's guidelines to determine "whether grants that involve enhancing dangerous pathogens, such as coronaviruses, are worth the risks and that proper safeguards are in place," reports the Daily Caller. But Fauci and Collins had again prevented all of Baric and Daszak's deadly coronavirus studies from reaching this HHS review board. This was done using yet another loophole that had been incorporated into the P3CO framework, the Daily Caller points out. "In 2017, a change made under their [Fauci and Collins'] watch removed the [HHS] committee’s power to block the projects, recasting the panel as strictly an advisory body," reports the Washington Post. The Daily Caller article quotes an HHS spokesperson who'd told that according to the framework's rules with the loophole inserted, the HHS review board would be "kept in the dark on any grant" until its funding agency flagged that grant for review. Thus the HHS’s P3CO Review Committee could only review those grants refereed to them by Fauci and Collins, if and only if Fauci and Collins flagged the studies as risky.

Having transferred to themselves the power to forward or not forward any risky grants for review, and having relaxed the definition of risky gain of function research to have "greater leeway to approve projects without referring them to the review committee," as the Washington Post explains, NIH/NIAID had succeeded at completely nullifying the P3CO framework too just like they'd done to the moratorium.

No coronavirus study was ever flagged to go through the HHS's P3CO review committee. We know this to be true because Fauci had been told so in the reply to his email that he'd attached "gain of function.pdf" to (see previous section). The reply to Fauci's email came from Hugh Auchincloss who was Fauci's top deputy at the NIAID. Auchincloss wrote to Fauci in his reply [p.3206 of 3234],

"Emily is sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work [Shi and Baric's work Fauci had attached as 'gain of function.pdf'] abroad."

Here, 'Emily' refers to Dr. Emily Erbelding, Director of the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at the NIH. This NIH department director was certain that Fauci and Collins had never flagged any coronavirus study to get evaluated by the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight (P3CO) framework for risk analysis. The Washington Post reports:

“From 2017 to 2020, no more than 'three or four' projects [not involving coronaviruses] were forwarded to the review committee, said Robert Kadlec, who oversaw the panel and served as the Trump administration’s assistant HHS secretary for preparedness and response."

The Post article states Kadlec's senior aide Christian Hassell "suggested the lack of reviews reflected how narrowly the revised policy defines gain-of-function research."

If only Hassel had known that the definition of gain-of-function research was on its way to disappearing completely on October 20, 2021!

Under Fauci and Collin's compromised "leadership," not only just about no experiment was flagged for the HHS's review board, but the HHS boards' member names were also never disclosed to the public. The deliberations of these secret members were also kept "confidential," allowing no transparency in how the reviews were conducted. The Washington Post summarizes:

"HHS, which administers the review committee, has kept its work confidential: No agendas, meeting minutes or other records of its proceedings are public. Even the names of the federal officials assigned to serve on the committee, which has spanned the Obama, Trump and Biden administrations, are kept secret."

"This secrecy means we don't know how these requirements [of the P3CO framework] were applied, if at all, to the experiments now funded by the government," state influential epidemiologists Dr. Marc Lipsitch and Dr. Tom Ingles. In their op-ed titled "The U.S. is funding dangerous experiments it doesn't want you to know about." Lipsitch and Ingles identify themselves as "two of the hundreds of researchers, medical and public-health professionals, and others who publicly opposed these experiments when they were first announced." "This lack of transparency is unacceptable," state Lipsitch and Ingles in their op-ed. The researchers add:

"Making decisions to approve potentially dangerous research in secret betrays the government's responsibility to inform and involve the public when approving endeavors, whether scientific or otherwise, that could put health and lives at risk."

With the 2014 moratorium nullified, the loophole in the P3CO Framework in place, the definition of gain of function research relaxed to not include most risky studies, and the deliberations of the HHS review board set to be remain "confidential" and shrouded in secrecy in case any risky study may have to get forwarded to the board, traitors Fauci and Collins continued to develop the CCP's bioweapons with U.S. funds.

Fauci is so used to lying and deceiving the public that despite having nullified the P3CO Framework's guidelines as described, he has falsely claimed in his senate testimony, “Dr. Baric does not do gain of function research and if it is, it is according to the guidelines and is being conducted in North Carolina, not in China.” Here, the first lie Fauci tells is a lie by omission when Fauci doesn't mention the way Baric didn't do his gain of function work alone in North Carolina. Baric collaborated with Shi in China as their numerous joint papers demonstrate. The second lie in Fauci's statement is that Baric and Shi's gain of function work on coronaviruses was never evaluated against the P3CO framework's guidelines as has been demonstrated, giving Fauci no right to claim it was 'according to the guidelines.' For the third lie the same statement contains, please note that the "if it is" part of the sentence negates the part before it saying "Dr. Baric does not do gain of function research."

God only knows for how long Fauci will be allowed to keep lying like a rug and flopping like a fish out of water during the equally corrupt Biden regime.

CHAPTER 19 – 'Gain of function.pdf' taught the CCP how to create pandemic pathogens without leaving traces of lab manipulation

During his collaboration with Shi Zhengli, Baric had taught the CCP how to create potential bioweapons of mass destruction with viruses containing no traces of lab manipulation.

In the previous section, we'd seen that in reply to Fauci's email with 'gain of function.pdf' attached, Fauci's top deputy Hugh Auchincloss had replied, "She [Dr. Emily Erbelding] will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work [Shi and Baric's risky gain of function studies]." This and the rest of the damning information laid out in the previous section had caused 13 pissed-off members of congress to send a letter to Fauci, asking him many questions including asking him to "provide the findings of Dr. Erbelding's review of NIAID ties to gain-of-function-research abroad." Fauci didn't respond to this letter, ignoring its 30 day response deadline.

What could Dr. Erbelding have uncovered in her review of NIAID's ties to the research described in "gain of function.pdf?" How exactly Baric and Shi, authors of the paper Fauci had attached as "gain of function.pdf," had collaborated during the research they'd conducted? And most importantly, which part of their deadly gain of function studies had been conducted in the Wuhan Institute whose researchers had been secretly collaborating with China’s military at least since 2017, with which the Biden administration has had to agree with?

We do have some partial answers.

Regarding Baric's cooperation with Shi Zhengli in China, prominent Columbia University virologist Dr. Vincent Racaniello explains:

"EcoHealth Alliance provided funds to Zengli Shi at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to conduct bat surveillance for SARS-like CoVs. [...] Baric then received the spike sequences from Wuhan to do his experiments independently."

Baric's interaction with co-author Shi hasn't been limited to receiving spike protein sequences, according to the article 'Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan,' published in MIT Technology Review. This article states:

"They did share resources—for example, Baric sent the transgenic mice with [genetically engineered] human lung receptors to Wuhan. But after their initial collaboration, the two centers were more like competitors. They were in a race to identify dangerous coronaviruses, assess the potential threat, and develop countermeasures like vaccines."

This suggests Shi had learned plenty from Baric...

Could fighting health threats and vaccine development really be the main reason for the cooperation of a military-affiliated Chinese lab and an American virologist expert at making bat viruses pathogenic for humans?

Of course not.

The study described in "Gain of function.pdf" had taught the CCP how to create lab-engineered viruses in a way indistinguishable from natural viruses.

Baric was one of the developers of a technique called the 'no-see-um method' of leaving no trace of genetic modification in lab-engineered viruses. Baric had confirmed this interpretation of his work in a September 2020 interview where he'd admitted, “You can engineer a virus without leaving any trace." "As early as 2016, scientists working at the WIV were able to do the same,” states the report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, adding that China had learned to do such a thing during Baric and Shi's interactions between 2014 and 2016. This means that Baric had taught China how to engineer bioweapons that couldn't be traced to a lab origin during the studies described in the 2015 paper Fauci had attached as "gain of function.pdf."

Before beginning to collaborate with Shi, Baric had first published in 2005 the way he and his colleagues had discovered how to engineer viruses “indistinguishable from wild type.”

Can there still be any doubt in any idiot's mind about the way the CCP had been developing high-tech bioweapons with American taxpayer dollars with the help of the U.S. officials and researchers it had compromised?

In addition to enhancing the pathogenicity of SARS-like viruses, Baric had also been making the deadly MERS virus even more transmissible in humans in a way that leaves no traces of lab manipulation.

All for mankind's "benefit!"

CHAPTER 20 – Baric's collaboration with Daszak moving "closer and closer" to creating "killer" viruses weeks before the pandemic

With their path cleared of all obstacles by Fauci and Collins as described above, Dr. Baric and Dr. Daszak had not only been collaborating with Shi Zhengli in Wuhan, but with each other as well in turning bat viruses into "human killers," as Daszak himself put it. Daszak said so just weeks before the pandemic began, which has been captured on video.

As may be recalled, Baric was one of Daszak's closest allies he'd emailed while gathering signatures for the misleading Lancet letter he'd drafted, in trying to make his letter seem like “simply a letter from leading scientists.” Daszak had asked Baric not to sign this letter, to make it look like it "has some distance" from them. “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration,” Daszak had written in his email to Baric. What Daszak and Baric were working on during their collaboration was revealed during a podcast interview (video takes a minute to appear at the very end of page) with Daszak recorded on December 9, 2019, just a few weeks before the pandemic was announced on December 31, 2019. Daszak told during his interview:

“You can manipulate them [coronaviruses] in the lab pretty easily [...] Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus. Zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, you can build the protein — and we work with Ralph Baric at [the University of North Carolina] to do this — and insert the backbone of another virus and do some work in the lab.”

Loose-mouthed Daszak had elaborated on the nature of his collaboration with Baric in an earlier 2016 interview. Here, Daszak had explicitly stated their goal as "moving closer and closer to" creating “viruses that really do look like killers.” Daszak had also admitted in this interview that part of their work was done by his "colleagues in China." Daszak had described as follows how they had been engineering "killers" in collaboration with communist China:

“Some of these viruses will be killers, some of them won't, how do we work that out? From a viral sequence. It's not straightforward, [...] so we sequence the spike protein, the protein that attaches to cells, then we — well, I didn’t do this work but my colleagues in China did the work — you create pseudoparticles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they'd bind to human cells.

Each step of this, you move closer and closer to [see if] this virus could really become pathogenic in people.

So you narrow down the field, you reduce the cost, and you end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.”

This was how Daszak had been developing human "killers" out of bat viruses right before the pandemic's announcement.

In an October 20, 2021 letter to Congressman James Comer, the NIH's acting director Tabak falsely claimed that the viruses Daszak engineered had gained in function as "an unexpected result of the research, as opposed to something the researchers set out to do." This claim falls apart in the light of the above interview during which Daszak had explained his purpose of systematically narrowing down his virus reservoir to "end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.” Each step of this methodology had let Daszak deliberately and intentionally move "closer and closer to [see if] this virus could really become pathogenic in people."

There was nothing "unintentional" or "unexpected" about the way Daszak, Fauci, Collins and all of their collaborators have murdered about 7 million people as of March 3023.

CHAPTER 21 – Former Vice President of EcoHealth Alliance lawyers up and announces Daszak's group did create SARS-CoV-2

A big rat jumped out of the sinking ship after Fauci announced his resignation following investigation threats before the 2022 midterm elections.

Below is the chronological order of the events that caused increasing panic among those responsible for creating SARS-CoV-2, causing Andrew Huff, the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, to decide to lawyer up and declare that Daszak's EcoHealth alliance indeed created SARS-CoV-2.

On May 1 2022, Senator Rand Paul promised to "wage a vigorous review into the origins of the coronavirus if Republicans retake the Senate and he lands a committee chairmanship," reports the Guardian. On July 20, 2022, Paul issued another warning to Fauci, saying, "If the GOP takes back Congress in the midterms, be prepared to testify under oath regarding the coronavirus pandemic." Paul added, "the NIH was funding that lab and that there was reasonable scientific evidence that suggests that it came from the lab. So he's going to be made to testify under oath. And I hope he sticks around because we do have some questions." On Aug 04, 2022, Sen. Rand Paul led a first-ever congressional hearing on the origin of the pandemic during which the the possibility of bioweapon release from the Wuhan lab was also discussed. On August 22, 2022, panicked Fauci announced his resignation despite the way he had previously announced he'd resign in 2025.

On September 2022, EcoHealth Alliance's former vice president Andrew Huff approached Renz Law, LLC., alleging that SARS-CoV-2 was created during the project “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” that EcoHealth Alliance had been awarded by Fauci's NIAID. In the packet his attorney has released, Huff describes as follows the way he had been tasked with reviewing the grant proposal of their project responsible for the pandemic:

"In late 2014, I was asked to review (provide edits, comments, and feedback) on a research proposal that was in preparation to be submitted to the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) National Institute for Allergens and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to conduct Gain of Function research and development with numerous partners including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was supported by Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina (UNC)."

Huff further describes how SARS-CoV-2 was created by the grant whose proposal he'd reviewed, stating:

• "I attest that I reviewed the proposal that was submitted to NIH which detailed the gain of function virology work that was being conducted to create the agent known as SARS-COV2, which causes the disease known as COVID-19.
• I attest that the proposal clearly stated that the gain of function work on SARSCOV2 was already underway in China, prior to October 2014, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), with the support of USAID in collaboration with EcoHealth Alliance and EcoHealth Alliance’s partners and sponsors.
• I attest that I made Dr. Peter Daszak aware of the lack of a Biological Security Officer (BSO) and Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) at EcoHealth Alliance in reference to the Select Agent Form on in the “Understanding the risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” proposal in accordance NIH requirements.
• I witnessed firsthand presentations by Dr. Shi Zhengli (WIV) and Dr. Ralph Baric (UNC) at EcoHealth Alliance related to their Gain of Function work managed and supported by EcoHealth Alliance.
• I witnessed firsthand presentations by the executive team at EcoHealth Alliance related to the gain of function work conducted at EcoHealth Alliance.
• I attest that EcoHealth Alliance’s developed SARS-COV2 and is responsible for the development of the agent SARS-COV2 during my employment at the organization.

Huff's following statement reveals the way Daszak had deliberately been letting communist China do whatever it wanted to do with the SARS-CoV-2 agent the CCP created with U.S. dollars. Huff described his concerns about the lack of visibility, lack of oversight and lack of risk mitigation measures Daszak had flat out refused to remedy:

I attest that I informed the EcoHealth Alliance executive team that I believed there were biosafety and biosecurity risks in contract laboratories during an executive meeting. Specifically, I was concerned that EcoHealth Alliance did not have enough visibility or firsthand knowledge of what was happening at foreign laboratories contracted and managed by EcoHealth Alliance. During this meeting I discussed bio-risk management with the team due to these concerns. Dr. Daszak refused to mitigate the risks without any objection or discussion from the other executives. In my opinion, Daszak was dismissive of my concerns. He did not seem concerned about EcoHealth’s lack of oversight which I felt was strange because it is typically the CEO’s duty to protect the organization from organizational threats and risks. After raising my concern, I accepted Peter’s position that our control measures were adequate."

As the verification of Huff's allegations, the packet released by Huff's attorney contains "Dr. Huff’s documents retained from his employment at EcoHealth Alliance."

Here is a video of Andrew Huff describing the deeply compromised Biden Regime's cover-up of EcoHealth Alliance's creation of the pandemic.

Huff's supporting documents will hopefully be the icing on the cake for the plethora of evidence that proves beyond reasonable doubt that Daszak, Fauci, Collins have created the COVID-19 pandemic, as this article will continue to demonstrate.

CHAPTER 22 – The numerous additional regulations Fauci and Collins violated to let Daszak continue his project that created SARS-CoV-2

Daszak allowed to continue to make his viruses more deadly in violation of his grant's terms

Fauci and Collins had devised numerous additional unethical ploys and had violated many additional policies in their efforts to keep removing the obstacles in Daszak's way during his project that created the pandemic. These additional ploys and policy violations have been exposed in a series of 5 great articles written by the news organization the Intercept after the organization won 2 FIOA lawsuits against NIH/NIAID.

All of the policy violations that will be described in this and the next 2 sections leave no doubt about the reality of the allegations of Andrew Huff, the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance who's announced it was them who created SARS-CoV-2 during their project "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence."

The first of the 2 FIOA lawsuits the investigative group the Intercept had filed against the NIH the was won by the outlet in September 2021, letting the organization gain access to more than 900 pages of materials on Daszak's U.S.-funded grant "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence." This grant was initially awarded for a five-year period from 2014 to 2019. The grant's funding was renewed in 2019 for another 5 year period, suspended by the Trump administration on April 2020, re-instated by the Biden administration on August 2020, stopped again 2 years later on August 2022, and re-initiated again on September 2022 without the involvement of the Wuhan lab. Regarding this still ongoing project responsible for the pandemic, the Intercept hired and consulted 11 prominent virologists, asking them if risky gain of function research had been conducted during any phase. 7 out of the 11 top virologists said they believed risky gain-of-function research had indeed been done.

Just a few weeks after The Intercept published the conclusions of the top virologists it had hired, Collins announced his resignation from his position as the NIH's director. Collins had previously stated that the NIH had never approved “any grant that would have supported gain of function research on dangerous coronaviruses to see if they could be more transmissible or lethal for individuals in the human species.” Collins resigned after the accusations of molecular biologist Dr. Richard Ebright who had told Newsweek one year earlier the very same conclusion the Intercept's 7 experts arrived at, telling Newsweek that risky gain of function research had been conducted in Wuhan during Daszak's project. This had not received much media attention at that time, but after the Intercept's 7 virologists backed his conclusion, Ebright publicly accused Fauci and Collins of having lied to congress. Collins decided to step down a month later on October 5th 2021.

"Hardly any media or news outlets mentioned the resignation," points out the Alliance for Human Research Protection, stating:

"The silence of the media is but an indication of the TOTAL subservience of the media to its funders which has incapacitated the mainstream press and media. Reporters are tethered to a prescribed script - no longer capable of honest journalism."

The same subservient and incapacitated mainstream outlets have also not paid attention to the following incriminating facts revealed by the Intercept's 5 articles.

As Daszak's grant had been awarded from 2014 to 2019 and renewed in 2019, the first 3 years of his work had taken place during the 2014 moratorium requiring pausing risky gain of function studies. Additionally, Daszak's work after 2017 was supposed to have been independently reviewed against the P3CO framework's guidelines put in place after the moratorium was ended. But when the Intercept had asked the NIH if Daszak's research had been paused by the moratorium in 2014 or had been sent to the HHS's review board for risk evaluation against the P3CO Framework in 2017, NIH spokesperson Elizabeth Deatrick had replied "NIAID determined that the work was not subject to the Gain-of-Function (GoF) research funding pause and the subsequent HHS P3CO Framework.” Daszak's work had been allowed to continue with the help of the same loopholes and ploys we've described that had been utilized to allow Baric's risky gain of function studies to continue. The Daily Caller reports:

"Had EcoHealth’s grant been subjected to P3CO review, an HHS panel would have independently evaluated the grant and, if necessary, recommended additional biocontainment measures to prevent potential lab leaks — or even recommended that the grant be denied entirely."

But none of the above had been done when Fauci and Collins had been aiding the CCP shove the world headlong into the COVID-19 pandemic. Fauci and Collins had allowed no coronavirus study to be independently reviewed against the P3CO framework's guidelines as has also been previously demonstrated, covering up the efforts that created Daszak's killer viruses including SARS-CoV-2.

On November 3, 2021, the Intercept published another article in their series describing the way NIH/NIAID had worked with Daszak to help him evade additional protocols and let him police his own research in an unprecedented manner. The Intercept reports that according to the email communications between Daszak and NIAID officers, "Initially, NIH staff appeared intent on enforcing the funding pause [2014 moratorium]." Jenny Greer, a grants management specialist at the NIH, and Erik Stemmy, a NIH officer handling coronavirus research, had initially emailed Daszak saying that his experiments “appear to involve research covered under the pause.” But then something quite unusual had occurred.

In a July 7 2018 letter to EcoHealth Alliance, NIH officers Greer and Stemmy formally allowed Daszak to worm his way out of the pause by letting Daszak-suggested language get inserted into his grant's terms and conditions. According to this Daszak-proposed language added to the grant proposal, the experiments that have been deemed risky gain of function studies by the Intercept's 7 top virologists would get a pass from the restrictions for as long as the engineered chimeric viruses didn't grow more quickly than the original viruses on which they were based. If the engineered viruses showed evidence of enhanced virus growth greater than 1 log (or 10 times) over the original viruses and grew more efficiently in human lung cells, Daszak was to immediately stop his experiments and inform his NIAID program officer and wait for a secondary review.

But Daszak's experiments never stopped despite the way his killer viruses did multiply faster than 10 times over the original viruses in human lung cell receptors.

During 2018, the 4th year of Daszak's project, one of the engineered chimeric coronaviruses did grow at a rate much quicker than the original viruses on which it was based. The enhanced growth of the engineered chimeric viruses in human lung cells was, "at one point, up to 4 log greater — or 10,000 times — the rate of the original virus. But there are no indications the research was stopped," reports the Intercept. "In fact, the bat coronavirus grant was renewed for a five-year period in 2019," adds the same Intercept article.

As if it wasn't enough that Daszak had been allowed to evade the moratorium and evade the P3CO Framework, Daszak had also been allowed to evade the terms he'd himself been permitted to insert into his own grant! Such was the extent of violations Fauci and Collins permitted in ensuring the continuation of the studies developing the SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon.

The enhanced coronaviruses that grew 10,000 times faster than the original viruses in the lungs of humanized mice (genetically engineered mice with human lung cell receptors) caused the "mice to lose significant weight," states the Intercept, indicating that the "humanized" mice had become very sick. "From the weight loss, it’s gain of function. Tony Fauci is wrong saying it’s not.” told Vincent Racaniello, a professor of microbiology who was one of the top virologists The Intercept had consulted.

Please never forget the way Daszak's project "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence," which was not stopped in 2018 despite how risky it had become, has still not been stopped as of March 2023. God only knows how much more dangerous Daszak's killer viruses may have become in the meantime! Please don't postpone raising awareness of this exposé and putting pressure on your representatives and senators to stop Daszak and his collaborators as described here.

Tabak's silly ploy to try to lessen NIH/NIAID's culpability, which goes awry and blows up all over his face

NIH's acting director Lawrence A. Tabak, who had previously served as the NIH's Deputy Ethics Counselor, ironically, began lying and engaging in a series of unethical ploys in trying to reduce the NIH's culpability in letting Daszak's deadly gain of function studies continue.

As the previous section demonstrated, if Daszak's new viruses were to multiply faster than 10 times over the original viruses in human lung cell receptors, Daszak was to stop his experiments immediately, inform his NIAID program officer and wait for a secondary review, according to his grant proposal's terms. But Daszak's work had never been paused despite the way his new viruses at one point multiplied 10,000 times the rate of the original viruses. Why had Daszak's research not been paused and why had a second review never been conducted?

Tabak tried to make it seem like Daszak's experiments were never paused because Daszak had failed to let the NIH know at that time how pathogenic his new viruses had become. Tabak tried to accomplished this by making the NIH hand out to the Intercept an apparently very late version of Daszak's yearly progress report for 2018 (Daszak's 4th year) when his engineered viruses had multiplied 10,000 times faster than the original viruses. This supposedly "very late" 4th year progress report that was handed to the Intercept was dated September 2020, seemingly submitted 2 years after its due date. In trying to convince Rep. James Comer the NIH hadn't been informed how much faster the new viruses multiplied, Tabak had lied as follows in his October 20, 2021 letter to Comer:

"language was included in the terms and conditions of the grant awarded to Eco Health that outlined criteria for a secondary review such as a requirement that the grantee report immediately a one log increase in growth. These measures would prompt a secondary review to determine whether the research aims should be reevaluated or new biosafety measures should be enacted. Eco Health failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant."

Even if the above had been true, NIH/NIAID would still be guilty of gross negligence due to having renewed Daszak's funding for another 5 years without having received Daszak's 4th year's progress report. But Tabak perhaps believed this to be a lesser violation somehow.

"Adding to the evidence that the annual update [2018 yearly progress report] was submitted in 2020 are references to studies that were published after 2018," states the Intercept. This so-called "evidence" had been fabricated by Tabak to make it seem like the report had really been submitted in 2020, as it quickly became obvious. Tabak's false narrative rapidly broke down due to the following 2 reasons.

Firstly, Daszak's supposedly "very late" yearly progress report for 2018 wasn't the only place where Daszak had reported the up to 4 log (10,000 times) increase in the growth rate of the enhanced viruses. Daszak had reported the same result in the application for his grant's 2019 renewal as well. The Intercept had noted this in the more than 900 documents on Daszak's research it had obtained, which Tabak seems to have missed. When the Intercept had pointed this out to the NIH, asking the agency if it had reviewed Daszak's renewal application informing them of the dramatic increase in the viral growth rate, the NIH had confirmed it had reviewed the renewal application, unable to back Tabak who'd wanted to feign ignorance of the violation of Daszak's grant's terms.

Tabak's claim that Daszak had not submitted his report on time didn't hold water also because Daszak had emailed a copy of his timely 4th year's report to his Program Officer at the NIAID after he'd filed it "in the NIH system on April 13th 2018," Daszak told the NIH in a letter contesting Tabak's accusation. Attached to this letter was the proof of his timely submission of the 4th year's report, as well as the report's copy he'd emailed to his program officer, Daszak wrote in this letter.

To make matters worse for Tabak, NIH's spokesperson Elizabeth Deatrick did verify the way Daszak had reported to them the increase in the viral growth rate in 2 places. Deatrick told the Intercept: “The PI [principal investigator] reported these results in the year 4 progress report and grant renewal application," telling the truth perhaps because she didn't wanting culpability for backing Tabak's disprovable lie.

To make matters ultimately worse for Tabak, NIH officials who didn't want to violate the requirements of the FIOA lawsuit the Intercept had won, had ended up handing out to the Intercept Dazsak's original 2018 yearly report having the timely submission date on it.

Tabak's stupid little blame-game had blown up big time as such all over his face!

The Intercept summarizes the situation after having been handed in the original 2018 report with the timely submission date, which Tabak had claimed didn't exist:

"Among the documents NIH released to The Intercept yesterday was the original [2018] version of an annual report from the fourth year of the bat coronavirus grant. The version released to The Intercept in September indicated that it had been submitted in 2020, after the pandemic began and more than two years after it was due. The two versions appear to be almost identical, though they include different reference publications."

Useful idiot Tabak is still allowed to remain as the NIH's director as of March 2023, despite being such a complete idiot.

In trying to lessen the NIH's culpability, pathological liars Daszak and Tabak had told congressman James Comer additional lies. Although Daszak's 4th year's experiments did involve risky gain of function studies according to the 7 experts the Intercept had commissioned, Daszak and Tabak had claimed the studies were not risky because the SARS-like bat viruses on which the engineered viruses were based couldn't originally infect humans. This claim was based on the relaxed definition of risky gain of function research that had been loosened in 2017 to be able to deem any gain of function study "not risky" if it didn't start out with potential pandemic pathogens. The definition had been relaxed by NIH/NIAID in such a counter-intuitive manner to avoid having to flag deadly coronavirus studies for independent review and risk evaluation against the PCO3 Framework's guidelines, as has been previously described. Based on this strangely loosened definition of what constitutes risky gain of function research, Tabak had written to congressman James Comer that Daszak's experiments "did not fit the definition of research involving enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential (ePPP)," because "These bat coronaviruses [on which the resulting virus was based] had not been shown to infect humans." Tabak had added, "As such, the research was not subject to departmental review under the HHS P3CO Framework." This argument was backed by EcoHealth Alliance's lying communications manager Robert Kessler, who'd given the same reason for not having deemed year 4's work risky. The Intercept states, "Robert Kessler, communications manager for EcoHealth Alliance, denied that the work on the humanized mice met the definition of gain-of-function research," because the original bat viruses were "not known to be able to infect humans.”

This shows the extent to which the heads of the NIH, NIAID and EcoHealth Alliance have failed to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in creating enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential out of viruses that originally did not pose pandemic risk to humans. as may be recalled, making animal viruses capable of destroying human populations and calling it not risky because the animal viruses could originally not infect humans represents "Conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences," making all those responsible guilty of criminal negligence.

Daszak's 5th year's progress report, which is again supposedly "missing," may reveal exactly how SARS-CoV-2 was created if subpoenaed

Exactly which pathogens had been created by Daszak right before the Covid-19 pandemic's announcement, after his funding had been renewed in 2018 "without delay" and without the secondary review required by his grant's terms as described in the previous section?

The NIH had been so eager to move Daszak onto his 5th year because in 2019, Daszak was to do gain of function experiments on MERS viruses that were even riskier than his deadly 2018 experiments.

The MERS virus was actually only one of the deadly pathogens Daszak had been working with right before the pandemic had been announced at the end of 2019. The same year the pandemic began, Daszak had been working with hundreds of new enhanced potential pandemic pathogens, as the loose-mouthed virologist told NPR in response to the suspension of his grant by the Trump Administration on April 2020. NPR reports:

"He [Daszak] says the project [“Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence”] had identified fragments of genetic sequences for hundreds of wholly new bat coronaviruses, including some that were close relatives of SARS-COV-2, the virus causing the current pandemic. "The next step in that research is to sequence the whole genome of those viruses and say, could they bind to human cells? Does this look like a virus that could potentially emerge?""

More information on these hundreds of viruses Daszak had been trying to infect humans with would have been available in Daszak's 5th year progress report — if only NIH/NIAID would have released its original version.

In the more than 900 pages of documents on Daszak's grant that the Intercept had obtained after its first lawsuit, the only anomaly wasn't the supposedly "very late" submitted 4th year progress report described in the previous section. Daszak's 5th year progress report had been altogether "missing." The Intercept had had to sue the NIH for the 2nd time in its efforts to obtain the 5th year's report. When the report was finally handed in after the organization won their second FIOA lawsuit, it was provided with a "very late" submission date on it just like the 4th year's progress report described in the previous section. Again!

According to the 5th year's progress report handed to the Intercept with the "very late" submission date on it, Daszak had in 2019 genetically enhanced the pathogenicity of the MERS virus which is one of the deadliest human pathogens with a fatality rate of 35%. In the grant proposal documents obtained after the intercept's first FIOA lawsuit, the Intercept had seen references to proposed experiments on the MERS coronavirus, but when the organization had asked Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance about these experiments, EcoHealth spokesperson Robert Kessler had lied, saying Daszak's group had not conducted the work. “The MERS work proposed in the grant is suggested as an alternative and was not undertaken,” Kessler had told in his email. Kessler's lie was revealed when the second FIOA lawsuit forced the NIH to produce the supposedly "very late" submitted progress report.

The supposedly "late" 5th year's annual progress report was dated August 2021 despite the way it covered the grant period ending May 2019. Was desperate Tabak really desperate enough to try to play the same stupid blame-game he'd played with Daszak's 4th year report, which had blown up all over his face before?

Did Tabak still hope anyone would believe NIH/NIAID wasn't aware that Daszak had worked on enhancing the pathogenicity of the MERS virus after NIH had renewed Daszak's funding for another 5 years?

Daszak claimed he had not been allowed to submit his 2019 progress report on time due to the way the NIH's system had locked him out of being able to submit an annual 5th year report. This had occurred, according to Daszak, because the NIH had gone ahead and renewed the funding for his grant for another 5 years before waiting for his 5th year's progress report to be submitted, causing the system to not accept the yearly report normally received before renewal. Daszak explains how all this happened before his report's submission deadline:

"As is documented by the NIH receipt system itself (PDF attachment #5), we first uploaded this report on time, in July 2019 (the final allowable date for submission would have been September 30th 2019). However, by the time we tried to officially submit, our R01 grant had been renewed (July 24th 2019) and the system locked us out from submitting a normal annual final Year 5 report at that point. On July 30th 2019, we requested further information about the submission of the Year 5 report from the NIH Grants Management Specialist who had been dealing with our renewal, but we did not receive a response to our questions (PDF attachment #6). NIH also did not send any subsequent request to us for the Year 5 report, despite the reality that we were in frequent communication with staff during that period."

Could Daszak be telling the truth?

Knowing that both Daszak and Tabak are corrupt and lie easily, which one of them should be believed?

If Daszak is telling the truth, it makes the NIH guilty of having renewed Daszak's funding without even bothering to wait for an annual progress report. Nothing can better showcase Collins and Fauci's incredibly gross willful blindness, given that they'd known the viruses Daszak engineered in year 4 had become more dangerous for humans, and given that they'd known Daszak was to enhance the MERS virus as the Intercept had seen described in Daszak's grant proposal.

It may well be the case that both Daszak and Tabak are lying. If 2019's progress report contains how Daszak created SARS-CoV-2 or even deadlier enhanced pandemic pathogens, Tabak and Daszak may have collaborated to obliterate the original 2019's report. Daszak and Tabak may then have crafted the story Daszak published, also creating a revised "very late" version of the original report after taking out the parts on the creation of SARS-CoV-2 and any similar "killer viruses." If this may have been done, subpoenaing and unearthing the original 2019's progress report may uncover exactly how SARS-CoV-2 was created.

As the WHO categorizes the MERS virus as a potential pandemic pathogen, further enhancing the transmissibility of such a potential pandemic pathogen represents risky gain of function research even according to the relaxed definition of risky gain of function research NIH/NIAID had loosened in 2017, to be able to deem gain of function studies "not risky" if they didn't start out with potential pandemic pathogens. This dismantles Fauci's claim that NIH/NIAID has never funded risky gain of function research in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

NIH/NIAID's willful negligence in flagging the deadly MERS virus experiments for risk analysis against the PCO3 framework could have been enough reason to indict Fauci and Collins for negligent homicide, if only America's justice system still worked.

"Changing the receptor binding site on MERS is sort of crazy,” top virologist Jack Nunberg wrote in an email to the Intercept, explaining: "engineering of a known human pathogen raises new and unpredictable risks beyond those posed by their previously reported studies using a non-pathogenic [to humans] bat virus backbone.”

Comer needs to ask Tabak and Kessler why enhancing the virulence of an originally deadly potential pandemic pathogen like the MERS virus didn't even deserved to have its yearly report reviewed, let alone getting reviewed under the P3CO framework! If not this, what else could represent criminally negligent "conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences?"

To enable Congressman Comer to not let go of holding all of the traitors named here accountable, please don't postpone doing your part.

CHAPTER 23 – Re-instating the grant that created SARS-CoV-2 despite numerous non-compliance issues, thus knowingly exposing the world to future pandemic risk

Daszak's project "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" that created SARS-CoV-2 continues despite the NIH's, NIAID's and Daszak's gross criminal negligence and countless policy violations described above. The world is being filled with God knows how many new deadly "killer viruses."

On January 6, 2022, the NIH's Deputy Director Michael Lauer sent Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance a letter listing numerous additional non-compliance issues, demanding that EcoHealth Alliance provide original laboratory notebooks and electronic files related to the research under investigation as the cause of the pandemic. "The records have yet to be provided," reports the Intercept, showing that Deputy Director Lauer was just putting on a show of enforcing compliance, when NIH/NIAID is continuing to give Daszak's team free rein to develop better and better "human killers."

As mentioned at the beginning of this exposé, the NIH waited until August 19, 2022 to finally cut off Daszak's subaward to China, followed by re-instating the same grant R01AI110964 just a month later on September 21, 2022, this time without the involvement of the Wuhan lab. This has outraged Rep. James Comer (R-KY), the ranking member on House Oversight, who stated:

“It’s unacceptable that the NIH continues to allow EcoHealth Alliance to receive taxpayer dollars even though it is confirmed EcoHealth violated the terms of its grant contract. EcoHealth conducted gain of function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, knew about the Chinese Communist Party’s coverup, and failed to inform the U.S. government.”

Molecular biologist Richard Ebright, has stated it's “disturbing that additional funding continues to be awarded to a contractor that the NIH has reported to have repeatedly and seriously violated contractual terms and conditions of a grant,” reports the Intercept.

"The new grant comes despite an open congressional investigation into the organization [EcoHealth Alliance], which has two other ongoing NIH grants and a third in negotiation," the Intercept states.

Please don't postpone taking whatever action you can think of to stop this egregious bioweapon development program of the Deep State.

CHAPTER 24 – The exact recipe for SARS-CoV-2: Daszak's proposal to create furin cleavage sites in bat coronaviruses

One of the grants Fauci's NIAID awarded Daszak had proposed the insertion of novel furin cleavage sites into SARS-like viruses to improve their transmissibility in humans. As may be recalled, Nobel laureate biologist David Baltimore had deemed the presence of such a furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2's genome the “smoking gun” to the theory that the virus was engineered in a lab (before Baltimore was pressured to retract this statement.) As may also be recalled, the world's top virologists had initially all agreed that the presence of the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 indicated its lab origin. This was the real scientific consensus before all the top scientists made 180 degree turns in their opinion after having been "steered" under Fauci and Collins' leadership.

The fact that Daszak had received funding from Fauci for a grant proposing to insert furin cleavage sites into viruses was exposed by whistleblower Commandant of the Marine Corps Fellow Joseph Murphy, who was then working for the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

Murphy had put the final touch on the efforts of a group of amateur detectives who call themselves DRASTIC, which stands for Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Teams Investigating Covid-19. DRASTIC has about 24 correspondents from different countries who work independently to search for clues about the pandemic's origin. "For a long time, DRASTIC's discoveries stayed confined to the strange world of Twitter, known only to a few nerdy followers," reports Newsweek. "Gradually, the quality of their research and the rigor of their thinking drew a larger following, including many professional scientists and journalists," adds the Newsweek article describing this group's accomplishments. In September 2021, these amateur sleuths got contacted by an anonymous person who'd brought to their attention a grant proposal submitted to a program called Preventing Emerging Pathogenic Threats (PREEMPT) that had been initiated by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). This proposal was one of many that had been solicited by DARPA's PREEMPT program to "develop new tools and models to quantify the likelihood of a virus to jump from an animal host into humans."

The grant proposal submitted to the PREEMPT program that had been pointed out to DRASTIC describes a research project called "DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses," which appears to have been rejected by DARPA. Project DEFUSE was led by Daszak who'd authored over 20 CCP/PLA affiliated studies. Daszak's coworker for Project DEFUSE was... You guessed! It was none other than China's good old buddy Baric, who'd taught the CCP how to engineer pandemic pathogens without leaving traces of lab manipulation. Daszak and Baric were to work with... You guessed again! With their favorite Chinese buddy "bat woman" Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan lab which had been collaborating with China’s military since at least 2017.

Another participant of Daszak's DEFUSE project was Chinese researcher Linfa Wang, who was one of Daszak's 2 closest allies Daszak had wanted to distance from his efforts of creating a fake consensus against the lab leak theory.

Project DEFUSE proposed by Daszak and his comrades had been turned down by DARPA, mainly because it involved risky gain of function (GoF) research without mentioning or assessing any risks. The project had also been rejected for not having a risk mitigation plan for dual use research of concern (DURC), meaning research that can be used for both beneficial and nefarious purposes.

DARPA's rejection letter explicitly states that Daszak's team's proposal does involve gain of function research/dual use research of concern, contrary to Fauci's testimony claiming he's never funded such research in Wuhan. The letter explicitly states:

"The team's approach does potentially involve GoF/DURC research (they aim to synthesize spike glycoproteins which bind to human cell receptors and insert them into SARSr-CoV backbones to assess whether they can cause SARS-like disease)."

DRASTIC's analysis of DARPA's rejection letter further explains why DARPA had not funded this proposal, further demonstrating the extent to which Daszak had been unconcerned with the risks of his GoF/DURC research, showcasing his disregard for human life in his criminal mental state. As has been demonstrated, Daszak and NIH/NIAID had broken countless rules and regulations to be able to continue to develop China's bioweapons, which explains their lack of concern for preventing the nefarious use of their DURC research.

The Atlantic reports having verified the authenticity of the grant proposal for project DEFUSE. Their article states: "There is good reason to believe the document is genuine. The Atlantic has confirmed that a grant proposal with the same identifying number and co-investigators was submitted to DARPA in 2018."

When DRASTIC published on their website the documents and analysis of project DEFUSE that DARPA rejected, this caused the story to get picked up by outlets including the Atlantic, which reported, "A new leaked document is stirring up another frenzy over the pandemic’s origins." The frenzy was because "The 2018 DEFUSE research grant application explicitly states the applicants’ intention to artificially insert furin polybasic cleavage sites into high abundance, but low risk bat coronaviruses found in China," reports the Gateway Pundit.

About Project DEFUSE, the Intercept reports that molecular biologist Richard Ebright emphasized:

“The relevance of this is that SARS Cov-2, the pandemic virus, is the only virus in its entire genus of SARS-related coronaviruses that contains a fully functional [furin] cleavage site at the S1, S2 junction. And here is a proposal from the beginning of 2018, proposing explicitly to engineer that sequence at that position in chimeric lab-generated coronaviruses.”

The Intercept also quotes molecular biologist Alina Chan saying:

“Let’s look at the big picture: A novel SARS coronavirus emerges in Wuhan with a novel cleavage site in it. We now have evidence that, in early 2018, they had pitched inserting novel cleavage sites into novel SARS-related viruses in their lab."

In a May 5, 2021 article published in The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, renowned science writer Nicholas Wade articulately describes to laymen all of the reasons why it's extremely improbable for SARS-CoV-2's furin cleavage site to have naturally evolved. Towards the end of his article, Wade concludes:

"For the furin cleavage site to arise naturally in SARS2, a chain of events has to happen, each of which is quite unlikely for the reasons given above [in Wade's article]. A long chain with several improbable steps is unlikely to ever be completed."

In his September 2021 article titled "New Routes to Making Covid-19 In the Lab," Nicholas Wade deems the insertion of such a novel furin cleavage site into a SARS-like virus "the exact recipe for generating SARS2 [SARS-CoV-2]."

"In May 2020, only a few months into the pandemic, EcoHealth’s Peter Daszak had ridiculed discussions of the furin cleavage site," reports the Atlantic. But just a few years earlier, Daszak had proposed to accomplish, in a lab, the very same thing he'd ridiculed as being fabricated by conspiracy theorists! Funny?

The Intercept reports that anonymous scientists the outlet contacted had told them "there is published evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was already engaged in some of the genetic engineering work described in the proposal [of Project DEFUSE]."

But it wasn't the Chinese who'd ended up fully funding Daszak's proposal, it was the U.S. through Fauci's NIAID.

Whistleblower Commandant of the Marine Corps Fellow Joseph Murphy had seen, during his work at DARPA, hidden in a "(top secret) share drive," certain unclassified documents that didn't belong in that classified drive. These were the grant proposal documents for project DEFUSE as well as an Eco Health Alliance letter responding to the news of having been awarded funding by Fauci's NIAID.

"Being Defense related, it makes sense that Eco Health submitted the proposal first to the Department of Defense, before it settled with NIH/NIAID," explains Commandant Murphy on the 3rd page of his report that he's submitted to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense. Murphy adds in this report that the work had taken place at "the WIV and at several sites in the U.S., identified in detail in the proposal."

In his report submitted to the Inspector General on the letterhead of DARPA on August 13, 2021, Murphy specifies the exact location of the documents supporting his claim, saying:

"The EcoHealth Alliance response to the PREEMPT BAA is placed along with other proposal documents in the PREEMPT folder on the DARPA Biological Technologies Office JWICS (top secret) share drive, address: Network/filer/BTO/CI Folder/PREEMPT"

Which compromised DARPA officer could have hidden in a top secret drive the unclassified documents of Daszak's proposal and his response to having been awarded funding by Fauci?

And what has the Inspector General of the Department of Defense done with the hidden documents whose exact location had been pointed out to him by Murphy?

If you'd like to know the answers, please contact your representatives and senators, linking to this article and politely letting them know you'll only vote for those who'll hold all the guilty parties named here accountable.

When Murphy had filed his report with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, he'd handed a copy to Project Veritas, a non-profit journalism enterprise exposing corruption and other misconduct. Project Veritas has published Murphy's report in its entirety, revealing Murphy's own analysis of what he'd seen in the top secret classified drive at DARPA and why he believes Daszak's project DEFUSE must have created SARS-CoV-2. Murphy

Murphy states in his analysis dated August 13, 2021 that Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance had created SARS-CoV-2 during Project Defuse. This has on September 2022 been confirmed by the former vice president of the EcoHealth Alliance Andrew Huff, who's added that SARS-CoV-2 has been created by EcoHealth Alliance during the project renamed as “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.” Murphy states in his analysis:

“SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), as suggested by the reporting surrounding the lab leak hypothesis. The details of this program have been concealed since the pandemic began. These details can be found in the EcoHealth Alliance proposal response to the DARPA PREEMPT program Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HR00118S0017, dated March 2011 — a document not yet publicly disclosed.”

In his Substack Post, Robert Malone states he feels Murphy’s letter “appears to be the real deal so far.” adding,

“If validated, it is as big as the Pentagon papers. This would mean that research funded and conducted by the US Government has caused the death of millions of people world wide. Just ponder that. I can’t hardly wrap my head around the idea. Shocking doesn’t describe how important this is. History will remember.”

Most people continue to remain oblivious of both Murphy's and Huff's allegations in a world overtaken by the global networks of the censorship industrial complex, in a country whose Justice Department is just as corrupt as its NIH.

CHAPTER 25 – Decades-long history of ignoring fervent pandemic warnings coming from hundreds of conscientious scientists

After having demonstrated how SARS-CoV-2 has been created with our taxpayer dollars, this exposé will keep demonstrating Fauci's criminal mental state by showcasing how well he'd been warned countless times about the pandemic risk the research he funded creates.

On January 2010, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Fauci's NIAID, the World Health Organization and UNICEF formed the 'Decade of Vaccines Collaboration.' Only a year after the formation of this collaboration, the scientific community realized that Fauci's NIAID had started funding risky studies exposing the world to pandemic risk. The deadly gain of function research Fauci had been funding attracted widespread attention for the first time in 2011, when when two scientific papers announced the way virologists had succeeded at genetically enhancing the transmissibility of a bird flu virus strain (H5N1 avian influenza strain). Being originally only transmissible between birds, the H5N1 virus had been genetically modified to gain the function of becoming "easily transmissible between ferrets, the animals that most closely mimic the human response to flu," Science magazine reports. This article adds:

"Scientists believe it's likely that the pathogen, if it emerged in nature or were released, would trigger an influenza pandemic, quite possibly with many millions of deaths."

The same Science article quotes Paul Keim, microbial geneticist and chair of U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, stating "I can't think of another pathogenic organism that is as scary as this one."

Fauci kept defending and funding the deadly gain of function studies

Amid the outcry and protests to ban the risky gain-of-function research (GOFR), Fauci publicly defended their continuation as the director of the NIAID which controls a large portion of the funds allotted for medical research in the U.S. If Fauci were to say the moon is made of cheese, everyone would have to agree if they were to keep getting the funding they needed to continue their careers as researchers. Fauci, who had the power to drag the rest of the scientific community behind him and determine the "consensus" as such, told Scientific American:

"I think the benefit that will come out of the Fouchier paper [one of the 2 papers on enhancing the H5N1 bird flu virus] in stimulating thoughts and ways to better understand transmissibility and adaptability and pathogenesis, in my mind, far outweigh the risk of nefarious use of this information."

Fauci further gaslighted the world by touting the supposed "benefits" of gain-of-function research in a Washington Post op-ed he'd co-authored with Collins, titled "A Flu Virus Risk Worth Taking." Fauci and Collins' op-ed claims: "important information and insights can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory."

Fauci and Collins' insane voices were temporarily drowned by their conscientious opposition on January 2012, when many influential scientists agreed to put a voluntary moratorium (temporary suspension) on the risky gain-of-function studies. Fauci fought back, participating in a New York meeting during which he tried to persuade the scientific community to lift the voluntary pause on the mad science he'd been funding. NPR summarizes:

"At a recent press briefing, Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which funded the controversial [gain of function] experiments, said that he intended to go to the meeting and 'discuss in some detail with the group the kinds of approaches we can have to try and expedite as quickly as possible the lifting of the moratorium.'"

In his efforts to get the moratorium lifted so he could resume funding the engineering of bioweapons for Bill Gates and the CCP, Fauci told the Guardian on March 2012, "There cannot be any impediment to science that will ultimately be good to the general public." Such was Fauci's inverted logic that caused the COVID-19 pandemic, representing criminally negligent "Conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences."

The influential voice of Fauci did manage to drown the voice of prudence and common sense within a year. The voluntary 2012 moratorium did get lifted and the risky studies were resumed on January 2013. The Independent announced the continuation of the gain of function studies in their article featuring an eerily prophetic image of a girl in a green face mask, with the image caption stating "Scientists fear that if airborne transmission became possible it would lead to a deadly flu pandemic."

CHAPTER 26 – CDC: accidents involving dangerous pathogens "occur on average twice a week"

Fauci's appalled opposition kept fighting back, forming an alliance called the Cambridge Working Group against the risky studies. This huge group of hundreds of conscientious scientists (scroll for the list of hundreds of members) has published numerous papers and articles spelling out the grave dangers of enhancing the pathogenicity of viruses.

The efforts of the Cambridge Working Group against risky gain of function research did persuade the Obama Administration to impose a second moratorium on GOF studies starting October 2014. This is the moratorium that Fauci and Collins unilaterally nullified and prevented from serving its intended purpose as has been demonstrated.

The decision to impose this second moratorium on 2014 was partly due to three accidents that had occurred in the handling of the enhanced flu viruses, explains the Scientific American article subtitled: "The third recent mistake in handling of pathogens is a 'wake-up call,' says Centers for Disease Control head." Scientific American then published another article titled "Bio-Unsafety Level 3: Could the Next Lab Accident Result in a Pandemic?" This article states the shocking frequency of the occurrence of dangerous lab accidents as follows:

"In 1977 a flu virus swept the world in an event that became known as the Russian flu. It was caused by a strain of flu that, later genetic tests showed, looked remarkably like those that had circulated in 1950. The belief is that the virus escaped from a laboratory or was used in a vaccine project that went awry. [...] The CDC, which oversees laboratory safety in the U.S., reported in 2011 that lab errors involving select agents — the most dangerous pathogens — occur on average twice a week in U.S. labs."

“It’s not hard to predict rain in England and it’s not hard to predict select agent mistakes in the U.S.," said Public Health professor Marc Lipsitch, one of the leading voices in the debate against risky gain of function research.

Right before the decision to enact the 2014 moratorium, a congressional hearing had taken place about the lab accidents, their frequency, and the possibility that "a lab accident could allow such manmade flu strains to escape." Presented to the hearing was a consensus statement signed by the several hundred conscientious scientists making up the Cambridge Working Group alliance against risky gain-of-function research. This consensus statement the alliance presented to the hearing says:

"Laboratory creation of highly transmissible, novel strains of dangerous viruses, especially but not limited to influenza, poses substantially increased risks. An accidental infection in such a setting could trigger outbreaks that would be difficult or impossible to control. Historically, new strains of influenza, once they establish transmission in the human population, have infected a quarter or more of the world's population within two years."

On August 17, 2020, ProPublica published an article titled "Here Are Six Accidents UNC Researchers Had With Lab-Created Coronaviruses." This article spells out some of the accidents that have occurred in the University of North Carolina laboratory of the CCP's good old ally Ralph Baric who has taught China how to engineer pandemic pathogens without leaving traces of lab manipulation. The ProPublica article on Baric' s lab states: "There have been mouse bites and spills and other mishaps during experiments involving genetically altered coronaviruses at a high-security lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill." This lab is "probably one of the safest BSL-3 facilities in the world," points out the MIT Technology Review, but nevertheless such accidents had occurred. Baric continues to conduct his deadly gain of function experiments in his human-error-prone lab as of March 2023.

There have also been countless deadly lab accidents kept out of the public's eye.

"In America’s biolabs, hundreds of accidents have gone undisclosed to the public," reports the Intercept. The outlet has published a great 3 part series titled "Experimenting With Disaster" based on over 5,500 pages of NIH documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The outlet reports in Part 1 of its series:

An Intercept investigation based on over 5,500 pages of NIH documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act has uncovered a litany of mishaps: malfunctioning equipment, spilled beakers, transgenic rodents running down the hall, a sedated macaque coming back to life and biting a researcher hard enough to lacerate their hand. Many of the incidents involved less dangerous pathogens that can be handled with basic safety equipment, and most did not lead to infection. But several accidents happened while scientists were handling deadly or debilitating viruses in highly secure labs, and a few, like the Chikungunya virus slip-up, did lead to illness.

“People have it in their minds that lab accidents are very, very rare, and if they happen, they happen only in the least well-run overseas labs,” said Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University and an advocate for better biosafety standards. “That simply isn’t true.”

The history of the lab accidents summarized may be enough to convince any 'ordinary careful and prudent person' of the fact that in a world inevitably prone to human error, once a pandemic pathogen is created, it's only a matter of time until it finds its way out of even the world's "safest" lab and start infecting human populations, killing millions of people like SARS-CoV-2 has done. In a world where there's always room for human carelessness and error, continuing to allow the genetic enhancement of any virus for any reason whatsoever must be deemed criminally negligent conduct "incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences."

I strongly believe there can be no legitimate justification for conducting any kind of gain of function research whatsoever to enhance the pathogenicity of any virus, because trying to differentiate between what's risky and what's not risky gain of function research would leave the door wide open for malicious parties to keep trying to muddy the waters just like Fauci and Collins have done, playing with definitions and inventing various loopholes and ploys in trying to blur the line between what constitutes risk and what doesn't. Permitting some gain of function studies and banning others would keep the door open for efforts to make the simple truth appear "very nebulous."

CHAPTER 27 – Fauci and Collins fire the 11 opposing White House biosecurity advisors, new advisors get moratorium lifted

Here is yet one more egregious ploy demonstrating the criminal mental state of ploy-masters Fauci and Collins.

To get the 2014 moratorium lifted and the deadly gain of function studies resumed, Fauci and Collins have unrightfully "released from duty" all of the White House biosecurity advisors who publicly opposed the deadly gain of function studies.

On October 2014, the White House announced how it would proceed in deciding if and when to lift the 2014 moratorium on gain of function studies. Nature explains:

"The White House says that it will wait for recommendations from the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) and the National Research Council before deciding whether and how to lift the ban. The groups are expected to finish their work within a year. As Nature went to press, the NSABB was set to convene on 22 October, its first meeting in two years."

"NSABB [the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] advises and guides the U.S. government about 'dual use' research that involves biological agents that could be used as bioweapons," explains Science. About this advisory board's upcoming meeting to recommend the White House on whether or not to resume the risky studies, NSABB member Arturo Casadevall had assumed: "The NSABB meeting is certain to see heated debate as scientists from all sides convene." But there had been no debates at all when the advisory board actually convened on October 22, 2014, let alone heated debates. Fauci and Collins had succeeded at pulling a "clever" fast one that put an end to all debate about whether the White House should or should not continue to bestow upon animal viruses the ability to destroy human populations.

On July 2014, just a few months before NSABB was expected to meet on October 2014, NIH/NIAID dismissed NSABB's 11 (out of 23) members who had publicly opposed the risky gain of function studies.

Microbiologist Arturo Casadevall, one of NSABB's biosecurity advisors who got dismissed, explains: "all the members who have been through the H5N1 [enhanced bird flu virus] debates have been replaced at the same time." Science reports:

"The 11 members learned they were being dismissed Sunday evening in an e-mail from the board's executive director, Mary Groesch, who works at the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), NSABB's overseer. "

The same Science article adds that a NIH representative told the 11 members had been dismissed "so that fresh and diverse perspectives can be brought to bear on the committee's deliberations."

Fauci and Collins had thus never allowed the White House to hear the advice of its biosecurity advisors who'd been opposed to creating bioweapons of mass destruction capable of killing countless humans. When the re-staffed National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity convened, the "fresh and diverse perspectives" of the new board members did get the moratorium lifted on December 2017.

A huge step had been taken towards shoving the world headlong into the pandemic that has as of March 2023 killed around 7 million innocent people, not counting those who have died of vaccine side effects.

Former EcoHealth Alliance VP Andrew Huff's attorney Thomas Renz's lawsuit against EcoHealth Alliance, the globalist cabal and the CCP is continuing as of March 2023. Attorney Renz, perhaps the world's most courageous man, states:

"At the end of the day, the crime that was and is COVID-19 will be revealed. We will win this fight and there will be accountability. There will be accountability for the disease, the hospital murders, the jabs, the lockdowns, and everything else and we will do everything we can to ensure that EVERY single person that profited from this crime against humanity pays the price."

Let us please let Renz's courage rub on all of us as we fight evil in accord with the edicts of the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence to save this world.

 

CHAPTER 1 – Most heavily censored atrocities you may have missed

By piecing together previously scattered facts like a jigsaw puzzle, this exposé paints the complete picture of the heinous attempt to ease in a global totalitarian regime through new generation warfare comprised of the releasing of bioweapons accompanied by an insidious psyop strategy. If you're not yet sure if the Great Reset is happening, please first verify its irrefutable reality.

Here is an explosive interview with International law professor Dr. Francis Boyle who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 signed into law by George H. W. Bush. In this interview, Boyle gives a detailed statement on the way the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive biological warfare weapon. But unfortunately, such authoritative sources continue to be obliterated in the current cancel culture fueled by the censorship industrial complex that's enveloped the world.

After 2020's coup that installed CCP-compromised Biden, the very same grant that created the COVID-19 pandemic still continues with the taxpayer dollars of American citizens in a country so thoroughly infiltrated that no one's stopping it. This is absolutely real as this chapter demonstrates, hidden from the majority of the public by CCP-style censorship efforts.

The U.S. appeared to have stopped funding the genetic enhancement of coronaviruses in the Wuhan Lab on August 19, 2022, when the NIH finally announced cutting off this subaward to China. But despite cutting off the subaward, the NIH's Deputy Director Michael Lauer had told the Washington Examiner that his agency may continue to fund EcoHealth Alliance for the same grant R01AI110964 without the involvement of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Sure enough, on September 21, 2022, the NIH did resume EcoHealth Alliance's funding of grant R01AI110964 to "collect samples of viruses from wildlife and then “rapidly supply viral sequences and isolates for use in vaccine and therapeutic development,” reports the Intercept. Which idiot would believe that no longer funding Wuhan Institute's subaward can prevent China from learning all about the new viruses CCP-owned Daszak creates, given Daszak's deep history of enmeshment with the CCP and the PLA in a country with a puppet regime also owned by the CCP?

The terminated and re-instated grant to EcoHealth Alliance is the same one that created the pandemic, announced to the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance Andrew Huff. After lawyering up, Huff has come forward admitting that their group did create Sars-CoV-2 with the same R01AI110964 grant the NIH resumed funding on September 21, 2022.

Abominable?

But it gets even worse.

EcoHealth Alliance is just 1 of the 11 similar institutions studying the spillover potential of viruses in the global network of hundreds of biolabs funded by the U.S. The above grant is only one of God knows how many other deadly grants causing animal viruses to become transmissible among human populations.

If the lunatic billionaires and compromised officials funding this heinous operation are not stopped, they will continue to enrich themselves immeasurably as they'll keep forcing on the world to take their "vaccines" for endless new viruses, keeping populations indefinitely suppressed through "healthcare" tyranny in a totalitarian hellscape.

Did you know that researchers at Boston University have already succeeded at creating a much deadlier variant of SARS-CoV-2 which has an 80% kill rate. Congratulations!

On July 5, 2022, Forbes published an article, titled "The US Is Funding a Massive Virus Hunt That Might Cause Another Pandemic. Great Idea!"

In a congress filled with 388 traitors, who's there for us to stop this ultimately evil operation while CCP's puppet president occupies the White House?

It's my strong opinion that only We the People can stop these evil lunatics, if each and every one of us does his/her part.

All gain of function research must be criminalized immediately with severe penalties for violators. And all those who've suffered side effects from the COVID shots must be allowed to sue the vaccine manufacturers for damages.

It's imperative for all citizens to not waste time resisting what's being done to the world and block the Great Reset agenda.

CHAPTER 2 – Beyond reasonable doubt: SARS-CoV-2 was deliberately allowed to "escape"

This chapter of this exposé proves beyond reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 was deliberately allowed to "escape" from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Below is a summary of my main reasons for believing so, followed by more details:

• On October 2019, just 2 months before the announcement of the COVID-19 pandemic, Fauci and the HHS officials have been caught on video discussing releasing the "virus from China" to launch their mRNA vaccines without going through the conventional lengthy testing process. Please watch this entire video until the end to hear a Rockefeller Foundation-affiliated HHS officer openly say the "virus from China" can be used to "explode the system" and rush the approval process of the new mRNA vaccines. This is absolutely real, please don't miss OANN's Pierson Sharp's interpretation in this video.
• Again the same month on October 2019 (only 2 months before the pandemic's announcement), a high-level pandemic response drill called Event 201 was hosted by the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, adding to the evidence that the masterminds of the Great Reset had known the virus would "escape."
• On September 2019, just one month before Fauci and the HHS officials discussed releasing the "virus from China" and hosted the Event 201 pandemic response drill the same month, the Wuhan Institute's biosecurity measures had been allowed to become so inadequate that the biosecurity-4 lab's director Yuan Zhiming felt compelled to publish an article listing all the biosecurity shortcomings allowed to go on. Zhiming wrote that these shortcomings resulted from "insufficient level of resources being provided by the PRC [People's Republic of China] government," states the addendum to the final report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. This shows the way the CCP allowed the virus to escape in a way creating plausible deniability about deliberate release.

It first occurred to fiction writer Dean Koontz that the biolabs in Wuhan would be the ideal place for developing deadly bioweapons of mass destruction behind the iron curtain. Koontz's uncanny 1981 novel "The Eyes of Darkness" mentions a virus called Wuhan-400 that gets released from China as a bioweapon. Probably inspired by this novel, the Deep State made of imperialist billionaires colluding with the CCP had their deadly virus research shipped to Wuhan. Away from inquiring eyes, the Wuhan Institute could maintain (or not maintain) its own biosafety measures entirely at the discretion of masterminds of the Great Reset. There could be no better way to hide what happened if the virus "escaped."

Rowan Jacobsen's article titled "Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan" explains how the Chinese researchers learned everything the American researchers knew during their collaboration. Wuhan institute "soon used its own reverse-genetics technology to make numerous coronavirus chimeras," states Jacobsen. But the gain of function research in Wuhan was conducted under way riskier conditions than similar research conducted in America. Jacobsen's article summarizes the situation:

"The Chinese work was carried out at biosafety level 2 (BSL-2), a much lower tier than Baric’s BSL-3+. [...] That meant the same viruses that Daszak was holding up as a clear and present danger to the world were being studied under conditions that, according to Richard Ebright, matched “the biosafety level of a US dentist’s office.”"

Jacobsen's article goes on to explain:

"But the WIV was not breaking any rules by working at BSL-2, says Filippa Lentzos, a biosecurity expert at King’s College London “There are no enforceable standards of what you should and shouldn’t do. It’s up to the individual countries, institutions, and scientists.” And in China, she says, the vertiginous rise of high-tech biological research has not been accompanied by an equivalent increase in oversight."

The Washington Post quotes Beth Cameron, vice president for global biological policy and programs at the nonprofit Nuclear Threat Initiative, also saying that when conducting risky studies, there are no enforceable standards of what individual institutions, countries and scientists should or shouldn't do. Cameron has told the Post that safety would "depend largely on strong security measures at each lab to protect against an accidental release and govern who is allowed to work on the experiments."

Thus there was nothing the world could do to oversee and prevent what was taking place out of sight and out of mind in communist China. Knowing this, NIH/NIAID had persistently kept funding the Wuhan lab by violating the numerous rules and procedures that have been described in this exposé, All these violations have made it possible for Daszak and Baric to teach communist China how to create bioweapons of mass destruction that couldn't be traced back to a lab origin.

Jacobsen's MIT Technology Review article states that Daszak, "In response to questions about the decision to do the research in BSL-2 conditions," forwarded him a statement from EcoHealth Alliance saying, "the organization must follow the local laws of the countries in which we work," adding that the NIH had determined the research was "not gain-of-function.""

Biosafety procedures at the Wuhan Institute had been inadequate at least since January 2018, the Washington Post reports. Their article states that "In January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing took the unusual step of repeatedly sending U.S. science diplomats to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)." These U.S. diplomats had explicitly warned Washington that the Wuhan Institute's biosecurity measures were so lax they could cause a SARS-like pandemic. The Washington Post article summarizes:

"What the U.S. officials learned during their visits concerned them so much that they dispatched two diplomatic cables [special diplomatic text-based messages] categorized as Sensitive But Unclassified back to Washington. The cables warned about safety and management weaknesses at the WIV lab and proposed more attention and help. The first cable, which I [the reporter] obtained, also warns that the lab's work on bat coronaviruses and their potential human transmission represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic."

On September 2019, 3 months before the pandemic, the CCP had allowed the biosecurity measures at the Wuhan Institute to become so lax that Yuan Zhiming, the head of China's CDC, then Director of Wuhan's BSL-4 lab and bat lady Shi’s supervisor, got fed up, publishing an article documenting the key biosecurity shortcomings of his Institute in the Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity. These shortcomings include "inadequate biosafety management systems, insufficient resources for efficient laboratory operation, and deficiency of professional capacity," states the addendum to the final report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. This addendum also states that "With a surprising level of transparency, Yuan admits that the enforcement of pathogen, waste, and laboratory animal management regulations “needs to be strengthened.”" For more detail, please see in Zhiming's article the sections titled "3.3. Insufficient resources for efficient laboratory operation" and "3.4. Deficiency of professional capacity."

Perhaps the most interesting part of Zhiming's article is the director's following admission revealing that if an "accident" occurred, it would be hard to identify who was responsible. Zhiming wrote:

"Currently, most laboratories lack specialized biosafety managers and engineers. In such facilities, some of the skilled staff is composed by part-time researchers. This makes it difficult to identify and mitigate potential safety hazards in facility and equipment operation early enough. "

The outcries of both the U.S. diplomats and biosecurity-4 lab's own director didn't cause the U.S. or Chinese authorities to move a finger. Instead of helping fix the biosecurity shortcomings, the the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted a pandemic response drill. Instead of being focusing on prevention, the "philanthropic" billionaires focused on preparation. During their drill, they practiced, as shown in these simulation videos, how to shut down world economies, schools, restrict travel, and how to distribute their mRNA vaccines to immensely enrich themselves in a country so corrupt no one can sue vaccine manufacturers for side effects.

It can't be emphasized enough the way the above drills occurred the very same month Fauci and the HHS officials plotted releasing the "virus from China." to speed up the process of launching their mRNA vaccines, as has been caught on video. Sure enough, the pandemic did start 2 months later.

Most ironically, the creators of the COVID-19 pandemic even prepared an report warning the world that a pandemic was about to occur, doing so just weeks before their "prophecy" actualized. On September 2019, Fauci helped prepare a World Health Organization report whose title starts with the worlds "A World at Risk," highlighting an increasing risk of global pandemic from a pathogen escaping after being engineered in a lab. Downloading the report reveals on page 32 that Fauci is a member of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board who'd authored the report. This report that Fauci had helped prepare states:

“The chances of a global pandemic are growing. While scientific and technological developments provide new tools that advance public health (including safely assessing medical countermeasures), they also allow for disease-causing microorganisms to be engineered or recreated in laboratories. A deliberate release would complicate outbreak response [...] Taken together, naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate events caused by high-impact respiratory pathogens pose 'global catastrophic biological risks.'"

Not funny?

All of the above demonstrates how well aware the authorities, including Fauci, had been of the way their efforts exposed the world to pandemic risk.

The deadly experiments have STILL not stopped as of March 2023 even AFTER the pandemic!

Why should the gain of function studies stop, as as it's so far been a match made in heaven for everyone in charge of the operation? Vaccine developer Gates and his cabal of wealthy elites have multiplied their wealth many times over by the untested mRNA vaccines they've made world governments force on their populations. The CCP has reached its goal of shutting down and weakening world economies. The masterminds of globalism have almost reached their goal of easing in their totalitarian one-world government modeled after the CCP.

Everyone benefited except for the 7 million "non-essential" little people who have died as of March 2023.

"We need more money to plan for the second pandemic. There’s gonna be another pandemic,” America's senile president blurted out, announcing the next pandemic not only once but multiple times.

Such is the plight of the world perhaps approaching its end in the hands of a few insane old billionaires holding the strings of their senile "president."

The globalists will never let NIH/NIAID stop funding Daszak unless the Great Reset operation is dismantled from the ground up. Until then, Daszak and Baric will openly continue to prefect their modern bioweapons in a country where the CCP and globalist millionaires have not only captured the NIH/NIAID but also the White House.

For the love of God, please don't postpone doing the grassroots activism described here if you wish to help save humanity from an unthinkable end. Together we can accomplish a lot, but only if each of us does his/her part in shaping the world's future. Please also do whatever else you can think of in accord with the edicts of the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

CHAPTER 3 – The insidious psyop technique accompanying bioweapon's release

Who could be naive enough to believe that the CCP would let the U.S. engineer potential bioweapons in its own country — without having complete control of the process?

And who in their right minds could believe humankind could "benefit" from the genetic enhancement of animal viruses to cause them to rapidly infect human populations?

Insane?

But remember... It’s you who’s "crazy" — we were all deemed crazy little conspiracy theorists daring to doubt the superior wisdom of top scientists with PhD degrees when the pandemic began, when "authoritative sources" had deemed Fauci the “hero of the pandemic” instead of the villain. Mainstream channels and social platforms were colluding to give the impression that no legitimate authority agreed with us, maintaining a façade of unanimity while censoring or deriding the truth and promoting false narratives to deceive and sidetrack the masses. We were kept in isolation while this occurred and not allowed to congregate with others who could affirm our opinions and feelings about the shutting down of our businesses. As you may have stayed glued to your TV in terror watching the strange "reality" they kept feeding you, did you ever wonder if something was wrong with your mind?

For those unfamiliar with this psyop strategy, it’s commonly referred to as “gaslighting,” defined by Britannica as ”an elaborate and insidious technique of deception and psychological manipulation” serving to “gradually undermine the victim’s confidence in his own ability to distinguish truth from falsehood, right from wrong, or reality from appearance, thereby rendering him pathologically dependent on the gaslighter in his thinking or feelings.”

How many Americans may have lost confidence in their own ability to "distinguish truth from falsehood, right from wrong, or reality from appearance" after the pandemic began, having become "pathologically dependent" on CNN, MSNBC or Google Feeds in their thinking or feelings? Plenty of Americans, apparently, as too few people opposed the insanity of keeping the economy shut down even after it became apparent the hospitals were never going to exceed their treatment capacities.

The Britannica article on gaslighting goes on to describe that the basic elements of the technique may include:

• "Isolating the victim from independent sources of information and validation, including other people."
• "Attempting to convince the victim of the truth of something intuitively bizarre or outrageous by forcefully insisting on it or by marshaling superficial evidence;"
• "Dismissing the victim’s contrary perceptions or feelings as invalid or pathological; questioning the knowledge and impugning the motives of persons who contradict the viewpoint of the gaslighter;"

Below is everything we, the "crazy conspiracy theorists," were never meant to find out as we were "supposed to" continue to let Cable TV and fake news sources shape our "reality."

CHAPTER 4 – Charging Fauci and Collins with criminally negligent homicide

As of March 2023, International law professor Dr. Francis Boyle, who's drafted the United States Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 (BWATA), is still trying to find a courageous Attorney General willing to indict Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Dr. Francis Collins, the former director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) which oversees Fauci's NIAID. Boyle is accusing Fauci and Collins of having violated his Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, accusing them of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The details are found in Boyle's great interview.

This article hopes to help Boyle and others succeed at indicting the creators of the pandemic, as well as indicting everyone who's aided and abetted Fauci and Collins.

What are the crimes Fauci and Collins can most easily be indicted for in the light of the existing evidence?

According to US Legal, criminal negligence is defined as:

"Conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences"

Which "ordinary prudent or careful person" can be expected support and fund the genetic enhancement of bat viruses to make them capable of rapidly infecting human populations?

To convict someone of criminal negligence, US Legal states that the courts must be able to prove his criminal mental state, explaining:

"Proof of that mental state requires that the failure to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk that a result will occur must be a gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person."

Representing an incredibly "gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person," Fauci and Collins have failed to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in funding the creation of bioweapons of mass destruction in a CCP-affiliated laboratory in communist China. This represents the simple truth obfuscated by treasonous top scientists and mainstream media colluding with the CCP.

In the 2016 paper titled "Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis," the world was warned that "advances in biotechnology may enable development and use of a new generation of biological weapons of mass destruction." This paper defined gain of function research (GOFR) as follows:

"Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens."

This 2016 paper details the risks and biosafety concerns of artificially enhancing "the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens," explicitly stating that "a devastating pandemic could potentially result from a laboratory accident involving an especially dangerous pathogen created via GOFR [gain of function research]." The same 1916 paper explains the purported benefits of GOFR such as attempts to develop vaccines and medical countermeasures, adding:

"Critics questioned the validity of claims about such benefits and argued that the studies might facilitate creation of biological weapons agents that could kill millions, or possibly even billions, of people."

This is just one of the countless warnings Collins' NIH and Fauci's NIAID had been given. NIH/NIAID nevertheless kept facilitating the "creation of biological weapons agents that could kill millions, or possibly even billions," in a PLA-affiliated lab in communist China through numerous unethical ploys and policy violations the upcoming sections spell out in detail.

In late 2019 when the pandemic began, with the mainstream media eerily avoiding mentioning the possibility of a lab accident or bioweapon release, Fauci was allowed to assume the role of an unelected autocrat shaping almost all aspects of U.S. policy. The way Fauci's role overrode even the president's has been blurted out by Joe Biden in a December 2, 2021 speech whose video is available. In this speech, Biden irritably utters "I've seen more of Dr. Fauci than I have my wife... Look, who's president? Fauci!" They say one hears the truth from children, but it's taken a demented old man to voice the extent to which America was for several years run by a CCP-compromised "health" official.

On August 22, 2022, Fauci announced he'll be "stepping down from the positions of Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Chief of the NIAID Laboratory of Immunoregulation, as well as the position of Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden." His retirement pension "will amount to over $400,000 and top the annual salary that the President of the United States brings in," reports Fox News. Instead of spending his retirement in the lap of luxury after having caused more than 6 million people to die as of September 2022, this monster should spend his retirement in prison as this article will hopefully help bring on.

CHAPTER 5 – Piles of evidence lead to the Wuhan Institute of Virology

On March 2023, the FBI and U.S. Department of Energy announced SARS-CoV-2 may indeed have come from the Wuhan lab, with the media finally being allowed to report freely on the lab leak hypothesis. On March 10 2023, the House voted unanimously to declassify U.S. intelligence on the origins of COVID-19. "It's unclear whether the president will sign the measure into law, and the White House said the matter was under review," reported ABC News on March 10, 2023.

Back in August 2021, few media outlets had dared cover the way the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff had announced that the pandemic came from the Wuhan lab in their August 2021 addendum to their report titled "The Origins of Covid-19, an Investigation of the Wuhan Institute of Virology." This report states:

"It is the opinion of Committee Minority Staff, based on the preponderance of available information; the documented efforts to obfuscate, hide, and destroy evidence; and the lack of physical evidence to the contrary; that SARS-CoV-2 was accidentally released from a Wuhan Institute of Virology laboratory sometime prior to September 12, 2019."

There was nothing "accidental" about the virus's intentional release, as the upcoming parts of the exposé will demonstrate.

In an August 2, 2021 op-ed, Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe announced the way he's “had access to all of the U.S. government’s most sensitive intelligence related to the pandemic," which caused him to conclude:

"although the CCP has gone to great lengths to ensure there is no "smoking gun," every piece of evidence I have seen points to the pandemic’s origin being a leak out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."

On August 8, 2022. Professor Jeffrey Sachs, the head of the COVID-19 commission of the world's most influential top medical journal the Lancet, stated that after 2 years of intensive investigation, he's "pretty convinced" SARS-CoV-2 was engineered in a lab. Sachs has declared (scroll for video):

"I chaired the commission for the Lancet for 2 years on Covid. I'm pretty convinced it came out of US lab biotechnology, not out of nature, just to mention, after 2 years of intensive work on this. So it's a blunder, in my view, of biotech [...] it's not being investigated, not in the United States, not anywhere, and I think for real reasons, that they don't want to look underneath the rug."

Dr. Robert Redfield, the former director of the CDC, also announced that he believed a lab leak is the most likely explanation for the COVID-19 pandemic. Redfield explained:

"I'm just giving my best opinion as a virologist, and I don't think it's plausible that this virus went from a bat to an animal – we still don't know that animal – and then went into humans and immediately learned how to be human-to-human transmissible to the point of now causing one of the greatest pandemics we've had in the history of the world."

"That's not consistent with how other coronaviruses have come into the human species," Redfield told, referring to the way all other coronaviruses that had emerged in animals and jumped onto humans had taken some time to evolve the ability to start spreading effectively among humans. The former CDC director also pointed out, "You have a virus that is one of the most infectious viruses in the history of humanity, and yet that virus no longer can infect the bat? [...] No, this is highly abnormal." Redfield added:

"And, it does suggest that there's an alternative hypothesis that it went from a bat virus, got into a laboratory, where in the laboratory, it was taught, educated, it evolved, so that it became a virus that could efficiently transmit human to human."

The real "conspiracy is Collins, Fauci, and the established scientific community," told former CDC director Redfield, also stating, "Everyone had to agree to the narrative" pushed by Fauci and Collins that the pandemic originated in a wet market. "I was threatened, my life was threatened," Redfield said. "I have letters I got from prominent scientists, that previously gave me awards, telling me that the best thing I could do for the world was to shoot myself because of what I said," the ex-director told. "Nothing's going to happen as long as the Biden administration is here," Redfield also added.

On October 2022, the Senate Committee on Health Education, Labor and Pensions Minority Oversight Staff published their own analysis of the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, announcing in their interim report: "Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident." This report then falsely states "more information is needed to arrive at a more precise, if not a definitive, understanding of the origins of SARS-CoV-2." The investigators commissioned for this report have, possibly through willful blindness, have missed way too many pieces of the puzzle included in this exposé. The next 2 sections immediately erase all doubts about the fact that the virus did escape from the lab.

CHAPTER 6 – Wuhan lab staff gets sick, Wuhan hospitals fill up, and the lab destroys its viral databases right before pandemic's announcement

Right before the COVID-10 pandemic's announcement, the CCP did not only destroy all of its viral databases that could lead to the origins of SARS-CoV-2, but it also forced compromised U.S. officials to destroy their databases. Demonstrating how this occurred leaves no doubt about the way the virus must have escaped from the Wuhan lab.

The destruction of the databases of the Wuhan lab is described in this section, and the destruction of collaborating NIH's databases are described in the next section.

"Bat lady" Shi Zhengli, who directs the coronavirus research efforts at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, has claimed that the genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 does not match any of the viral sequences her team had been studying. But declassified U.S. intel has revealed that staff members at the lab fell ill with COVID-like symptoms in the Autumn of 2019, before the first reported case of the pandemic in late 2019. Again during the autumn of 2019, many international athletes, who had traveled to Wuhan for the Military World Games, got sick with Covid-19-like symptoms. Hospitals around the Wuhan lab at that time had also filled up, states the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff report titled "The Origins of Covid-19." The report explains:

"Satellite imagery of Wuhan in September and October 2019 [...] showed a significant uptick in the number of people at local hospitals surrounding the WIV’s [Wuhan Institute of Virology's] headquarters, coupled with an unusually high number of patients with symptoms similar to COVID-19."

The same autumn of 2019 when the Wuhan lab staff developed Covid-19-like symptoms and the hospitals near the lab filled up, the Wuhan Institute deleted its main database of more than 22,000 unpublished samples and sequences of bat and rodent viral genomic sequences on September 12, 2019. Eventually all of the 16 virus databases managed by the Wuhan Institute were taken offline. None of these databases could so far be recovered. Vanity Fair reports:

"Why would a database supported by U.S. tax dollars to help prevent and respond to a pandemic be made “inaccessible exactly when it was needed to fulfill its intended purpose?” asks Jamie Metzl, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, who was among the first to call for a full investigation of COVID-19’s origins."

In trying to learn how SARS-CoV-2 originated, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo asked China to provide the U.S. with its earliest samples of the virus. But China destroyed these samples too and admitted to having destroyed them on January 3rd 2020.

All of the above indicates that China had everything to hide regarding how COVID-19 originated.

As if the destruction of the piles of evidence the deleted databases contained wasn't enough in trying to obfuscate the pandemic's origin, revisions had been made to the early viral genomic sequences in trying to mislead the world into believing that the virus jumped from pangolins. This was uncovered by the nonprofit investigative research group U.S. Right to Know. These revisions had been made to the genomic datasets of four high-profile studies claiming that SARS-CoV-2 evolved in bats, jumped onto pangolins from bats, and then onto humans.

Not only the Chinese researchers but numerous U.S. researchers and officials also aided and abetted the CCP's cover-up attempts and following misinformation campaign to deceive the world about where SARS-CoV-2 came from. The next section starts naming these people and how they betrayed the world.

But not everyone had been willing to kowtow to the CCP...

CHAPTER 7 – Dr. Bloom courageously resists and exposes the corruption of NIH's director Collins and grantee Andersen

Dr. Jesse Bloom reminds us that there are still researchers who value truth over trying to climb the academic or political ladder.

In a country where the NIH and NIAID provide a big portion of the grant funding for medical research, it would be academic suicide for most researchers to let themselves fall out of favor with NIAID's director Fauci and NIH's director Collins. Without being able to win grant awards from Fauci and Collins, researchers wouldn't be able to conduct the studies and publish the new findings needed to retain or advance their academic positions. Thus the CCP only had to compromise key officials such as Collins and Fauci in a system that discouraged everyone else from getting on the wrong side of their grant providers. Grantees who kowtowed to Fauci and Collins kept getting funded and kept rising. Those who refused to do Fauci and Collins' bidding got no funds.

But one researcher nevertheless selflessly resisted.

On June 2020, Wuhan University researchers emailed the NIH requesting that the U.S. institute also deletes its own early genomic sequences from its viral databases. Collins' NIH did comply with China's request. The fact that this deletion had occurred was discovered by evolutionary biologist Jesse Bloom, who succeeded at partially recovering the deleted sequences. Bloom was able to recover "13 partial viral sequences collected from people in the city [of Wuhan] in the early days of the pandemic." Bloom then wrote a paper explaining, "the Huanan Seafood Market sequences are not fully representative of the viruses in Wuhan early in the epidemic." The recovered data demonstrated "that the coronavirus was circulating in the city long before the December 2019 outbreak at the city’s Huanan seafood market, which was a major focus of the recent WHO report on the origins of the pandemic," reports the Intercept. The WHO's seafood market origin theory had been fabricated.

The same Intercept article states, "It turned out that researchers from Wuhan University had emailed the NIH in June 2020 to request that the sequences be deleted."

Before Bloom published his paper on the deleted genomic sequences, he'd sent a copy to NIH's director Collins and NIAID's director Fauci. Upon receiving the paper before its publication, Collins organized a meeting with Bloom and 2 other virologists he invited. One of Collins' invitees was evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen, who repeatedly tried to dissuade Bloom from publishing his findings during their meeting. Andersen finally told Bloom he was a screener at the pre-print server where Bloom's paper still resided, he would be able to either delete Bloom's paper or revise it “in a way that would leave no record that this had been done.” But Bloom refused to allow Andersen to delete or alter his paper, letting it get published as is.

After it leaked to the press that Collins had invited to his meeting someone like Andersen who could alter the preprint server without any trace, more and more corruption kept surfacing as will be demonstrated, which finally forced NIH's director Collins to announce his resignation in October 5th 2021. Fauci has done the same much later despite the stench of his corruption surpassing that of Collins.'

CHAPTER 8 – NIH's disgraced ex-director becomes Biden's top science advisor, NIH's acting director "reveals" 292 fully redacted pages

Compromised ex-director Collins had proven too useful to the CCP to be left to retire in peace after his resignation.

After getting declared a "National Treasure" by gaslighting propaganda-spewing outlets, compromised Collins rejoined compromised Biden’s administrative team like compromised birds of a feather. Collins became a top science advisor to the Biden White House on February 2022. Collins had gone right back to helping Fauci determine U.S. government policy by having become he co-chair of Biden's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

Collins' new tasks included to "help find the next director of NIH" as of September 2022.

If Americans continue to do nothing about saving their country, God knows how many future NIH directors will keep sending U.S. taxpayer funds to China, Ukraine, and God knows where else for creating more pandemic pathogens. There needs to be a huge outcry about this, please don't postpone doing your part.

As Collins was looking for the NIH's new director, the duties of the director of the NIH were being performed by acting director Lawrence A. Tabak, who had previously been serving as the NIH's Principal Deputy Director and Deputy Ethics Counselor. Some ethics counselor Tabak had been if it was his counsel that had encouraged Collins to do the incredibly corrupt deeds this exposé will keep documenting.

In performing the duties of NIH's acting director, Tabak has continued to walk Collins' path in aiding and abetting the CCP, causing the NIH to hide additional critical evidence on the pandemic's origin. On, February 20 2022, in response to litigation, the former "ethics counselor" sent to the Intercept 292 fully redacted pages rather than substantive material that could have shed light on how SARS-CoV-2 was created!

No joking — Tabak did send the Intercept 292 fully redacted pages of "information" about the grants the NIH provided to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, revealing his unwillingness to come clean about NIH/NIAID's collaboration with the CCP in engineering the SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon. Please see the fully redacted 292 pages start here after page 15!

The story of NIH/NIAID's ridiculous attempts to cover up the pandemic's origin unfortunately does not end here.

The deeply compromised Biden administration advised by Collins and Fauci tried to mislead the world for the umpteenth time in their declassified COVID-19 Origin Intelligence Report released on Aug 27, 2021. This absurdly brief report claimed the White House's investigation into the pandemic's origins is inconclusive, saying "China’s cooperation most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19." The Biden administration would like you to believe that the investigation into the pandemic's origin may conveniently never conclude, when China may never be expected to cooperate to incriminate itself. But as this article will continue to demonstrate, revealing the pandemic's origin doesn't need China at all. The NIH's attempts to delete, alter and avoid revealing key information indicates that the full truth can be learned by subpoenaing Collins, Tabak, Fauci and every other corrupt researcher this exposé will continue to name, and by forcing these corrupt researchers to un-redact and hand in everything they've been hiding.

The compromised Biden White House continues to do all it can to further obfuscate how the pandemic started. On February 23, 2022, Biden cancelled a program called the China Initiative because of "increasing concerns from the academic and scientific community about the department’s pursuit of certain research grant fraud cases." This has been admitted by Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen in a speech at George Mason University, suggesting the stifling of the investigations into the gain of function research grants administered by Fauci and Collins. Assistant Attorney General Olsen told during this speech:

"We have heard that these prosecutions — and the public narrative they create — can lead to a chilling atmosphere for scientists and scholars that damages the scientific enterprise in this country."

The authorities are thus still telling us they can't be sure if the virus came from the Wuhan lab as of March 2023 (not satire).

CHAPTER 9 – After the launch of America's global network of biolabs, Biden announces second pandemic's coming

Having prevented any prosecutions that could damage the collaboration of the American and Chinese virologists engineering bioweapons of mass destruction, the Biden administration plans for (loads slow) future pandemics, which has been caught on video. "We need more money to plan for the second pandemic. There’s gonna be another pandemic,” America's senile president has blurted out multiple times. The Infowars article reporting Biden say such words includes 2 videos of the 2 occasions Biden has announced that the next pandemic's on its way. This Infowars article ends with the words: "From which biolab will the second pandemic originate? Only time will tell."

On March 9, 2022, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian released a tweet alleging “The US has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone. It should give a full account of its biological military activities at home and abroad and subject itself to multilateral verification.” The U.S. has not responded to China's allegation, but the NIAID's website contains an August 2020 announcement titled "NIAID Establishes Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases," whose subtitle states "Global Network to Focus on Spillover Potential." This announcement states that "NIAID intends to provide approximately $82 million over 5 years to support the network." The NPR article covering the NIAID's funding of this global network of biolabs states:

"EcoHealth Alliance is one of the 11 institutions and research teams receiving grants from NIH [...] to establish the Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases. The global network will monitor pathogens that emerge in wildlife and study how and where they go on to infect humans."

The NPR article adds:

"That will mean studying coronaviruses, of course, but also filoviruses, a family of viruses that includes Ebola, and paramyxoviruses, a group that includes the viruses that cause mumps, measles and Nipah, a highly lethal virus that inspired the 2011 movie Contagion."

NIAID's August 2020 announcement of the creation of its global network of biolabs further states that "Each Center in the network will involve collaborations with peer institutions in the United States and 28 other countries."

NIAID's global network's own website states one of the network's goals as being "to prospectively develop a framework and the infrastructure necessary to respond quickly and effectively to future outbreaks." This shows the way the worldwide infrastructure will be ready for the Great Reset to rapidly succeed at getting implemented when the next pandemic will inevitably occur due to the hundreds, or perhaps millions of additional pandemic pathogens being created in the hundreds of biolabs of the worldwide Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases network.

Will the world end due to the compromised Biden Administration's efforts to fill it with pandemic pathogens or due to its efforts to start a nuclear World War III with Russia and China?

Or are We the People going to start acting to stop this ultimately evil agenda in the light of the edicts of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence?

Regarding the biolabs in Ukraine, when Sen. Marco Rubio asked US Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland "Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?," Nuland admitted under oath (50 seconds into the video):

"Ukraine has — biological research facilities — which, in fact — we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach."

It's ironic the way the U.S. didn't have any problem with developing in China the "research materials" it doesn't want Russia to gain access to.

When Fauci announced his retirement on December 2022, he told CBS News that he'll be stepping down "to pursue the 'next chapter' of his career." It's likely Fauci too will end up on Biden's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology just like Collins has done in his career's 'next chapter.' If not put in prison, Fauci is likely to continue to help mastermind the Great Reset and determine the U.S. policy that's been filling the world with countless new deadly viruses.

For the love of God, please help put an end to all this, please don't postpone doing your part in helping save the world.

CHAPTER 10 – Biden officials agree Wuhan Institute collaborates with CCP's Military, then continue to fund lab, committing high treason

Fauci's willful dereliction of duty has been such that he didn't even bother doing a simple Google search, apparently, before funding the creation of potential bioweapons of mass destruction in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Wuhan Institute's multiple connections to the CCP's People's Liberation Army (PLA) was listed on the lab's English language website before the pandemic began. This is pointed out in the the August 2021 addendum to the final report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, which states: "This website was scrubbed on May 28, 2020, and the lists of committee members removed. However, archived copies of the website are available online.”

Here is the archived copy (loads slowly) of the Wuhan Institute's webpage the CCP tried to obliterate, demonstrating how easily Fauci could have overcome his willful blindness if he'd wanted to. The PLA connections this archived copy reveals are summarized as follows in the Foreign Affairs Committee addendum report:

“The Academic Committee of State Key Laboratory of Virology at the WIV included a Deputy Director from the Second Military Medical University and a member from the 302 Military Hospital of China. The Scientific Advisory Committee for the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases had among its members a researcher from the Institute of Military Veterinary at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences.”

On January 15, 2021, the Department of State declassified a fact sheet announcing that Wuhan Lab researchers have been secretly collaborating on publications and projects with China’s military since at least 2017. Trump’s former deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger affirmed this on March 30, 2021, saying:

“There is a body of research that's been taking place conducted by the Chinese military in collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has not been acknowledged by the Chinese government. We've seen the data. I've personally seen the data.”

"It should be noted that the WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology] has a Chinese Communist Party Committee within the institute, as well as a Commission for Discipline Inspection," states the addendum to the final report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. This report explains:

"The Party Committee is divided into four party branches, which are then divided into subbranches organized around the individual WIV departments, research centers, and offices. Each subbranch has its own Propaganda Committee. Committee Minority Staff were able to identify eight WIV researchers on these committees, including several who are affiliated with the Key Laboratory that Shi [Zhengli] directs."

After listing the names and CCP-affiliations of the 8 Wuhan Lab researchers on the Chinese Communist Party committees within the Wuhan Institute, the same report goes on to explain the activities of these committees, stating, "The Committee for Discipline Inspection is charged with “the implementation of the party's line, policy, party discipline, relevant laws and regulations, and the institute's rules and regulations." The report adds: "In addition to the researchers serving on propaganda committees, other key figures at the WIV also serve as CCP officials.” These key figures serving as CCP officials within the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their affiliations are summarized as follows in the final report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff:

"The Director General of the institute is Wang Yanyi,¹⁹³ who joined the China Zhi Gong Party, a CCP controlled minority party, in 2010. In 2018, the same year she became the Director General of the WIV, she was elected the Deputy Director of the Wuhan Municipal Party Committee.¹⁹⁴ Until early 2020, the BSL-4 lab was managed by Yuan Zhiming.¹⁹⁵ Yuan is the President of the Chinese Communist Party Committee within the Wuhan Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, to which the WIV belongs.¹⁹⁶ Local CCP leaders not only run the WIV itself, but also directly managed the BSL-4 lab.¹⁹⁷ According to a French diplomat, Yuan’s performance and management was subpar – the lab has been underutilized and the most talented scientists have left. After the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak began, Yuan was replaced on January 31, 2020.¹⁹⁸ In a possible fulfillment of the concerns raised by the French defense and intelligence services almost two decades prior, he was succeeded by Major General Chen Wei, the PRC’s top biowarfare expert.^199"

This demonstrates the incredible extent of Fauci's criminal "negligence," so to speak, in letting U.S. taxpayer dollars create bioweapons of mass destruction in CCP's lab.

Fauci's willful "blindness" was such that during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Hearing on May 25, 2021, Fauci called the Chinese grantees he's funded "very competent, trustworthy scientists" when questioned by Senator John Kennedy. In this hearing, Fauci refused to comment on the Chinese Communist Party’s influence on these scientists, but said he knew these scientists to be "trustworthy." Such is the extent of Fauci's failure to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in exposing the world to a pandemic coming out of communist China.

In the declassified fact sheet of the Department of State, it also states that gain-of-function studies did get conducted at the Wuhan Lab. Among the bat viruses studied was a coronavirus named RATG13 that's genetically 96.2% similar to the virus causing COVID-19. About this extremely close relative of SARS-CoV-2 that had been studied, former Clinton administration national security official Jamie Metzl wrote in The Wall Street Journal:

“suggesting that an outbreak of a deadly bat coronavirus coincidentally occurred near the only level 4 virology institute in all of China—which happened to be studying the closest known relative of that exact virus—strains credulity.”

Could an incredible coincidence really have occurred, making SARS-CoV-2 not come from the virology lab studying its 96.2% likeness in Wuhan where researchers had gotten sick and all databases had been scrubbed right before the pandemic?

Funny?

The Biden Administration and their bought-out "mainstream" shills had run out of straws to grasp in continuing to decry the lab leak theory as a "crazy conspiracy." On March 2021, the Washington Post published that the Biden Administration had agreed with the accuracy of the information in the fact sheet of the Trump State Department. Their article quotes an unnamed senior Biden State Department official explain:

“There wasn’t significant or meaningful disagreement regarding the information presented in the fact sheet,” [..] “No one is disputing the information, the fact that these data points exist, the fact that they are accurate. Where there was some discomfort was that [the Trump administration] put spin on the ball.”

The so-called "spin on the ball" refers to the way the Trump State Department leaned their interpretation all the way towards the Wuhan lab leak theory. "The Biden administration is trying to take a neutral stance on the issue," told the same unnamed senior Biden State Department official to the Washington Post.

The Washington Post article also states that "There was certainly not consensus [inside the U.S. government] on the still unproven theory that this emerged from the lab." Regarding this so called "consensus" of the scientists advising the Biden White House including Fauci and Collins, the next section demonstrates exactly how this fake "consensus" against the lab leak theory was shaped by a web of egregious ploys and lies that have surfaced as a result of Fauci's emails (slow-loading) obtained after Freedom of Information Act (FIOA) lawsuits.

But before moving on, it must be noted that the Biden White House kept funding the creation of bioweapons of mass destruction in a PLA-affiliated lab for almost a year until August 19, 2022, doing so AFTER having had to agree on January 15, 2021 that Wuhan Lab's researchers were collaborating with China’s military. This alone makes everyone responsible for continuing to fund the Wuhan lab guilty of high treason.

CHAPTER 11 – The CCP's huge disinformation campaign created with the help of compromised officials and researchers

In a May 2021 interview, even Fauci finally had to admit he's no longer confident SARS-CoV-2 evolved naturally. A year before in May 4, 2020, Fauci had told National Geographic that scientific evidence "is very, very strongly" leaning toward the natural evolution origin. Fauci had been "very, very" wrong.

Back when the pandemic began, Fauci and Collins had pushed top scientists into pretending to unanimously agree on SARS-CoV-2's natural origin theory, misleading the world through a fake "consensus." The creation of the fake "consensus" was accomplished with Fauci and Collins' "advice and leadership," according to emails.

In describing the collusion of the CCP-compromised top science officials and their corrupt grantees who's misled the world, let's start with unethical virologist Kristian Andersen. As may be recalled, Andersen had offered to alter or delete Dr. Bloom's paper exposing the NIH's deletion of certain viral sequences. The deleted sequences, which were partially recovered by Dr. Bloom, proved that the virus couldn't have emerged from the Huanan seafood market the way the WHO had "determined." Corrupt grantee Andersen's only gift wasn't his ability to mess with and alter papers in the preprint server, but also his readiness to execute 180 degree turns in his opinions. On February 4, 2020, Andersen wrote in an email: “The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered with intent and that is demonstrably not the case.” But only three days ago on February 1, 2020, Andersen and his colleagues had defended the lab leak hypothesis during a teleconference with the world's top virologists organized by Sir Jeremy Farrar, a powerful research grant administrator in London and a scientific advisor to the UK Government. Farrar's teleconference included world's most powerful science officials such as Sir Patrick Vallance who's the chief scientific adviser to the UK government.

Before his teleconference, Farrar had sent a warning email to all participants demanding: "Information and discussion is shared in total confidence and not to be shared until agreement on next steps." But what was discussed during this teleconference didn't stay confidential after FIOA lawsuits allowed the House Committee on Oversight and Reform to view the emails that participants had exchanged following the teleconference. These emails reveal that during the teleconference, Andersen and his colleagues had expressed "little doubt that the virus bore the fingerprints of manipulation." This was due to the presence of a genetic element called a furin cleavage site in the virus. The New York Post quotes teleconference participant Robert F. Garry explaining in an email sent one day after the teleconference that the virus's furin cleavage site is a a string of 12 units of RNA representing a precision unusual in nature. Garry wrote in his February 2, 2020 email: "I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature … it’s stunning. Of course, in the lab it would be easy to generate the perfect 12 base insert that you wanted."

One day after the teleconference organized by Farrar, another member of the Andersen group, Michael Farzan, had also emphasized the unlikeliness of SARS-CoV-2 acquiring its furin cleavage site naturally. Farzan had pointed out that the virus was likely to have acquired this element through direct insertion in a lab or through sustained interaction between human tissue and a chimeric virus engineered in a lab that lacked proper biocontainment protocols. Farzan had said, "I am 70:30 or 60:40 [lab]."

Again the day after Farrar's February 1 teleconference, participant Andrew Rambaut had expressed his agreement with his colleagues, saying: “From a (natural) evolutionary point of view the only thing here that strikes me as unusual is the furin cleavage site.” On February 4, 2020, another participant called Edward Holmes had also indicated he was “60-40 lab.”

If the world were to ever learn that SARS-CoV-2 had been engineered in the Wuhan lab, world governments could sooner or later try to hold China accountable for it. The CCP didn't want things to begin to slide in that direction. A well-thought-out disinformation campaign was put into effect using the CCP's good old buddies in the U.S. and U.K. governments and their subservient grantees.

Going back to Andersen who had suddenly changed his mind and decried his colleagues' initial consensus as a "crackpot theory," he'd done so in an email to virologist Peter Daszak who's been leading the research on coronaviruses in partnership with China, being the president of EcoHealth Alliance which kept directing U.S. federal grant money to the Wuhan Institute. In his email to Daszak, Andersen seems to have let the CCP's key contact person know his willingness to help China by putting the fear of ridicule into anyone who continued to entertain the lab leak idea or kept wondering if a bioweapon had been released. But only a month ago, on January 31, 2020, Andersen had written to Fauci in a memo that he too favored the lab leak hypothesis. Andersen had told Fauci in this memo: “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.” Andersen had also written in the same memo to Fauci: “after discussions earlier today, Eddie [Edward C. Holmes], Bob [Robert F. Garry], Mike [Michael Farzan] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from [natural] evolutionary theory.” Andersen isn't reported to have changed his mind a month later in Farrar's February 1 2020 teleconference he'd attended with the same colleagues Holmes, Garry and Farzan. Just 3 days after this teleconference, what or who, exactly, had caused Andersen to execute his 180 degree change of mind?

Andersen and his colleagues had reversed their opinions right after having received "advice and leadership" from Fauci and Collins, emails reveal.

On February 4 2020, on the same day Andersen had called the deliberate release theory a "crackpot theory," Andersen had emailed [page 2401 of 3234] Fauci, Collins and Farrar the final copy of a paper he'd written on the pandemic's origin, asking for “comments, suggestions, or questions” from his grant providers. Andersen had co-authored this paper with 4 colleagues who'd attended Farrar's teleconference, who included Rambaunt, Holmes and Garry who'd initially supported the lab leak hypothesis in their private communications 2 days ago. In his email [page 2401 of 3234] to Fauci, Collins and Farrar containing him and his colleagues' paper as an attachment, Andersen had written: "Thank you again for your advice and leadership as we have been working through the SARS-CoV-2 'origins' paper."

The final version of Andersen's group's paper prepared with Collins' and Fauci's "advice and leadership" got published in the highly influential journal Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, announcing the opposite of its authors' original consensus, stating: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus. [...] We do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible." Thus had Fauci and Collins' grantees lied through their teeth to deceive the masses.

After the Nature paper was published, Fauci used the power of his position to distribute this misleading paper and others like it to the media according to emails.

On May 5, 2020, W. Ian Lipkin, one of the 5 authors of the Andersen group's misleading Nature Medicine Article, sent an email to Fauci [page 706 of 3234], sucking up to the influential grant provider, thanking him for having steered them in the right direction. Lipkin has written to Fauci: “we deeply appreciate your efforts in steering and messaging.”

The situation is summarized as follows in the January 11, 2022 letter of the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House of Representatives:

"It is unclear what, if any, new evidence was presented or if the underlying science changed in that short period of time, but after speaking with Drs. Fauci and Collins, the authors abandoned their belief COVID-19 was the result of a laboratory leak. It is also unclear if Drs. Fauci or Collins edited the [Nature Medicine] paper prior to publication."

Farrar had helped convene the 5 authors of the misleading Nature Medicine paper, which was admitted by Farrar's office to the Daily Mail. Farrar had convened the 5 authors despite the way he had not yet changed his mind about the virus's origin on February 2, 2 days before Andersen had cc'd their article to him. Still speaking the truth, Farrar had written in his February 2 email, "On a spectrum if 0 is nature and 100 is release—I am honestly at 50!” But whatever had gotten into Andersen's group caught up with Farrar too in a jiffy. About 2 weeks after having emailed he was 50-50 for the lab leak hypothesis, on February 19, 2020, Farrar too announced his turn by becoming one of the signatories of another highly influential misleading letter published in the world's top medical journal The Lancet. In this letter, 27 top scientists including Farrar "unanimously" declared: "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."

The world's top scientific minds had thus "strongly" condemned as conspiracy nuts everyone daring to oppose their "consensus." Which esteemed academic or journalist could still push the issue?

Ordinary citizens and influencers alike had not only been mislead but also deviously manipulated by their fear of ridicule.

The fake "consensus" letter published in the Lancet shaped the view of the mainstream media for more than a year, explains science writer Nicholas Wade. Likewise, the misleading Nature Medicine letter Fauci and Collins had "steered" the Andersen group to write has been cited 2759 times as of March 17, 2022, which indicates how frequently the mainstream media, social platforms and self-appointed "fact checkers" have referenced the lies deriding the lab leak hypothesis and deemed it "disinformation," censuring those pointing out the likelihood of the lab origin. Those who opposed were "letting fear and conspiratorial thinking" cloud their judgement, wrote Forbes in its article titled "The Wuhan Lab Leak Hypothesis Is A Conspiracy Theory, Not Science." Among the numerous slam pieces decrying or ridiculing the lab leak and deliberate release theories is even a National Review article titled "The Lab Leak Theory Is Unbearably Racist."

On September 11, 2021, the Daily Mail published that "26 out of the 27 Lancet scientists who trashed theory that Covid leaked from a Chinese lab have links to Wuhan researchers." This Daily Mail article covers an original investigation conducted by the Daily Telegraph exposing the 26 researchers' affiliations with Wuhan lab's researchers. These Wuhan researchers, as may be recalled, had been secretly collaborating with China’s military since at least 2017, according to the State Department's fact sheet whose data points couldn't be disputed by the Biden administration.

CHAPTER 12 – Email reveals Collins asked Fauci how else to squelch the lab leak theory

It took about a year and a half for the CCP's intimidation methods to start losing their grip on the scientific community.

On October 16, 2021, the Lancet published a letter this time in support of the lab-leak theory, coming from a conscientious group of scientists who "pointed out the logical fallacies and questionable assumptions in the research that Daszak’s group [the 27 scientists who had signed the previous Lancet letter] cited," reports PJ Media.

On April 16, 2020, NIH's director Collins panicked upon seeing a Fox News report announcing that multiple sources briefed on the origins of COVID-19 believed it emerged from the Wuhan lab. Wondering if they may not have done enough to squelch the lab leak hypothesis, Collins emailed Fauci with a link to the Fox News report, saying:

“Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy, with what seems to be growing momentum. [...]

I hoped the Nature Medicine article on the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would settle this. But probably didn’t get much visibility. Anything more we can do? Ask the National Academy [of Sciences] to weigh in?”

Fauci replied on April 17, 2020: “I would not do anything about this right now. It is a shiny object that will go away in times [sic].”

The lab leak and bioweapon release theories, which no reasonable person could have dismissed, will never "go away in time" in a world where the voice of truth has convincing power over blatant lies, gaslighting efforts and cancel culture. The outraged masses hungry for the truth may never be expected to stop digging up the facts.

On October 5th, 2020, White House adviser Scott Atlas and Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar met with a conscientious group of scientists who'd been critical of the COVID-19 lockdown strategy, who'd released a statement called the “Great Barrington Declaration” advocating the alternative strategy of only protecting the elderly and the vulnerable and allowing children and younger people to return to work and school. When Collins heard of Atlas and Azar's meeting with the declaration's signatories, he wrote to Fauci and other officials in an email, “There needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its [Great Barrington Declaration's] premises.”

The above reveals the extent to which Collins, Fauci and their collaborators work for the globalist criminal cabal bent on destroying world economies to establish a totalitarian One World Government. Please resist letting yourself get manipulated into believing that the Great Reset is a "crazy conspiracy theory," please spread this 10-minute irrefutable proof of the world's takeover far and wide.

Going back to the Great Barrington Declaration which has received almost one million signatures from infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, it's sad the way the voices of even such a large number of signatories have been cancelled by worldwide intense censorship efforts ramped up after the bioweapon's release. The lockdowns did continue as Collins wished they would, causing untold harm and damage to the the entire world's economy.

On May 5, 2021, about a month after Fox News' report had set Collins into panic, Nobel laureate biologist David Baltimore announced (this website is NOT "suspicious," they just don't want you to see it) that the existence of the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2’s genome is the “smoking gun” to the theory that SARS-CoV-2 is engineered in a lab. As may be recalled, the existence of this furin cleavage site was the main reason for the original real consensus of world's top virologists who'd initially favored the lab leak hypothesis. Nobel laureate Baltimore's referral to the same furin cleavage site as a 'smoking gun' may have caused not just Collins but Fauci too to panic this time. God knows how many sleepless nights Fauci and Collins may have suffered before Baltimore did cave in to the threat of the "quick and devastating" takedown looming over his head. Baltimore quickly caved in and announced on June, 2021 that he'd overstated the case. When pathological liar virologist Andersen tweeted that Baltimore had been incorrect, Baltimore responded by saying Andersen may be right. Baltimore told Los Angeles Times that he regrets using the phrase 'smoking gun' and that he should have softened it.

CHAPTER 13 – Peter Daszak: the public face of the CCP

Dr. Peter Daszak, the director of EcoHealth Alliance and leader of the coronavirus studies conducted in partnership with China, is perhaps the most valuable American traitor on the CCP's side, who's helped lead the immense efforts described to squash the lab leak and deliberate release hypothesis to protect China.

Daszak, who created SARS-CoV-2, according to the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, as will shortly be elaborated, has a deep history of enmeshment with the CCP and the PLA. This has been uncovered by the National Pulse which reports that Daszak has completed over 20 research projects listing “affiliations” with Chinese Communist Party-linked entities. These projects include studies funded by the Chinese government and co-authored by military-linked researchers, reports the National Pulse. Fauci and Collins have had no qualms about continuing to fund such a researcher by egregiously violating numerous rules and policies, resorting to almost every form of deceit imaginable in their treasonous collaboration with the CCP, as the upcoming sections will demonstrate.

According to additional emails published after FIOA lawsuits, the previously described Lancet letter strongly condemning the "conspiracy theories" wasn't really written by the joint effort of the world's top virologists. This letter had been composed by Daszak after he'd been asked by his "collaborators" in China for a "show of support," according to a February 8, 2020 email.

In showing "his support" for his Chinese collaborators, as Daszak began circulating his Lancet letter's draft among his colleagues to find cosigners, his email to his recruits warned them of his attempts to create the appearance of scientific unanimity, saying: “Please note that this statement will not have EcoHealth Alliance logo on it and will not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person.” Daszak wrote that he wanted the letter he'd composed to seem like “simply a letter from leading scientists.” Daszak added that he wanted “to avoid the appearance of a political statement.”

In further trying to make his political statement seem like a unanimous scientific consensus statement, Daszak emailed his closest colleague Ralph Baric on February 6, 2020, mentioning in this email another close colleague of his called Linfa Wang, saying “I spoke with Linfa last night about the statement we sent round, He thinks, and I agree with him, that you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn't work in a counterproductive way." Daszak added in the same email, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.” Baric replied to Daszak saying “I also think this is a good decision.” “Otherwise it looks self-serving and we lose impact," Baric added. In the end, despite the way Baric and Wang didn't sign the letter, Daszak did sign it.

Daszak has been the “public face of a CCP disinformation campaign designed to suppress public discussion about a potential lab leak” of SARS-CoV-2, states the August 2021 report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff on the pandemic’s origins. Daszak, Farrar and the other 25 recruits Daszak could persuade to sign the Lancet letter had all lied flat out in the 'Acknowledgements' section of their letter when they'd stated "We declare no competing interests.” At least 6 signatories did have competing interests and had either worked at or been funded by EcoHealth Alliance, reports Vanity Fair. As previously mentioned, the Telegraph has also unearthed that 26 out of the 27 signatories of the Lancet letter have links to Wuhan Institute researchers. After the revelation of these affiliations by the Telegraph and Vanity Fair, the Lancet invited all the 27 signatories to disclose their competing interests, but none of the signatories complied except Daszak who disclosed some of his affiliations. The Lancet has had to publish an addendum to its original letter in June 21, 2021 announcing only Daszak's ties to the Wuhan lab.

Daszak's treasonous deeds are far from being limited to the above as the rest of this investigation demonstrates. Despite the piles of evidence that has accumulated against Daszak, he still maintains his position as the president of Eco Health Alliance and keeps receiving funding from NIH/NIAID as has been pointed out at the beginning of this exposé. Sadly, the DOJ is doing nothing because it's also infiltrated with treasonous individuals, its corruption stinking even worse that the NIH's and NIAID's.

Many prominent scientists from around the world have come together and written a letter to the board of EcoHealth Alliance spelling out Daszak's corruption in detail and asking for his removal, but all such efforts are proving ineffective in the current incredibly corrupt political climate hell bent on letting Daszak improve his bioweapons.

CHAPTER 14 – Information warfare orchestrated by China's top military bio-warfare expert General Chen Wei

Daszak's ability to persuade his 27 colleagues to sign the Lancet letter and the efforts to dismiss the lab leak hypothesis seem to have stemmed from the persuasive tactics of CCP's top military bio-warfare expert General Chen Wei.

"Chen Wei, a Major General of the People's Liberation Army, was flown in to Wuhan by the central government late last month before officially taking the helm of Wuhan Institute of Virology," reports the Daily Mail. Here, "late last month" refers to late January 2020 when Wei took over the Biosafety Level-4 division of the Wuhan Institute.

The above is confirmed by the final report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, which states that "Major General Chen Wei, the PRC’s top biowarfare expert" took over the BSL-4 division of the Wuhan Institute of Virology on January 31, 2020. The report states:

"Until early 2020, the BSL-4 lab was managed by Yuan Zhiming.¹⁹⁵ Yuan is the President of the Chinese Communist Party Committee within the Wuhan Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, to which the WIV belongs.¹⁹⁶ [...] After the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak began, Yuan was replaced on January 31, 2020.¹⁹⁸ [...] he was succeeded by Major General Chen Wei, the PRC’s top biowarfare expert.^199"

Former biological warfare analyst Dany Shoham agrees with House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, stating that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is linked to Beijing’s covert bio-weapons program. Shoham has a doctorate in medical microbiology, he's studied Chinese biological warfare and was a senior analyst with Israeli military intelligence for biological and chemical warfare in the Middle East and worldwide between1970 and 1991. Interested readers may find more detail in Shoham's article published in the Institute for Defense Studies.

"The epidemic is like a military situation. The epicentre equals to the battlefield," biowarfare expert General Chen Wei has stated. Showcasing Chen Wei's possible accomplishments, below is a summary of the previously described events that have occurred within days of Wei's appointment to the Wuhan Institute on January 31, 2020:

February 4, 2020: Andersen turned away from his confidentially-expressed initial opinion in favor of the lab leak theory and referred to the lab leak theory as "crackpot theory" in his email to Daszak. That same day, Andersen emailed [page 2401 of 3234] Fauci, Collins and Farrar his deceptive Nature paper. The publication of this paper on March 17, 2020 shows the way all of its co-authors Rambaunt, Holmes and Garry and Lipkin had abandoned their original consensus in favor of the lab leak theory.

February 6, 2020: Daszak began to recruit signatories for his misleading Lancet letter stating "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin." This letter's publication in the Lancet shows the way the 27 top scientists who signed the letter lied in favor of the CCP.

Between February 4, 2020 and February 19, 2020: Farrar too announced his 180 degree turn from the lab leak hypothesis by becoming one of the signatories of Daszak's misleading Lancet letter.

It should never be forgotten that General Wei and higher ranking PLA members may never have accomplished so much without the "advice and leadership" of collaborating grant providers Fauci and Collins.

Biowarfare expert General Chen Wei's misinformation campaign to protect China is still ongoing as American media and social platforms are still heavily plagued by CCP-style censorship coupled with misleading narratives.

CHAPTER 15 – Fake "consensus" falls apart, liberal outlets eat crow

The CCP's "clever" disinformation campaign implemented through Fauci and Collins' "guidance" and "steering" could fool the world only for so long.

In addition to all of the publications whose links have been included in the previous sections unearthing SARS-CoV-2's origin, numerous additional publications by conscientious journalists and scientists did manage to reach the public despite the cancel culture. These articles and papers kept emphasizing the way the pandemic's natural origin hypothesis had been embraced without any legitimate evidence backing it up, and the lab leak and bioweapon release theories had been dismissed way too readily without valid justification. On March 4, 2021, many prominent conscientious scientists from around the world published an open letter to the WHO calling for a new investigation into the pandemic's origin.

Eventually, enough of the reality got exposed to force the compromised Biden Administration and its bought-out propaganda outlets to start eating crow. In July 2021, CNN announced "Senior Biden officials finding that Covid lab leak theory as credible as natural origins explanation." On May 2021, the Washington Post published an article titled "Timeline: How the Wuhan lab-leak theory suddenly became credible, highlighting the key reasons why the fake "consensus" of the top virologists had became unsustainable. In this Washington Post article, scrolling down to the section "New evidence emerges" lets one see the most influential articles and papers pointing out the facts.

On May 2001, strongly leftist Politico announced, "Facebook no longer treating 'man-made' Covid as a crackpot idea," describing the platform's new policy of no longer censoring the posts calling Covid-19 man-made.

On May 2002, left-biased Politifact retracted its Wuhan Lab Leak theory fact check.

In June 2021, the Washington Post was forced to revise a hit piece it had published whose original headline read “Tom Cotton keeps repeating a coronavirus conspiracy theory that was already debunked.” The slightly softened version of this hit piece now includes the correction, "The term ‘debunked’ and The Post’s use of ‘conspiracy theory’ have been removed because, then as now, there was no determination about the origins of the virus."

These are just a few examples of the way the fake-news outlets had been forced to choose between losing all credibility with their leftist audience or toning down their efforts to protect the CCP and its treasonous collaborators.

CHAPTER 16 – Relaxing the definition of "gain of function" research in 2017 and completely getting rid of the definition in 2021

On May 11, 2021, Fauci shamelessly lied under oath during his testimony before the senate, claiming: "the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” "Gain of function is a very nebulous term,” Fauci further lied to Rand Paul during a November 4, 2021 senate hearing (2:58 into the video). Just a few days before Fauci claimed that the definition of gain of function is "very nebulous," he'd had this definition scrubbed from the NIH's website.

Fauci went even further in a November 18, 2021 interview, calling 'gain of function' a “completely meaningless term."

The deletion of the definition of gain of function research from the NIH's website had occurred sometime between Oct. 19, 2021 and Oct. 21, 2021, reports the Epoch Times. But when the NIH's staff deleted the definition from their website, they didn't seem to know about the existence of a Web utility which makes periodic digital archives of the World Wide Web. This backup utility has allowed reporters as well as congress and senate to view the original version of the webpage defining gain of function research. On the Wayback machine's archive, here is the NIH's original definition (loads slow):

Gain-of-Function Research

The term gain-of-function (GOF) research describes a type of research that modifies a biological agent so that it confers new or enhanced activity to that agent. Some scientists use the term broadly to refer to any such modification. However, not all research described as GOF entails the same level of risk. The subset of GOF research that is anticipated to enhance the transmissibility and/or virulence of potential pandemic pathogens, which are likely to make them more dangerous to humans, has been the subject of substantial scrutiny and deliberation. [...] This research poses biosafety and biosecurity risks, and these risks must be carefully managed.

According to this definition, a gain of function (GOF) study would be deemed a risky GOF study if it's anticipated to enhance the transmissibility and/or virulence of potential pandemic pathogens to make those pathogens more dangerous to humans.

The above definition sounds as if the risky subset of the gain of function studies would have to enhance only those viruses that are potential pandemic pathogens to begin with, discluding the studies that turn initially benign viruses into potential pandemic pathogens. This strange language is the relaxed version of yet another original definition, points out the Washington Post in their article titled "A Science in the Shadows." The first change to the original definition had been made in 2017, to let NIH/NIAID refer fewer gain of function studies to an independent HHS review board for risk analysis. The new definition had given "NIH leaders greater leeway to approve projects without referring them to the review committee," explains the Washington Post. This reveals that the deletion of the definition of gain of function research from the NIH's website on October 20, 2021 wasn't Fauci and Collins' only attempt to muddy the waters, obfuscating the extent to which they've been exposing the world to pandemic risk.

As may be noted, making benign viruses capable of destroying human populations and calling it not risky because the experiments didn't start with potential pandemic pathogens represents "Conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences." This makes Fauci and Collins guilty of criminal negligence.

The url of the relaxed definition of 'gain of function' research that the NIH obliterated in 2021 used to say "gain-function-research-involving-potential-pandemic-pathogens," but the updated url now says "research-involving-potential-pandemic-pathogens." Because the phrase "gain-function" has been removed from the url, Fauci has not funded gain of function research in collaboration with China. Makes sense to anybody?

The NIH's current page that used to define gain of function research now only defines "ePPP [Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogen] Research." The only reference to "gain-of-function” (GOF) research on this updated page is in a misleading sentence saying: "While ePPP research is a type of so called “gain-of-function” (GOF) research, the vast majority of GOF research does not involve ePPP and falls outside the scope of oversight required for research involving ePPPs." In this sentence, it may be noted that since the definition of gain of function research no longer exists, it's referred to as "so called." Funny?

In 2016, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) invented the synonym 'gain of function research of concern (GOFROC)' for the risky subset of gain of function studies enhancing the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens to make them more dangerous to humans in ways that can cause pandemics. Gain of function research of concern (GOFROC) is clearly defined in a very clear and straightforward manner in NSABB's 2016 guidelines as "gain-of function studies with the potential to generate pathogens with pandemic potential in humans by exhibiting high transmissibility and high virulence."

What on earth is "very nebulous" about that?

And why should it matter if the resulting pathogens "exhibiting high transmissibility and high virulence" are created out of originally benign pathogens or other deadly pathogens? Isn't it the result that matters?

If Fauci were to be asked if he's ever funded gain of function research of concern as defined in NSABB's guidelines, what would he have to say? The NIH's updated page actually answers this question for Fauci, stating:

"On limited occasions, when justified by compelling public health need and conducted in very high biosecurity laboratories, NIH has supported certain research that may be reasonably anticipated to create, transfer or use potential pandemic pathogens resulting from the enhancement of a pathogen’s transmissibility and/or virulence in humans."

The above is equivalent to saying that the NIH has funded gain of function research of concern, according to NSABB's guidelines. Some of those risky gain of function studies have definitely been conducted in the Wuhan lab, as the next sections demonstrate. Such risky gain of function research was not conducted "in very high biosecurity laboratories" as the NIH's updated page claims, but was conducted under extremely lax biosecurity conditions in China, as will also be demonstrated. And the genetic engineering of novel potential pandemic pathogens with bioweapon applications in communist China was absolutely not justifiable by any "compelling public health need" as NIH's updated page claims — thinking so represents a "gross deviation from the standard of a reasonable person."

Senator Rand Paul has summed up the situation on November 4, 2020 when he exclaimed to Fauci: "What you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically." Fauci's reply began with the words "According to the definition that is currently operable,” causing Paul to burst out laughing. Such is the farce created by one evil little garden gnome who's held the reins of America's equally ridiculous senile president for more than 2 years.

In response to criticism of his ridiculous word-game farce, ploy-master Fauci has arrogantly told the world, "They're really criticizing science because I represent science. That's dangerous." This shows is the extent of the narcissistic personality disorder of perhaps history's biggest monster who's knowingly murdered almost 7 million people as of March 2023.

The next section demonstrates which risky gain of function studies, as defined by NSABB's guidelines, Fauci and Collins funded in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in communist China, failing to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in doing so.

CHAPTER 17 – "Gain of function.pdf" Fauci had named as such

Fauci, who'd told congress under oath that NIH/NIAID never funded gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute, had on February 1, 2020 sent an email (p.3221 of 3234) with an attachment he'd named 'gain of function.pdf.' This attachment is the 2015 research paper of a risky gain of function study funded by Fauci (funny?) and conducted in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This deadly study whose paper was named 'gain of function.pdf' by Fauci has taught the CCP how to create lab-engineered viruses in a way indistinguishable from natural viruses.

The full name Fauci had given to the pdf he'd attached to his email was "Baric, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf." In this file name, Shi refers to study author Shi Zhengli, the Director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology known as China's "bat woman." Shi had co-authored this study with Ralph Baric, a U.S. researcher who's received millions of dollars in funding from Fauci's NIAID for research into coronaviruses.

The 2015 paper Fauci had attached as 'gain of function.pdf' produced by Baric's collaboration with "bat woman" Shi describes the enhancement of a SARS-like coronavirus that could originally only infect bats, which had been genetically enhanced to become capable of binding to human cells. The engineered viruses could not only "replicate 'efficiently' in primary human airways cells," but they could also "withstand antibodies and vaccines," summarizes the Addendum to the Final Report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff. Baric and Shi's 2015 paper also states that the spike proteins of the SARS variant had been modified "to maximize the opportunity for pathogenesis." Fauci's NIAID and another branch of Collins' NIH had provided the grant that created such a pathogen.

The deadly nature of the the SARS-like viruses Shi and Baric described creating had been acknowledged by the study authors who'd explicitly stated in their paper that similar studies may be "too risky to pursue." This paper Fauci had named "gain of function.pdf" contains the following paragraph describing the study's risky nature:

"Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue, as increased pathogenicity in mammalian models cannot be excluded. [...] the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens. In developing policies moving forward, it is important to consider the value of the data generated by these studies and whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved."

The risks of "gain of function.pdf," which Fauci had funded in partnership with study author Shi's Wuhan lab, worried the scientific community to the extent another paper was published in Nature titled "Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research," covering the pandemic risk created by the studies described in Baric and Shi's 2015 paper. This Nature paper titled "Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research" states: "The argument is essentially a rerun of the debate over whether to allow lab research that increases the virulence, ease of spread or host range of dangerous pathogens — what is known as ‘gain-of-function’ research."

The Nature paper on the risks of Baric and Shi's research explains that "In October 2014, the US government imposed a moratorium on federal funding of such research on the viruses that cause SARS, influenza and MERS." Although Baric and Shi's risky gain of function studies had started before the 2014 moratorium, they had not been paused by the moratorium. The Nature paper explicitly points out the way Shi and Baric's gain of function studies had been "initiated before the US Government Deliberative Process Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS and SARS Viruses," pointing out the way such research should have been paused. Why had such gain of function studies not been paused?

"The NIH eventually concluded that the work was not so risky as to fall under the moratorium," states Baric in the Nature paper.

Criminally negligent Fauci and Collins had decided the moratorium shouldn't halt a study enabling a bat virus to infect human populations, because, well — it wasn't deemed risky in a world where Fauci believes the definition of risky gain of function research is "very nebulous."

The Nature paper quotes several researchers who had fervently disagreed with Fauci and Collins's conviction that Baric and Shi's work wasn't risky gain of function research. Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, had stated the obvious, saying: “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory.” This opinion was shared by Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and biodefense expert at Rutgers University, who'd said, “The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk.”

There are not only a few but hundreds of conscientious scientists opposing the continuation of such risky gain of function studies as will shorty be elaborated, demonstrating the extent to which Fauci and Collins have turned a deaf ear to the voice of reason and common sense for decades.

The next section delves into the "clever" ploys Fauci and Collins had utilized to bestow upon themselves the full power to unilaterally decide which risky studies should and should not be conducted.

CHAPTER 18 – The numerous ploys Fauci and Collins utilized and the policies they violated to nullify the 2014 moratorium and nullify the P3CO framework for risk analysis and mitigation

In aiding and abetting communist China develop enhanced potential pandemic pathogens as bioweapons with U.S. dollars, Fauci and Collins's criminal mental state was such that they breached the numerous regulations and policies described below.

As has been described in the previous section, despite the way Baric and "bat woman" Shi's deadly gain of function studies had began before the 2014 moratorium's enactment, they had not been paused by the moratorium halting risky gain of function studies. One of the reasons "justifying" letting the risky research continue was an escape clause that had been worked into the moratorium, giving Fauci and Collins an "excuse" to override it whenever they wished at their sole discretion. This escape clause was a footnote on the first page of the moratorium document stating “An exception from the research pause may be obtained if the head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.” Study author Baric had taken advantage of this escape clause and applied for an exemption from the moratorium. Baric "felt that his research was urgent: new cases of MERS, spread by camels, were even then popping up in the Middle East," explains the article titled 'Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan,' published in MIT Technology Review. Baric's research supposedly served to “move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger,” Daszak had claimed. Fauci and Collins, of course, had agreed, granting Baric his exemption and letting the deadly pandemic pathogens resume getting engineered in collaboration with Shi working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

"Not only were Baric’s studies allowed to move forward, but so were all studies that applied for exemptions," states the MIT Technology Review article titled 'Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan.'

Out of all the studies that had at first been paused, "about half were later allowed to continue because the work didn't fit the definition [of risky gain of function research] or was deemed essential to public health," Science reports.

Fauci and Collins had thus unilaterally nullified the moratorium.

In December 2017, the moratorium that was never allowed to fulfill its intended purpose officially got lifted, getting replaced by a set of guidelines called the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight (P3CO) Framework. This framework required a review board to be formed within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which would utilize the new framework's guidelines to determine "whether grants that involve enhancing dangerous pathogens, such as coronaviruses, are worth the risks and that proper safeguards are in place," reports the Daily Caller. But Fauci and Collins had again prevented all of Baric and Daszak's deadly coronavirus studies from reaching this HHS review board. This was done using yet another loophole that had been incorporated into the P3CO framework, the Daily Caller points out. "In 2017, a change made under their [Fauci and Collins'] watch removed the [HHS] committee’s power to block the projects, recasting the panel as strictly an advisory body," reports the Washington Post. The Daily Caller article quotes an HHS spokesperson who'd told that according to the framework's rules with the loophole inserted, the HHS review board would be "kept in the dark on any grant" until its funding agency flagged that grant for review. Thus the HHS’s P3CO Review Committee could only review those grants refereed to them by Fauci and Collins, if and only if Fauci and Collins flagged the studies as risky.

Having transferred to themselves the power to forward or not forward any risky grants for review, and having relaxed the definition of risky gain of function research to have "greater leeway to approve projects without referring them to the review committee," as the Washington Post explains, NIH/NIAID had succeeded at completely nullifying the P3CO framework too just like they'd done to the moratorium.

No coronavirus study was ever flagged to go through the HHS's P3CO review committee. We know this to be true because Fauci had been told so in the reply to his email that he'd attached "gain of function.pdf" to (see previous section). The reply to Fauci's email came from Hugh Auchincloss who was Fauci's top deputy at the NIAID. Auchincloss wrote to Fauci in his reply [p.3206 of 3234],

"Emily is sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work [Shi and Baric's work Fauci had attached as 'gain of function.pdf'] abroad."

Here, 'Emily' refers to Dr. Emily Erbelding, Director of the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at the NIH. This NIH department director was certain that Fauci and Collins had never flagged any coronavirus study to get evaluated by the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight (P3CO) framework for risk analysis. The Washington Post reports:

“From 2017 to 2020, no more than 'three or four' projects [not involving coronaviruses] were forwarded to the review committee, said Robert Kadlec, who oversaw the panel and served as the Trump administration’s assistant HHS secretary for preparedness and response."

The Post article states Kadlec's senior aide Christian Hassell "suggested the lack of reviews reflected how narrowly the revised policy defines gain-of-function research."

If only Hassel had known that the definition of gain-of-function research was on its way to disappearing completely on October 20, 2021!

Under Fauci and Collin's compromised "leadership," not only just about no experiment was flagged for the HHS's review board, but the HHS boards' member names were also never disclosed to the public. The deliberations of these secret members were also kept "confidential," allowing no transparency in how the reviews were conducted. The Washington Post summarizes:

"HHS, which administers the review committee, has kept its work confidential: No agendas, meeting minutes or other records of its proceedings are public. Even the names of the federal officials assigned to serve on the committee, which has spanned the Obama, Trump and Biden administrations, are kept secret."

"This secrecy means we don't know how these requirements [of the P3CO framework] were applied, if at all, to the experiments now funded by the government," state influential epidemiologists Dr. Marc Lipsitch and Dr. Tom Ingles. In their op-ed titled "The U.S. is funding dangerous experiments it doesn't want you to know about." Lipsitch and Ingles identify themselves as "two of the hundreds of researchers, medical and public-health professionals, and others who publicly opposed these experiments when they were first announced." "This lack of transparency is unacceptable," state Lipsitch and Ingles in their op-ed. The researchers add:

"Making decisions to approve potentially dangerous research in secret betrays the government's responsibility to inform and involve the public when approving endeavors, whether scientific or otherwise, that could put health and lives at risk."

With the 2014 moratorium nullified, the loophole in the P3CO Framework in place, the definition of gain of function research relaxed to not include most risky studies, and the deliberations of the HHS review board set to be remain "confidential" and shrouded in secrecy in case any risky study may have to get forwarded to the board, traitors Fauci and Collins continued to develop the CCP's bioweapons with U.S. funds.

Fauci is so used to lying and deceiving the public that despite having nullified the P3CO Framework's guidelines as described, he has falsely claimed in his senate testimony, “Dr. Baric does not do gain of function research and if it is, it is according to the guidelines and is being conducted in North Carolina, not in China.” Here, the first lie Fauci tells is a lie by omission when Fauci doesn't mention the way Baric didn't do his gain of function work alone in North Carolina. Baric collaborated with Shi in China as their numerous joint papers demonstrate. The second lie in Fauci's statement is that Baric and Shi's gain of function work on coronaviruses was never evaluated against the P3CO framework's guidelines as has been demonstrated, giving Fauci no right to claim it was 'according to the guidelines.' For the third lie the same statement contains, please note that the "if it is" part of the sentence negates the part before it saying "Dr. Baric does not do gain of function research."

God only knows for how long Fauci will be allowed to keep lying like a rug and flopping like a fish out of water during the equally corrupt Biden regime.

CHAPTER 19 – 'Gain of function.pdf' taught the CCP how to create pandemic pathogens without leaving traces of lab manipulation

During his collaboration with Shi Zhengli, Baric had taught the CCP how to create potential bioweapons of mass destruction with viruses containing no traces of lab manipulation.

In the previous section, we'd seen that in reply to Fauci's email with 'gain of function.pdf' attached, Fauci's top deputy Hugh Auchincloss had replied, "She [Dr. Emily Erbelding] will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work [Shi and Baric's risky gain of function studies]." This and the rest of the damning information laid out in the previous section had caused 13 pissed-off members of congress to send a letter to Fauci, asking him many questions including asking him to "provide the findings of Dr. Erbelding's review of NIAID ties to gain-of-function-research abroad." Fauci didn't respond to this letter, ignoring its 30 day response deadline.

What could Dr. Erbelding have uncovered in her review of NIAID's ties to the research described in "gain of function.pdf?" How exactly Baric and Shi, authors of the paper Fauci had attached as "gain of function.pdf," had collaborated during the research they'd conducted? And most importantly, which part of their deadly gain of function studies had been conducted in the Wuhan Institute whose researchers had been secretly collaborating with China’s military at least since 2017, with which the Biden administration has had to agree with?

We do have some partial answers.

Regarding Baric's cooperation with Shi Zhengli in China, prominent Columbia University virologist Dr. Vincent Racaniello explains:

"EcoHealth Alliance provided funds to Zengli Shi at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to conduct bat surveillance for SARS-like CoVs. [...] Baric then received the spike sequences from Wuhan to do his experiments independently."

Baric's interaction with co-author Shi hasn't been limited to receiving spike protein sequences, according to the article 'Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan,' published in MIT Technology Review. This article states:

"They did share resources—for example, Baric sent the transgenic mice with [genetically engineered] human lung receptors to Wuhan. But after their initial collaboration, the two centers were more like competitors. They were in a race to identify dangerous coronaviruses, assess the potential threat, and develop countermeasures like vaccines."

This suggests Shi had learned plenty from Baric...

Could fighting health threats and vaccine development really be the main reason for the cooperation of a military-affiliated Chinese lab and an American virologist expert at making bat viruses pathogenic for humans?

Of course not.

The study described in "Gain of function.pdf" had taught the CCP how to create lab-engineered viruses in a way indistinguishable from natural viruses.

Baric was one of the developers of a technique called the 'no-see-um method' of leaving no trace of genetic modification in lab-engineered viruses. Baric had confirmed this interpretation of his work in a September 2020 interview where he'd admitted, “You can engineer a virus without leaving any trace." "As early as 2016, scientists working at the WIV were able to do the same,” states the report of House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, adding that China had learned to do such a thing during Baric and Shi's interactions between 2014 and 2016. This means that Baric had taught China how to engineer bioweapons that couldn't be traced to a lab origin during the studies described in the 2015 paper Fauci had attached as "gain of function.pdf."

Before beginning to collaborate with Shi, Baric had first published in 2005 the way he and his colleagues had discovered how to engineer viruses “indistinguishable from wild type.”

Can there still be any doubt in any idiot's mind about the way the CCP had been developing high-tech bioweapons with American taxpayer dollars with the help of the U.S. officials and researchers it had compromised?

In addition to enhancing the pathogenicity of SARS-like viruses, Baric had also been making the deadly MERS virus even more transmissible in humans in a way that leaves no traces of lab manipulation.

All for mankind's "benefit!"

CHAPTER 20 – Baric's collaboration with Daszak moving "closer and closer" to creating "killer" viruses weeks before the pandemic

With their path cleared of all obstacles by Fauci and Collins, Baric and Daszak had not only been collaborating with Shi Zhengli in Wuhan, but with each other as well in turning bat viruses into "human killers," as Daszak had put it. Daszak had said so just weeks before the pandemic began, which has been captured on video.

As may be recalled, Baric was one of Daszak's closest allies he'd emailed while gathering signatures for the misleading Lancet letter he'd drafted, in trying to make his letter seem like “simply a letter from leading scientists.” Daszak had asked Baric not to sign this letter, to make it look like it "has some distance" from them. “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration,” Daszak had written in his email to Baric. What Daszak and Baric were working on during their collaboration was revealed during a podcast interview (video takes a minute to appear at the very end of page) with Daszak recorded on December 9, 2019, just a few weeks before the pandemic was announced on December 31, 2019. Daszak told during his interview:

“You can manipulate them [coronaviruses] in the lab pretty easily [...] Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus. Zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, you can build the protein — and we work with Ralph Baric at [the University of North Carolina] to do this — and insert the backbone of another virus and do some work in the lab.”

Loose-mouthed Daszak had elaborated on the nature of his collaboration with Baric in an earlier 2016 interview. Here, Daszak had explicitly stated their goal as "moving closer and closer to" creating “viruses that really do look like killers.” Daszak had also admitted in this interview that part of their work was done by his "colleagues in China." Daszak had described as follows how they had been engineering "killers" in collaboration with communist China:

“Some of these viruses will be killers, some of them won't, how do we work that out? From a viral sequence. It's not straightforward, [...] so we sequence the spike protein, the protein that attaches to cells, then we — well, I didn’t do this work but my colleagues in China did the work — you create pseudoparticles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they'd bind to human cells.

Each step of this, you move closer and closer to [see if] this virus could really become pathogenic in people.

So you narrow down the field, you reduce the cost, and you end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.”

This was how Daszak had been developing human "killers" out of bat viruses right before the pandemic's announcement.

In an October 20, 2021 letter to Congressman James Comer, the NIH's acting director Tabak falsely claimed that the viruses Daszak engineered had gained in function as "an unexpected result of the research, as opposed to something the researchers set out to do." This claim falls apart in the light of the above interview during which Daszak had explained his purpose of systematically narrowing down his virus reservoir to "end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.” Each step of this methodology had let Daszak deliberately and intentionally move "closer and closer to [see if] this virus could really become pathogenic in people."

There was nothing "unintentional" or "unexpected" about the way Daszak, Fauci, Collins and all of their collaborators have murdered about 7 million people as of March 3023.

CHAPTER 21 – Former Vice President of EcoHealth Alliance lawyers up and announces Daszak's group did create SARS-CoV-2

A big rat jumped out of the sinking ship after Fauci announced his resignation following investigation threats before the 2022 midterm elections.

Below is the chronological order of the events that caused increasing panic among those responsible for creating SARS-CoV-2, causing Andrew Huff, the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, to decide to lawyer up and declare that Daszak's EcoHealth alliance indeed created SARS-CoV-2.

On May 1 2022, Senator Rand Paul promised to "wage a vigorous review into the origins of the coronavirus if Republicans retake the Senate and he lands a committee chairmanship," reports the Guardian. On July 20, 2022, Paul issued another warning to Fauci, saying, "If the GOP takes back Congress in the midterms, be prepared to testify under oath regarding the coronavirus pandemic." Paul added, "the NIH was funding that lab and that there was reasonable scientific evidence that suggests that it came from the lab. So he's going to be made to testify under oath. And I hope he sticks around because we do have some questions." On Aug 04, 2022, Sen. Rand Paul led a first-ever congressional hearing on the origin of the pandemic during which the the possibility of bioweapon release from the Wuhan lab was also discussed. On August 22, 2022, panicked Fauci announced his resignation despite the way he had previously announced he'd resign in 2025.

On September 2022, EcoHealth Alliance's former vice president Andrew Huff approached Renz Law, LLC., alleging that SARS-CoV-2 was created during the project “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” that EcoHealth Alliance had been awarded by Fauci's NIAID. In the packet his attorney has released, Huff describes as follows the way he had been tasked with reviewing the grant proposal of their project responsible for the pandemic:

"In late 2014, I was asked to review (provide edits, comments, and feedback) on a research proposal that was in preparation to be submitted to the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) National Institute for Allergens and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to conduct Gain of Function research and development with numerous partners including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was supported by Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina (UNC)."

Huff further describes how SARS-CoV-2 was created by the grant whose proposal he'd reviewed, stating:

• "I attest that I reviewed the proposal that was submitted to NIH which detailed the gain of function virology work that was being conducted to create the agent known as SARS-COV2, which causes the disease known as COVID-19.
• I attest that the proposal clearly stated that the gain of function work on SARSCOV2 was already underway in China, prior to October 2014, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), with the support of USAID in collaboration with EcoHealth Alliance and EcoHealth Alliance’s partners and sponsors.
• I attest that I made Dr. Peter Daszak aware of the lack of a Biological Security Officer (BSO) and Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) at EcoHealth Alliance in reference to the Select Agent Form on in the “Understanding the risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” proposal in accordance NIH requirements.
• I witnessed firsthand presentations by Dr. Shi Zhengli (WIV) and Dr. Ralph Baric (UNC) at EcoHealth Alliance related to their Gain of Function work managed and supported by EcoHealth Alliance.
• I witnessed firsthand presentations by the executive team at EcoHealth Alliance related to the gain of function work conducted at EcoHealth Alliance.
• I attest that EcoHealth Alliance’s developed SARS-COV2 and is responsible for the development of the agent SARS-COV2 during my employment at the organization.

Huff's following statement reveals the way Daszak had deliberately been letting communist China do whatever it wanted to do with the SARS-CoV-2 agent the CCP created with U.S. dollars. Huff described his concerns about the lack of visibility, lack of oversight and lack of risk mitigation measures Daszak had flat out refused to remedy:

I attest that I informed the EcoHealth Alliance executive team that I believed there were biosafety and biosecurity risks in contract laboratories during an executive meeting. Specifically, I was concerned that EcoHealth Alliance did not have enough visibility or firsthand knowledge of what was happening at foreign laboratories contracted and managed by EcoHealth Alliance. During this meeting I discussed bio-risk management with the team due to these concerns. Dr. Daszak refused to mitigate the risks without any objection or discussion from the other executives. In my opinion, Daszak was dismissive of my concerns. He did not seem concerned about EcoHealth’s lack of oversight which I felt was strange because it is typically the CEO’s duty to protect the organization from organizational threats and risks. After raising my concern, I accepted Peter’s position that our control measures were adequate."

As the verification of Huff's allegations, the packet released by Huff's attorney contains "Dr. Huff’s documents retained from his employment at EcoHealth Alliance."

Here is a video of Andrew Huff describing the deeply compromised Biden Regime's cover-up of EcoHealth Alliance's creation of the pandemic.

Huff's supporting documents will hopefully be the icing on the cake for the plethora of evidence that proves beyond reasonable doubt that Daszak, Fauci, Collins have created the COVID-19 pandemic, as this article will continue to demonstrate.

CHAPTER 22 – The numerous additional regulations Fauci and Collins violated to let Daszak continue his project that created SARS-CoV-2

Daszak allowed to continue to make his viruses more deadly in violation of his grant's terms

Fauci and Collins had devised numerous additional unethical ploys and had violated many additional policies in their efforts to keep removing the obstacles in Daszak's way during his project that created the pandemic. These additional ploys and policy violations have been exposed in a series of 5 great articles written by the news organization the Intercept after the organization won 2 FIOA lawsuits against NIH/NIAID.

All of the policy violations that will be described in this and the next 2 sections leave no doubt about the reality of the allegations of Andrew Huff, the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance who's announced it was them who created SARS-CoV-2 during their project "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence."

The first of the 2 FIOA lawsuits the investigative group the Intercept had filed against the NIH the was won by the outlet in September 2021, letting the organization gain access to more than 900 pages of materials on Daszak's U.S.-funded grant "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence." This grant was initially awarded for a five-year period from 2014 to 2019. The grant's funding was renewed in 2019 for another 5 year period, suspended by the Trump administration on April 2020, re-instated by the Biden administration on August 2020, stopped again 2 years later on August 2022, and re-initiated again on September 2022 without the involvement of the Wuhan lab. Regarding this still ongoing project responsible for the pandemic, the Intercept hired and consulted 11 prominent virologists, asking them if risky gain of function research had been conducted during any phase. 7 out of the 11 top virologists said they believed risky gain-of-function research had indeed been done.

Just a few weeks after The Intercept published the conclusions of the top virologists it had hired, Collins announced his resignation from his position as the NIH's director. Collins had previously stated that the NIH had never approved “any grant that would have supported gain of function research on dangerous coronaviruses to see if they could be more transmissible or lethal for individuals in the human species.” Collins resigned after the accusations of molecular biologist Dr. Richard Ebright who had told Newsweek one year earlier the very same conclusion the Intercept's 7 experts arrived at, telling Newsweek that risky gain of function research had been conducted in Wuhan during Daszak's project. This had not received much media attention at that time, but after the Intercept's 7 virologists backed his conclusion, Ebright publicly accused Fauci and Collins of having lied to congress. Collins decided to step down a month later on October 5th 2021.

"Hardly any media or news outlets mentioned the resignation," points out the Alliance for Human Research Protection, stating:

"The silence of the media is but an indication of the TOTAL subservience of the media to its funders which has incapacitated the mainstream press and media. Reporters are tethered to a prescribed script - no longer capable of honest journalism."

The same subservient and incapacitated mainstream outlets have also not paid attention to the following incriminating facts revealed by the Intercept's 5 articles.

As Daszak's grant had been awarded from 2014 to 2019 and renewed in 2019, the first 3 years of his work had taken place during the 2014 moratorium requiring pausing risky gain of function studies. Additionally, Daszak's work after 2017 was supposed to have been independently reviewed against the P3CO framework's guidelines put in place after the moratorium was ended. But when the Intercept had asked the NIH if Daszak's research had been paused by the moratorium in 2014 or had been sent to the HHS's review board for risk evaluation against the P3CO Framework in 2017, NIH spokesperson Elizabeth Deatrick had replied "NIAID determined that the work was not subject to the Gain-of-Function (GoF) research funding pause and the subsequent HHS P3CO Framework.” Daszak's work had been allowed to continue with the help of the same loopholes and ploys we've described that had been utilized to allow Baric's risky gain of function studies to continue. The Daily Caller reports:

"Had EcoHealth’s grant been subjected to P3CO review, an HHS panel would have independently evaluated the grant and, if necessary, recommended additional biocontainment measures to prevent potential lab leaks — or even recommended that the grant be denied entirely."

But none of the above had been done when Fauci and Collins had been aiding the CCP shove the world headlong into the COVID-19 pandemic. Fauci and Collins had allowed no coronavirus study to be independently reviewed against the P3CO framework's guidelines as has also been previously demonstrated, covering up the efforts that created Daszak's killer viruses including SARS-CoV-2.

On November 3, 2021, the Intercept published another article in their series describing the way NIH/NIAID had worked with Daszak to help him evade additional protocols and let him police his own research in an unprecedented manner. The Intercept reports that according to the email communications between Daszak and NIAID officers, "Initially, NIH staff appeared intent on enforcing the funding pause [2014 moratorium]." Jenny Greer, a grants management specialist at the NIH, and Erik Stemmy, a NIH officer handling coronavirus research, had initially emailed Daszak saying that his experiments “appear to involve research covered under the pause.” But then something quite unusual had occurred.

In a July 7 2018 letter to EcoHealth Alliance, NIH officers Greer and Stemmy formally allowed Daszak to worm his way out of the pause by letting Daszak-suggested language get inserted into his grant's terms and conditions. According to this Daszak-proposed language added to the grant proposal, the experiments that have been deemed risky gain of function studies by the Intercept's 7 top virologists would get a pass from the restrictions for as long as the engineered chimeric viruses didn't grow more quickly than the original viruses on which they were based. If the engineered viruses showed evidence of enhanced virus growth greater than 1 log (or 10 times) over the original viruses and grew more efficiently in human lung cells, Daszak was to immediately stop his experiments and inform his NIAID program officer and wait for a secondary review.

But Daszak's experiments never stopped despite the way his killer viruses did multiply faster than 10 times over the original viruses in human lung cell receptors.

During 2018, the 4th year of Daszak's project, one of the engineered chimeric coronaviruses did grow at a rate much quicker than the original viruses on which it was based. The enhanced growth of the engineered chimeric viruses in human lung cells was, "at one point, up to 4 log greater — or 10,000 times — the rate of the original virus. But there are no indications the research was stopped," reports the Intercept. "In fact, the bat coronavirus grant was renewed for a five-year period in 2019," adds the same Intercept article.

As if it wasn't enough that Daszak had been allowed to evade the moratorium and evade the P3CO Framework, Daszak had also been allowed to evade the terms he'd himself been permitted to insert into his own grant! Such was the extent of violations Fauci and Collins permitted in ensuring the continuation of the studies developing the SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon.

The enhanced coronaviruses that grew 10,000 times faster than the original viruses in the lungs of humanized mice (genetically engineered mice with human lung cell receptors) caused the "mice to lose significant weight," states the Intercept, indicating that the "humanized" mice had become very sick. "From the weight loss, it’s gain of function. Tony Fauci is wrong saying it’s not.” told Vincent Racaniello, a professor of microbiology who was one of the top virologists The Intercept had consulted.

Please never forget the way Daszak's project "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence," which was not stopped in 2018 despite how risky it had become, has still not been stopped as of March 2023. God only knows how much more dangerous Daszak's killer viruses may have become in the meantime! Please don't postpone raising awareness of this exposé and putting pressure on your representatives and senators to stop Daszak and his collaborators as described here.

Tabak's silly ploy to try to lessen NIH/NIAID's culpability, which goes awry and blows up all over his face

NIH's acting director Lawrence A. Tabak, who had previously served as the NIH's Deputy Ethics Counselor, ironically, began lying and engaging in a series of unethical ploys in trying to reduce the NIH's culpability in letting Daszak's deadly gain of function studies continue.

As the previous section demonstrated, if Daszak's new viruses were to multiply faster than 10 times over the original viruses in human lung cell receptors, Daszak was to stop his experiments immediately, inform his NIAID program officer and wait for a secondary review, according to his grant proposal's terms. But Daszak's work had never been paused despite the way his new viruses at one point multiplied 10,000 times the rate of the original viruses. Why had Daszak's research not been paused and why had a second review never been conducted?

Tabak tried to make it seem like Daszak's experiments were never paused because Daszak had failed to let the NIH know at that time how pathogenic his new viruses had become. Tabak tried to accomplished this by making the NIH hand out to the Intercept an apparently very late version of Daszak's yearly progress report for 2018 (Daszak's 4th year) when his engineered viruses had multiplied 10,000 times faster than the original viruses. This supposedly "very late" 4th year progress report that was handed to the Intercept was dated September 2020, seemingly submitted 2 years after its due date. In trying to convince Rep. James Comer the NIH hadn't been informed how much faster the new viruses multiplied, Tabak had lied as follows in his October 20, 2021 letter to Comer:

"language was included in the terms and conditions of the grant awarded to Eco Health that outlined criteria for a secondary review such as a requirement that the grantee report immediately a one log increase in growth. These measures would prompt a secondary review to determine whether the research aims should be reevaluated or new biosafety measures should be enacted. Eco Health failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant."

Even if the above had been true, NIH/NIAID would still be guilty of gross negligence due to having renewed Daszak's funding for another 5 years without having received Daszak's 4th year's progress report. But Tabak perhaps believed this to be a lesser violation somehow.

"Adding to the evidence that the annual update [2018 yearly progress report] was submitted in 2020 are references to studies that were published after 2018," states the Intercept. This so-called "evidence" had been fabricated by Tabak to make it seem like the report had really been submitted in 2020, as it quickly became obvious. Tabak's false narrative rapidly broke down due to the following 2 reasons.

Firstly, Daszak's supposedly "very late" yearly progress report for 2018 wasn't the only place where Daszak had reported the up to 4 log (10,000 times) increase in the growth rate of the enhanced viruses. Daszak had reported the same result in the application for his grant's 2019 renewal as well. The Intercept had noted this in the more than 900 documents on Daszak's research it had obtained, which Tabak seems to have missed. When the Intercept had pointed this out to the NIH, asking the agency if it had reviewed Daszak's renewal application informing them of the dramatic increase in the viral growth rate, the NIH had confirmed it had reviewed the renewal application, unable to back Tabak who'd wanted to feign ignorance of the violation of Daszak's grant's terms.

Tabak's claim that Daszak had not submitted his report on time didn't hold water also because Daszak had emailed a copy of his timely 4th year's report to his Program Officer at the NIAID after he'd filed it "in the NIH system on April 13th 2018," Daszak told the NIH in a letter contesting Tabak's accusation. Attached to this letter was the proof of his timely submission of the 4th year's report, as well as the report's copy he'd emailed to his program officer, Daszak wrote in this letter.

To make matters worse for Tabak, NIH's spokesperson Elizabeth Deatrick did verify the way Daszak had reported to them the increase in the viral growth rate in 2 places. Deatrick told the Intercept: “The PI [principal investigator] reported these results in the year 4 progress report and grant renewal application," telling the truth perhaps because she didn't wanting culpability for backing Tabak's disprovable lie.

To make matters ultimately worse for Tabak, NIH officials who didn't want to violate the requirements of the FIOA lawsuit the Intercept had won, had ended up handing out to the Intercept Dazsak's original 2018 yearly report having the timely submission date on it.

Tabak's stupid little blame-game had blown up big time as such all over his face!

The Intercept summarizes the situation after having been handed in the original 2018 report with the timely submission date, which Tabak had claimed didn't exist:

"Among the documents NIH released to The Intercept yesterday was the original [2018] version of an annual report from the fourth year of the bat coronavirus grant. The version released to The Intercept in September indicated that it had been submitted in 2020, after the pandemic began and more than two years after it was due. The two versions appear to be almost identical, though they include different reference publications."

Useful idiot Tabak is still allowed to remain as the NIH's director as of March 2023, despite being such a complete idiot.

In trying to lessen the NIH's culpability, pathological liars Daszak and Tabak had told congressman James Comer additional lies. Although Daszak's 4th year's experiments did involve risky gain of function studies according to the 7 experts the Intercept had commissioned, Daszak and Tabak had claimed the studies were not risky because the SARS-like bat viruses on which the engineered viruses were based couldn't originally infect humans. This claim was based on the relaxed definition of risky gain of function research that had been loosened in 2017 to be able to deem any gain of function study "not risky" if it didn't start out with potential pandemic pathogens. The definition had been relaxed by NIH/NIAID in such a counter-intuitive manner to avoid having to flag deadly coronavirus studies for independent review and risk evaluation against the PCO3 Framework's guidelines, as has been previously described. Based on this strangely loosened definition of what constitutes risky gain of function research, Tabak had written to congressman James Comer that Daszak's experiments "did not fit the definition of research involving enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential (ePPP)," because "These bat coronaviruses [on which the resulting virus was based] had not been shown to infect humans." Tabak had added, "As such, the research was not subject to departmental review under the HHS P3CO Framework." This argument was backed by EcoHealth Alliance's lying communications manager Robert Kessler, who'd given the same reason for not having deemed year 4's work risky. The Intercept states, "Robert Kessler, communications manager for EcoHealth Alliance, denied that the work on the humanized mice met the definition of gain-of-function research," because the original bat viruses were "not known to be able to infect humans.”

This shows the extent to which the heads of the NIH, NIAID and EcoHealth Alliance have failed to "perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk" in creating enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential out of viruses that originally did not pose pandemic risk to humans. as may be recalled, making animal viruses capable of destroying human populations and calling it not risky because the animal viruses could originally not infect humans represents "Conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences," making all those responsible guilty of criminal negligence.

Daszak's 5th year's progress report, which is again supposedly "missing," may reveal exactly how SARS-CoV-2 was created if subpoenaed

Exactly which pathogens had been created by Daszak right before the Covid-19 pandemic's announcement, after his funding had been renewed in 2018 "without delay" and without the secondary review required by his grant's terms as described in the previous section?

The NIH had been so eager to move Daszak onto his 5th year because in 2019, Daszak was to do gain of function experiments on MERS viruses that were even riskier than his deadly 2018 experiments.

The MERS virus was actually only one of the deadly pathogens Daszak had been working with right before the pandemic had been announced at the end of 2019. The same year the pandemic began, Daszak had been working with hundreds of new enhanced potential pandemic pathogens, as the loose-mouthed virologist told NPR in response to the suspension of his grant by the Trump Administration on April 2020. NPR reports:

"He [Daszak] says the project [“Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence”] had identified fragments of genetic sequences for hundreds of wholly new bat coronaviruses, including some that were close relatives of SARS-COV-2, the virus causing the current pandemic. "The next step in that research is to sequence the whole genome of those viruses and say, could they bind to human cells? Does this look like a virus that could potentially emerge?""

More information on these hundreds of viruses Daszak had been trying to infect humans with would have been available in Daszak's 5th year progress report — if only NIH/NIAID would have released its original version.

In the more than 900 pages of documents on Daszak's grant that the Intercept had obtained after its first lawsuit, the only anomaly wasn't the supposedly "very late" submitted 4th year progress report described in the previous section. Daszak's 5th year progress report had been altogether "missing." The Intercept had had to sue the NIH for the 2nd time in its efforts to obtain the 5th year's report. When the report was finally handed in after the organization won their second FIOA lawsuit, it was provided with a "very late" submission date on it just like the 4th year's progress report described in the previous section. Again!

According to the 5th year's progress report handed to the Intercept with the "very late" submission date on it, Daszak had in 2019 genetically enhanced the pathogenicity of the MERS virus which is one of the deadliest human pathogens with a fatality rate of 35%. In the grant proposal documents obtained after the intercept's first FIOA lawsuit, the Intercept had seen references to proposed experiments on the MERS coronavirus, but when the organization had asked Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance about these experiments, EcoHealth spokesperson Robert Kessler had lied, saying Daszak's group had not conducted the work. “The MERS work proposed in the grant is suggested as an alternative and was not undertaken,” Kessler had told in his email. Kessler's lie was revealed when the second FIOA lawsuit forced the NIH to produce the supposedly "very late" submitted progress report.

The supposedly "late" 5th year's annual progress report was dated August 2021 despite the way it covered the grant period ending May 2019. Was desperate Tabak really desperate enough to try to play the same stupid blame-game he'd played with Daszak's 4th year report, which had blown up all over his face before?

Did Tabak still hope anyone would believe NIH/NIAID wasn't aware that Daszak had worked on enhancing the pathogenicity of the MERS virus after NIH had renewed Daszak's funding for another 5 years?

Daszak claimed he had not been allowed to submit his 2019 progress report on time due to the way the NIH's system had locked him out of being able to submit an annual 5th year report. This had occurred, according to Daszak, because the NIH had gone ahead and renewed the funding for his grant for another 5 years before waiting for his 5th year's progress report to be submitted, causing the system to not accept the yearly report normally received before renewal. Daszak explains how all this happened before his report's submission deadline:

"As is documented by the NIH receipt system itself (PDF attachment #5), we first uploaded this report on time, in July 2019 (the final allowable date for submission would have been September 30th 2019). However, by the time we tried to officially submit, our R01 grant had been renewed (July 24th 2019) and the system locked us out from submitting a normal annual final Year 5 report at that point. On July 30th 2019, we requested further information about the submission of the Year 5 report from the NIH Grants Management Specialist who had been dealing with our renewal, but we did not receive a response to our questions (PDF attachment #6). NIH also did not send any subsequent request to us for the Year 5 report, despite the reality that we were in frequent communication with staff during that period."

Could Daszak be telling the truth?

Knowing that both Daszak and Tabak are corrupt and lie easily, which one of them should be believed?

If Daszak is telling the truth, it makes the NIH guilty of having renewed Daszak's funding without even bothering to wait for an annual progress report. Nothing can better showcase Collins and Fauci's incredibly gross willful blindness, given that they'd known the viruses Daszak engineered in year 4 had become more dangerous for humans, and given that they'd known Daszak was to enhance the MERS virus as the Intercept had seen described in Daszak's grant proposal.

It may well be the case that both Daszak and Tabak are lying. If 2019's progress report contains how Daszak created SARS-CoV-2 or even deadlier enhanced pandemic pathogens, Tabak and Daszak may have collaborated to obliterate the original 2019's report. Daszak and Tabak may then have crafted the story Daszak published, also creating a revised "very late" version of the original report after taking out the parts on the creation of SARS-CoV-2 and any similar "killer viruses." If this may have been done, subpoenaing and unearthing the original 2019's progress report may uncover exactly how SARS-CoV-2 was created.

As the WHO categorizes the MERS virus as a potential pandemic pathogen, further enhancing the transmissibility of such a potential pandemic pathogen represents risky gain of function research even according to the relaxed definition of risky gain of function research NIH/NIAID had loosened in 2017, to be able to deem gain of function studies "not risky" if they didn't start out with potential pandemic pathogens. This dismantles Fauci's claim that NIH/NIAID has never funded risky gain of function research in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

NIH/NIAID's willful negligence in flagging the deadly MERS virus experiments for risk analysis against the PCO3 framework could have been enough reason to indict Fauci and Collins for negligent homicide, if only America's justice system still worked.

"Changing the receptor binding site on MERS is sort of crazy,” top virologist Jack Nunberg wrote in an email to the Intercept, explaining: "engineering of a known human pathogen raises new and unpredictable risks beyond those posed by their previously reported studies using a non-pathogenic [to humans] bat virus backbone.”

Comer needs to ask Tabak and Kessler why enhancing the virulence of an originally deadly potential pandemic pathogen like the MERS virus didn't even deserved to have its yearly report reviewed, let alone getting reviewed under the P3CO framework! If not this, what else could represent criminally negligent "conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences?"

To enable Congressman Comer to not let go of holding all of the traitors named here accountable, please don't postpone doing your part.

CHAPTER 23 – Re-instating the grant that created SARS-CoV-2 despite numerous non-compliance issues, thus knowingly exposing the world to future pandemic risk

Daszak's project "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" that created SARS-CoV-2 continues despite the NIH's, NIAID's and Daszak's gross criminal negligence and countless policy violations described above. The world is being filled with God knows how many new deadly "killer viruses."

On January 6, 2022, the NIH's Deputy Director Michael Lauer sent Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance a letter listing numerous additional non-compliance issues, demanding that EcoHealth Alliance provide original laboratory notebooks and electronic files related to the research under investigation as the cause of the pandemic. "The records have yet to be provided," reports the Intercept, showing that Deputy Director Lauer was just putting on a show of enforcing compliance, when NIH/NIAID is continuing to give Daszak's team free rein to develop better and better "human killers."

As mentioned at the beginning of this exposé, the NIH waited until August 19, 2022 to finally cut off Daszak's subaward to China, followed by re-instating the same grant R01AI110964 just a month later on September 21, 2022, this time without the involvement of the Wuhan lab. This has outraged Rep. James Comer (R-KY), the ranking member on House Oversight, who stated:

“It’s unacceptable that the NIH continues to allow EcoHealth Alliance to receive taxpayer dollars even though it is confirmed EcoHealth violated the terms of its grant contract. EcoHealth conducted gain of function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, knew about the Chinese Communist Party’s coverup, and failed to inform the U.S. government.”

Molecular biologist Richard Ebright, has stated it's “disturbing that additional funding continues to be awarded to a contractor that the NIH has reported to have repeatedly and seriously violated contractual terms and conditions of a grant,” reports the Intercept.

"The new grant comes despite an open congressional investigation into the organization [EcoHealth Alliance], which has two other ongoing NIH grants and a third in negotiation," the Intercept states.

Please don't postpone taking whatever action you can think of to stop this egregious bioweapon development program of the Deep State.

CHAPTER 24 – The exact recipe for SARS-CoV-2: Daszak's proposal to create furin cleavage sites in bat coronaviruses

One of the grants Fauci's NIAID awarded Daszak had proposed the insertion of novel furin cleavage sites into SARS-like viruses to improve their transmissibility in humans. As may be recalled, Nobel laureate biologist David Baltimore had deemed the presence of such a furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2's genome the “smoking gun” to the theory that the virus was engineered in a lab (before Baltimore was pressured to retract this statement.) As may also be recalled, the world's top virologists had initially all agreed that the presence of the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 indicated its lab origin. This was the real scientific consensus before all the top scientists made 180 degree turns in their opinion after having been "steered" under Fauci and Collins' leadership.

The fact that Daszak had received funding from Fauci for a grant proposing to insert furin cleavage sites into viruses was exposed by whistleblower Commandant of the Marine Corps Fellow Joseph Murphy, who was then working for the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

Murphy had put the final touch on the efforts of a group of amateur detectives who call themselves DRASTIC, which stands for Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Teams Investigating Covid-19. DRASTIC has about 24 correspondents from different countries who work independently to search for clues about the pandemic's origin. "For a long time, DRASTIC's discoveries stayed confined to the strange world of Twitter, known only to a few nerdy followers," reports Newsweek. "Gradually, the quality of their research and the rigor of their thinking drew a larger following, including many professional scientists and journalists," adds the Newsweek article describing this group's accomplishments. In September 2021, these amateur sleuths got contacted by an anonymous person who'd brought to their attention a grant proposal submitted to a program called Preventing Emerging Pathogenic Threats (PREEMPT) that had been initiated by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). This proposal was one of many that had been solicited by DARPA's PREEMPT program to "develop new tools and models to quantify the likelihood of a virus to jump from an animal host into humans."

The grant proposal submitted to the PREEMPT program that had been pointed out to DRASTIC describes a research project called "DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses," which appears to have been rejected by DARPA. Project DEFUSE was led by Daszak who'd authored over 20 CCP/PLA affiliated studies. Daszak's coworker for Project DEFUSE was... You guessed! It was none other than China's good old buddy Baric, who'd taught the CCP how to engineer pandemic pathogens without leaving traces of lab manipulation. Daszak and Baric were to work with... You guessed again! With their favorite Chinese buddy "bat woman" Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan lab which had been collaborating with China’s military since at least 2017.

Another participant of Daszak's DEFUSE project was Chinese researcher Linfa Wang, who was one of Daszak's 2 closest allies Daszak had wanted to distance from his efforts of creating a fake consensus against the lab leak theory.

Project DEFUSE proposed by Daszak and his comrades had been turned down by DARPA, mainly because it involved risky gain of function (GoF) research without mentioning or assessing any risks. The project had also been rejected for not having a risk mitigation plan for dual use research of concern (DURC), meaning research that can be used for both beneficial and nefarious purposes.

DARPA's rejection letter explicitly states that Daszak's team's proposal does involve gain of function research/dual use research of concern, contrary to Fauci's testimony claiming he's never funded such research in Wuhan. The letter explicitly states:

"The team's approach does potentially involve GoF/DURC research (they aim to synthesize spike glycoproteins which bind to human cell receptors and insert them into SARSr-CoV backbones to assess whether they can cause SARS-like disease)."

DRASTIC's analysis of DARPA's rejection letter further explains why DARPA had not funded this proposal, further demonstrating the extent to which Daszak had been unconcerned with the risks of his GoF/DURC research, showcasing his disregard for human life in his criminal mental state. As has been demonstrated, Daszak and NIH/NIAID had broken countless rules and regulations to be able to continue to develop China's bioweapons, which explains their lack of concern for preventing the nefarious use of their DURC research.

The Atlantic reports having verified the authenticity of the grant proposal for project DEFUSE. Their article states: "There is good reason to believe the document is genuine. The Atlantic has confirmed that a grant proposal with the same identifying number and co-investigators was submitted to DARPA in 2018."

When DRASTIC published on their website the documents and analysis of project DEFUSE that DARPA rejected, this caused the story to get picked up by outlets including the Atlantic, which reported, "A new leaked document is stirring up another frenzy over the pandemic’s origins." The frenzy was because "The 2018 DEFUSE research grant application explicitly states the applicants’ intention to artificially insert furin polybasic cleavage sites into high abundance, but low risk bat coronaviruses found in China," reports the Gateway Pundit.

About Project DEFUSE, the Intercept reports that molecular biologist Richard Ebright emphasized:

“The relevance of this is that SARS Cov-2, the pandemic virus, is the only virus in its entire genus of SARS-related coronaviruses that contains a fully functional [furin] cleavage site at the S1, S2 junction. And here is a proposal from the beginning of 2018, proposing explicitly to engineer that sequence at that position in chimeric lab-generated coronaviruses.”

The Intercept also quotes molecular biologist Alina Chan saying:

“Let’s look at the big picture: A novel SARS coronavirus emerges in Wuhan with a novel cleavage site in it. We now have evidence that, in early 2018, they had pitched inserting novel cleavage sites into novel SARS-related viruses in their lab."

In a May 5, 2021 article published in The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, renowned science writer Nicholas Wade articulately describes to laymen all of the reasons why it's extremely improbable for SARS-CoV-2's furin cleavage site to have naturally evolved. Towards the end of his article, Wade concludes:

"For the furin cleavage site to arise naturally in SARS2, a chain of events has to happen, each of which is quite unlikely for the reasons given above [in Wade's article]. A long chain with several improbable steps is unlikely to ever be completed."

In his September 2021 article titled "New Routes to Making Covid-19 In the Lab," Nicholas Wade deems the insertion of such a novel furin cleavage site into a SARS-like virus "the exact recipe for generating SARS2 [SARS-CoV-2]."

"In May 2020, only a few months into the pandemic, EcoHealth’s Peter Daszak had ridiculed discussions of the furin cleavage site," reports the Atlantic. But just a few years earlier, Daszak had proposed to accomplish, in a lab, the very same thing he'd ridiculed as being fabricated by conspiracy theorists! Funny?

The Intercept reports that anonymous scientists the outlet contacted had told them "there is published evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was already engaged in some of the genetic engineering work described in the proposal [of Project DEFUSE]."

But it wasn't the Chinese who'd ended up fully funding Daszak's proposal, it was the U.S. through Fauci's NIAID.

Whistleblower Commandant of the Marine Corps Fellow Joseph Murphy had seen, during his work at DARPA, hidden in a "(top secret) share drive," certain unclassified documents that didn't belong in that classified drive. These were the grant proposal documents for project DEFUSE as well as an Eco Health Alliance letter responding to the news of having been awarded funding by Fauci's NIAID.

"Being Defense related, it makes sense that Eco Health submitted the proposal first to the Department of Defense, before it settled with NIH/NIAID," explains Commandant Murphy on the 3rd page of his report that he's submitted to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense. Murphy adds in this report that the work had taken place at "the WIV and at several sites in the U.S., identified in detail in the proposal."

In his report submitted to the Inspector General on the letterhead of DARPA on August 13, 2021, Murphy specifies the exact location of the documents supporting his claim, saying:

"The EcoHealth Alliance response to the PREEMPT BAA is placed along with other proposal documents in the PREEMPT folder on the DARPA Biological Technologies Office JWICS (top secret) share drive, address: Network/filer/BTO/CI Folder/PREEMPT"

Which compromised DARPA officer could have hidden in a top secret drive the unclassified documents of Daszak's proposal and his response to having been awarded funding by Fauci?

And what has the Inspector General of the Department of Defense done with the hidden documents whose exact location had been pointed out to him by Murphy?

If you'd like to know the answers, please contact your representatives and senators, linking to this article and politely letting them know you'll only vote for those who'll hold all the guilty parties named here accountable.

When Murphy had filed his report with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, he'd handed a copy to Project Veritas, a non-profit journalism enterprise exposing corruption and other misconduct. Project Veritas has published Murphy's report in its entirety, revealing Murphy's own analysis of what he'd seen in the top secret classified drive at DARPA and why he believes Daszak's project DEFUSE must have created SARS-CoV-2. Murphy

Murphy states in his analysis dated August 13, 2021 that Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance had created SARS-CoV-2 during Project Defuse. This has on September 2022 been confirmed by the former vice president of the EcoHealth Alliance Andrew Huff, who's added that SARS-CoV-2 has been created by EcoHealth Alliance during the project renamed as “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.” Murphy states in his analysis:

“SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), as suggested by the reporting surrounding the lab leak hypothesis. The details of this program have been concealed since the pandemic began. These details can be found in the EcoHealth Alliance proposal response to the DARPA PREEMPT program Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HR00118S0017, dated March 2011 — a document not yet publicly disclosed.”

In his Substack Post, Robert Malone states he feels Murphy’s letter “appears to be the real deal so far.” adding,

“If validated, it is as big as the Pentagon papers. This would mean that research funded and conducted by the US Government has caused the death of millions of people world wide. Just ponder that. I can’t hardly wrap my head around the idea. Shocking doesn’t describe how important this is. History will remember.”

Most people continue to remain oblivious of both Murphy's and Huff's allegations in a world overtaken by the global networks of the censorship industrial complex, in a country whose Justice Department is just as corrupt as its NIH.

CHAPTER 25 – Decades-long history of ignoring fervent pandemic warnings coming from hundreds of conscientious scientists

After having demonstrated how SARS-CoV-2 has been created with our taxpayer dollars, this exposé will keep demonstrating Fauci's criminal mental state by showcasing how well he'd been warned countless times about the pandemic risk the research he funded creates.

On January 2010, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Fauci's NIAID, the World Health Organization and UNICEF formed the 'Decade of Vaccines Collaboration.' Only a year after the formation of this collaboration, the scientific community realized that Fauci's NIAID had started funding risky studies exposing the world to pandemic risk. The deadly gain of function research Fauci had been funding attracted widespread attention for the first time in 2011, when when two scientific papers announced the way virologists had succeeded at genetically enhancing the transmissibility of a bird flu virus strain (H5N1 avian influenza strain). Being originally only transmissible between birds, the H5N1 virus had been genetically modified to gain the function of becoming "easily transmissible between ferrets, the animals that most closely mimic the human response to flu," Science magazine reports. This article adds:

"Scientists believe it's likely that the pathogen, if it emerged in nature or were released, would trigger an influenza pandemic, quite possibly with many millions of deaths."

The same Science article quotes Paul Keim, microbial geneticist and chair of U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, stating "I can't think of another pathogenic organism that is as scary as this one."

Fauci kept defending and funding the deadly gain of function studies

Amid the outcry and protests to ban the risky gain-of-function research (GOFR), Fauci publicly defended their continuation as the director of the NIAID which controls a large portion of the funds allotted for medical research in the U.S. If Fauci were to say the moon is made of cheese, everyone would have to agree if they were to keep getting the funding they needed to continue their careers as researchers. Fauci, who had the power to drag the rest of the scientific community behind him and determine the "consensus" as such, told Scientific American:

"I think the benefit that will come out of the Fouchier paper [one of the 2 papers on enhancing the H5N1 bird flu virus] in stimulating thoughts and ways to better understand transmissibility and adaptability and pathogenesis, in my mind, far outweigh the risk of nefarious use of this information."

Fauci further gaslighted the world by touting the supposed "benefits" of gain-of-function research in a Washington Post op-ed he'd co-authored with Collins, titled "A Flu Virus Risk Worth Taking." Fauci and Collins' op-ed claims: "important information and insights can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory."

Fauci and Collins' insane voices were temporarily drowned by their conscientious opposition on January 2012, when many influential scientists agreed to put a voluntary moratorium (temporary suspension) on the risky gain-of-function studies. Fauci fought back, participating in a New York meeting during which he tried to persuade the scientific community to lift the voluntary pause on the mad science he'd been funding. NPR summarizes:

"At a recent press briefing, Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which funded the controversial [gain of function] experiments, said that he intended to go to the meeting and 'discuss in some detail with the group the kinds of approaches we can have to try and expedite as quickly as possible the lifting of the moratorium.'"

In his efforts to get the moratorium lifted so he could resume funding the engineering of bioweapons for Bill Gates and the CCP, Fauci told the Guardian on March 2012, "There cannot be any impediment to science that will ultimately be good to the general public." Such was Fauci's inverted logic that caused the COVID-19 pandemic, representing criminally negligent "Conduct which is such a departure from what would be that of an ordinary prudent or careful person in the same circumstance as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences."

The influential voice of Fauci did manage to drown the voice of prudence and common sense within a year. The voluntary 2012 moratorium did get lifted and the risky studies were resumed on January 2013. The Independent announced the continuation of the gain of function studies in their article featuring an eerily prophetic image of a girl in a green face mask, with the image caption stating "Scientists fear that if airborne transmission became possible it would lead to a deadly flu pandemic."

CHAPTER 26 – CDC: accidents involving dangerous pathogens "occur on average twice a week"

Fauci's appalled opposition kept fighting back, forming an alliance called the Cambridge Working Group against the risky studies. This huge group of hundreds of conscientious scientists (scroll for the list of hundreds of members) has published numerous papers and articles spelling out the grave dangers of enhancing the pathogenicity of viruses.

The efforts of the Cambridge Working Group against risky gain of function research did persuade the Obama Administration to impose a second moratorium on GOF studies starting October 2014. This is the moratorium that Fauci and Collins unilaterally nullified and prevented from serving its intended purpose as has been demonstrated.

The decision to impose this second moratorium on 2014 was partly due to three accidents that had occurred in the handling of the enhanced flu viruses, explains the Scientific American article subtitled: "The third recent mistake in handling of pathogens is a 'wake-up call,' says Centers for Disease Control head." Scientific American then published another article titled "Bio-Unsafety Level 3: Could the Next Lab Accident Result in a Pandemic?" This article states the shocking frequency of the occurrence of dangerous lab accidents as follows:

"In 1977 a flu virus swept the world in an event that became known as the Russian flu. It was caused by a strain of flu that, later genetic tests showed, looked remarkably like those that had circulated in 1950. The belief is that the virus escaped from a laboratory or was used in a vaccine project that went awry. [...] The CDC, which oversees laboratory safety in the U.S., reported in 2011 that lab errors involving select agents — the most dangerous pathogens — occur on average twice a week in U.S. labs."

“It’s not hard to predict rain in England and it’s not hard to predict select agent mistakes in the U.S.," said Public Health professor Marc Lipsitch, one of the leading voices in the debate against risky gain of function research.

Right before the decision to enact the 2014 moratorium, a congressional hearing had taken place about the lab accidents, their frequency, and the possibility that "a lab accident could allow such manmade flu strains to escape." Presented to the hearing was a consensus statement signed by the several hundred conscientious scientists making up the Cambridge Working Group alliance against risky gain-of-function research. This consensus statement the alliance presented to the hearing says:

"Laboratory creation of highly transmissible, novel strains of dangerous viruses, especially but not limited to influenza, poses substantially increased risks. An accidental infection in such a setting could trigger outbreaks that would be difficult or impossible to control. Historically, new strains of influenza, once they establish transmission in the human population, have infected a quarter or more of the world's population within two years."

On August 17, 2020, ProPublica published an article titled "Here Are Six Accidents UNC Researchers Had With Lab-Created Coronaviruses." This article spells out some of the accidents that have occurred in the University of North Carolina laboratory of the CCP's good old ally Ralph Baric who has taught China how to engineer pandemic pathogens without leaving traces of lab manipulation. The ProPublica article on Baric' s lab states: "There have been mouse bites and spills and other mishaps during experiments involving genetically altered coronaviruses at a high-security lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill." This lab is "probably one of the safest BSL-3 facilities in the world," points out the MIT Technology Review, but nevertheless such accidents had occurred. Baric continues to conduct his deadly gain of function experiments in his human-error-prone lab as of March 2023.

There have also been countless deadly lab accidents kept out of the public's eye.

"In America’s biolabs, hundreds of accidents have gone undisclosed to the public," reports the Intercept. The outlet has published a great 3 part series titled "Experimenting With Disaster" based on over 5,500 pages of NIH documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The outlet reports in Part 1 of its series:

An Intercept investigation based on over 5,500 pages of NIH documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act has uncovered a litany of mishaps: malfunctioning equipment, spilled beakers, transgenic rodents running down the hall, a sedated macaque coming back to life and biting a researcher hard enough to lacerate their hand. Many of the incidents involved less dangerous pathogens that can be handled with basic safety equipment, and most did not lead to infection. But several accidents happened while scientists were handling deadly or debilitating viruses in highly secure labs, and a few, like the Chikungunya virus slip-up, did lead to illness.

“People have it in their minds that lab accidents are very, very rare, and if they happen, they happen only in the least well-run overseas labs,” said Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University and an advocate for better biosafety standards. “That simply isn’t true.”

The history of the lab accidents summarized may be enough to convince any 'ordinary careful and prudent person' of the fact that in a world inevitably prone to human error, once a pandemic pathogen is created, it's only a matter of time until it finds its way out of even the world's "safest" lab and start infecting human populations, killing millions of people like SARS-CoV-2 has done. In a world where there's always room for human carelessness and error, continuing to allow the genetic enhancement of any virus for any reason whatsoever must be deemed criminally negligent conduct "incompatible with a proper regard for human life or an indifference to consequences."

I strongly believe there can be no legitimate justification for conducting any kind of gain of function research whatsoever to enhance the pathogenicity of any virus, because trying to differentiate between what's risky and what's not risky gain of function research would leave the door wide open for malicious parties to keep trying to muddy the waters just like Fauci and Collins have done, playing with definitions and inventing various loopholes and ploys in trying to blur the line between what constitutes risk and what doesn't. Permitting some gain of function studies and banning others would keep the door open for efforts to make the simple truth appear "very nebulous."

CHAPTER 27 – Fauci and Collins fire the 11 opposing White House biosecurity advisors, new advisors get moratorium lifted

Here is yet one more egregious ploy demonstrating the criminal mental state of ploy-masters Fauci and Collins.

To get the 2014 moratorium lifted and the deadly gain of function studies resumed, Fauci and Collins have unrightfully "released from duty" all of the White House biosecurity advisors who publicly opposed the deadly gain of function studies.

On October 2014, the White House announced how it would proceed in deciding if and when to lift the 2014 moratorium on gain of function studies. Nature explains:

"The White House says that it will wait for recommendations from the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) and the National Research Council before deciding whether and how to lift the ban. The groups are expected to finish their work within a year. As Nature went to press, the NSABB was set to convene on 22 October, its first meeting in two years."

"NSABB [the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] advises and guides the U.S. government about 'dual use' research that involves biological agents that could be used as bioweapons," explains Science. About this advisory board's upcoming meeting to recommend the White House on whether or not to resume the risky studies, NSABB member Arturo Casadevall had assumed: "The NSABB meeting is certain to see heated debate as scientists from all sides convene." But there had been no debates at all when the advisory board actually convened on October 22, 2014, let alone heated debates. Fauci and Collins had succeeded at pulling a "clever" fast one that put an end to all debate about whether the White House should or should not continue to bestow upon animal viruses the ability to destroy human populations.

On July 2014, just a few months before NSABB was expected to meet on October 2014, NIH/NIAID dismissed NSABB's 11 (out of 23) members who had publicly opposed the risky gain of function studies.

Microbiologist Arturo Casadevall, one of NSABB's biosecurity advisors who got dismissed, explains: "all the members who have been through the H5N1 [enhanced bird flu virus] debates have been replaced at the same time." Science reports:

"The 11 members learned they were being dismissed Sunday evening in an e-mail from the board's executive director, Mary Groesch, who works at the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), NSABB's overseer. "

The same Science article adds that a NIH representative told the 11 members had been dismissed "so that fresh and diverse perspectives can be brought to bear on the committee's deliberations."

Fauci and Collins had thus never allowed the White House to hear the advice of its biosecurity advisors who'd been opposed to creating bioweapons of mass destruction capable of killing countless humans. When the re-staffed National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity convened, the "fresh and diverse perspectives" of the new board members did get the moratorium lifted on December 2017.

A huge step had been taken towards shoving the world headlong into the pandemic that has as of March 2023 killed around 7 million innocent people, not counting those who have died of vaccine side effects.

Former EcoHealth Alliance VP Andrew Huff's attorney Thomas Renz's lawsuit against EcoHealth Alliance, the globalist cabal and the CCP is continuing as of March 2023. Attorney Renz, perhaps the world's most courageous man, states:

"At the end of the day, the crime that was and is COVID-19 will be revealed. We will win this fight and there will be accountability. There will be accountability for the disease, the hospital murders, the jabs, the lockdowns, and everything else and we will do everything we can to ensure that EVERY single person that profited from this crime against humanity pays the price."

Let us please let Renz's courage rub on all of us as we fight evil in accord with the edicts of the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence to save this world.